a1.,1974; Portner et
al.,
1975).HN
was not detected under restrictive conditions eitherby iodination of
theinfected cell
surface proteins(Tuffereau et al.,
1985),or in
the virus particles after 35S-methionine labelling(Markwell
etal.,
1985). This latterpoint
is emphasizedin figure I
andTable
1.Figure
1 panelA,
shows a comparisonof
the35s-methionine labelled viral
polypeptidesfound in wild type (wt) or mutant
(ts)virions,
grown under permissive (31 oC) or non permissive (39 oC) conditions.At 3l
oC, the amount
of
HN1r271 incorporatedin
the virus particlesis
abouttwofold lower
than that of HNye1, when the amounts ofHN
are normalized to the amounts of the other membraneviral protein M (for clarity
seeHN
andM in
the trackslx,31
oC,figure
1panel
A,
and tableI, 31'C
lines).At
39 oC, however,HN
appears barely detectablein
the mutant virions, while its amount in the
wild
type virus is not reduced relative to the otherviral
proteins andin particular
toM (figure
1 panelA tracks 3x,39 oC;
tableI
39oC lines). The data in table
I
indicate that at 39oC, HNts271 is reducedby
about15-20 folds
comparedto HNwt,
andby
10folds
comparedto
HN1s271 at31oc,
whennormalized to M. However,
these numbers mustreflect an over estimation of
theHNts271
incorporatedin
thevirions
at 39oC dueto
a non specific radioactive signal,since HN was not
detectedby specific HN
antibodiesin the
W'esternblot of
the samples (tracks ts 39oC, lx, 3x, figure
1 panelB).
Therefore,within
thelimits of sensitivity of
the Westernblot
method, the mutantvirions grown
at non permissivetemperature
appearsfree of HN. Furthermore, this massive reduction of HN
incorporationin virions
appears to take placewith
nosignificant
impairmentof viral
budding, since productionsof
virus particlesfor wt
and ts271 at 39 oC are equivalent (see labelled virus figure panelA).
The previous data, which
confirm
the conclusions reached in previous reports (Portner etal.,
1974; Portner etal.,
1975: Tuffereau etal.,
1985;Markwell
etal.,
1985), couldstill not
exclude the presencein
thevirions of
theHN
transmembrane-cytoplasmicportion.
HNts271is efficiently
synthesized at the non permissive temperature, but is degraded before reachingthe cell
surface (Tuffereauet al., l9S5). HN
degradationcould therefore leave the HN-transmembrane-cytoplasmic portion in place. An
antiserum was therefore raised against the N-terminal twenty amino acids representingtwo-thirds of
theHN
cytoplasmictail
(Blumberg etal.,
1985),by
three subcutaneousinjections of
the peptidecoupled to keyholelimpet
hemocyanin.As
expected, this antiserum does not reactwith
theHN
ectodomain expressed at thecell
surface (figure 2, lanesI
andZ), as does an antiserum raised against the wholeviral
particle (Rab-vir,figure
2, lanes 3 and4). Under
these conditions,Rab-vir
recognizesmainly
the two glycoproteins since they are the only one expressed at the cell surface. In contrast, aftercell
disruption, under conditions where Rab-vir now reacts alsowith
the intracellularviral
proteins (lanes7
and 8),Rab-HNtail, now,
gains access to the cytoplasmic tails, and specifically precipitatesHN
(figure 2, lanes 5 and 6).To verify that
Rab-HN1ai1could
detect aputative HN
transmembrane-cytoplasmicportion, purified wild
type virus particles were digestedwith
bromelain to remove the glycoproteins ectodomains. These bald particles were then analyzedby'Westem blot using
Rab-HN1a11.Figure
3 panelA (wt 31 oC
lanes) showsthat upon bromelain
digestion theHN
protein is degradedinto
smaller products. TheX
bands appear to be intermediates in the digestion (they completely disappear with more extensive digestion, not shown),whilst
TCP represents thefinal
digestion product. Its migration relative to bovineinsulin
(21130 amino acids) is consistentwith
a polypeptide of about 60 residueswhich
constitutes theminimal
sizefor the HN
transmembrane-cytoplasmic domain(Blumberg et al.,
1985). The same resultwas
