• Aucun résultat trouvé

R.2 – Contribution to the purposes of the Representative List

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "R.2 – Contribution to the purposes of the Representative List"

Copied!
40
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Paris, 24 February 2014 Original: English/French

CONVENTION FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE

TRANSVERSAL ISSUES ARISING IN THE EVALUATION AND EXAMINATION OF NOMINATIONS, PROPOSALS AND REQUESTS

To assist the Consultative Body, the Subsidiary Body and the Intergovernmental Committee in their work, the Secretariat prepared a document treating a number of transversal issues that have arisen over recent years in the examination of files by the Committee and in their evaluation by the Consultative Body and Subsidiary Body. This document provides an index, topic by topic, to the issues previously addressed in the reports of those two bodies and in the decisions of the Committee itself. It has been updated after the eighth session of the Committee in December 2013.

(2)

Contents

Working methods and principles for evaluation...4

Technical characteristics of nomination...9

U.1 / R.1 – Definition...13

U.2 – Viability and threats...16

R.2 – Contribution to the purposes of the Representative List...17

U.3 / R.3 – Safeguarding measures...18

U.4 / R.4 / P.5 / A.1 – Community participation and consent...23

U.5 / R.5 – Inventorying...25

Selection of Best Safeguarding Practices...27

International Assistance requests...29

Cross-border elements and multi-national nominations...31

Other topics... 33 Key documents

Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention Operational Directives for the implementation of the Convention for

the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage

Operational Directives

Decisions of the eighth session of the Committee (2013) Decisions 8.COM Decisions of the seventh session of the Committee (2012) Decisions 7.COM Decisions of the sixth session of the Committee (2011) Decisions 6.COM Decisions of the fifth session of the Committee (2010) Decisions 5.COM Decisions of the fourth session of the Committee (2009) Decisions 4.COM Report of the Consultative Body on its work in 2013 Document 8.COM 7 Examination of nominations for inscription on the List of Intangible

Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding

Document 8.COM 7.a Examination of proposals for selection to the Register of Best

Safeguarding Practices

Document 8.COM 7.b Examination of International Assistance requests Document 8.COM 7.c

(3)

Report of the Subsidiary Body on its work in 2013 and evaluation of nominations for inscription in 2013 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity

Document 8.COM 8

Report of the Consultative Body on its work in 2012 Document 7.COM 7 Examination of nominations for inscription in 2012 on the List of

Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding

Document 7.COM 8 Examination of proposals for selection in 2012 to the Register of Best

Safeguarding Practices

Document 7.COM 9 Examination of International Assistance requests greater than

US$25,000

Document 7.COM 10 Report of the Subsidiary Body on its work in 2012 and evaluation of

nominations for inscription in 2012 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity

Document 7.COM 11

Report of the Consultative Body on its work in 2011 Document 6.COM 7 Evaluation of nominations for inscription in 2011 on the List of

Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding

Document 6.COM 8 Evaluation of proposals to the 2011 Register of Best Safeguarding

Practices

Document 6.COM 9 Evaluation of International Assistance requests greater than

US$25,000

Document 6.COM 10 Report of the Subsidiary Body on its work in 2011 and evaluation of

nominations for inscription in 2011 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity

Document 6.COM 13

Evaluation of nominations for inscription in 2010 on the

Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity

Document 5.COM 6 Report of the rapporteur of the meeting of the examiners for the

Urgent Safeguarding List and the International Assistance request greater than US$25,000 (5 July 2010)

Document 5.COM INF.5

Evaluation of the nominations for inscription on the Representative List (2009)

Document 4.COM 13

Abbreviations

BSP Best Safeguarding Practices

CB Consultative Body

IA International Assistance

RL Representative List

SB Subsidiary Body

USL Urgent Safeguarding List

(4)

Working methods and principles for evaluation

Recommendations based on nomination, not the merits of the element

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 9 (RL) Operational Directives paragraph 25

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 19, 20 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 27 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 21, 22 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 17 (CB) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 20 (CB) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 55 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 12 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 28 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 17 (RL) Overall recommendation and specific feedback

in case of referral or unfavourable recommendation

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 22, 23 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 21, 28 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 18 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 16 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 52 (RL)

Evaluators’ consensus Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 16 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 14, 21 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraphs 13, 14 (CB)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 3, 5 (USL) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 3 (IA) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 14, 15 (CB)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 12, 13, 14, 15,16,17 (USL)

Evaluators’ flexibility Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 37, 42, 43

