Dans le Chapitre suivant, nous détaillons en quoi une telle combinaison contribue à répondre à des enjeux
majeurs de la conception des SIM. Puis nous identifions, les ressources existantes sujettes à une telle
combinaison et définissons clairement la méthode que nous avons élaborée au fil de ce travail de
recherche ainsi que les questions auxquelles nous avons répondu dans la suite de ce manuscrit.
AttrakDiff. (2005).User Interface Design GmbH. Retrieved December 21, 2011, from
http://www.attrakdiff.de/en/Home/
Axure: Interactive Wireframe Software and Mockup Tool. (2012).Axure Software Solutions. Retrieved March
27, 2012, from http://www.axure.com/
Bach, C. (2004). Elaboration et validation de Critères Ergonomiques pour les Interactions Homme-Environnements
Virtuels. Methods.
Bach, C., & Scapin, D. (2005). Critères Ergonomiques pour les Interactions {Homme-Environnements}
Virtuels : définitions, justifications et exemples. Retrieved from
http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rr-5531.html
Bach, C., & Scapin, D. (2010). Comparing Inspections and User Testing for the Evaluation of Virtual
Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(8), 786-824. Taylor & Francis.
doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.487195
Bailey, B. P., & Konstan, J. A. (2003). Are informal tools better?: comparing DEMAIS, pencil and paper,
and authorware for early multimedia design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in
computing systems (pp. 313-320). Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org.gate6.inist.fr/citation.cfm?id=642611.642666
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2008). An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594. Taylor & Francis.
doi:10.1080/10447310802205776
Barthet, M. F., Tarby, J. C., & Vanderdonckt, J. (1996). The Diane+ method (pp. 95-120). Namur,
Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
Bastide, R., Navarre, D., & Palanque, P. (2002). A model-based tool for interactive prototyping of highly
interactive applications. CHI 02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems CHI 02, 516.
ACM Press. doi:10.1145/506443.506457
Bastien, J. M. C., & Scapin, D. (2002). Les méthodes ergonomiques : de l’analyse à la conception et à
l'évaluation. Biarritz.
Beard, D. V., Smith, D. K., & Denelsbeck, K. M. (1996). QGOMS: a direct-manipulation tool for simple
GOMS models (pp. 25-26). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ACM.
doi:10.1145/257089.257112
Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies,
27(5), 587-613. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.002
Blackwell, A., & Green, T. R. G. (2002). Notational Systems - the Cognitive Dimensions of Notations
framework. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science (John M. Ca.).
Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.13.2023
Blackwell, A., Edge, D., Dubuc, L., Rode, J. A., Stringer, M., & Toye, E. F. (2005). Using solid diagrams
for tangible interface prototyping. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(4), 18-21. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.99.7005
Boehm, B. (1986). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. ACM SIGSOFT Software
Engineering Notes, 11(4), 22-42. doi:10.1145/12944.12948
Bono, E. D. (1985). Six Thinking Hats. Thinking, 44(0), 1-8. Penguin Books Ltd. Retrieved from
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/111582/992708
Boy, G. A. (1997). The group elicitation method for participatory design and usability testing. interactions,
4(2), 27-33. doi:10.1145/245129.245132
Brandt, E. (2007). How Tangible Mock-Ups Support Design Collaboration. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy,
Brandt, E., & Grunnet, C. (2000). Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In T.
Cherkasky, J. Greenbaum, & P. Mambrey (Eds.), Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference PDC 2000
(pp. 11-20). Retrieved from http://www.itu.dk/courses/I/F2004/PDC00-drama-endelig.pdf
Brandt, E., & Messeter, J. (2004). Facilitating collaboration through design games. Proceedings of the eighth
conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1 (pp.