obtainedwith SV-wt grown at
39 oC(not shown). V/hen a similar treatment was applied to ts271 particles grown
at permissive temperature (ts 31 oC lanes), the smaller digestion product ofHN
migrating at theposition of
thewt-HN
intermediates(X)
was observed. This product, however, waslikely to
represent thefinal
digestion product containing theHN
transmembrane cytoplasmic part, since, upon further treatmentwith
bromelain,it
was never cleavedinto a smaller polypeptide (figure 3,
panelB). This
presumablyreflects a different susceptibilily of
the mutantHN
to bromelain. The analysis of the virus ts271 particlesproduced at non
permissive temperature(lanes ts 39 oC) clearly
showedthat
the absenceof HN
wasnot
compensatedfor by the
presenceof
abromelain
resistant polypeptide of any size that could represent a residual transmembrane portion.In
the caseof VSV
ts045, however, the G C-terminal cytoplasmictail
wasdifficult
todetect due to
aggregation.It
wasin fact only identified in the stacking gel after electrophoresis of
spikelessvirions under nonreducing conditions (Metsikkô
andSimons,
1986). Such conditionsof
analysis were therefore usedin
the present study(figure 3,panel C). In
contrastto VSV, the
electrophoresisof ts271
nonreducedsamples
gives results similar to
thoseobtained
under reducingconditions, i.e.
noevidence
for
the presence HN-transmembranecytoplasmic portion
was obtainedin
particles produced at restrictive temperature. Neither band
X,
nor any aggregatein
the stacking gel, specific for ts 39 oC was identifîed (figure 3C).The data presented here indicate that the HN glycoprotein, which contains the essential
function for virion
attachment,is not
essentialfor virus particle formation. Even
a possible rolefor
the transmembrane-cytoplasmicportion of
the protein was excluded.Lack of HN participation
in virion
budding was moreover supported by the fact that the extensivereduction of HN incorporation in virus particles
appearsnot to impair
budding efficiency. These conclusions contrast
with
the results reported for theVSV
G protein, the counterpartof SV-HN. VSV
G wasjudged
essentialfor virus
buclcling,since its
transmembrane-cytoplasmictail was found
presentin
spikelessvirions
(Metsikkô and Simons, 1986).In both
Sendaiand VSV, the M protein plays a central
strategicrole in budding
(Yoshidaet al.,
1976; Tuffereau andRoux,
1988;Knipe et
ar. 1977).However,
thetwo
virusesdiffer in
thatVSV
only contains one glycoprotein, whereas Sendaivirus
containsHN
andFo. If
one assumes that the anchorportion of
oneglycoprotein
is essentialfor
budding,G would
not be dispensablein
the caseof VSV,
whereas,in
absence of
HN,
Fo couldfulfîll
this functionin
Sendai virus.It is
relevantto this
question that a Newcastle diseasevirus
temperature sensitivemutant in the fusion protein, is equally capable of budding in
absenceof
Fo(Matsumura et al.
1990).V/hether
thesevirions contain the Fo
transmembrane-cytoplasmicportion
has not been reported. For Sendaivirus,
weinitially
cconsidered Fo as having an accessory functionin
virus budding, basedmainly
on the observationthat its stability
andfunction
appeared unaffectedin situations of restricted virus
budding. In these situations, however,instability
and/or malfunction ofSV-HN
andM
were always
observed(Tuffereau
andRoux,
1988;Roux et al.,
1985;Roux
andWaldvogel,
1982; Rouxet al.,
1984; Yoshidaet al.,
1979).we
therefore postulatedthat a preferential interaction between
HN
andM
(rather thanFo/M)
would be essentialfor efficient
virus budding. The present data rather support thatM function (i.e ability to
organize abud)
doesnot
depend onHN,
and thatHN,
althoughit may normally
interactwith M,
is not an essential componentin
the budding process. Therefore,if
aglycoprotein is
neededin paramyxovirus budding, Fo
hasto
becomethis
essential
Dans le document
Etude de l'assemblage et du bourgeonnement du virus de Sendai
(Page 43-47)