• Aucun résultat trouvé

L X-RAY FLUORESCENCE CROSS-SECTIONS MEASUREMENTS FOR ELEMENTS 56≤Z≤66 IN THE ENERGY RANGE 11-41 keV

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "L X-RAY FLUORESCENCE CROSS-SECTIONS MEASUREMENTS FOR ELEMENTS 56≤Z≤66 IN THE ENERGY RANGE 11-41 keV"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00227224

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00227224

Submitted on 1 Jan 1987

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

L X-RAY FLUORESCENCE CROSS-SECTIONS MEASUREMENTS FOR ELEMENTS 56 Z 66 IN

THE ENERGY RANGE 11-41 keV

S. Singh, S. Kumar, D. Mehta, M. Garg, N. Singh, P. Mangal, P. Trehan

To cite this version:

S. Singh, S. Kumar, D. Mehta, M. Garg, N. Singh, et al.. L X-RAY FLUORESCENCE CROSS- SECTIONS MEASUREMENTS FOR ELEMENTS 56 Z 66 IN THE ENERGY RANGE 11-41 keV.

Journal de Physique Colloques, 1987, 48 (C9), pp.C8-669-C8-672. �10.1051/jphyscol:19879116�. �jpa-

00227224�

(2)

L X-RAY FLUORESCENCE CROSS-SECTIONS MEASUREMENTS FOR ELEMENTS 56SZS66 IN THE ENERGY RANGE 11-41 keV

S. SINGH, S . KUMAR", D. MEHTA, M.L. GARG, N. SINGH, P.C. MANGAL* and P.N. TREHAN

Department of: P h y s i c s , Panjab U n i v e r s i t y , Chandigarh 160014, I n d i a

" ~ e p a r t m e n t of B i o p h y s i c s . Panjab U n i v e r s i t y , Chandfgarh 160014, I n d i a

Abstract:- The

L

X-ray fluorescence cross-sections

(s, -

qR

-

and

aiy

) have been

measured for ten elements (56gZG66) at various photon energies in the range of 11-41 keV.

A

good agreement is found between the measured results and the theoretically calculated values of

L

XRF cross-sections using various physical parameters based on relativisitc theory.

Introduction:- Information on X-ray fluorescence (XRF) cross-sections is important because of its wide use in many areas of basic and applied science, notably in the fields of atomic, molecular and radiation physics and in the non-destructive elemental analysis of materials using XRF technique.

A

limited work has been done in the direction of measurement of

L

XRJ? cross-sections (Garg et a1 1985, 1986, 1987, Kumar et a1 1985, Singh et a1 1987 a,b). It was observed that for the elements (56(2(71), the experimental results of

L

XRF cross-sections are, in general, liigher than the theoretical estimates. It was therefore, thought worthwhile to measure the L XRF cross-sections for more elements at different excitation energies in this atomic region so as to develop some statistical basis for looking deeply into the observed discrepancy, between the experimental and theoretical L XRF cross-sections. Keeping this in mind,

L

XRF cross-section of Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb and Dy have been measured as a function of incident photon energy between 11-41 keV.

Experimental Method:- The experimental arrangement for our annular source geometry both in 'direct' and 'secondary' excitation modes have been described elsewhere (Garg et a1 1984). In this arrangement low energy photon sources of 241Am (300 mCi) and lo9cd (25 mCi) along with exciter system (NER-496) obtained from New England Nuclear USA have been used.

The spectra from various targets were recorded with Si(Li) detector (FWHM 170 eV at 5.9 keV)

,

coupled to

4096

channel ND-100 analyser. Three sets of observation-. were taken for each target.

A

relative efficiency curve for Si(Li) detector in the energy range

4-80

keV was generated as described by Garg et a1 (1985). The error in the efficiency values in the energy region of interest (4-15 keV) are estimated to be less than 3%.

Results and Discussions:- The measured values of

L

XRF cross-sections(QLg,$

and G ) for elements with atomic number 565Y66 at different incident photon LY

energies (11-41 key) are listed in table. The overall error in the measured values are estimated to be of the order of 6-10%. This error is attributed to

Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:19879116

(3)

C9-670 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

the uncertainties in different parameters used to evaluate L XRF cross-sections using equation 1 of Singh et al (1987b).

