6 PROPOSITIONS DE BONNES PRATIQUES
6.3 Conclusion
Il était essentiel, par la présente synthèse, d’identifier les meilleures pratiques en matière d’investissements rentables en termes de sécurité routière en Europe et dans le monde, car cela permet de mieux comprendre comment l’application réussie de mesures individuelles portant sur les infrastructures ou l’adoption d’approches intégrées ont permis d’améliorer la sécurité routière. Grâce à une analyse pertinente de la littérature, les résultats obtenus dans une situation donnée peuvent permettre de prédire les effets de certaines mesures lorsqu’elles sont appliquées dans des circonstances analogues et ainsi, de formuler des lignes directrices spécifiques afin de garantir une application efficace des politiques de sécurité routière.
De plus, nous avons souligné certains principes fondamentaux concernant les techniques d’évaluation de l’efficience de ces investissements d’infrastructure en nous appuyant sur l’expérience acquise dans le cadre d’une analyse exhaustive de la littérature portant sur des études de cas provenant du monde entier. Les diverses composantes d’une évaluation de l’efficience, les entraves à ce processus d’évaluation et le rôle de l’évaluation de l’efficience dans le processus décisionnel ont été rappelés, car il s’agit de facteurs importants dont il faut tenir compte lorsque l’on évalue l’efficience d’une mesure de sécurité routière.
N’oublions pas qu’il n’existe pas de «recette miracle» ou de panacée à l’heure de choisir une mesure portant sur les infrastructures parmi tant d’autres. Leur rentabilité varie en fonction du pays dans lequel elles sont mises en œuvre, de la période de mise en œuvre, de l’envergure de la mesure mais aussi du niveau global de sécurité dans le pays concerné. Cette remarque s’applique surtout à l’impact sur la sécurité de chaque mesure, identifié grâce à notre analyse de la littérature, car cet impact peut varier en fonction des caractéristiques du pays dans lequel la mesure est mise en œuvre. De plus, les coûts de mise en œuvre des investissements portant sur les infrastructures, qui sont en général élevés par rapport à d’autres mesures de sécurité routière (telles que l’intensification des contrôles de police, les campagnes de sécurité routière etc.) peuvent varier considérablement d’un pays à l’autre, surtout lorsqu’un ensemble de mesures est envisagé.
REFERENCES
1. Alfaro, J-L., Chapuis, M., Fabre, F. (1994) (Eds): COST 313. Socioeconomic cost of road accidents. Report EUR 15464 EN. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities.
2. Allaire, C., Ahner, D., Abarca, M., Adgar, P., and Long, S. (1996). Relationship Between Side Slope Conditions and Collision Records in Washington State. WA-RD 425.1, Olympia, Washington State Department of Transportation.
3. Al-Masaeid, H. R, Hammory, K., Al-Omari, B. (1999). Consistency of horizontal alignment under adverse weather conditions. Road & Transport Research.
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2002). Roadside Design Guide. Washington, D.C.
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2004). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, D.C.
6. Austroads (2002). Evaluation of the proposed actions emanating from Road Safety Audits, Sydney, A4, 104pp, AP-R209/02.
7. Bahar, G., Mollett, C., Persaud, B., Lyon, C., Smiley, A., Smahel, T., and McGee, H.
(2004). NCHRP Report 518: Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Pavement Markers.
Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
8. Bared J.G., Kaisar E.I. (2001). Advantages of offset T-intersections with guidelines. In the Proceedings of: Road Safety on Three Continents, Swedish National Road and Transport Institute, Moscow, Russia, 19–21 September, 2001.
9. BASt (2002). Sicherheitsaudit für Straßen (SAS) in Deutschland. In: Berichte der BASt, Verkehrstechnik Heft V98.
10. Bergh T., Carlsson A., Moberg J. (2005). 2+1 Roads with Cable Barriers--A Swedish Success Story, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, Illinois, June 29 - July 1.
11. Bjorklund G., Aberg L. (2005). Driver behaviour in intersections: Formal and informal traffic rules. Transportation Research Part F 8, PP. 239-253.
