• Aucun résultat trouvé

FlexRAN: A flexible and programmable platform for software-defined radio access networks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "FlexRAN: A flexible and programmable platform for software-defined radio access networks"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Control and data plane separation in the RAN - Allow operators to open RAN to authorized

third-parties

- Deploy innovative applications and service endpoints for mobile subscribers, enterprises and vertical segments

Centralized & real-time control

- Simplified base station coordination and sophisticated control

- Support for real-time control applications with stringent time constraints (e.g. MAC scheduler)

Virtualized control functions - Control functions with clean structure and well-defined interfaces

- Can be replaced in a flexible manner without affecting

the rest of the system Control delegation &

Policy reconfiguration - Delegate control functions from centralized controller to agent at runtime

- Reconfigure the function parameters on-the-fly

- Real-time centralized MAC scheduler deployed

over FlexRAN master controller [1] L. E. Li et al. Toward software-defined cellular networks. In European Workshop on Software

Defined Networking (EWSDN), pp. 7-12. IEEE, 2012.

[2] A. Gudipati et al. SoftRAN: Software defined radio access network. In Proceedings of the

second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking, pp. 25-30. ACM,

2013.

[3] V. Yazici et al. A new control plane for 5G

network architecture with a case study of unified handoff, mobility and routing management.

Communications Magazine, IEEE, 52(11):76-85, 2014.

Vanilla OAI OAI + FlexRAN 12

14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Throughput (Mb/s)

Uplink Downlink

This work was partly funded by the EU FP7 project FLEX (ICT-2013.1.7-612050) and by the EU H2020 5G- PPP project COHERENT (ICT 671632).

- Mobile Edge Computing application deployed over FlexRAN master controller

- Real-time monitoring of MAC network information for improved bitrate adjustment

- Dynamic introduction of new MVNOs

- On-demand modification of scheduling policy and resource allocation per MVNO

Implemented in C on top of OpenAirInterface (OAI) - Code refactoring for separation of control and data plane

- Implementation of FlexRAN agent API

Linux-based C++ implementation from scratch Real and non-real time modes of operation

Google Protocol Buffers protocol implementation

Full UE transparency and equal service quality to vanilla OAI

Driving factors behind 5G evolution - Dramatic increases in data traffic

- Emerging communication paradigms like Machine Type Communications

- Support for a diverse set of performance and service requirements through isolated logical networks

Dimensions of innovation towards 5G

- Scaling capacity (ultra-densification, new radio access technologies, new spectrum bands)

- New more flexible network architectures

- Support of network virtualization and slicing

Key technology for evolving mobile networks:

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) [1]

Paradigm shifting ideas underlying SDN

- Control and data plane separation through a well-defined API

- Consolidation of the control plane

- Flexibility introduced to the network through its programmability

Benefits of a Software-Defined Radio Access Network (SD-RAN) design

- Simplified base station coordination that enables strategies and technologies aimed to improve

spectrum efficiency and scale system capacity

- Softwarized RAN control that allows easier evolution through programmability and enables a wide range of use cases and novel services considered in the

context of 5G, like virtualization of the RAN and Mobile Edge Computing.

Existing SD-RAN work

- Largely conceptual (e.g. [2][3])

- No implemented solutions that researchers can use to evaluate their SD-RAN designs and to assess the benefits of new SD-RAN enabled services.

Evolution of Mobile Networks SD-RAN in 5G Networking Our contribution: FlexRAN

References FlexRAN Use Cases

FlexRAN Implementation

The poster is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Poster template by Mathieu Zen based on Felix Breuer's work

FlexRAN

Performance

FlexRAN Use Cases

Adaptable centralized scheduling in the presence of master-agent

communication latency

Lightweight and scalable operation of master controller

Sublinear signaling overhead increase for the agent-master communication

Minimal memory and CPU overhead increase at eNodeB by introduction of agent

FlexRAN Architecture

Acknowledgement

Improved interference management through coordinated scheduling of cells

Improved video bitrate adaptation over conventional streaming services

Dynamic on-demand allocation of radio resources in MVNOs

FlexRAN is the first open-source SD-RAN platform to fill this void. It's salient features are:

FlexRAN controller

Adaptive bitrate video streaming at the network edge in the context of Mobile Edge Computing

Active RAN Sharing and on-demand resource allocation among Mobile Virtual Network

Operators (MVNOs) FlexRAN agent

Improved interference management through coordinated scheduling in HetNet settings

Références

Documents relatifs

We will provide an in-depth overview of the resource allocation and BBU-RRH assignment schemes found in literature. The majority of proposed policies in the literature can

An IO could be, for example, a Venue Owner (VO) (such as mall, stadium, enterprise or municipality) or the traditional network operator; (iii) IT Equipment Vendor

We evaluate the performance of the proposed model and heuristics, showing the impact of all the considered parameters (viz. different types of traffic, tolerable latency,

Time evolution of the system state has been probabilistically described, and closed expressions have been derived for locality of content delivery, system stability and convergence

By modifying periodically bandwidth, path, and media fields in real-time according to the proposed algorithm, the MEC application can control the maximum permitted video quality,

The concept of this algorithm is simple; for each cluster C i , if either the latency or the cost of communication (i.e., exchanged data) with the ME is higher than the local

To support the large-scale, distributed, and localized nature of edge cloud a general technology and archi- tectural solution for edge clouds will thus require: (a) Control as

The solution to this challenges can be found in a novel mobile network architecture called Cloud Radio Access Network (C-RAN) that is expected to be the essential part