The experimental values of L XRF cross-sections are compared with theoretical values calculated using the formulation of Close et al (1973) as described by Garg et al (1984). In the present calculations the values of Lj-subshell

photoionisation cross-sections ((TT ) are taken from Scofield (1973), the fractional radiative rates (Fi_-) are from Scofield (1974). Two sets of values of fluorescence yields (<*)j) and Coster Kronig transition probabilities (f^,-) are chosen. First are semi-emperical fitted values of Krause (1979) and second are the values taken from the tables of Chen et al (1981), based on relativisitic Dirac Hartee-Slater calculations. Chen et al (1981) have tabulated values of (4Jj) and (f^-j) for Ba, Nd and Eu only. The values for other elements were calculated using Cubic spline interpolation (Forsythe et al 1977). It is evident from table, that the experi- mental values of L XRF cross-sections are in general higher than the theoretical estimates, when W ; and f4 • given by Krause et al (1979) are used. The agreement between the experimental and theoretical results are found to be better when W i and f^j are taken from the table's of Chen et al (1981). It may therefore be pointed out that the theoretical values of L XRF cross-sections should be calculated using tOian(l f-L-j from Chen et al (1981). Also the experimental values of L XRF cross-sections, can be used with more confidence for any type of applications, where the values of L XRF cross-sections are required.

Table 1 : Comparison of experimental and theoretical L XRF cross-sections (barns/atom) for Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb and Dy at 11.4, 15.2, 17.8, 22.6, 25.8 and 41.0 keV excitation energies

Energy (keV) Ba(56)

11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 La(57) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 Ce(58) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 Pr(59) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8

(a)

1097(94) 528(38) 291 (21) 168(10) 133(9) 1411(93)

614(41) 387(25) 198(13) 132(9) 1469(96)

678(56) 396(25) 221(14) 155(11) 1660(107)

820(52) 497(32) 260(16) 181(12)

°L

(b)

1097 482 304 151 102 1260 556 351 174 118 1442 639 404 201 136 1636 726 460 229 155

(c)

1256 555 352 175 119 1424 632 401 200 136 1622 722 458 229 156 1834 818 520 260 177

(a)

833(100) 503(47) 297(22) 182(12) 129(8) 1215(111)

635(43) 391(28) 225(14) 150(10) 1297(94) 663(50) 419(27) 263(16) 171(11) 1555(106)

793(55) 492(33) 294(18) 187(13)

r

H

(b)

1058 503 332 176 123 1207

575 379 201 141 1369 654 431 229 161 1543 738 488 259 182

(c)

1156 550 362 192 135 1319

628 414 219 154 1505

718 474 252 177 1709 817 540 287 202

(a)

- 76(13) 42(8) 33(2)

- - 84(14) 62(12) 36(3) 31(4) _ 118(15)

78(7) 55(4) 30(2)

- 134(24)

82(10) 49(3) 41(7)

«LY

(b)

85 57 31

99 67 36 26

111 75 41 29

125 84 46 33

(c)

92 61 33

107 72 39 28

121 81 44 31

137 93 51 36

(4)

15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 Sm(62) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 Eu(63) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 41.0 Gd(64) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 41.0 Tb(65) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 41.0 Dy(66) 11.4 15.2 17.8 22.6 25.8 41.0

930(58) 569(36) 297(18) 211(13) 2351(161) 1125(71)

699(44) 374(23) 242(15) 2822(179) 1323(83)

848(54) 443(27) 284(18) 77(5) 3177(201) 1538(97)

953(60) 511(32) 327(20) 87(6) 3536(225) 1646(108) 952(59) 543(34) 354(22) 99(6) 3651(230) 1752(109) 1140(71)

610(38) 384(24) 104(7)

829 526 263 178 2343 1047 666 334 227 2642 1180 752 378 257 66 2945 1319 842 423 288 75 3301 1484 947 478 325 84 3697 1668 1067 539 367 95

928 590 296 201 2618 1174 749 378 257 2939 1318 842 425 290 75 3280 1476 943 477 325 85 3601 1645 1053 533 364 95 4044 1833 1175 596 407 107

856(54) 520(33) 331(20) 213(15) 2344(154) 1227(79)