12. Blaeij, A. de.; Koetse, M.; Tseng, Y-Y.; Rietveld, P.; Verhoef, E. (2004). Valuation of safety, time, air pollution, climate change and noise; methods and estimates for various countries. Report prepared for ROSEBUD. Department of Spatial Economics, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
13. Brenac T. (1994). Accidents en carrefour sur routes nationales, modélisation du nombre d'accidents prédictible sur un carrefour et exemples d'applications. Rapport INRETS No 185, INRETS, Arcueil.
14. Bunn, F., Collier, T., Frost, C., Ker, K., Roberts, I., Wentz, R. (2004). Area-wide traffic calming for preventing traffic related injuries (Cochrane review). The Cochrane Library, No. 3, Chichester, UK, John Wiley and Sons.
15. Carlsson, A., Brude, U., Bergh, T. (2001). Utvardering av alternative 13m vag.
Halvarsrapport 2001. Vag-och Transportforskningsinstitutet, Linkoping.
16. Casey S.M., Lund A.K. (1992). Changes in speed and speed adaptation following increase in national maximum speed limit. Journal of Safety Research 23 (3).
17. CEN - European Committee for Standardization (1998). EN 1317-1:1998 - Road restraint systems - Part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test methods. Directive 89/106/EEC, CEN/TC 226 - Road equipment.
18. Center for Transportation Research and Education (2006). Safety Impacts Of Street Lighting at Isolated Rural Intersections - Part II. Final Report, CTRE, Iowa State University.
19. Christensen, P. (2004). Area wide urban traffic calming schemes: re-analysis of a meta-analysis. Working paper TØ/1676/2004, Oslo, Norway, Institute of Transport Economics.
20. Cohen S., Duval H., Lassare S., Orfeuil J.P. (1998). Limitation de vitesse: les décisions publiques et leurs effets. Transports et Sécurité, Ed. Hermès, Paris, ]998.
21. CEDR - Conference of European Directors of Roads (2006). Most Effective Short-, Medium- and Lon-Term Measures to Improve Safety on European Roads. Final Report prepared by the Conference of European Directors of Roads.
22. Corben, B.F. et al. (1997). An evaluation of the general effectiveness of countermeasures designed for crashes into fixed roadside objects. Manuscript submitted to Accident Analysis and Prevention.
23. Country Comparisons. Deliverable D3.7a of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet.
24. CRA (Charles River Associates Incorporated), (1998). Consumer acceptance of automotive crash avoidance devices: A report of qualitative research. USDoT, CRA Interim Report (Project No. 852-05).
25. Craus J., Mahalel D. (1986). Analysis of operation and safety characteristics of left-turn lanes. ITE Journal, July, pp. 34-39.
26. Elvik, R., (2001). Area-wide Urban Traffic Calming Schemes: A Meta-Analysis of Safety Effects. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33 (3), pp. 327- 336.
27. Elvik, R., Vaa, T. (2004). The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Elsevier, 2004.
28. ERSO - The European Road safety Observatory (2006). Roads - webtext of the European Road Safety Observatory. Available on-line at www.erso.eu
29. ERSO - The European Road safety Observatory (2006). Speeding - webtext of the European Road Safety Observatory. Available on-line at www.erso.eu
30. ETSC - European Transport Safety Council (1995). Reducing Traffic Injuries resulting from excess and inappropriate speed. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels 31. ETSC - European Transport Safety Council (1997). Road safety audit and safety impact
assessment. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels.
32. European Commission (1997). Promoting road safety in the EU: The programme for 1997-2001. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
33. European Commission (2002). eSafety: Final Report of the eSafety Working Group on Road Safety. European Commission, Brussels. Available on line at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/esafety/doc/esafety_library/esafety_wg _final_report_nov02.pdf
34. European Commission (2003). Road Safety Action Programme, 311 final. European Commission, Brussels.
35. European Commission (2005). Cars that can dial 112: Commission and industry target 2009. Press Release Report IP/05/134.
36. European Commission (2006). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on road infrastructure safety management. European Commision, Brussels, 5.10.2006.
