• Aucun résultat trouvé

The protection of fundamental rights in the EU: Future challenges

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The protection of fundamental rights in the EU: Future challenges"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Centre for European Law of the

University of Luxembourg

&

IUIL - Institut Universitaire International

Luxembourg

The protection of

fundamental rights in the EU:

Future challenges

Conference on EU Litigation

Monday, October 22

nd

2012

MUDAM, Luxembourg

Date:

Monday, 22nd October 2012

Location:

MUDAM Luxembourg

Musée d’Art Moderne Grand-Duc Jean 3, Park Dräi Eechelen

L-1499 Luxembourg Luxembourg

Languages:

English and French

Context

:

This conference is organized in the context of the specialization on European Litigation of the University of Luxembourg’s Master in European Economic Law (LL.M.).

Inscription fees:

100,-€ *

Contact:

Veronique Acker by phone: (+352) 26.15.92.23 by fax: (+352) 26.15.92.28.

For more information and registration see:

http://conference.iuil.lu/

(2)

PROGRAMME*

9.00 am Introduction and Welcome

Marc Jaeger (President, General Court, Court of Justice of the European Union)

Stefan Braum (Dean, Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance, University of Luxembourg)

Herwig Hofmann (Professor, Centre for European Law, University of Luxembourg)

9.15 am Key Note Speech

Viviane Reding (Vice President Commission) (tbc)

9.45 am Session 1 -The new plurality of Fundamental Rights sources - What will change and how?

Chair: Koen Lenaerts (Judge, Court of Justice of the European Union)

“The negotiations for the EU accession to the ECHR and the

accession process” Hannes Kraemer (Legal Service, EU Commission) “The Co-Responsibility of the Member States and the EU before the ECHR?” Hans Nilsson (Head of Unit, Fundamental Rights and Criminal Justice, Council of the EU)

Interpreting the ECHR, interpreting EU law: Differences that count? Will the ECHR’s margin of appreciation doctrine be imported into EU law? Speaker: Eleanor Sharpston (Advocate General, CJEU)

Respondent: Rick Lawson (Dean, Professor, Leiden Law Faculty)

Discussion

11.00 am Coffee Break

11.20 am Session 2 - How to manage the pluralism of sources of fundamental rights in the EU?

Chair: Allan Rosas (Judge, Court of Justice of the European Union)

“The relation between the rights arising from the Charter and general principles of law”

Speaker: Herwig C.H. Hofmann (Professor, University of Luxembourg) Respondent:Sascha Prechal (Judge, CJEU)

“The relation between EU fundamental rights and those recognised in the constitutions of the Member States: competition or

complementarity?”

Speaker: Jan Passer (Judge, Czech Supreme Administrative Court) Respondent: Tom Eijsbouts (Professor, University of Leiden)

The relation between the Charter and the Convention – how to solve conflicts?

Speaker: Jörg Gerkrath (Professor, University of Luxembourg) Respondent: Henk Lubberdink (Chair of Chamber,Council of State, Netherlands).

1.00 pm Light Lunch

2.00 pm Session 3 – Interpretation and Effects of Rights in the new System of Multiple Sources of Rights

Chair: Josef Azizi (Judge, General Court, CJEU)

What is the effect of accepting horizontal direct effect of Fundamental Rights on the competencies of the Union?

Speaker: Thomas Henze (Federal Ministry of Economics, Germany) Respondent: Allan Rosas (Judge, CJEU)

“The Accession from the Point of View of the Convention and the ECtHR” tbc (Judge, European Court of Human Rights)

Which effects will the accession have on judicial procedures and judicial cooperation?

Speaker: Arjen Meij (visiting Professor University of Luxembourg, former judge, General Court, CJEU)

Respondent: André Potocki (Judge, ECtHR)

Discussion

3.00 pm Coffee Break

4.00 pm Session 4 - Case studies

Marc Jaeger (President, General Court, Court of Justice of the European Union)

Union Citizenship and Human Rights under Article 2 TEU Speaker: Armin v. Bogdandy (Director, MPI, Heidelberg) Respondent: Cathryn Costello (Fellow, University of Oxford) The Ne Bis in Idem Principle – State of Play and Perspectives Speaker: Geert Corstens (President, Netherlands Supreme Court) Respondent: Georges Ravarani (President of the Administrative Court and Vice President of the Constitutional Court of the G.D. of

Luxembourg)

The example of Anti-Discrimination: Does the inflation of sources lead to a devaluation of rights?

Speaker: Gerard C. Rowe (Professor, Univ Viadrina, Frankfurt a.d.O. and Professeur associé, University of Luxembourg).

Respondent: Monica Claes (Professor, University of Maastricht).

5.30 pm Concluding remarks by President Marc Jaeger 6.00 pm Closing of conference

Références

Documents relatifs

If indeed what the Court is doing when it upholds Article 9 is promoting a robust liberal secularism based ultimately on the cornerstone value of state neutrality,

Different types of conflicts, divergences or collisions are thus likely to occur, notably: (1 st ) divergences on the substance or the scope of one

tially, fairly and within a reasonable time, the right to be heard, the right to have access to files, or the obligation to give reasons for decisions, for the purposes of Article

Toute reproduction ou diffusion est interdite.... Toute reproduction ou diffusion

It included interviews with those jud- ges, members of the juvenile court prosecutor’s office and the other judges involved, as well as with all of the institutio- nal partners

Thus, in paragraph 47 of the judgment of March 21 st 2017, it asserts “… although they are independent professionals, notaries have official powers as a public

The children protected may not be discriminated against therefore because they are non-nationals of the State in which they are discriminated. Foreign children may invoke

While the Convention recognizes disability as an evolving concept, it clearly endorses the understanding of it as a social construct, when it states that disability “results from