HAL Id: jpa-00220310
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220310
Submitted on 1 Jan 1980
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
LOW TEMPERATURE IRRADIATIONS OF SOME
Fe-B METALLIC GLASSES
A. Audouard, J. Jousset, J. Dural
To cite this version:
LOW TEMPERATURE IRRXDIATICNS
OF
SOME Fe-B METFLLIC GLASSES
A . Audouard, J.C. J o u s s e t and J . ~ u r a l *
Centre drEtudes NuclIaires de Saclay, I n s t i t u t National des Sciences e t Techniques NucZlaires, Laboratoire de MItaZlurgie
-
B.P. N06-
91190 Cif s u r Y v e t t e , France.*
Centre drEtudes NucZdaires de Fontenay a m Roses, Section dlEtudes des Solides Irradids-
B. P. N06, 92260 Fontenay a m Roses, France.
1
-
I n t r o d u c t i o n For t h e f i s s i o n fragment i r r a d i a t i o n s t h e The first i r r a d i a t i o n s o f m r p h o u sm e t a l l i c a l l o y s have been performed i n t h e e a r l y s e v e n t i e s by D. LESUEUR (1). H e had s h t h a t f o r Pd80Si20:i/U 235 f i s s i o n f r a p e n t 20 K i r r a d i a t i o n s induced a n amorphous s t a t e d i f f e r e n t f r o m t h e one obtained by s p l a t c o o l i n g .
i i / t h e r e was a competition between damage and m e a l a l l along t h e i r r a d i a t i o n . Me i n t e r p r e - t a t e d t h i s competition as being due t o t h e two d i f f e r e n t ways o f energy d e p o s i t i o n o f a f i s s i o n fragment i n a metal, e l e c t r o n i c i n t e r a c t i o n s which l e a d t o t h e m 1 e f f e c t s ( s o c a l l e d "thermal spike") and atomic c o l l i s i o n s ("cascades").
~ r r a h i a t i o n experiments of m r p h o u s m e t a l l i c a l l o y s have a t l e a s t two g o a l s :
i / d i s t i n g u i s h between t h e s e t h e m 1 and c o l l i s i o n e f f e c t s : i i / u n d e r s t a n d t h e microscopic n a t u r e of t h e dannge and consequently g e t a n i d e a of t h e s h o r t range o r d e r o f t h e m r p h o u s m e t a l l i c a l l o y s .
For t h e s e r e a s o n s , we have i r r a d i a t e d a-FeB a l l o y s a t 20 K with : i / h i g h doses o f 2.5 MeV e l e c t r o n s which, i n c r y s t a l l i n e m e t a l s , induce i n d i v i d u a l displacements o f atoms, ii/ f i s s i o n neu-.
t r o n s
w h i c h i n d u c e t h e ' ' ~ ( n , a ) n u c l e a rre-
a c t i o n . T h e 6 MeV i n d u c e d a p a r t i c l e s l e a d t o a c o l l e c t i v e d a m a g e , i i i / U 235 f i s s i o n F r a g m e n t s w h i c h h a v e , a s p r e v i o u s l y s a i d ,samples were e l e c t r o l y t i c a l l y thinned a t t h i c k - n e s s e s f r o m 6 p m t o 14prn.U 235 was deposited on both s i d e s of t h e samples by evaporation o f U02 enriched t o 95 % i n t h e 235 i s o t o p e
.
1 4 k m was t h e m x k t h i c h e s s s i n c e t h e range of U 235 f i s s i o n f r a p n t s is around 7 p m i n i r o n . These coated samples, a s w e l l a s t h e E i s s i o n n e u t r o n s samples, were i r r a d i a t e d i n t h e Vinka f a c i l i t y ( 2 )of t h e r e a c t o r T r i t o n o f Fontenay aux Roses. The e l e c t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n were p e r f o m d a l s o a t Fontenay aux Roses i n t h e Vinkac f a c i l i t y o f t h e V a n d e Graaf accelerector ( 3 ) .
3
-
R e s u l t s3.1. D m g e production
E l e c t r o n and n e u t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n s :
Figures 1 and 2 show d m g e production curves f o r both a l l o y s d u r i n g e l e c t r o n and f i s s i o n neutron i r r a d i a t i o n s ( 6 MeV a p a r t i c l e s ) r e s p e c - t i v e 1 y . A r a d i a t i o n darrage i s c l e a r e l y seen i n both c a s e s . A s a t u r a t i o n e f f e c t appears i n t h e c a s e o f e l e c t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n and t h e s a t u r a t i o n i s complete in t h e c a s e o f neutron i r r a d i a t i o n . The e l e c t r i c a l r e s i s t i v i t y i n c r e a s e a t s a t u r a t i o n i s
APs
= 6 , s?