37. European Commission White Paper (2001). European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide. European Commission, Brussels.
38. Eurostat / UNECE / ECMT (2003). Glossary for transport statistics. Document prepared by the Intersecretariat Working Group on Transport Statistics. European Commission, United Nations Economic Commissions for Europe, European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
39. Federal Highway Administration (2003). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, D.C.
40. Fitzpatrick, K., Balke, K., Harwood, D. W., and Anderson, I. B. (2000). NCHRP Report 440: Accident Mitigation Guide for Congested Rural Two-Lane Highways. Washington, D.C., National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
41. Forbes, G. (2003). Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations: Final Report. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Transport Canada.
42. Fridstrom L. et al. (1995). Measuring the contribution of randomness, exposure, weather and daylight to the variation of road accident counts. Accident Analysis & Prevention 27, pp.1-20.
43. Friedman L.S., Barach P., Richter E.D. (2007). Raised speed limits, case fatality and road deaths: a six year follow-up using ARIMA models. Injury Prevention 13, pp. 156-161.
44. Gaudry, M. (2004). Sur les coûts de la vie humaine utilisés en Europe depuis le rapport Boiteux de juin 2001. Communication présentée lors de la réunion du 28 avril 2004 du Comité sur les pratiques d’évaluation des grandes infrastructures de transport du Conseil Général des Ponts et Chaussées (CGPC), comité présidé par M. Claude Gressier. (In French)
45. Golias J., Yannis G., Antoniοu C. (2002). Classification of driver assistance systems according to their impact on road safety and traffic efficiency. Transport Reviews, Vol.
22, No. 2, pp. 179-196.
46. Golias J.C. (1997). Effects of signalisation on four-arm urban junction safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention 29 (2), pp. 181-190.
47. Graham J.L, Harwood D.W. (1982). Effectiveness of clear recovery zones. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 247. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
48. Griffith, M. S. (1999). Safety Evaluation of Rolled-In Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways. 78th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
49. Hadi, M. A., Aruldhas, J., Chow, L., and Wattleworth, J. (1995), Estimating Safety Effects of Cross - Section Design for Various Highway Types Using Negative Binomial Regression. Transportation Research Record 1500, Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, pp. 169-177.
50. Hakkert, A.S., Gitelman, V., et al (2002). Development of Method, Guidelines and Tools for Evaluating Safety Effects of Road Infrastructure Improvements. Final report, T&M Company, Ministry of Transport (in Hebrew).
51. Harwood D.W., Bauer K.M., Potts I.B., Torbic D.J., Richard K.R., Kohlman Rabbani E.R., Hauer E., Elefteriadou L. (2002). Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes. Federal Highway Administration Report No FHWA-RD-02-089.
52. Harwood, D.W., Council, F.M., Hauer, E., Hughes, W.E., Vogt, A. (2000). Prediction of the expected safety performance of rural two-lane highways. FHWA-RD-99-207, Federal Highway Administration USA.
53. Hassan, Y., Sayed, T., Bidulka, S. (2002). Influence of vertical alignment on horizontal curve perception: Phase II, modeling perceived radius. Transportation Research Record No 1796, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
54. Hauer, E. (1999). Safety and the choice of degree of curve. Transportation Research Record No 1665, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
55. Hauer, E. (2000a). Highway Medians and Safety, Review of literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. Available on-line at www.roadsafetyresearch.com.
56. Hauer, E. (2000b). Lane Width and Safety, Review of literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. Available on-line at www.roadsafetyresearch.com.
57. Hauer, E. (2000c). Shoulder Width, Shoulder Paving and Safety, Review of literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. Available on-line at www.roadsafetyresearch.com.
58. Hauer, E., (1997). Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety, Pergamon.
59. Hauer, E., Terry, D. and Griffith, M.S. (1994). Effect of resurfacing on safety of two-lane rural roads in New-York State. Transportation Research Record 1467, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
60. Herrstedt L. (2000). Road Safety Audit Note 74. Road Directorade. Copenhagen.
61. Herrstedt, L. (1992). Traffic calming design - a speed management method. Danish Experiences on Environmentally Adapted Through Roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention 24 (1), pp. 3–16.