121-131). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org.gate6.inist.fr/citation.cfm?id=1011870.1011885&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFI
D=78624755&CFTOKEN=48702884
Bresciani, S., Blackwell, A., & Eppler, M. (2008). A Collaborative Dimensions Framework: Understanding
the Mediating Role of Conceptual Visualizations in Collaborative Knowledge Work. Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (p. 364). Los Alamitos, {CA,} {USA}: {IEEE} Computer
Society. doi:http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.7
Buur, J., Jensen, M. V., & Djajadiningrat, T. (2004). Hands-only scenarios and video action walls: novel
methods for tangible user interaction design (pp. 185-192). Cambridge, {MA,} {USA}: ACM.
doi:10.1145/1013115.1013141
Bødker, S., & Buur, J. (2002). The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design. {ACM} Trans.
{Comput.-Hum.} Interact., 9(2), 152-169. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org.gate6.inist.fr/citation.cfm?id=513665.513670
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjogren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Co-operative design perspectives on 20 years with
the Scandinavian IT design model. Proceedings of Nordi CHI 2000. Stockholm.
Carroll, J. M. (1995). Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. (J. M.
Carroll, Ed.)Workshop (Vol. 27, p. 408). John Wiley & Sons.
Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. interactions (p. 368).
MIT Press. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Making-Use-Scenario-Based-Human-Computer-Interactions/dp/0262032791
Chalon, R., & David, B. T. (2008). IRVO: an Architectural Model for Collaborative Interaction in Mixed
Reality Environments. Retrieved from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/639629.html
Cheung, D., Tigli, J.-Y., Lavirotte, S., & Riveill, M. (2006). Wcomp: a Multi-Design Approach for
Prototyping Applications using Heterogeneous Resources. Seventeenth IEEE International Workshop on
Rapid System Prototyping (pp. 119-125). Retrieved from
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1630759&tag=1
Coutrix, C. (2009). Interfaces de Réalité Mixte : Conception et Prototypage. Université Joseph Fourier. Retrieved
from http://www.sudoc.abes.fr/DB=2.1/SRCH?IKT=12&TRM=139215905
Coutrix, C., & Nigay, L. (2008). Balancing physical and digital properties in mixed objects (pp. 305-308).
Napoli, Italy: ACM. doi:10.1145/1385569.1385619
Coutrix, C., & Nigay, L. (2011). OP: A Novel Programming Model for Integrated Design and Prototyping
of Mixed Objects. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler
(Eds.), Proceedings of Interact’11 (pp. 54-72). Lisbonne, Portugal: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved
from http://www.springerlink.com/index/F301752212525341.pdf
Davis, R. C., Colwell, B., & Landay, J. A. (2008). K-Sketch : A “ Kinetic ” Sketch Pad for Novice
Animators. Construction Equipment, 413-422. ACM. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357122
Dievendorf, L. A., Brock, D. P., & Jacob, R. J. K. (1995). Extending the User Action Notation (UAN) for
Specifying Interfaces with Multiple Input Devices and Parallel Path Structure. {NAVAL}
{RESEARCH} {LAB} {WASHINGTON} {DC}.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer interaction (3rd ed., p. 834). Prentice Hall.
Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=249491
Dragicevic, P., Fekete, J.-D., Kastler, R. A., & Chantrerie, L. (2001). Input Device Selection and
Interaction Configuration with ICON. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.25.1638
Dubois, E., & Gray, P. (2007). A Design-Oriented Information-Flow Refinement of the ASUR
Interaction Model. In J. Gulliksen, M. B. Harning, P. Palanque, G. C. Veer, & J. Wesson (Eds.),
Engineering Interactive Systems (Vol. 4940, pp. 465-482). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92698-6
Dubois, E., Gray, P., & Nigay, L. (2002). ASUR++: A Design Notation for Mobile Mixed Systems (pp.
123-139). Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=666588
FaceReader. (2011).Noldus Information Technology. Retrieved December 21, 2011, from
http://www.noldus.com/human-behavior-research/products/facereader
Fishkin, K. P. (2004). A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 8(5),
347-358. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1023819
Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The Agile Manifesto. Software Development, 9(August), 28–35. [San
Francisco, CA: Miller Freeman, Inc., 1993-. Retrieved from
http://andrey.hristov.com/fht-stuttgart/The_Agile_Manifesto_SDMagazine.pdf
Gamboa-Rodriguez, F., & Scapin, D. (1997). Editing MAD* task descriptions for specifying user
interfaces, at both semantic and presentation levels. Proceedings DSV-IS ’97, 4th International
Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems. Granada, Spain.
Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4),
26. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=95788.95793
Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. (J. M. Greenbaum
& M. Kyng, Eds.)Design at Work Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (Vol. Design at, p. 294).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.1007/BF02298175
Hassenzahl, M. (2006). Hedonic, emotional, and experiential perspectives on product quality. In C.
Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction (pp. 266-272). Idea Group.
doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch042
Hornecker, E. (2007). Sketches, Drawings, Diagrams, Physical Models, Prototypes, and Gesture as
Representational Forms. Second International Workshop on Physicality, (September), 2-3. Retrieved from
http://www.physicality.org/Physicality_2007/Entries/2008/3/8_Physicality_2007_proceedings_file
s/Physicality2007Proceedings.pdf#page=97
Hornecker, E. (2010a). Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework: the card
brainstorming game. Tangible and embedded interaction, 10, 101-108. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1709886.1709905
Hornecker, E. (2010b). The Tangible Interaction Cards: A Brainstorming Exercise Game. Retrieved
December 26, 2011, b from http://www.ehornecker.de/CardGame.html#process
Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space
and social interaction (pp. 437-446). Montréal, Québec, Canada: ACM.
doi:10.1145/1124772.1124838
Horowitz, R. (1994). ASIT Créativité - résolution créative - conception innovante - innovation et
differenciation. Retrieved from http://www.asit.info/
Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W. E., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C.,
Beaudouin-Lafon, M., et al. (2003). Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proceedings of the
{SIGCHI} conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 17-24). Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, {USA}:
ACM. doi:10.1145/642611.642616
Jacob, R. J. K., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L. M., Horn, M. S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E. T., & Zigelbaum, J.
(2008). Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth
annual {SIGCHI} conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 201-210). Florence, Italy: ACM.
doi:10.1145/1357054.1357089
Dade-Robertson, M. (2009). Supporting the creation of hybrid museum experiences. Proceedings of the 27th
international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’09 (p. 1973). New York, New York,
USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1518701.1519001
Kontio, J., Lehtola, L., Bragge, J., & Box, P. O. (2004). Using the Focus Group Method in Software
Engineering: Obtaining Practitioner and User Experiences. Proceedings of the 2004 International
Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (pp. 271-280). Washington, DC, USA: {IEEE} Computer
Society. doi:10.1109/ISESE.2004.35
Krasner, G. E., & Pope, S. T. (1988). A cookbook for using the model-view controller user interface
paradigm in Smalltalk-80. J. Object Oriented Program., 1(3), 26-49. Retrieved from
http://www.itu.dk/courses/VOP/E2005/VOP2005E/8_mvc_krasner_and_pope.pdf
Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., & Kort, J. (2009). Understanding,
scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on
Human factors in computing systems (pp. 719-728). ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518813
Lepore, T. (2010). Sketches and Wireframes and Prototypes! Oh My! Creating Your Own Magical Wizard
Experience. {UX} Matters. Retrieved from
http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2010/05/sketches-and-wireframes-and-prototypes-oh-my-creating-your-own-magical-wizard-experience.php
Lin, J., Newman, M. W., Hong, J. I., & Landay, J. A. (2000). DENIM: finding a tighter fit between tools
and practice for Web site design. Interface (Vol. 2, pp. 510-517). ACM. doi:10.1145/332040.332486
Mackay, W. E., Ratzer, A. V., & Janecek, P. (2000). Video artifacts for design: bridging the Gap between
abstraction and detail. Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices,
methods, and techniques (pp. 72-82). New York City, New York, United States: ACM.
doi:10.1145/347642.347666
Martinie, C., Palanque, P., & Winckler, M. (2011). Structuring and composition mechanisms to address
scalability issues in task models. Proceeding INTERACT’11, 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on
Human-computer interaction (pp. 589-609). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag . Retrieved from
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2042182.2042235
Masson, D., Demeure, A., & Calvary, G. (2010). Magellan, an evolutionary system to foster user interface
design creativity. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
- EICS ’10 (p. 87). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1822018.1822032
Monk, A., & Howard, S. (1998). Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work
context. interactions, 5(2), 21-30. doi:10.1145/274430.274434
Mori, G., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2002). CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for
interactive system design. {IEEE} Trans. Softw. Eng., 28(8), 797-813. Retrieved from
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=636196.636202&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=23197
686&CFTOKEN=88858182
Moussa, W., Jessel, J.-pierre, & Dubois, E. (2006). Notational-based prototyping of mixed interactions.