(RL)

Split decision/options Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 14 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 15, 16 (USL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 53 (RL)

(5)

Referral option Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 8 (RL) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraphs 4, 9 (RL) Operational Directives paragraphs 30, 35, 36

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 12, 14, 21, 28 (RL)

Document 7.COM 61 to 80 (RL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 23, 25, 49, 51, 54, 55, 57, 58 (RL)

Consistency with precedents established by bodies and Committee (including treatment of referred files)

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 5 (CB)

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 20 (all processes) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 7 (CB)

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 16 (RL) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraphs 5, 7, 8 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 21, 24, 28 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 22, 24, 27, 28, 43 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 23 (CB) Document 7.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP) Document 7.COM

52, 69, 71, 74 (RL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 57, 58, 59 (RL)

Nominations withdrawn and resubmitted Document 8. COM 8 paragraph 28 (RL)

Secretariat’s guidance and support (consideration by submitting States when revising the file and/or in general)

Decision 7.COM 7 paragraphs 14, 15 (CB) Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 5 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 9, 10, 24, 27 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 2 (IA) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 8, 9, 23 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 10, 23 (CB) Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 8, 21, 22, 23 (CB)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 6 (BSP) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 25 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 15 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraphs 22, 23 (RL)

Secretariat’s substantial feedback on IA requests

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 2 (IA)

Evaluators’ neutrality Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 22 (RL)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 18 (RL) Evaluators’ previous knowledge or information

about the element

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 19, 21 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 22 (RL) Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 19 (CB) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 28 (RL) Sites visits within the evaluation process Decision 4.COM 18 Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs16, 17

(USL, IA)

(6)

Quality of evaluators’ reports Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 14, 30 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 42 (RL) Imbalance among RL/USL/BSP/IA Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB)

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 4 (BSP) Decision 8.COM 7.c paragraph 3 (IA) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraph 4 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 11 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 3 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 4 (IA) Document 7.COM 9 paragraph 6 (BSP) Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 5 (BSP) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 16 (RL) Limited number of successful files Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB)

Not all criteria need be satisfied for BSP and IA; based on the satisfaction of criteria as a whole

Operational Directives paragraphs 7 (BSP), 10 and 12 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 8 (IA) Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 8, 9 (BSP) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 6 (IA) Geographic balance of nominations/

proposals/requests

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 5 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 4 (CB) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 4 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 6 (BSP), 10 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 18 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 10, 19 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 16 (CB) Document 7.COM

(RL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraphs 20, 29 (RL)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 14 (RL) Substitution of files from a submitting State

during the same cycle Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 13 (CB) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 4 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 28 (CB)

Emergency requests (examination on an accelerated basis)

Decision 8.COM 13.e Decision 5.COM 10.2

Operational Directives paragraphs 11 (IA), 32 (USL), 47 (IA), 50 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 10 (USL)

Preparatory assistance requests Decision 7.COM 7 paragraphs 14, 15 (CB)

Operational Directives paragraphs 9(d), 19, 49 (IA) Nomination to the Urgent Safeguarding List of

an element inscribed on the Representative List

Operational Directives paragraph 38 Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 29 (USL)

Periodic reporting as a follow-up tool for inscriptions

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 14 (RL) Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 22 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 54 (RL) Establishment of a national committee or ad-

hoc panel for the pre-assessment of files/ Full use of national resources

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 34, 39 (CB)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 22 (CB)

(7)

Mock nominations Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 13 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 11 (RL)

Technical characteristics of a nomination

Overall quality and completeness of information provided

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 7 (USL) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 10 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 7 (CB) Decision 7.COM 10 paragraph 6 (IA) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraphs 16, 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 4, 11 (CB) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 10 paragraph 6 (IA) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 5 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 22, 25, 48 (IA), 54

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 27, 28, 30, 33, 34 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 23 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 25 (CB) Document 7.COM 9 paragraph 15 (BSP) Document 7.COM

31 (RL)

Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 18, 20, 23 (CB)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 22, 23 (USL)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraphs 14, 15 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 23, 32, 49 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 15, 26 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 22 (RL) Argumentation/demonstration vs simple

assertions

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 30 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL)

Deterioration in the overall quality of the files Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 27, 28

(CB) Improved quality of resubmitted files (after

negative recommendation/decision)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 24, 27 (CB)

Technical completeness of file Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 7 (USL) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 17 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Operational Directives paragraphs 22, 48 (IA), 54

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 9, 10 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 8, 9 (RL) Document 7.COM

49, 51, 55, 56 (RL)