62. Herrstedt, L., Kjemtrup, K., Borges, P. & Andersen, P. (1993). An improved traffic environment - a catalogue of ideas. Danish Road Directorate, Ministry of Transport, Herlev (DK)
63. Hickey, J. Jr. (1997). Drift-off-road accident reductions on the Pennsylvania turnpike.
Transportation Research Record 1573, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 105-109.
64. Highway Agency (2005). Value Management of Local Network Management Schemes.
Report developed by the Highway Agency, Department for Transport, UK
65. Hoareau E., Newstead S., Cameron M. (2006). An evaluation of the default 50 km/h speed limit in Victoria. Monash University, Accident Research Centre Report No. 261, November 2006.
66. Hoglund P.G. (1994). Alternative intersection design - a possible way of reducing air pollutant emissions from road and street traffic? The Science of the Total Environment 146/147, pp. 35-44.
67. Hughes, L.M., McGee, H.W. and Hauer, E. (2001). Impacts of resurfacing projects with and without additional safety improvements. Research Results Digest Number 255, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
68. Hyde´n C., Va´rhelyi A. (2000). The effects on safety, time consumption and environment of large scale use of roundabouts in an urban area: a case study. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32, pp. 11–23.
69. IHT - Institution of highways and transportation (1987). Roads and traffic in urban areas.
London UK.
70. IHT - Institution of highways and transportation (1990). Guidelines for Accident Reduction and Prevention. International edition, London UK.
71. Institute of Transportation Engineers (1999). Traffic Engineering Handbook Fifth Edition.
Washington, D.C., Institute of Transportation Engineers.
72. Jørgensen, N.O., Nilsson P.K., (1995). Traffiksikkerhedsrevesionsprojektet. Evaluering.
Det Eksterne panels rapport. Rapport No 33. Vejdirektoratet, København.
73. Knuiman, M. W., Council, F. M., and Reinfurt, D. W. (1993). Association of median width and highway accident rates. Transportation Research Record 1401, Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, pp. 70-82.
74. Lamm, R., Psarianos, B., Mailaender, T.(1999). Highway Design and Traffic Safety Engineering Handbook. McGraw Hill.
75. Lindenmann H.P. (2005). The Effects on Road Safety on 30 Kilometer-Per-Hour Zone Signposting in Residential Districts. ITE Journal 75 (6).
76. Long A.D., Kloeden C.N., Hutchinson T.P., McLean A.J. (2006). Reduction of speed limit from 110 km/h to 100 km/h on certain roads in South Australia: a preliminary evaluation.
Centre for Automotive Safety Research, Report Series CARS024, University of Adelaide, 2006.
77. Mahalel D., Craus J., Polus A. (1987). Evaluation of staggered and cross intersections.
Journal of Transportation Engineering 112, pp. 495-506.
78. Mannering F. L. (2007). Effects of Interstate Speed Limits on Driving Speeds: Some New Evidence. In the Proceedings of the: Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
79. Matthews, L.R., and Barnes, J.W., (1988). Relation between road environment and curve accidents. In the Proceedings of the 14th ARRB Conference, Part 4, pp. 105-120.
80. Matzoros A., Van Vliet D. (1992). A model of air pollution from road traffic, based on the characteristics of interrupted flow and junction control: Part II- Model results.
Transportation Research Part A 26A (4), pp. 331-355.
81. Miaou, S. P. (1996). Measuring the Goodness of Fit of Accident Prediction Models.
FHWA-RD-96-040, McLean, Va., Federal Highway Administration.
82. Mullen M. A., Wilson J.H., Gottsman L., Noland R.B., Schroeer W.L. (1997). Emissions impact of eliminating national speed limits: one year later. Transportation Research Record No. 1587.
83. National Roads Authority (2007). Road Safety Engineering Report on Accident Remedial Schemes, report provided by National Roads Authority.
