• Aucun résultat trouvé

5 Descriptive Statistics

6.6 People perceiving economic change are more positive toward China

Similar to the individual living condition, results also show that people who recognized an economic improvement in their country tended to have more positive attitudes toward China’s growing influence. The effect is quite strong in all models (r

= 0.0543, 0.0538, 0.0527) and highly significant (p ≤ 0.001). These results can be explained by two different arguments. First is that people in fact see differences and economic improvements in their countries and they attach these changes to Chinese investments. Many examples were already mentioned in the previous results chapters: people may see direct beneficiaries because of Chinese infrastructure investments like access to electricity, railways, roads, or telecommunication infrastructure. Because these investments are highly visible and recognizable in their daily lives, it is possible that citizens are able to connect these improvements with FDI from China.

Graphic 15: Fitted plot – Economic change and people’s perception

Notes: The y-axis again shows the fitted values of people’s perceptions of China’s influence. The x-axis covers the respondents’ rankings of economic change in their country (compared to twelve months before). 1 means ‘much worse’, while 5 means ‘much better’.

However, argued previously, it is more likely that people who perceive direct economic improvements in their countries are in general more open for foreign investments. Again, the interaction effects supported this argumentation. The amount of inward FDI relative to GDP and the total amounts on the regional level did not affect the positive impact between the respondents’ perceptions of economic change and their levels of support for China’s engagement. Federal direct investment neither strengthens nor weakens the effect because no significance is observable.

Thus, other factors likely explain this connection more productively. One factor that should not be neglected is the role of public opinion shaping – especially through the media in sub-Saharan Africa. As we have learned from several classical media research papers, mass media can influence people’s views and opinions on specific issues. Ball-Rokeach and DeFleur (1976: 19) found that if people do not have ‘social realities that provide adequate frameworks for understanding, acting, and escaping, and when audiences are dependent in these ways on media information received, such messages may have a number of alteration effects’. Wanta et al. (2004: 372)

‘show a clear relationship between media coverage of nations and how individuals viewed those nations’. In contrast to Western media, articles in African newspapers or radio broadcasts about China are biased to appear much more positive. Matanji (2019: 44) analyzed media coverage in three African countries. The examination

‘suggested that most African countries favor Chinese investment’. Thus, people may also be influenced by their local media stipulating that China brings economic improvement. It would be another explanation for why the effect of people thinking their economy has improved were more positive toward China’s engagement – regardless of whether people themselves benefit from FDI. In this field of opinion-building, further research is necessary.

To summarize, the sixth hypothesis can be confirmed. People who think their country’s economy has improved compared to one year before tended to have more positive attitudes toward China’s growing political and economic influence in sub-Saharan Africa. However, this positive effect was independent on the amount of inward FDI to the respondents’ countries or regions.

7 Conclusion

This quantitative analysis confirms that people’s attitudes toward China’s growing economic and political influence in sub-Saharan Africa can be shaped by the amount of inward FDI. In countries where China invests large amounts of money relative to the state’s GDP, respondents had more positive perceptions of China’s activities. The effect is quite strong and significant as well. Prior research has struggled to find empirical evidence for this connection in part because of a lack of significance due to a small number of cases (countries) and low variance. To overcome this deficit, this paper attained a closer look at the places in sub-Saharan Africa to which this Chinese FDI goes. Using data from the AEI, hundreds of Chinese FDI projects have been disaggregated from the country level to the regional (provincial) level, which increases the variance significantly and reduces the problem of visibility. Analysing the effects on the regional level increases the probability that people are aware of these Chinese investments or even are directly affected because they work for a Chinese multi-national or benefit from new infrastructure. The effect of regional FDI on people’s perceptions was not very strong but showed an interesting tendency. In contrast to the western perspective on China in Africa, inward FDI from the People’s Republic did not generate negative perceptions at all; it was indeed able to produce positive attitudes. Or, in other words, China is able to buy love in sub-Saharan Africa. But why? This question cannot be ultimately answered here. According to Goldsmith et al. (2012: 1), foreign aid ‘can serve an important strategic goal for those countries that give it: fostering positive perceptions among foreign publics. By doing good, a country can do well’ (Goldsmith et al. 2012: 1). However, it is even more likely that China’s expansive infrastructure projects have positively shaped people’s attitudes. The numerous railroad projects in several African countries mostly operated by Chinese SEOs are important to the economy but also to the mobility of many citizens in these countries. They have solved some of the logistic difficulties of the African continent. Our results supported this explanation, as Chinese investments in the transport and real estate sectors tended to be the most important factor positively shaping people’s attitudes. This argumentation aligns with the results for other effects in this analysis. Classic globalization theories are not well applicable to the idea of people’s support for China’s engagement. First, the type of occupation (skill level) has no impact on how people perceive China. The oft-heard fear of China taking away local labor was not reflected in the data in terms of how people felt about China’s activities. Local low-skilled workers did not report feeling

