• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rain leakage of residential windows in the lower mainland of British Columbia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Rain leakage of residential windows in the lower mainland of British Columbia"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: Building Practice Note, 1984-11-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20331680

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Rain leakage of residential windows in the lower mainland of British

Columbia

Blackall, T. N.; Baker, M. C.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=9bf99c3a-11ab-42d9-8aaf-5f67e0cee077 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=9bf99c3a-11ab-42d9-8aaf-5f67e0cee077

(2)

ZSSN

0701-5232

BU

p~

A , T I

I

LDI

NG

CE!~:.

;:I.,.

i::

:

.-.

..

.-7 t.' .,

-. ?-

. .-.. ,..

MIPI LEAKAGE OF ~ ~ I D E N T I A L GILNDOWS

IN

THE

LOWER MAINLAND OF BRITISH COLUMBIA by

T h N - B l a c k 1 1 and H,C. Baker

Division of Building; Research, Natfmal Research Councfl of Canada

(3)

RAIN LElKAGL OF RRSIDENTZAL WINDOWS IN THE LOWER MAINLAMI

OF BRITISH

COLUMBIA

T.N. Blackall and M.C. Baker

Many inquiries concerning rain penetration

of

exterior walls are

received by the B.C. Regional Station of the D i v i s l o a of Building Research, Natfonal Research Council of Canada. Much of the damage that has been

investigated consisted of staining and deterioration of interior f i n i s h e s of

the walls around windows. In severe cases wetting of carpets and f l o o r s

n e a r windows was also encountered. This report d i s c u s s e s wood windm frames

in relation to the principles of water penetration, and the watershedding

function of f l a s h i n g s , sheathing paper and window details. It a l s o

discusses flange-mounted metal windows

and

their installation d e t a i l s , particularly in regard t o the a p p l i c a t i o n o f sheathing paper around window

openings

.

Causes

of

Rain leakage

Rain leakage occurs as a result of three factors: water on a wall, paths for the water to penetrate the wall surface and forces t o drive water inward. These three factors are described below.

Presence of water on a wall surface

It

i s almost certain that at some time there w f l l be water on a w a l l surface. E a r l i e r houses had large roof overhangs that p r o t e c t e d the walls

from wetting, except when rain w a s accompanied by high winds, At wind

s p e e d s o f less than 20 km/h, rain will d r i p almost v e r t i c a l l y f r o m the edge

of an overhang i f a reasonable drip edge is provided. Much current

r e s i d e n t i a l construction -Lo the lower mainland of British Columbia, however,

is characterized by a lack of roof overhangs or projections above openings.

Flashings that are designed to a c t as a d r i p edge can be ineffective when

they are cut back flush t o or behind the aurface. (This is frequently done

t o make them Inconspicuous.) Hater migrating dorm a wall surface can be

d r i v e n across a building face by the wind to Concentrate at vertical obstructions such as projecting window jambs. T h i s

is

usually evident by the stlaining that: appears below the bottom mrners of windows, although part of t h i s may be due to rain runoff f r o m s i l l s that s l o p e to one corner.

Water l e a k a ~ e naehs

There will alrmst always be paths far water to penetrate at the j o i n t s

around window and door openings, unless great care is taken in desfgn and

canstruction. The junction between the tough framing of a window opening

and the window frame, and between the frame and the exterior wall f i n i s h is

seldom sealed completely, Even when achieved i n i t t a l l y , water tightness and

(4)

SILL

FIGURE 1 DETAIL OF EARLIER W5OD UfHDOY

In an attempt to s i m p l i f y details and produce lees expensive windows,

designers and manufacturers sometimes ignore design details that e v o l v e d

over hundreds of years of building practice. An earlier wood window design

shown in Figure 1 shows a d r i p cap and flashing ar the head af the window,

properly sloped t o control water. The

sill

is steeply s l o p e d to drain water

away.

In

addition, t h i s design has a barrier to rain penetration behind the bottom of the sash, a groove t o stop water flowing back under the ~ $ 1 1 , and a notch in the sill a t

the wall

to deter water from entering under the s i l l .