84. Nellthorp, J., Samson, T., Bickel, P., Doll. C., Lindberg, G.,(2001). Valuation Conventions for UNITE. UNITE (Unification of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency) Working Funded by the 5th Framework RTD Programme. Leeds, ITS
University of Leeds. Available on-line at
http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/unite/downloads/D5_Annex3.pdf
85. Neuman, T. R., Pfefer, R., Slack, K. L., Hardy, K. K., Council, F. M., McGee, H., Prothe, L., and Eccles, K. A. (2003). NCHRP Report 500 Volume 6: A Guide for Addressing Run-off-Road Collisions. Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
86. Newstead S.V., Corben B.F. (2001). Evaluation of the 1992-1996 Transport Accident Commission funded accident black spot treatment program in Victoria. Report 2001/05 (182). Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
87. NTUA - National Technical University of Athens (2005). Improvement of accident data compatibility throughout Europe. Deliverable 1.5 of SafetyNetWP1 - Intermediate Progress Report on Task 1.4, SafetyNet Consortium, Athens.
88. NTUA - National Technical University of Athens (2005). State of the Art Report on Risk and Exposure Data. Deliverable 2.1 of SafetyNetWP2, SafetyNet Consortium, Athens.
Available on-line at: http://www.erso.eu/safetynet/fixed/WP2/Deliverable%20wp
%202.1%20state%20of%20the%20art.pdf
89. Ogden, K.W. (1997). The effects of paved shoulders on accidents on rural highways.
Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol. 29 No 3.
90. Patterson T.L., Frith W.J., Povey L.J., Keall M.D. (2002). The Effect of Increasing Rural Interstate Speed Limits in the United States. Traffic Injury Prevention 3, pp. 316–320.
91. Pau M., Angius S. (2001). Do speed bumps really decrease traffic speed? An Italian experience. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33, pp. 585–597.
92. Pechan and Associates, Inc. (1997). The effects of raising speed limits on motor vehicle emissions. Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation, Energy and Transportation Sectors Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available on-line at:
http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/2000/2000/2087/spd2-rpt.pdf
93. Peltola, H. (2000). Seasonally changing speed limits: Effects on speeds and accidents.
Transportation Research Record No 1734, pp. 46-51.
94. Persaud B., Hauer E., Retting R., Vallurupalli R., Mucsi K. (1997). Crash reductions related to traffic signal removal in Philadelphia. Accident Analysis and Prevention 29 (6), pp. 803-810.
95. Persaud, B. N., Retting, R. A., Garder, P. E., and Lord, D. (2001), Observational Before-After Study of the Safety Effect of U.S. Roundabout Conversions Using the Empirical Bayes Method. Transportation Research Record, No. 1751, Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council
96. PIARC Technical Committee on Road Safety (2003). Road Safety manual. World Road Association.
97. PIARC Technical Committee on Road Safety (2007). Road Accident Investigation Guidelines for Road Engineers. World Road Association.
98. PROMISING Consortium (2001). Cost-benefit analysis of measures for vulnerable road users. PROMISING - Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users, Deliverable D5.
99. Retting R.A., Chapline J.F., Williams A.F. (2002). Changes in crash risk following re-timing of traffic signal change intervals. Accident Analysis and Prevention 34, pp. 215-220.
100. Retting R.A., Weinstein H.B., Solomon M.G. (2003). Analysis of motor-vehicle crashes at stop signs in four U.S. cities. Journal of Safety Research 34, pp. 485-489.
101. Richter E.D., Barach P., Friedman L., Krikler S., Israeli A. (2004). Raised speed limits, speed spillover, case-fatality rates, and road deaths in Israel: A 5-year follow-up.
American Journal of Public Health 94 (4).
102. RiPCORD – Iserest Consortium (2007). Road Safety Audit - Best Practice Guidelines, Qualification of Auditors and "Programming". http://www.ripcord-iserest.com.
103. RISER consortium (2007). RISER - Roadside Infrastructure for Safer Roads.
http://www.riser-project.com/.