Linguistic quality Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 20 (CB) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 14 (BSP) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 26 (RL) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 24 (RL)

Technical wording vs clear explanation Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 35 (RL)

(8)

Inappropriate vocabulary and expressions not favourable to dialogue

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraphs 11, 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 11 (RL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 26, 49 (RL)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 27 (RL) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 26 (RL) Apparent lack of basic knowledge of the

Convention and its concepts

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 33 (CB) Misplaced information Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB)

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 17 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 23 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 26 (CB) Document 7.COM 9 paragraph 15 (BSP) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 9, 28, 29 (RL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 25 (RL) Coherency and consistency of information;

conflicting information

Decision 7.COM 10 paragraph 4 (IA) Decision 6.COM 10 paragraph 6 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 23, 25, 30, 31 (CB)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 27 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 13 (USL) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 32 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 28, 29 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 15, 16, 26 (USL, IA)

Repetition of texts among different files (copy- and-paste issue), ‘assembly-line’ files

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 13 (RL) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 5 (CB) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 6 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 32 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 16, 17 (CB)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 7 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 30, 43 (RL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 33 (RL) Maximum word limit and minimum

expectations

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL) Document 7.COM

(RL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 31 (RL)

Succinctness vs. unnecessary wordiness Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL)

Informative titles Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 38 (RL)

(9)

Videos and photographs Decision 7.COM 8 paragraph 5 (USL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 14 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 30 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 31 (RL) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 27, 28 (USL)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 24 (USL) Language and subtitles of videos Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL)

Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Document 7.COM

Correspondence and a coherence between the audiovisual materials and description in the nomination

Decision 7.COM 8 paragraph 4 (USL) Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 31 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 30 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 22, 31 (RL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 27, 28 (USL)

Community participation in the video and use of community narration approach vs voice-off narrator

Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 6 (USL) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 32 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 31 (RL)

Good examples of videos Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 31 (USL)

Correspondence between instructions and answers

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 30 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 25, 43 (RL)

Adoption and effectiveness of new ICH-02 form Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 25 (RL)

Document 7.COM 29, 51, 52, 55 (RL)

Combined ICH-01/ICH-04 forms Decision 8.COM 7 paragraphs 10, 11 (CB) Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 26 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 28 (USL) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 5 (IA) Model nominations Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 10 (RL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 20, 56

(RL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 71 (RL) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 42 (RL) Cultural, political and administrative

specificities vs expectation of an intergovernmental body

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 23 (USL)

(10)

U.1 / R.1 – Definition

Conformity to the definition of ICH (Article 2) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 12 (RL) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 5, 8 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 34, 35, 36 (RL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 9 (USL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraphs 19, 20 (RL)

Scope of elements: definite vs. generic Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 12 (RL) Decision 7.COM 13.b

Decision 6.COM 8 paragraphs 6, 7, 8 (USL) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 10 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 4, 5, 8 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 35 (RL) Document 7.COM 13.b

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 12 (USL) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 26 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 64-65 (RL)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 20 (RL) Diversity of the intangible cultural heritage

presented in nominations

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 7 (RL) Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 19 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 27 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 18 (RL)

Description of the element in its complexity Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 4 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 50 (RL) Similar elements by a single State Party Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 8 (USL)

Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 6 (RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 26 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 61-63, 65 (RL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 40 (RL) Social functions and cultural significance at

present vs historical perspective

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 6 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 34, 35, 53 (RL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 11, 12 (USL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 17, 23 (USL)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 18 (BSP) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 34 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 20 (RL)

(11)

Clear identification of communities / method used for identification or selection

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 6 (BSP) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 36 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 30 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 21 (USL) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 22 (IA) Document 7.COM

(RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 32 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 69, 70 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 22, 23 (USL, IA)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 20 (RL)

Community heterogeneity Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 37 (CB)

Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 29, 30 (CB)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 70 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 20 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 35 (RL) Static/inappropriate conception of the element

(notion of ‘authenticity’)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 4, 5, 8 (USL)

Document 8. COM 8 paragraph 35 (RL) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 11 (USL) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 23 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 27 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 18 (USL, IA)

Technical description vs. social meaning Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 6 (USL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 12 (USL) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 35 Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 38 (RL)

(12)

Commercialization and over- commercialization, industrialization

Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 6 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 102 (e), 104, 107 (m), 116, 117