as harmed as one may have expected. This is in part because China ‘tended to keep local recruiting to a minimum and recruited mostly their own professionals and laborers’ (Zhao 2014: 11).”

In contrast to skill-level, the effect of education is highly significant. People with a lower educational background are more positive toward China than high-educated respondents. As the African continent is still at a separate point of globalization and is based on labour-abundant economic sectors, it is likely that these globalization effects have not reached the continent the same way as in other parts of the world. It may explain why low-educated people in this section of the world are (still) more positive toward globalization and in this case China’s growing economic and political influence. Regarding the negative perceptions among high-educated respondents, Chinese growing presence can also be regarded as a kind of threat to their privileged position in African societies. The interaction regression models of this research showed that highly educated respondents are even more skeptical toward China’s engagement if the amount of inward FDI is high as well.

Additionally interesting but no longer surprising is the fact that people in urban areas were in general less positive toward China’s influence, as citizens in cities tended to be more educated. However, not as for education, the effect turns vice versa as the amount of inward FDI increases. This means that people in urban areas tended to be more positive but only where China invests a considerable amount.

Further, the results show that people who rated their individual living situations as good also had more positive attitudes toward China’s growing influence. The same is true for people who thought their country had economically improved. However, it is doubtful that people are able to see these economic changes themselves and intead attribute them to China’s investments. For all variables tested in this research, public opinion – mainly driven by local mass media – should not be neglected. In general, China is portrayed more positive in African media than in other parts of the world Matanji (2019). Analysing the effect of local media should be taken into account for further research. This research significantly contributed to a better understanding of popular views of China’s activities in sub-Saharan Africa. Hanusch (2012: 510) in his research mentioned that it would be ‘beneficial to examine African perceptions of the Chinese across population groups, focusing especially on individuals employed in sectors in which there is particularly pronounced Chinese engagement’. The results of this paper have helped to overcome this research gap, as they deliver important evidence to show that socioeconomic factors do affect how African people perceive

China’s engagement in their countries. However, this paper also has limitations.

Socioeconomic factors alone are sufficient explanations for people’s support of China’s activities. It would be also important to find evidence of cultural factors, as internationalization and the growing Chinese presence also affect people’s environment in Africa. Yankuzo (2014), for example, spoke of an increasing homogenization in African culture, whereas African culture is becoming increasingly dominated by global principles. The fear of losing their own culture may be an important driver of why people have more negative attitudes towards China.

Additionally interesting would be to analyze how people’s opinions of China’s activities change over time. It is likely that some of the assumed economic and social effects are going to be visible in a few years. The fact that the amount of Chinese investments can positively shape people’s perceptions of China shows that further research in this field is highly needed.

8 References

Adams, Samuel (2009): Foreign Direct investment, domestic investment, and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling 31(6), 939-949.

Adeyemi, Sam (2017): Africa doesn’t need charity, it needs good leadership.

(https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/05/africa-­‐doesn-­‐t-­‐need-­‐charity-­‐it-­‐

needs-­‐good-­‐leadership/ [Status 1.11.2020]).

Adisu, Kinfu, Sharkey, Thomas and Okoroafo, Sam C. (2010): The Impact of Chinese Investment in Africa. International Journal of Business and Management 5(9), 3-9.

Afrobarometer (2016): Merged Round 6 Data.

(https://afrobarometer.org/data/merged-data [Status 4.5.2020]).