2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (pp. 229-230). IEEE.
doi:10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297818
Muller, M., Wildman, D. M., & White, E. A. (1993). “Equal opportunity” PD using PICTIVE. Commun.
{ACM}, 36(6), 64. doi:10.1145/153571.214818
Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods (Vol.
17, pp. 25-62). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0114
Nigay, Laurence, & Coutaz, J. (1997). Multifeature Systems : The CARE Properties and Their Impact on
Software Design The Design Space : Physical Devices and Interaction Languages. Intelligence and
multimodality in multimedia interfaces, (Nigay). AAAI Press. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.12.7140&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Norman, D. A. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday Business.
Norman, D. A. (2003). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things (p. 272). Basic Books; 1
edition. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Emotional-Design-Love-Everyday-Things/dp/0465051359
OmniGraffle. (2012).The Omni Group. Retrieved March 27, 2012, from
http://www.omnigroup.com/products/omnigraffle/
Osborn, A. F. (1965). L’Imagination constructive (2nd ed.). Paris: Dunod. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.fr/LImagination-constructive-Alexander-Faickney-Osborn/dp/2040030581
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., & Tahmassebi, S. (1998). Formal Models for Cooperative Tasks: Concepts and an
Application for En-Route Air Traffic Control. DSV-IS.
Pressman, R. S. (1997). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. McGrawHill (p. 880). McGraw Hill.
Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Software-Engineering-Practitioners-Roger-Pressman/dp/007301933X
Purcell, T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19(4), 389-430. Retrieved
from http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK_NSTL_QK3157977.aspx
Renevier, P., & Nigay, L. (2004). Notation de Conception pour les Systèmes Mixtes Collaboratifs et
Mobiles (pp. 66-73). Nice, France: ACM. doi:10.1145/1050873.1050891
Rosenbaum, S., Cockton, G., Coyne, K., Muller, M., & Rauch, T. (2002). Focus groups in HCI: wealth of
information or waste of resources? (pp. 702-703). Minneapolis, Minnesota, {USA}: ACM.
doi:10.1145/506443.506554
Scapin, D., & Bastien, J. M. C. (2001). Analyse des tâches et aide ergonomique à la conception : l’approche
MAD*. Analyse et conception de {l’IHM} (pp. 85-116).
Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research
in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131-147. Springer London. doi:10.1007/BF01580516
Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2007). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies,
and Emerging Applications (2nd ed.). {CRC} Press Inc.
Serrano, M., Nigay, L., Lawson, J. Y., Ramsay, A., Murray-Smith, R., & Denef, S. (2008). The open
interface framework: a tool for multimodal interaction. Design (pp. 3501-3506). Association for
Computing Machinery. Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/34238/
Shaer, O., & Jacob, R. J. K. (2009). A specification paradigm for the design and implementation of
tangible user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 16(4), 1-39.
Shaer, O., Leland, N., Calvillo-Gamez, E., & Jacob, R. J. K. (2004). The TAC paradigm: specifying
tangible user interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 359-369.
doi:10.1007/s00779-004-0298-3
Simon, H. A. (1969). Les Sciences de l’Artificiel - 3ème Edition (p. 215). The MIT Press. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Sciences-Artificial-Herbert-Simon/dp/0262691914
Smith, S. (2007). Exploring the Specification of Haptic Interaction. Interactive Systems. Design, Specification,
and Verification (pp. 171-184). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69554-7_14
Säde, S. (2001). Cardboard mock-ups and conversations: Studies on user-centered product design. University of Art and
Dans le document
Méthode de Conception Assistée par les Modèles pour les Systèmes Interactifs Mixtes
(Page 104-109)