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 36, 40 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 38, 51, 53 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 38 (CB) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 18 (BSP) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 42, 67 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 20 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 37 (RL) Communities as primary beneficiaries of

inscriptions and subsequent benefits

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 4 (BSP) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 7 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 36 (CB) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 38 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 26 (USL) Modernization, professionalization and

institutionalization Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 68 (RL) Folklorization, festivalization, de-

contextualization, theatricalization

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 40 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 53 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 21 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 37 (RL) Religious practices (canonical/orthodox vs.

popular)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 36 (RL)

Foodways and intangible cultural heritage Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 51 (RL)

Organized sports and intangible cultural heritage

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 34 (RL) Compatibility with existing international human

rights instruments or with the requirement of mutual respect among communities or with sustainable development

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 11 (RL) Document 7.COM

Interaction between ICH and tangible heritage associated with it

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 8 (RL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 55 (RL) Document 7.COM

Link between criterion R.1 and criterion R.2 and between U.1 and U.2

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 8 (USL) Document 8. COM 8 paragraph 36 (RL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 37 (RL) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 32 (RL) Revitalization of an element no longer

practised

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 7 (USL)

(13)

U.2 – Viability and threats

Different purposes of the Representative List and the Urgent Safeguarding List (appropriate lists)

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 9 (RL) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 12 (RL)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 18 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 39, 40 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 26 (USL, RL)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 16 (RL) Contribution to the viability of the intangible

cultural heritage

Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 7 (USL) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 11 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 7 (P.4) (BSP), 27 (USL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 32 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 9 (USL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 17 (CB) Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 10, 24 (IA)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 31 (USL) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 13 (BSP) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 13 (IA) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 19 (USL, IA)

Globalization as a threat Operational Directives paragraph 27 (USL) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 13 (USL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 19 (USL, IA)

Threat to viability Operational Directives paragraph 27 (USL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 35 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 13, 15 (USL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 19 (USL, IA)

Demonstrate need of safeguarding in the nomination

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 9, 10 (USL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 13, 14 (USL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 10 (USL, IA)

Link between U.2 and U.3 Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 8, 9

(USL)

Consistency between R.2 and R.3 Document 8. COM 8 paragraph 38 (RL)

(14)

R.2 – Contribution to the purposes of the Representative List

Enhanced visibility of the element vs.

enhanced visibility of ICH in general

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 13 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 14 (RL) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraphs 14, 15 (RL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 37 (RL) Document 7.COM

(RL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 40, 62, 63 (RL)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 21 (RL) References to war and conflict / provocative

language vs. mutual respect / encouraging dialogue among communities

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraphs 11, 13 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB)

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraphs 10, 12 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 9 (RL) Operational Directives paragraph 107 (a)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 29 (CB) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 16 (IA) Document 7.COM

(RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 25 (USL) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 39 (RL)

Awareness raising on diversity of ICH and its expressions

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraphs 7, 13 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 5 (RL)

Document 7.COM

Participation of communities in the promotion of the visibility of ICH and awareness of its significance

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 15 (RL)

U.3 / R.3 – Safeguarding measures

Feasibility / credibility of safeguarding measures / plan

Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 8 (USL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 10 (CB) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 15 (RL) Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 9 (USL) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP) Operational Directives paragraph 27 (USL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 26 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 38 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraphs 21, 22 (CB)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 15, 17, 18, 19 (USL)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 13, 14, 28 (IA)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 23 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 27, 29 (USL)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraphs 11, 12 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 41, 43 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 10, 26 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 33 (RL)

(15)

Coherency between objectives, results, activities, work-plans and overall cost in safeguarding plans

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 12 (USL)

Safeguarding all the components of an element vs only certain aspects of it

Document 8. COM 8 paragraph 38 (RL) Timeframe and budget Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 10 (CB)

Decision 7.COM 10 paragraphs 4, 5 (IA) Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 9 (USL) Decision 6.COM 10 paragraph 6 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 34 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 3 (IA) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 36 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 17 (USL) Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 (IA)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 27, 29. 30 (USL)

Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 10 (IA) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 26 (USL, IA)

Different purposes of the Urgent Safeguarding List and International Assistance

Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 11 (CB) Decision 7.COM 8 paragraph 3 (USL) Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 10 (USL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 25, 26 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 28 (USL) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 5 (IA) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 19, 20 (USL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 30 (USL) Safeguarding plan (USL) vs. safeguarding

measures (RL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 38 (RL) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 27 (USL) Measures against negative consequences of

inscription / selection

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 14 (RL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 38, 52 (RL)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 18 (BSP) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 42 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 21 (USL, IA)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 21 (RL) Justification and description of safeguarding

measures and methodologies

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 12 (USL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 37 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 17 (USL)

