Pour un domaine donné comme celui de l’interaction homme machine qu’est ce qui définit les limites de
l’espace problème ? Si la pensée divergente permet d’établir différents chemins, n’est-il pas possible pour
un domaine donné d’optimiser cette pluralité ? Si la pensée convergente nous fournit les leviers nécessaires
à l’exploration des possibles, quels sont ces leviers pour le domaine des IHM ?
Ces questions apparaissent particulièrement pertinentes pour un domaine où les solutions et leurs
alternatives possibles sont particulièrement nombreuses. C’est le cas des Systèmes Interactifs Mixtes, dont
l’espace de conception est constitué non seulement de celui du domaine de l’IHM mais aussi d’un grand
nombre de dimensions de variabilité additionnelles. Ce sera l’objectif du Chapitre 2.
De plus, nous pouvons nous interroger sur la capacité des ressources de conception actuelles à supporter
ces grands principes. Dans le Chapitre 3, nous allons tenter de répondre en partie à ces questions en
explorant l’ensemble des ressources dédiées à la conception des systèmes interactif mixtes. A l’issue de
cette revue nous tenterons d’identifier la ou les ressources de conception pouvant assister au mieux une
exploration collaborative de l’espace de conception et donc par voie de conséquence engendrer de
manière systématique une forme de créativité.
5
Altshuller, G., & Seredinski, A. (2004). 40 Principes d’innovation : Triz pour toutes applications
(Broché.). Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.fr/40-Principes-dinnovation-toutes-applications/dp/2952139407
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder (p. xviii, 317 p). Westview Press. Retrieved from
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Creativity+in+Context#0
Bonnardel, N. (2000). Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a
constrained cognitive environment. {Knowledge-Based} Systems, 13(7-8), 505-513.
doi:10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00067-8
Bonnardel, N. (2006). Créativité et conception : Approches cognitives et ergonomiques. Solal Editeurs.
Brandt, E., & Messeter, J. (2004). Facilitating collaboration through design games. Proceedings of the eighth
conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1 (pp.
121-131). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org.gate6.inist.fr/citation.cfm?id=1011870.1011885&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFI
D=78624755&CFTOKEN=48702884
Bucciarelli, L. L. (2002). Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies, 23(3), 219-231.
Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00035-7
Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Interactive Technologies (p.
445). Morgan Kaufmann. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20&path=ASIN/0123740371
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. 1996. New York (4th
ed.). Harper Collins. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.fr/Creativity-Flow-Psychology-Discovery-Invention/dp/0060928204
Détienne, F., & Traverso, V. (2009). Méthodologies d’analyse de situations coopératives de conception : Corpus
MOSAIC. (F. Détienne & V. Traverso, Eds.) (p. 317). Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Détienne, F., Boujut, J.-françois, & Hohmann, B. (2004). Characterization of Collaborative Design and
Interaction Management Activities in a Distant Engineering Design Situation. 6th International
Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems - COOP’04 (pp. 83-98). Retrieved from
http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00117077/en/
Détienne, F., Martin, G., & Lavigne, E. (2006). Viewpoints in co-design: a field study in concurrent
engineering. Design Studies, 26(3), 215-241. Elsevier. Retrieved from
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0611152
Fiore, S. M., Rosen, M., Salas, E., Burke, S., & Jentsch, F. (2007). Problem-solving : Parsing and Defining
the Theoretical Problem Space. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, 143-163.
Franken, R. E. (2001). Human Motivation (p. 480). Wadsworth Publishing. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Human-Motivation-InfoTrac-Robert-Franken/dp/0534555306
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity As Seen Through the Lives of Freud, Einstein,
Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi (p. 464). New York: Basic Books.
Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4),
26. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=95788.95793
Glucksberg, S., & Weisberg, R. W. (1966). Verbal behavior and problem solving: Some effects of labeling
in a functional fixedness problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 659–664. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xge/71/5/659.pdf
Greeno, J. G., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Situativity and Symbols: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive
Science, 17(1), 49-59. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1701_3
Horowitz, R. (1999). Creative Problem Solving in Engineering Design. TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY. Retrieved
from
http://ebookbrowse.com/creative-problem-solving-in-engineering-design-thesis-by-roni-horowitz-pdf-d40009706
Kirk, D., Crabtree, A., & Rodden, T. (2005). Ways of the hands. In U. K. Hans Gellersen Lancaster
University, D. Kjeld Schmidt IT University of Copenhagen, F. Michel Beaudouin-Lafon Université
Paris-Sud, & F. Wendy Mackay INRIA (Eds.), Proceedings of ECSCW’05 (pp. 1-21). Paris, France:
Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1242029.1242030
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4),
513-549.
Larkin, J. H. (1989). Display Based Problem Solving. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex
Information Processing (pp. 69-108). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words.
Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-100. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjam, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité (Psychology of
Creativity). Armand Colin.
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.
Memory cognition, 24(5), 669-680. Springer. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8870535
Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and
distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness Activity theory and humancomputer
interaction (pp. 69-102). MIT Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Englewood .). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Cognition in the Head and in the World: An Introduction to the Special Issue on
Situated Action. Cognitive Science, 17(1), 1-6. Psychology Press. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1701_1
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer
Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=576915
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance Matters. (J. M. Carroll, Ed.)Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2),
139-178. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
Osborn, A. F. (1965). L’Imagination constructive (2nd ed.). Paris: Dunod. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.fr/LImagination-constructive-Alexander-Faickney-Osborn/dp/2040030581
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem
solving. (C. E. O’Malley, Ed.)Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, 128(3), 69-97. Springer.
doi:10.1145/130893.952914
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1983). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J.
Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology. (Wiley., p.
126). New York.
Salembier, P. (2007). Analyse, modélisation et instrumentation des activités coopératives situées. Université de Troyes.
Retrieved from http://www.activites.org/v1n1/salembier.pdf
Schön, D. A. (1984). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action (1st ed.). Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research
in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131-147. Springer London. doi:10.1007/BF01580516
Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation. {ACM} Trans.
{Comput.-Hum.} Interact., 7(1), 114-138. doi:10.1145/344949.345077
Simon, H. A. (1969). Les Sciences de l’Artificiel - 3ème Edition (p. 215). The MIT Press. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Sciences-Artificial-Herbert-Simon/dp/0262691914
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4), 181-201.
doi:10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
Simon, H. A. (1995). Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving in design. In A. Collen &
W. Gasparski (Eds.), Design and Systems general application of methodology (Vol. 3, pp. 245-257).
Dans le document
Méthode de Conception Assistée par les Modèles pour les Systèmes Interactifs Mixtes
(Page 46-49)