0 , ~ I J l c m and 4,7 f 0,3@cm for a-Feg0 B20 and a-Fe78M02B20 r e s p e c t i v e l y .t h e t w o e f f e c t s , t h e r m a l s p i k e s a n d c o l l i - s i o n c a s c a d e s . 2
-
E x p e r i m e n t a l p r o c e d u r e s .-
T h e s a n p l e s-E
w e r e M e t g l a s a s p r o v i d e d b y A l l i e d C h e m i c a l .3
Two t y p e s o f a l l o y s w e r e i r r a d i a t e d : a - F e p & p5
a n d a-Fe7$o 2B 20.
T h e y w h e r e r i b b o n s , 40 pm t h i c k . T h e d a m a g e a n d t h e a n n e a l i n g s w e r e f o l - l o w e d b y m e a n s o f t h e m e a s u r e o f t h e elec- t r i c a l r e s i s t i v i t y of t h e s a m p l e sa t
20 Kw i t h t h e u s u a l f o u r w i r e s p o t e n t i o m e t r i c Fig.1 - Darrage production curves o f e l e c t m n i r r a - d i a t e d amor?hous Fe-R samples
a
p is t h e i r r a d i a f . io n
m e t h o d . induced i n c ~ a s e of t h e e l e c + r i c a l m s i ~ + i v i t y .JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
-
31 0 - ~ ~ x d o s e ( 6 MeV a
.
crn )Fig. 2 - Damage production
curves
o f f a s t neutron i r r a d i a t e d m r p h o u s Fe-B samples.AP
is t h e i r r a d i a t i o n induced i n c r e a s e o f t h e e l e c t r i c a l r e s i s t i v i t y .F i s s i o n fragment i r r a d i a t i o n s :
F i g w e 3 shows d m g e production curves o f a-Fe78M~2B20 w i t h d i f f e r e n t t h i c h e s s e s . The r e s u l t s , a s it i s t h e c a s e f o r a-Fe
80 B20 can be s m r i z e d a s follows :
-
A t low doses, t h e r e s i s t i v i t y i n c r e a s e s very quickly. The t h i n n e r t h e sample, t h e h i g h e r t h e i n c r e a s e r a t e d( b P
d
(eft
)-
The curves e x h i b i t a mximum. The lower t h e t h i c h e s s , t h e lower t h e dose a t which t h e maximm occurs.- At high doses, t h e r e s i s t i v i t y i n c r e a s e s l i n e a r l y with t h e d o s e . ~ h i s could be d u e t o a s p u t t e - r i n g e f f e c t a s it was pointed o u t by
LESUEUR
(1).If we assume t h a t t h e s a t m a t i o n o f t h e i r r a d i a t i o n e f f e c t is complete, i . e . t h e r e i s no mre i n c r e a s e o f
p
,
we can deduce from t h e s l o p e o f t h e curve t h e s p u t t e r i n g r a t e . W e found few thousands a t o m p e r f i s s i o n fragment, in good accordance with LESUEUR's r e s u l t s . So, t h e t h i n n e r t h e sample, t h e lower t h e r e s i s t i v i t y a t s a t u r a t i o n . More, t h e r e s i s t i v i t y becomes s m l l e r t h a n b e f o r e i r r a d i a t i o n f o r t h e two t h i n n e s t samples.The main part of t h e s e f e a t u r e s were a l r e a d y observed by LESUEUR (1) in t h e c a s e o f t h e f i s s i o n f r a m n t i r r a d i a t i o n o f c-Pd80Si20 and a-Pd S i
80 20
Fig. 3a
Fig. 3b
Fig.3
-
Damge production c w v e s of f i s s i o n f r a p e n t i r r a d i a t e d a-Fe7b Mo2 B2,, a l l o y . Fig.3a : low dosesFig. 4
-
A ~ l e a l i n g curves f o r t h e a-Fe78M~2B20 a l l o y .A R o i s
t h e i r r a d i a t i b n induced Increase of e l e c t p i c a 1 resistance.A
R
i s what m i n s a f t e r an annealing a t a temperature T.,
andV
r e f e r s t o electron, . n e u t r o n a n d f i s s i o n fragment i r r a d i a t i o n respectively. F i w 4 shows t h e a n n e z l i n ~ derivative - -
-
dYb~
crwes[m(m.),
T]
f o r t h e a-Fe78E(02B20 a l l o y . For t h e t h r e e types of i r r a d i a t i o n , low temperature recovery stages occur. These stages are l e s s defi- ned than i n t h e mre usual c r y s t a l i r r a d i a t i o n case.A f t e r an annealing up t o r o o m temperature, a c e r t a i n munt of t h e induced
bPo
has not recove- red : about 0,6AQ,
and 0,2AQo
f o r n e u t r o n and e l e c t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n r e s p e c t i v e l y .The i r r a d i a t i o n e f f e c t was a l s o characte- r i z e d by t h e influence of t h e damage on t h e curves
(3
T,
.
