• Aucun résultat trouvé

Validation of the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system for Dutch

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Validation of the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system for Dutch"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Data Storage Fact Sheet

Name/identifier study: Chapter 6 – LENA validation in Dutch - Validation of the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system for Dutch

Author: Eva Bruyneel Date: 02/02/2019

1. Contact details

===========================================================

1a. Main researcher

--- - name: Eva Bruyneel

- address: Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Gent - e-mail: eva_bruyneel@hotmail.com

1b. Responsible Staff Member (ZAP)

--- - name: Herbert Roeyers

- address: Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Gent - e-mail: herbert.roeyers@ugent.be

If a response is not received when using the above contact details, please send an email to data.pp@ugent.be or contact Data Management, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

2. Information about the datasets to which this sheet applies

===========================================================

* Reference of the publication in which the datasets are reported:

Bruyneel, E. (2019). Early language development in very young children at risk for autism spectrum disorder (doctoral dissertation). Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

* Which datasets in that publication does this sheet apply to?:

All the data used in the chapter

(2)

3. Information about the files that have been stored

===========================================================

3a. Raw data

---

* Have the raw data been stored by the main researcher? [x] YES / [ ] NO If NO, please justify:

* On which platform are the raw data stored?

- [ ] researcher PC

- [x] research group file server: share of the longitudinal prospective babystudy - [x] other (specify): external hard drive

* Who has direct access to the raw data (i.e., without intervention of another person)?

- [x] main researcher - [x] responsible ZAP

- [ ] all members of the research group - [ ] all members of UGent

- [x] other (specify): researchers longitudinal prospective babystudy

3b. Other files

---

* Which other files have been stored?

- [x] file(s) describing the transition from raw data to reported results. Specify: see methodology section of the chapter, Word document describing different steps, SPSS files - [x] file(s) containing processed data. Specify: SPSS and Excel files

- [x] file(s) containing analyses. Specify: SPSS output files

- [x] files(s) containing information about informed consent: A blank copy of the informed consent

- [x] a file specifying legal and ethical provisions: The documents that were submitted to the Ethical committee

- [ ] file(s) that describe the content of the stored files and how this content should be interpreted. Specify: ...

- [ ] other files. Specify: ...

* On which platform are these other files stored?

- [x] individual PC

- [x] research group file server: share of the longitudinal prospective babystudy - [x] other: external hard drive

(3)

* Who has direct access to these other files (i.e., without intervention of another person)?

- [x] main researcher - [x] responsible ZAP

- [ ] all members of the research group - [ ] all members of UGent

- [ ] other (specify): ...

4. Reproduction

===========================================================

* Have the results been reproduced independently?: [ ] YES / [x] NO

* If yes, by whom (add if multiple):

- name:

- address:

- affiliation:

- e-mail:

Références

Documents relatifs

We identified three observable quantities that would provide evidence for the correlation between CPIs and ob- served transmission: S1 — The proportion of incident colonization

In the ATLAS experiment [1], for recording all data (raw and reduced), and processing and physical analysis tasks, the workload management systems – Production System 2 (PS2)

Our model is an extension of the USM for language change (Baxter et al., 2006) that takes into account potentially bilingual agents and models a priming effect between a group

If there is indeed a correlation between the relative gene expression levels and the class, more genes should appear to be correlated in the experimental condition than in the

In section 3 we define a new operator for action negation therefore give arise to a new dynamic logic.. In Section 4 we apply the new logic to the

[r]

The program provides viewable reports on the target child’s number of vocalizations (CVCs; an estimate of the number of speech or pre-speech productions by the target child per hour

In Scenario 2, when two agents of different groups interact, at each interaction, they choose language A with probability p and language B... Here p = 0.5 and the two languages