A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
H ANS L. C YCON
An upper bound for the local time-decay of
scattering solutions for the Schrödinger equation with Coulomb potential
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 39, n
o4 (1983), p. 385-392
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1983__39_4_385_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1983, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
385
An upper bound for the local time-decay
of scattering solutions for the Schrödinger equation
with Coulomb potential
Hans L. CYCON (*)
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Ca 91125
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Vol. XXXIX, n° 4, 1983,
Section A :
Physique ’ théorique.’
ABSTRACT. 2014 We show that the
large-time decay
for somescattering
states of the Coulomb
Schrodinger
operator can be estimatedby using
suitable « energy cut-off » norms.RESUME. - On montre, en utilisant des normes contenant un cut-off convenable en
energie,
que la decroissance auxgrands
temps de certains etats de diffusion del’opérateur
deSchrodinger
coulombien peut être estimee par1. INTRODUCTION
Consider the
Coulomb-Schrödinger
operator H :=Ho
+|-1
in theHilbert space
(n > 3)
whereHo:== ( - 1B)
and0. Note H is a
self-adjoint
operator in with domain the Sobolev spaceWe are interested in the « time evolution »
(*) On leave from Technische Universitat Berlin. Fachbereich Mathematik, Strasse des 17 Juni 135, 1 Berlin 12, BRD
Annales de Poincaré-Section A-Vol. XXXIX, 0020-2339/1983/385/S 5,00/
© Gauthier-Villars
386 H. L. CYCON
This is the
(Hilbert space-)
solution of theSchrodinger equation
where ~p E
D(H).
Since H has no
singular
continuous spectrum(see [12,
p.186 ],
compare also[2 ])
we have ~f == EB(see [7,
p.519 ])
and there aretwo types of
(formal)
solutions of(2) :
the bound states where~p E
Jfp(H) (i.
e. ~p is aneigenvector of H)
and thescattering
solutions where Bound states stay « localized » in a boundedregion
of [Rn for all times twhile
scattering
solutions leave any boundedregion
for t ~ oo(see [1,
p.
260 ]).
In this paper we will make the last statement more
precise,
i. e. we shallprove the estimate
for ~p in a dense set of and suitable constants to and c.
On the left hand side of
(3)
we use the «localizing » weighted
normII .p
==II (1
+ whereas on theright ~.~N
is a suitable « energy cut-off » norm which will be defined below.Local
time-decay
ofscattering
states forSchrodinger
operators withshort-range potentials
has been discussedby
many authors; see forexample [4] ] [5] ] [d] ] [9] ] [10 ]. Very recently
Kitada[8 proved, using pseudo-diffe-
rential operator
techniques,
an estimate similar to(3)
which includedlong
range
potentials
butonly
for states withsufficiently high
energy.We shall prove estimate
(3) by relatively elementary
calculations similar to those of Dollard[3] in
hisproof
of existence of modified wave operators.The essence of our
proof
is the device of a suitable norm which « supresses » lowenergies by
aweight
function.2. RESULTS
Let H :==
Ho
+g I x I -1 (x
E3)
as in the introduction. It is well known that the modified wave operatorexists
[3 ],
whereNotice, here and in the
following
we denote ~:== 2014 fV and define the operator :=for
any real orcomplex-valued
function F on [R".(and denote
the Fourier transform and its inverserespectively).
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
387
SCATTERING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
Now let
and
where we used the usual notation and
Then M is dense in H and N is dense in
(in
theL2-sense).
Wemight
Nunderstand
physically
asscattering
states with small low(and high)
energy parts.Define the norm
We will prove the
following.
THEOREM. - There are constants c
and t0
such thatIn order to prove the theorem we
require
some technical lemmas(compare [3] ]
and[11,
p.171 ]).
Let to := e and denote
where
We first show.
LEMMA 1. Then for any multiindex l~Nn
with |l| ~
2nprovided t
> ~ where c is a constantdepending
on g and n.Proof
2014 Notice first that ifli~
N, 1,...,n}
and t thenby
some calculation for a
suitable c
1 > 0Vol. XXXIX, n° 4-1983.