The v a r i a t i o n with T of t h e e l e c t r i c a l r e s i s t i v i t yp
qf t h e a l l o y was measured before i r r a d i a t i o n . After i r r a d i a t i o n , t h e same measurement was m d e between 20 K ( i r r a d i a t i o n temperature) and T (annealing temperature). Figure 5 and 6 show t h e s e curves f o r a-FemE and a-Fe78M~2B20 samples. It can be seen t h a t$
decreases a f t e r i r r a d i a t i o n and t h a t t h e recovery e f f e c t of t h e annealings leads t o an increase of t o m r d s i t s p m i r r a - d i a t i o n value.4
-
Discussion4.1. E l e c t r o n a n d n e u t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n s
.
I r r a d i a t i o n induces an important e f f e c t i n t h e s e Fe-B base amrphous alloys.b p ,
induced increase is of t h e same order of mgnitude than i n c r y s t a l s i . e . fewp.&
cm.-
s t r u c t u r a l changes a s observed in the case of neutron i r r a d i a t e d a-Pd80Si20 (7) and helium ion i r r a d i a t e d a-Pd80Si20 (8).dP
Fig.5
-(rn,
T)
N"" of a-Fe80B20sa"ple, before and a f t e r n e u t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n . f is t h e f r a c - t i o n r e s i s t i v i t y which have recovered a f t e r -the annealing a t t h e temperatme indicated on t h e curve.Fig.6
-
(g,
T ) curves of a-FeMo
B sample, before a n d a f t e r neutron aad!a?!?on. f i s t h e f r a c t i o n r e s i s t i v i t y which have recovered a f t e r t h e h e a l i n g a t t h e tempemture indicated on t h e curve.The hypothesis of a p i n t defect creation i s supported by t h e occurence of low temperature recovery stages i n t h e annealing curves. A s t h e short range order degree is probably lower than i n a c r y s t a l , recovery peaks in f i g u r e 4 are m t h e r than in t h e case of a c r y s t a l . So, it seems possible t o a s s o c i a t e t o a defect a spectrum of migration energy (4) ( 5 ) .
The r a d i a t i o n m g e m y be interpreted i n
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
If we assume that the Mathiessen's rule is dP
valid, The
3
value is representative of the structural state of an alloy. Figures 5 and 6 show that3
is very sensitive to the irradiation. This could mean that structural changes occur duringneutron irradiation i.e. 6 MeV a particles irradia-
tion. An alternate explanation is that the
~athiessen's rule is not valid for these neutron
irradiated alloys.
4.2. Fission frappent irradiations. In the case of fission fragment i m d i a - tions, production curves of figure 3 can only be explained by the existence of two processes (1)(4).
A
fission fragmnt losses its energy in two ways :-
nuclear collisions which induce displacement cascadesin
the whole bulk of the irradiated sample and lead to the creation of pint de" ~ects and m y be to the nucleation of another structu- ral state as it is the case in neutron irradia- tions. This process induces an increase of the electrical resistivity.-
electivnic excitation which induce t h e m 1 spikes near the surface of the sample and leads to the annealing out of the pint defects and probably to the creation of another different structural state. This process lowers the electrical resistivity.5 - Conclusion.
The results presented here show important d m g e effects
in
Fe-B type amorphous alloys irra- diated at 20 K by 2,5 MeV electrons, ( 6 MeV cr p a r - t i c l e s ) n e u t r o n s a n d f i s s i o n f r a g m e n t s .These effects are interpretated in terms of pint defects creation in the short range order of the mrphous structure and of induced structural changes in the mrphous state.
Further experiments are planned or in progress to support these assumptions. Aknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to
Dr.
C.1 1
JANOT,
Dr.
D. LESUEUR, Dr. Y. QUERE for m y helpful discussions. Thanksare
also due toMrs
K.
LORENZELLI f o r p r e p a r i n g t h e f i s s i o nfragment experiment samples, to MM. J. ARDONCEAU and R. 3LOT for efficient experimental help.
References
(1) D. LESUELIR, Rad.Eff.24, - 101 (1975) and rapport CEA R 4502 (1973).
(2) R.R. CONTE and J. DURAL, Rev.Phys.Appl.,;?,l (1967).
(3)
J.
D m ,
J. ARDONCEAU and J.C. JOUSSET to be published.(4) A. AUWUARD, J.
D
W
and J.C. JOUSSET, Rad.Eff.Let.g, 9 (1979).( 5 ) A. AUWUNU), J. BALOGH, J.
DURAL
and J.C. JOUSSET, to be published.(6)
J.
HILIAIRET, E. BALANZAT, J. BIGOT andH.
KUNZI,
this conf.(7)
K.
DOI,T.
AYANO ar,d K.KAWAMUF.A, J. Non-Cryst So1.34,415 (1979). -(8)