(16)

Participation of communities in safeguarding measures (both planning and implementing)

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraphs 7, 8 (CB) Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 5 (USL) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 15 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 12 (CB) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 6 (RL) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7c (BSP) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 14 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 38 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 16, 18, 19, 33 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 39, 50, 54 (RL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 22 (USL) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 21 (IA) Document 7.COM

60 (RL)

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 26, 27 (USL, IA)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 28, 31 (USL)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 17 (BSP) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 16 (IA) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 69 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 23 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 33 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 21 (RL) Remuneration to tradition-bearers as

safeguarding measure

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 36 (CB)

Transmission Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB)

Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 7 (USL) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP) Operational Directives paragraph 107

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 40 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 14 (USL) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 10, 14 (USL)

Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 30, 31 (CB)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 28 (USL) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 13 (IA) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 68 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 19, 21 (USL, IA)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraphs 20, 22 (RL)

Audience creation and sustainability (i.e.

demand-driven transmission)

Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB) Decision 6.COM 10 paragraph 5 (IA)

Operational Directives paragraphs 102, 117

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 30 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 28 (USL) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 16 (IA) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 20 (USL, IA)

(17)

Analysis of larger context (social, cultural, political) when elaborating safeguarding measures

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 40 (CB) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 31 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 11, 15 (USL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 20 (USL, IA)

Engagement of the State Party to ensure the safeguarding of the element

Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 15 (RL) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 8 (BSP) Operational Directives paragraph 105

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 38 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 16, 17 (USL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 22 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 14, 16 (USL)

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 33 (USL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 19 (USL, IA)

Commitment vs omnipresence of the State

Party and impact on sustainability Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 38 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 16, 17 (USL)

Periodic reporting as tool for following-up the safeguarding measures and demonstrating community participation

Decision 8.COM 6.a paragraphs 13, 14 Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 14 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 22 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 54 (RL) Transversal nature of safeguarding measures:

integration of several sectors, actors, associations, authorities, national and international networks

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 39 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 38, 50 (RL)

Coherence/link between R.3/U.3 and R.4/U.4 Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 12, 18

(USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 39 (RL) Adoption of long term perspective in the

safeguarding measures

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 16 (USL)

Coercive safeguarding measures Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 15 (USL)

Non-transferability of safeguarding measures, specific measures in response to specific threats

Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 8 (USL) Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 32 (CB)

(18)

U.4 / R.4 / P.5 / A.1 – Community participation and consent

Community participation in nomination process / programme implementation / preparation of the request

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 7 (CB) Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 5 (USL) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 15 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 12 (CB) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 6 (RL) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 14 (RL) Operational Directives paragraph 23

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 36, 37 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 19, 23, 33 (USL)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 8 (BSP) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 39, 40, 41, 50 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraphs 31, 32, 33 (CB)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 21, 22 (USL)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 21, 31 (IA)

Document 7.COM 60 (RL)

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 26, 27 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 20, 31 (USL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 44, 69 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 10, 27 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraphs 34, 35 (RL)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 22 (RL) Participation of communities outside submitting

State

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 26 (USL) Role of NGOs, experts and other stakeholders Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB)

Operational Directives paragraphs 80, 83, 86, 87, 88, 90

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 50 (RL) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 22 (USL) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 17 (BSP) Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 27 (CB) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 18 (USL, IA)

Participation of intermediary stakeholders or institutions vs direct link with communities

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 23, 24 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 40, 50 (RL)

Identification of appropriate signatory of community consent

Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 44 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 24 (USL, IA)

(19)

Evidence of community consent Decision 8.COM 8 paragraphs 15, 16 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 20, 21 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 41 (RL) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 28 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 22, 24, 32 (USL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 44 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs 23, 24 (USL, IA)

Translations of consent documents Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 46 (RL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 44 (RL) Standardized community consent vs different

forms of consent (audio-visual, symbolic objects, etc.)