388 H. L. CYCON
Therefore for any multiindex
Fe
and t > toHence for any
multiindex j E with |j|
6nwhere the constants C3 and c4
depend
on j and g.On the other hand we have
where t E 2n and ~5 > 0 suitable.
Using (8),
the last term abovecan be dominated
by
for suitable C6 and c.
Therefore
(6)
follows. II Now Introduce the notationwhere
Then we have
LEMMA 2. -
For 03C8~M
and a suitable cProof
2014 Let x E > to. Since e-itHo has arepresentation
as an inte-gral
operator, we have(using
the notation(4)
and(5))
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
389
SCATTERING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
Now we use the
identity
to obtain
(see [3, 11 ])
since
I e
’ -iy2 4t -1| ~ y2
’ 4~ it is easy to see m thatFurthermore
by integration by
partsSince the
integral
in this lastexpression
is bounded we getusing
Lemma 1Combining ( 13)
and( 14) yields
which
implies
Lemma 2. IILEMMA 3. -
For 03C8
E M and a suitable c > 0Proof
2014 Because the Hilbert-Schmidt norm ofVol. XXXIX, 4-1983.
390 H. L. CYCON
for suitable ell, we get
The last
inequality
followsby
a calculation similar to that in theproof
of Lemma 1. II
Finally
we prove the Theorem.Proof (of
theTheorem).
Let 03C8 E N,denote 03C8
:=thus 03C8
E M.Consider
Now denote
Then == ~p and we have Therefore
!! ~
Denote ~ 1 :_ ( ~ k ~ -1 ~) ~
Then we have
Now we use the notation
(9), (10)
and Lemma 2 and get for t ~ toThus we get
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
SCATTERING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION 391
By ( 16), ( 17)
and Lemma 3 we haveSince
II
=II
~PIIN
we have shown(3).
IIRemark. 2014 Note that an estimate similar to
(3)
holds if onereplaces t by - t
for t 2014 toprovided
onereplaces Qo by 03A9+D in
theproofs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank the California Institute of
Technology
for its kindhospitality during
thepreparation
of this work and theWigner Stiftung
and the Deutsche
Forschungs
Gemeinschaft forpartial
financial support.We also would like to thank B.
Simon,
R. Seiler and J. Avron for many veryhelpful
discussions.REFERENCES
[1] W. O. AMREIN, M. J. JAUCH, K. B. SINHA, Scattering theory in Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, Reading, Mass, 1977.
[2] H. L. CYCON, Absence of singular continuous spectrum for two body Schrödinger
operators with long-range potentials (a new proof). Proc. of Roy. Soc. of Edinburgh,
t. 94 A, 1983, p. 61-69.
[3] J. D. DOLLARD, Quantum mechanical scattering theory for short-range and Coulomb interactions, Rocky Mountain J. of Math., t. 1, n° 1, 1971, p. 5-88.
[4] A. JENSEN, Local decay in time of solutions to Schrödinger’s equation with a dilatation-
analytic interaction, manuscripta math., t. 25, 1978, p. 61-77.
[5] A. JENSEN, Spectral properties of Schrödinger operators and time-decay of the wave
functions; results in L2(Rm), m ~ 5, Duke Math. J., t. 47, n° 1, 1980, p. 57-80.
[6] A. JENSEN, T. KATO, Spectral properties of Schrödinger operators and time decay
of the wave functions, Duke Math. J., t. 46, n° 3, 1979, p. 583-611.
[7] T. KATO, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer, 1966.
[8] H. KITADA, Time decay of the high energy part of the solutionfor a Schrödinger equation, preprint University of Tokyo, 1982.
[9] M. MURATA, Scattering solutions decay at least logarithmically, Proc. Jap. Ac.,
t. 54, Ser. A, 1978, p. 42-45.
[10] J. RAUCH, Local decay of Scattering solutions to Schrödinger’s equation, Comm.
Math. Phys., t. 61, 1978, p. 149-168.
Vol. XXXIX, 4-1983.
392 H. L. CYCON
[11] M. REED, B. SIMON, Methods of modern mathematical physics III, Scattering theory,
Acad. press, 1979.
[12] M. REED, B. SIMON, Methods of modern mathematical physics IV. Analysis of operators,
Acad. press, 1978.
(Manuscrit reçu le 13 decembre 1982)
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A