104. ROSEBUD Consortium (2004). The Use of Efficiency Assessment Tools: Solutions to
Barriers. Available on-line at
http://partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/products/deliverable/Report_WP3_final_june_2004.pdf
105. ROSEBUD Consortium (2005). Testing the efficiency assessment tools on selected road safety measures. ROSEBUD WP4 Final Report. Available on-line at http://partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/products/deliverable/ROSEBUD_WP4_REPORT_FINAL.pdf.
106. ROSEBUD Consortium (2006). Examples of assessed road safety measures - a short
handbook. Available on-line at
http://partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/products/deliverable/Handbook_July2006.pdf.
107. Sabey, B.E., Taylor, H. (1980). The known risks we run: The Highway. TRRL Report SR567, Crowthorne, Berks, TRRL, 1980.
108. Sagberg F. (2006). Can Changed Speed Limit on a Road Section Influence Speed on Adjacent Sections? In the Proceedings of: "Research into Practice" 22nd ARRB Conference, Australian Road Research Board.
109. Shafi S., Gentilello L. (2007).A nationwide speed limit 65 miles per hour will save thousands of lives. The American Journal of Surgery 193, pp. 719–722.
110. Sisiopiku V., Akin D. (2003). Pedestrian behaviors at and perception towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data.
Transportation Research Part F 6, pp. 249-274.
111. Smith R.G., Lovegrove A. (1983). Danger compensation effects of stop signs at intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention 15 (2), pp. 95-105
112. Smith, B., Lamm, R. (1993). Coordination of Horizontal and Vertical Alignment with Regard to Highway Aesthetics. Transportation Research Record No 1445, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
113. SpeedAlert (2006). Harmonizing the in-vehicle speed alert concept definition. Official website of the SpeedAlert project http://www.speedalert.org/
114. Spyropoulou I., Golias J., Karlaftis, M.G., Penttinen M., Vaa T. (2007). Risk Factors and Intelligent Transport System answers - possible opportunities and shortcomings. In the Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transportation Research WCTR 2007, Berkeley, USA, 24-28 June, 2007.
115. Staahl, A., Oxley, P., Berntman, M. and Lind, L. (1995). The use of vision enhancements to assist elderly drivers. In the Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems.
116. Sun X., Garber N.J. (2002). Determining the Safety Effects of Differential Speed Limits on Rural Interstate Highways Using Empirical Bayes Method. University of Virginia, Centre for Transportation Studies, Research Report No. UVACTS-14-5-36, 2002
117. Surrey County Council (1998). Road Safety Audit: An investigation into casualty savings.
Discussion report, Surrey County Council Highways Management Division, Casualty Kennedy, K. (2003). Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway
Safety Plan - Volume 7: A Guidance for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves.
NCHRP Report 500, Transportation Research Board.
122. Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual 2000." Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, (2000).
123. Tsugawa, S., Kato, S., Matsui, T., Naganawa, H., and Fuji H. (2000). An Architecture for Cooperative Driving of Automated Vehicles. In the Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Dearborn, MI.
124. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1968). Convention on road signs and signal. Inland Transport Committee, UN, Vienna.
125. VESIPO (2002). Erarbeitung der Grundlagen für die Strassenverkehrs-sicherheitspolitik des Bundes. Basler & Hofman, Eckhardt, Perrin, Schönenberger, Fierz.
126. Virtanen, N. (2005). Impacts of an automatic emergency call system on accident consequences. Espoo, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT).
127. Vis, M.A. and A.L. van Gent (Eds.) (2007). Road Safety Performance Indicators: Country Comparisons. Deliverable D3.7a of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet.
128. Wells, P. (1999). Benefits of Road Safety Audit. Traffic Safety on Two Continents Conference, 20-22 September, Malmo Sweden.
129. Wesemann, P. (2000). Economic evaluation of road safety measures. Contribution to the 117th Round Table, 26 and 27 October 2000, Paris. SWOV Publication D-2000-16E.
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam.
130. Wong S.C., Sze N.N, Lo H.K., Hung W.T., Loo B.P.Y. (2005). Would relaxing speed
130. Wong S.C., Sze N.N, Lo H.K., Hung W.T., Loo B.P.Y. (2005). Would relaxing speed