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 16 (RL) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 20, 22 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 41 (RL) Document 7.COM

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 24 (USL, IA)

Retroactive consent/signatures Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 23 (USL)

Document 7.COM Respect of customary practices and informed

consent of communities

Operational Directives paragraphs 85, 101, 102 (d) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 28 (CB) Explanation of the context of community

consent

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 21 (USL)

Purpose of the consent clearly specified Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 21 (USL)

Clear definition of the communities and its contours

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 37 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 8 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 50 (RL) Essentialization/monolithic conception of

community

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 37 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 31 (USL) Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 29 (CB) Divided perspectives of the community on the

nomination of an element

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 22 (USL)

(20)

U.5 / R.5 – Inventorying

Conformity with Article 11 (i.e. community and NGO involvement)

Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 7 (USL) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraphs 15, 17 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraphs 6, 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 14 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 8, 19 (USL)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 42 (RL) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 24 (USL) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 31 (IA) Document 7.COM

(RL)

Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 45-49 (RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 21,32 (USL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 36 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraphs 22, 23 (RL)

Conformity with Article 12 (i.e. updating) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 17 (RL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL) Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraph 6 (CB)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 42 (RL) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 21 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 45-49 (RL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 36 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 23 (RL) Evidence of inclusion Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 7 (USL)

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 17 (RL) Decision 7.COM 8 paragraph 6 (USL) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 18 (RL)

Decision 7.COM 20.2 paragraphs 5 (RL), 6 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 31 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 42, 43 (RL)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 24 (USL) Document 7.COM

54, 55, 56 (RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 21 (USL) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 46, 48 (RL)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 36 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 23 (RL) Extract of the inventory translated into English

or French

Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 7 (USL) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 17 (RL)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 25 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 46 (RL) Internet reference to the inventory not

operational

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 25 (USL) Inclusion of element vs. inclusion of people in

the inventory

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 36 (RL) Inventory of ICH components vs. inventory of

objects, physical spaces

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 44 (RL)

(21)

Inventory still in progress Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 36 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 23 (RL) System and quality of inventory / avoid simply

listing

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 25 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 45 (RL) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 25 (USL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraphs 30, 46, 48 (RL)

Diversity in inventory formats Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 44, 45

(RL) Correspondence between inventory and

nomination form

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 31 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 44, 47 (RL)

Selection of Best Safeguarding Practices

Select projects that best satisfy criteria Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP)

Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 7, 8, 14 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraphs 12-14 (BSP)

Obligatory character of some criteria Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP)

Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 9, 11 (BSP)

New criteria for BSP needed and form to be updated

Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 13, 14, 15 (BSP)

Safeguarding methodologies / approaches, not the related element

Decision 7.COM 9 paragraph 4 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 16 (BSP)

Programmes linked with needs of sustainable development

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 7 (BSP) Encouraging research and evaluation of the

effectiveness of safeguarding measures

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 8 (BSP) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraphs 4, 6 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 9 (BSP) Operational Directives paragraph 45 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 11 (BSP)

Importance of external evaluation and independent assessment

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 8 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraphs 8, 9 (BSP)

Exemplarity of the safeguarding methodologies (BSP)

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 6 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7 (BSP)

Operational Directives paragraphs 3 (BSP), 46, 106 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 11 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraphs 12,16 (BSP)

Replicable safeguarding measures Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 6 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 10 (BSP)

(22)

Inclusive approach vs. top-down model, when designing safeguarding programmes

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 7 (CB) Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 11 (BSP)

P.1 – Safeguarding and viability at the heart of the programme

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 6 (BSP) P.2 – Existing international cooperation Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 8 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 7 (BSP) Document 7.COM 9 paragraph 11 (BSP) Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 13 (CB) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 25 (BSP) P.2– Quality and effectiveness of cross-border

coordination

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 7 (BSP) P.3 – Safeguarding measures in relation with

communities in line with principles of the Convention

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraphs 7, 11 (BSP)

P.4 – Maturity of programme, project or activity before proposing

Decision 6.COM 9 paragraphs 7a, b (BSP) Operational Directives paragraph 5 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 8 (BSP) Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 11, 14 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraphs 13, 15 (BSP)

P.5 – Participation and clear identification of the community

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 4 (BSP) Document 8.COM 7.b paragraphs 6, 8, 11 (BSP)

P.6 – Adaptability as a safeguarding model Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 6 (BSP) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraph 5 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 9 (BSP) Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 9, 14 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 16 (BSP) P.8 – Assessable results with clear criteria

needed

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 5 (BSP) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraph 4 (BSP)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 9 (BSP) Document 7.COM 9 paragraph 11 (BSP) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 15 (BSP) P.9 – Programmes, projects or activities

primarily applicable to the needs of developing countries

Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 6 (BSP) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraph 5 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraph 7a (BSP) Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 4 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 6, 7 (P.9) (BSP), 10 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraphs 4, 10, 11 (BSP)

Document 7.COM 9 paragraphs 7, 10 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 13 (BSP)

(23)