796(51) 429(27) 295(21) 2321(156) 1236(79)

841(54) 460(28) 307(21) 82(5) 2814(178) 1433(90)

935(58) 537(33) 353(23) 99(6) 3026(194) 1538(97)

945(59) 584(36) 406(25) 115(7) 3353(211) 1689(106) 1156(72)

655(40) 439(27) 127(8)

873 549 292 205 2192 1052 697 372 262 2488 1194 792 423 298 86 2749 1324 880 471 332 98 3052 1478 983 527 372 108 3420 1667 1111 597 421 123

926 613 326 229 2458 1179 782 417 294 2781 1336 886 474 333 97 3074 1482 986 527 372 110 3161 1653 1100 590 416 121 3788 1848 1231 661 467 136

121(11) 80(10) 69(5) 31(3)

_ 137(15)

95(11) 64(4) 52(6)

-

194(20) 103(14) 71(5) 46(4) 17(2) 340(39) 210(18) 135(10) 94(6) 56(4) 18(2) 511(49) 221(16) 162(11) 91(6) 65(8) 25(2) 457(39) 263(23) 151(11) 95(6) 72(5) 20(2)

141 95 52 37

179 121 66 47

201 136 75 53 16 455 227 154 85 61 19 500 251 170 94 67 21 561 283 192 106 76 23

156 105 58 41

199 134 74 53

223 151 83 59 18 507 253 171 94 67 21 513 279 189 104 74 23 618 312 212 117 83 25 - These measurements were not done due to poor statistics of the data under Ly

group of X-ray peaks.

a Present measured experimental values of L XRF cross-sections.

b Values calculated using CJ^and fjj taken from Krause et al (1979).

c Values calculated using OJj and f^j taken from Chen et al (1981).

References

Chen M H, Crasemann B and Mark H, 1981 Phys. Rev. A24, 177.

Close D A, Bearse R C, Malanify J J and Umbarger J J 1973 Phys. Rev. A8, 1873.

Garg M L, Singh J, Verma H R, Singh N, Mangal P C and Trehan P N, 1984 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17, 577.

(5)

C9-672 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

Garg M L, Kumar S, Mehta D, Verma H R, Mangal P C and Trehan P N, 1985

J. Phys.

B: At. Mol. Phys. 18, 4529.

Garg M L, Mehta D, Verma H R, Singh N, Mangal P C and Trehan P N, 1986 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19, 1615.

Forsythe G E, Malcolm M A and Molar C B, 1977, Computer methods for Mathematical computations.

Krause M 0, 1979, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 307.

Kumar S, Allawadhi K L and Sood B S, 1985, Phys. Rev. A31, 2918.

Singh S, Garg M L, Mehta D, Verma H R, Singh N, Mangal P C and Trehan P N, 1987a, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20, 941.

Singh S, Mehta D, Garg M L, Kumar S, Singh N, Mangal P C and Trehan P N,

1987b, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. (in press).

Références

Documents relatifs

The pres- ence of a high p t charged particle allows a scale to be identified which can be varied in a similar way as the scale in virtual photon interactions, and the effect on

different theory predictions: NLO pQCD; LO pQCD; PYTHIA using tune QW; PYTHIA using Tune S0; HERWIG using JIMMY; ALPGEN using PYTHIA tune QW; and SHERPA (Figure 3).. The pQCD

Conversely, assuming a bimodal time distri- bution with very fast reactions for which no X-ray can be emitted and with very long fusion-fission reactions for which all the

ةنيبرص دانزم فراعم ةلمج ةداملا هيلع تصن ام اذهو اهيلع علّطي نأ 00 يذيفنتلا موسرملا نم 06 - 08 فلاسلا هتقباطم نم قّقحتلا ةيغب لجس وأ رتفد

X has orthogonal columns (i.e. In this setting, we provide a “lasso-type” procedure which controls the FWER. We establish that the lasso-type estimator obtained by minimizing the

The baffles at the entrance to upper and lower divertor (labeled ‘A’ and ‘B’ in 1b) in DIII-D are toroidally continuous as is the inner wall. Figure 2: The recycling flows of

: model predictions and experimental results of copper cumulative concentration in the leachate for various injection concentrations. Figure 9 : model predictions of