Afrobarometer (2020): About Afrobarometer. (https://afrobarometer.org/about [Status 22.20.2020]).

AGRA (2015): African Agriculture Status Report. Youth in Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nairobi: AGRA.

Agri Eneji, Mathias, Onyinye, Iwayanwu J., Kennedy, Drenkat N. and Rong, Shi Li (2012): Impact of foreign trade and investment on Nigeria’s textile industry:

The case of China. Journal of African Studies and Development 4(5), 130-141.

Alden, Chris (2005). China and Africa. Survival 47(3), 147-164.

Alden, Chris (2007): China in Africa. London: Zed.

Aljazeera (2019): Why Africa loves China.

(https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/1/6/why-africa-loves-china/

[Status 23.10.2020]).

Alves, Ana Cristina (2013) China's ‘win-win’ cooperation: Unpacking the impact of infrastructure-for-resources deals in Africa. South African Journal of

International Affairs, 20(2), 207-226.

American Enterprise Institute (2020): China Global Investment Tracker.

(https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/[Status 10.5.2020]).

Amusa, Kafayat, Monkam, Viegi Nicola (2016): Foreign aid and Foreign direct investments in Sub-Saharan Africa – A panel data analysis. Economic Working Papers 612.

Andersen, Thomas and Poppel, Birger (2002). Living conditions in the arctic. Social Indicators Research 58, 191–216.

Ball-Rokeach, Sandra J. and DeFleur, Melvin L. (1976): A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects. Communication Research 3(1), 3–21.

BBC Africa (2014): China to build new East Africa railway line.

(https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27368877 [Status 10.09.2020]).

BBC (2004): How African is North Africa?

(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3421527.stm [Status 22.9.2020]).

Bellabona, Paola and Spigarelli, Francesca (2007): Moving from Open Door to Go Global: China goes on the world stage. Int. J. Chinese Culture and Management Int. J. Chinese Culture and Management 1, 93-107.

Beaulieu, Eugene, Yatawara, Ravi and Wang, Wei Guo (2005): Who Supports Free Trade in Latin America? Department of Economics Discussion Paper 4, 1-22.

Beule, Filip and Bulcke, Daniël (2009): Retrospective and prospective views about the future of the multinational enterprise. International Business Review 18, 215-223.

Biggeri, Mario and Sanfilippo, Marco (2009): Understanding China's move into Africa: an empirical analysis. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 7(1), 31-54.

Blomström, Magnus and Kokko, Ari (1998): Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys 12(3), 247-277.

Blomström, Magnus (2002): The Economics of International Investment Incentives.

World Bank Seminar on Globalization Santiago de Chile.

Borensztein, Eduardo, De Gregorio, José and Lee, Jong-Wha (1998): How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.

Bräutigam, Deborah (2020): A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’: the rise of a meme. Area Development and Policy 5, 1-14.

Bräutigam, Deborah and Jyhjong Hwang (2016): Eastern Promises: New Data on Chinese Loans in Africa 2000-2014. Working Paper 2016(4), 3-32.

Bräutigam, Deborah and Xiaoyang, Tang (2009): China’s Engagement in African Agriculture: “Down to the Countryside”. The China Quarterly 199, 686 - 706.

Brewer, Thomas L. (1991): Foreign direct investment in developing countries:

patterns, policies, and prospects. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 712, 1-58.

Buckley, Lila (2013): Narratives of China- Africa Cooperation for Agricultural Development: New Paradigms? CBAA Working Paper 53, 4-23.

Busse, Matthias, Erdogan, Ceren and Mühlen, Henning (2014): China’s Impact on Africa – The Role of Trade, FDI and Aid. Bochum: Institut für

Entwicklungsforschung und Entwicklungspolitik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Cai, Peter (2017): Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Sidney: Lowy Institute For International Policy.

Campbell, Horace and Chaulia, Seeram (2009): Unequal Equals: Angola And China.

World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues 13(1), 44–83.

Capello, Roberta and Perucca, Giovanni (2018): Cohesion policy perceptions of EU citizens. The role of context condition. Milano: EU Cohesivy Project.

