• Aucun résultat trouvé

Combination of Biofiltration and Electrocoagulation processes for the treatment of sanitary landfill leachate.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Combination of Biofiltration and Electrocoagulation processes for the treatment of sanitary landfill leachate."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Combination of Biofiltration and Electrocoagulation

processes for the treatment of sanitary landfill leachate

Pre- and post-program Insert your text here

DIA Oumar

a

, DROGUI Patrick

a

, BUELNA Gerardo

b

, DUBÉ Rino

b

a

Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS), Centre-Eau Terre Environnement, 490 Rue de la Couronne, Québec (QC) G1K 9A9, Canada.

b

Centre de Recherche Industrielle du Québec (CRIQ), 333 rue Franquet, Québec (QC) G1P 4C7, Canada.

OBJECTIVES

 Development and optimization of a hybrid process

capable of treating efficiently different types of

landfill leachates

 Investigate

the

interactions

between

the

biofiltration and the electrocoagulation process in

order to overcome the technological uncertainties

related to this combination

PRINCIPLES

BIOFILTRATION

ELECTROCOAGULATION

1

Electrocoagulation Cell

Capacity : 1.5 L

Cylindrical stainless steel

cathode

Cathode surface ≈ 900 cm

2

Anode surface = 476 cm

2

Power supplier (40V – 70A)

Biofiltration Pilot

 Height = 2m

 Diameter = 20 cm

 Organic media : Peat + wood chips

 Air Flow = 5 LPM  HRT : 5 – 6 days

 Countercurrent feeding

Parameters Units Average values Min Values Max values N Total COD mg/L 765 534 1332 74 BOD5 mg/L 70 12 110 11 BOD/COD - 0.09 0.02 0.13 11 TSS mg/L 30 30 30 1 Turbidity NTU 106.9 17.1 319 74 pH - 8.21 7.48 8.8 69 Alkalinity mg CaCO3/L 2750 2418 3198 6 N-NH4 mg/L 342 221 444 72 P-PO4 mg/L 2.33 0.24 9.8 67 Zn mg/L 0.07 0.04 0.10 2 Fe mg/L 2.6 1.9 3.31 2

Landfill leachate characteristics

BIOFILTRATION

ELECTROCOAGULATION

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Ammonia m g N -NH4 /L

Ammonia

Inlet Outlet 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 DBO5 m g O 2/ L

DBO

Inlet Outlet 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 DCO m g O 2/ L

COD

Inlet Outlet 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Turbidity NT U

Turbidity

Inlet Outlet

Biofilter efficiency

 325 days of operation without any sign of clogging

 Hydraulic load = 0.175 m3/m2/j

 Pollutants Removal on average:  96 % of BOD5  96 % of NH4  98 % of PO4  95 % of turbidity

 20 % removal of COD du to the high

presence pf humic substances in the landfill leachate

Effect of current density and treatment time on COD removal

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 CO D (m g O 2 /L ) Time (min)

Aluminum Anode

3 mA/cm2 5 mA/cm2 8 mA/cm2 10 mA/cm2 15 mA/cm2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 CO D (m g O 2 /L ) Time (min)

Iron Anode

3 mA/cm2 5 mA/cm2 8 mA/cm2 10 mA/cm2 15 mA/cm2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 C O D (m g O 2 /L ) Time (min)

Magnesium Anode

3 mA/cm2 10 mA/cm2 15 mA/cm2 20 mA/cm2

 The Increase of current and treatment time promotes

the COD removal in all anodes

 Aluminum and iron are more efficient for residual COD

removal

 The use of magnesium anode leads to a high increase

in pH after the treatment

Magnesium anode: Influence of alkalinity

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 C O D (m g O 2 /L ) Time (min)

COD Removal with different concentrations of sodium bicarbonate

1 g/L of NaHCO3 2 g/L of NaHCO3 3 g/L of NaHCO3

 The increase of alkalinity has a negative impact on COD removal

 The alkalinity resists to the increase of pH and delays the magnesium ions precipitation

 This phenomena leads to the formation of magnesium and calcium carbonates and induces

the fouling of the electrodes

𝐻𝐻𝑂

3

+ 𝑂𝐻

→ 𝐻𝑂

3

2−

+ 𝐻

2

𝑂

𝐻𝑂

3

2−

+ 𝑀𝑔

2+

→ 𝑀𝑔𝐻𝑂

3

𝑠

𝐻𝑂

3

2−

+ 𝐻𝐶

2+

→ 𝐻𝐶𝐻𝑂

3

(s)

The biological treatment has allowed removing 96% of ammonia nitrogen, 95 % of turbidity and 96 % biodegradable

carbon by applied a hydraulic load of 0.175 m3/m2/j

The subsequent electrocoagulation treatment has enabled to reduce 70% of residual COD and 90% of residual color

using aluminum anode with 10 mA/cm2 and 20 minutes of treatment time

 By comparison with aluminum and iron, magnesium anode is less suitable for the electrocoagulation of bio-treated landfill leachate. Magnesium anode greatly increases the pH so that electrodes fouling is observed

 The combination of biofiltration and electrocoagulation processes is technically feasible and economical viable to treat efficiently sanitary landfill leachate.

1. M. Y. Mollah, P. Morkovsky, J. A. Gomes, M. Kesmez, J. Parga, and D. L. Cocke. (2004) Fundamentals, present and future

perspectives of electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 114 (1-3): 199-210

METHODOLOGY

Anodes Current (mA/cm2) Time (min) COD initial (ppm) COD Removal (%) Color removal (%) pH final Aluminum 10 20 709 70% 90% 9,41 Iron 8 20 570 65 % 85% 9,09 Magnesium 10 30 670 53% 85% 10,63

Optimum parameters

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

PARTNERS

Références

Documents relatifs

A numerical model based on Richards equa- tion and an exponential relationship between saturated hydraulic conductivity and depth is used to analyze the landfill response to pumping

In this paper, the influence of four parameters using electrocoagulation technique (electrolysis current, electrolysis times, chloride concentration and pH) on

SUHVHQWVUHFHQWZRUNVFDUULHGRXWRQXVLQJ&DORQHDQG&FRXSOHGWRRWKHUWUHDWPHQWPHWKRGV DLPLQJDWWUHDWLQJZDVWHZDWHU

• langue nationale & langue officielle, • langue partenaire & langue première, • langue privilégiée & langue seconde, • langue source & langue standard,.

ص ، هسفإن ردصملا ، صخشلا ىلإ نئاكلا نم ، يبابحلا - 1.

Art 61/1 code de procédure français : « … si l’infraction par laquelle elle est entendue est un ou un délit puni d’une peine d’emprisonnement du droit d’être assistée

471 ةــــــيراـــقعلا ةلاـــــــــكولا دـقع يـف كــــــلهتسملا ةـيامح - ةـــــــسارد ةـــــــنراقم - ةعيفر مير روـــعل ةذاتسلأا نارهو

A total of 112 Salmonella Enteritidis strains isolated in French Polynesia were sent to the Centre National de Référence des Escherichia coli, Shigella, et Salmonella for