International Assistance requests

Coherency and consistency among the activities, timetable and costs

Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 10 (CB) Decision 7.COM 10 paragraphs 4, 5 (IA)

Document 8.COM 7.c paragraphs 3, 9 (IA) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 36 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 17, 18 (USL)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 13, 25 (IA)

Document 6.COM 10 paragraphs 14,15 (IA)

Connection between analysis/justification, objectives, expected results and activities

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 36 (CB) Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 17 (USL) Distinction between longer-term objectives and

shorter- term results Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 9 (IA)

Conceptual and technical deficiencies in the request

Decision 8.COM 7.c paragraph 4 (IA) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 6 (IA) Sustainability of the project (A.4) and

connection with feasibility requirements (A.3)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 17, 18, 19, 20, 29 (IA)

Impact of capacity-building on communities vs on implementing agencies (A.6)

Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 10 (IA) Description of State’s expected in-kind services

and support

Decision 7.COM 10 paragraph 5 (IA)

Operational Directives paragraphs 8 (IA), 12 (A.5) (IA)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 27 (IA) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 15 (IA) Financial compensation for community

members within IARs

Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 23 (IA) Confusion between ICH Fund and International

Fund for Cultural Diversity

Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 11 (IA) IARs for inventory making Operational Directives paragraph 9(b) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 5 (IA)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraphs 30, 31, 32 (IA)

International assistance request independent of inscription of an element on the Lists

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 28, 29 (USL)

Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 5 (IA) Contractual relationship between UNESCO

and the implementing organization

Decision 8.COM 7.c paragraph 4 (IA) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 3 (IA) Provision of expertise to prepare assistance

requests

Decision 8.COM 7.c paragraph 5 (IA) Document 8.COM 7.c paragraph 6 (IA)

(24)

Cross-border elements and multi-national nominations

Promotion of international cooperation and mutual assistance

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 6 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 15 (CB) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraph 6 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 6 (CB) Decision 6.COM 9 paragraphs 8, 9 (BSP) Decision 6.COM 17 paragraphs 3-7 Decision 5.COM 6 paragraphs 8, 9 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 4, 6, 7 (P.2) (BSP), 86, 87, 88

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 29 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 29 (CB) Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 24, 25 (CB)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 25, 26, 33 (USL)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 13 (BSP) Document 6.COM 17 paragraphs 1-3 Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 25 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 42 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 15 (RL) Multi-national nominations Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 6 (RL)

Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 6 (USL, BSP, IA) Decision 6.COM 8 paragraph 11 (USL)

Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 13 (RL) Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 8 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 13, 14, 15, 16

Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 10, 29 (RL)

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 24 (CB) Document 6.COM 13 paragraphs 61, 66 (RL)

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 25 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 41 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 15 (RL) Nominations on an extended basis of an

element already inscribed

Operational Directives paragraph 14 Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 30 (RL) Document 7.COM

81 to 89 (RL) Nomination of similar elements from different

States

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 26 (USL) Document 6.COM 17 paragraph 3 Acknowledge existence of similar element

outside territories without characterizing safeguarding efforts of another State

Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraph 12 (RL)

Decision 6.COM 7 paragraphs 6, 7 (USL, BSP, IA) Decision 6.COM 13 paragraph 11 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraph 87

Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 29 (CB) Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 25 (USL)

Balance in the information provided among different countries

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 29 (RL) Coordination mechanisms / sharing of good

experiences

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 6 (RL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 29, 30, 47 (RL)

Inventories in multi-national nominations Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 29, 47

(RL)

(25)

Other topics

Central role of communities in the whole process

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 7 (CB) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraph 12 (CB) Decision 7.COM 11 paragraphs 6, 7 (RL) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB)

Decision 6.COM 13 paragraphs 14, 15 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 23, 79, 80, 102 (b)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 36, 37, 38, 40 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.a paragraphs 19, 33 (USL)

Document 8.COM 7.b paragraph 11 (BSP) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 39, 50 (RL)

Document 7.COM 7 paragraphs 31, 32, 33 (CB)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 22, 29 (USL)

Document 7.COM 60 (RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraphs 20, 32 (USL)

Document 6.COM 9 paragraphs 17, 19 (BSP)

Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 16 (IA) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 69 (RL) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraphs10, 15, 18, 19, 23 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 34 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraphs 20, 22 (RL)

Limited commitment of States vs. community aspirations

Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 13 (USL, IA)

Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 24 (RL)

Economic vs community-oriented nominations Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 36 (CB)

Non-cultural purposes of the nomination Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 49 (RL)