Carmody, Pádraig and Owusu, Francis (2007): Competing hegemons? Chinese versus American geo-economic strategies in Africa. Political Geography 26, 504-524.

Chaponnière, Jean-Raphaël (2009): Chinese Aid to Africa, Origins, Forms and Issues.

In: Van Dijk, Meine Pieter (2009): The New Presence of China in Africa.

Amsterdam (NLD): Amsterdam University Press, 55-82.

Chen, Chuan and Orr, Ryan (2009): Chinese Contractors in Africa: Home

Government Support, Coordination Mechanisms, and Market Entry Strategies.

Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135(11). 1201-1210.

CL Brief (2020): China’s CNPC Natural Gas Project in Mozambique Delayed.

(https://www.clbrief.com/chinas-­‐cnpc-­‐natural-­‐gas-­‐project-­‐in-­‐mozambique-­‐

delayed [Status 13.10.2020]).

Corkin, Lucy and Burke, Christopher (2006): China’s Interest and Activity in Africa’s Construction and Infrastructure Sectors. Stellenbosch: Centre for Chinese Studies.

Downs, Anthony (1957): Economic Theory of Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65, 135-135.

Driffield, Nigel and Taylor, Karl (2000): FDI and the Labour Market: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16, 90-103.

Dupasquier, Chantal and Osakwe, Patrick (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa:

Performance, challenges, and responsibilities. Journal of Asian Economics 17, 241-260.

DW (2019): Robert Mugabe: Vom Volkshelden zum Diktator.

(https://www.dw.com/de/robert-­‐mugabe-­‐vom-­‐volkshelden-­‐zum-­‐diktator/a-­‐

41472336 [Status 31.10.2020]).

Esaiasson, Peter, Dahlberg, Stefan and Kokkonen, Andrej (2020): In pursuit of

happiness: Life satisfaction drives political support. European Journal of Political Research 59(1), 25-44.

Evans, Geoffrey and Rose Pauline (2007): Education and Support for Democracy in sub-Saharan Africa: Testing Mechanisms of Influence. Afrobarometer

Working Paper 75, 1-25.

Ferdinand, Peter (2016): Westward ho—the China dream and ‘one belt, one road’:

Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs 92(4), 941–957.

Foster, Vivien, Butterfield, William, Chen, Chuan and Pushak, Nataliya (2009):

Building Bridges China’s Growing Role as Infrastructure Financier for Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

Fox, Louise, Haines, Cleary, Muñoz, Jorge Huerta and Thomas, Alun (2013): Africa's Got Work to Do: Employment Prospects in the New Century. IMF Working Paper 13 (201). 1-38.

FU Berlin (2020): Gini Index (https://www.lai.fu-­‐berlin.de/e-­‐

learning/projekte/vwl_basiswissen/Umverteilung/Gini_Koeffizient/index.html [24.10.2020]).

Gabel, Matthew (1998): Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories. The Journal of Politics 60(2), 333-354.

Gabel, Matthew and Whitten, Guy D. (1997): Economic Conditions, Economic Perceptions, and Public Support for European Integration. Political Behavior 19, 81–96.

Gadzala, Aleksandra and Hanusch, Marek (2010): African Perspectives on China-Africa: Gauging Popular Perceptions and their Economic and Political Determinants. Afrobarometer Working Papers 117, 1-22.

Giovannetti Giorgia and Sanfilippo Marco (2016): Do Chinese Exports Crowd-out African Goods? An Econometric Analysis by Country and Sector. In: Henson, Spencer and Fiona O (2016): The Power of the Chinese Dragon. Palgrave Readers in Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Global Construction Review (2018): China holds back funding for latest Kenya railway phase (https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/news/china-­‐holds-­‐

back-­‐funding-­‐latest-­‐kenya-­‐railway-­‐phas/ [Status 11.10.2020]).

Global Times (2017): TAZARA documentary reaffirms China-Africa relations.

(https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1169284.shtml [Status 21.10.2020]).

Glaeser, Edward L., Ponzetto, Giacomo A. M. and Shleifer, Andrei (2007): Why Does Democracy Need Education? J Econ Growth 12 (2), 77–99

Goldsmith, Benkamin E., Horiuchi, Yosaku and Wood, Terence (2012): Doing Well by Doing Good:!The Impact of Foreign Aid on Foreign Public Opinion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 9: 1: 87-114.