Nomination/proposal/request as a mid-point within a long process of safeguarding

Document 7.COM 7 paragraphs 19, 20 (CB)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraphs 14, 15 (USL)

Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 15 (IA)

Gender Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 8 (RL)

Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB) Operational Directives paragraph 102 (c)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 37 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 55 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 30 (CB) Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 29 (CB)

(26)

Sustainable development: conflict resolution, peace building, environmental sustainability, sustainable tourism and enhancement of local economies

Decision 8.COM 7.a paragraph 4 (USL) Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 7 (BSP) Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 8 (RL) Decision 7.COM 7 paragraphs 5, 6 (CB) Decision 7.COM 10 paragraph 3 (IA) Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 10 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 17 (CB) Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 26 (USL) Document 8. COM 7.b paragraph 11 (BSP) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 56 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraphs 15, 38 (CB)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 26 (USL) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 12 (IA) Document 7.COM

Document 6.COM 7 paragraph 31 (CB) Document 6.COM 9 paragraph 19 (BSP) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 17 (IA) Document 6.COM 13 paragraph 42 (RL) Involvement of sustainable development

experts in work related to ICH

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Youth and children Decision 6.COM 7 paragraph 9 (CB) Decision 6.COM 10 paragraph 5 (IA)

Document 7.COM 8 paragraph 10 (USL) Document 6.COM 7 paragraphs 30, 31 (CB)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 28 (USL) Document 6.COM 10 paragraph 13 (IA) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 19 (USL, IA)

Capacity building Decision 8.COM 7 paragraphs 9, 10 (CB) Decision 8.COM 7.b paragraph 4 (BSP) Decision 8.COM 7.c paragraph 4 (IA)

Decision 7.COM 7 paragraphs 4, 14, 15 (CB) Decision 7.COM 9 paragraphs 7, 8 (BSP) Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 4 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraph 12 (A.6) (IA), 82

Document 8.COM 7 paragraphs 13, 35 (CB)

Document 8.COM 7.c paragraphs 6, 10 (IA)

Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 32 (RL) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 16 (CB) Document 7.COM 10 paragraph 24 (IA) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 27 (USL, IA)

Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 21 (RL) Document 4.COM 13 paragraph 24 (RL) Use of Convention’s emblem Decision 5.COM 6 paragraph 6 (RL)

Operational Directives paragraphs 122, chapter IV.2 (paragraphs 124 to 150)

Indigenous and minority peoples Operational Directives paragraph 102 (c) Document 7.COM 7 paragraph 30 (CB) Document 5.COM INF.5 paragraph 20 (USL, IA)

(27)

Promotion of tourism in the nomination and the video

Operational Directives paragraphs 102 (e), 117 Document 8.COM 7.a paragraph 32 (USL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraphs 31, 52 (RL)

Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 24 (USL) Document 5.COM 6 paragraph 37 (RL) Intellectual property Operational Directives paragraph 104 Document 6.COM 8 paragraph 24 (USL) Link between 2003 and 1972 Conventions,

intangible and tangible heritage

Decision 8.COM 8 paragraph 8 (RL) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 55 (RL) Link of intangible cultural heritage with spaces,

places and handicrafts

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 41 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 55 (RL) Confusion between 2003 and 2005

Conventions

Document 8.COM 7 paragraph 33 (CB)

Serial national nominations Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 20 (RL)

Involvement of multiple actors in the nominations, not limited to culture sector

Decision 8.COM 7 paragraph 8 (CB) Document 8.COM 8 paragraph 50 (RL)

Références

Documents relatifs

R.3: The viability of the element has been ensured by coordinated efforts by the communities and institutions concerned, in both the past and present.

968. The Secretary remarked on the fact that the IOS evaluation had noted the lack of guidance in the Operational Directives on how intangible cultural heritage was expected to

States Parties are encouraged to jointly submit multi-national nominations to the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding and the Representative

832. The delegation of Belgium remarked that although the Committee contained 24 members, the fact that six of its members made up the Subsidiary Body posed a problem of credibility

Decides that, from the information provided in nomination file 00753, Earthenware pottery- making skills in Botswana’s Kgatleng District satisfies the criteria for inscription on

4. By submission, dated 2 September 1992, the State party concedes that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies. The State party, however, argues that the

since the judges were not familiar with his case, he alleges that the Public Prosecutor was in a position to influence their decision. He further submits that compensation

By its decision of 17 March 1983 the Working Group of the Human Rights Committee transmitted the communication under rule 91 of the provisional rules of procedure to the State