Grimm, Sven (2014): China-Africa Cooperation: promises, practice and prospects.

Journal of Contemporary China 23(90), 993-1011.

Hanson, Gordon H. and Robertson, Raymud (2008): China and the manufacturing exports of other developing countries. Cambridge: National Bureau Of Economic Research.

Hanusch, Marek (2012): African Perspectives on China–Africa: Modelling Popular Perceptions and their Economic and Political Determinants. Oxford

Development Studies 40 (4). 492-516.

United Nations Labour Office ILO (2012): International Standard Classification of Occupations. (https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_172572.pdf [Status

22.9.2020]).

Harrison, Ann (1995): Determinants and effects of direct foreign investment in Cote d’Ivoire, Morocco, and Venezuela. Munich Personal Archive MPRA Paper 36594, 163-183.

Harrison, Ann E. and Aitken, Brian J. (1999): Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, American Economic Association 89(3), 605-618.

Hudson, John, Čaplánová, Anetta and Orviska, Marta (2004): Eastern European Attitudes to Integration with Western Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies 42, 271-288.

International Press Service (2019): How China’s Africa Alliance is Shifting World Order. (http://www.ipsnews.net/2019/07/chinas-africa-alliance-shifting-world-order/[Status 21.10.2020]).

Jäkel, Ina and Smolka, Marcel (2011): Individual Attitudes Towards Trade: Stolper-Samuelson Revisited. Open Economies Review 24(4), 731-761

Junbao, Jian (2007): China's Role in Africa. Beijing Review 50 (6).

Kirchherr, Julian, Disselhoff, Tim and Charler, Katrina (2016): Safeguards, financing, and employment in Chinese infrastructure projects in Africa: the case of Ghana’s Bui Dam. Waterlines 35(1), 37-58.

KOF ETH Zürich (2020): Globalisierungsindex (https://kof.ethz.ch/prognosen-­‐

indikatoren/indikatoren/kof-­‐globalisierungsindex.html [Status 5.10.2020]).

Konings, Piet (2008): China and Africa: Building a Strategic Partnership. Journal of Developing Societies 23(3), 341–67.

Kragelund, Peter and Van Dijk, Meine Pieter (2009): In: Van Dijk, Meine Pieter (2009):

The New Presence of China in Africa. Amsterdam (NLD): Amsterdam University Press, 83-100.

Lafargue, François (2005): China’s Presence in Africa. China Perspectives 61, 1-12.

Larkin, Bruce D. (1971): China and Africa, 1949–1970: The Foreign Policy of the People's Republic of China. The China Quarterly 52, 748-751.

Larue, Patrick. (2019). The determinants of Sub-Saharan African attitudes towards Chinese FDI. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies 12, 40-54.

Lewin, Keith M. (2009): Access to education in sub‐Saharan Africa: patterns, problems and possibilities. Comparative Education 45(2), 151-174.

Li, Xing (2015): Interpreting and Understanding “The Chinese Dream” in a Holistic Nexus. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 8(4), 505-520.

Los Angeles Times (2018): China has spent billions in Africa, but some critics at home question why. (https://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-china-africa-20180903-story.html [Status 21.9.2020]).

Los Angeles Times (2017): China says it built a railway in Africa out of altruism, but it’s more strategic than that. (https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-­‐fg-­‐china-­‐

africa-­‐ethiopia-­‐20170804-­‐htmlstory.html [Status 8.10.2020]).

Matanji, Frankline (2019): Framing the Chinese Investment in Africa: Media Coverage in Africa, China, United Kingdom, and the United States. Bowling Green (OH):

Bowling Green State University.

Mareis, Hannah and Labuschagne, Jean-Pierre (2019): If you want to prosper, consider building roads. China’s role in African infrastructure and capital projects. (https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/china-investment-africa-infrastructure-development.html [Status 20.11.2020]).

Martinez, Rayana (2015): Chinese Soft power, Africa, and the United Nations General

Martinez, Rayana (2015): Chinese Soft power, Africa, and the United Nations General