Experience ghowed this, d o n g w i t h the window head, to be an area wlth a

hFgh irtsk a£ water entry. At the window head wood drip cap fs uaed in a d d f t i o n t o the flashing. Although the p o s s i b i l i t y of leakage at the jamb

f a n o t as great as at the head or s i l l , in some older window d e s i g n s the

safeguards again@ t water penetration at the jamb

were

also quite carefully detailed.

(5)

FIGURE 2

REHIT HOD unm DTQ16flS t P AMTI C

palms FOR

SATE#

~ W T R V

The wood windows of a recently b u i l t project are shown in Figure 2.

The design details a t Ehe sf 11, head and jambs have been greatly simplif led.

The s i l l has a small slope only on the top surface. There is a shallow groove to d e t e r the f l o w along the underside of the

sill,

but it obviously

would not be as effective as the sloped underside in Figure 1. Also, t h l s design has no deterrent against

rain

entry at the

wall,

so that water

flowing along the underside of the sill can penetrate the wall or the

b u i l d i n g . Caulking between the sill and exterior cladding edght: be

effective f o r a short ti=, but with a proper design the d e t a i l should work

even w i t h o u t caulking. The flashing a t the head of this window was not

s l o p e d t o the exterior when i n s t a l l e d , and it was cue back so close t o the

castng that water could run mder it and behind the casing.

Any

building

movement causing wracking farces on the casings will also quite l i k e l y o p e n up water paths- Effective caulk5ng at the j a m b is d i f f i c u l t and water can easily penetrate behind

zhe

casing. Simplifying joinery d e t a i l s by using

only b u t t e d joints allows easy water penetration from outsfde to i n s i d e and also creates atr leakage paths f a r heat l o s s .

(6)

HEhD

T -

E a r l i e r metal window frames were often simplified even more than wood

frames in the interest of producing a stngle extrusion f o r head, jamb and s i l l members. A flange as part af the extrusion simplifies the installation and attachment in the opening. The early version shown in Figure 3 is

t y p i c a l of the designs used for metal window frames in this area. For

reasons of economy the exposed edges of che frame are almost flush with the

exterlor finish. The edge of the s i l l does not extend f a r enough to a l l o w

water to d r i p ~ l e a r of the j o i n t

and

the wall. This creates a potential for

leakage behind the exterior finish, as there is usually a crack between the f l n i e h and

the Erame.

The

s i t u a t i o n a t the jambs and head

is

similar and the potential for problems at the head may even be greater than at the sill, particularly if flashing is not used.

The s e c t i o n of a mte modern frame, also shawn in Figure 3, illustrates advances in desLgn over earlier types. Even this d e s i g n , however, has

potential for leakage if improperly installed. Drain holes ar.e provided in

t h e up-turned l i p of the s i l l , but the sill itgel£ w i l l nut d i r e c t water away

from the jofnt at the exterior w a l l f iniah. The large upstanding lfp at the

head d e t a i l w i l l create a water t r a p if the flashing is inadequate, or if no flashing is used,

(7)

Forces that drive water inwards

The forces that cause water penetration at openings are the k f n e t i c

energy of the rain

as

it is driven by wind, the difference in a i r pressure

across the ppening from outside to inside,, and-gravity and capillary forces

a c t i n g on water bridging ari opening. Sf ace these forces a t e normally always present: together, wakr penetration w l 1 1 almost certainly take place If

there are a l s o leakage paths.

Sheathing p a F r

Sheathing paper is used on the

walls

of

fram

buildings t o prevent a i r leakage from wind, and as a water barrier behind the exterior cladding, A

frame butlding is generally considered secure from the weather when the roof, doors and windows are i n place, and the sheathing paper is installed.

Unless the sheathing paper is damaged from d n d or construction operations

it does provide good short-term protection even without the e x t e r h r wall finish. Tt is usually i n s t a l l e d h o r i e w t a l l y starting from the bottom of

t h e w a l l , and is lapped

fn

s h i n g l ~ f a s h i a n to shed water, Vertical

applications may also be used

in

some cases. Sheathing paper is intended to

restrict water penetration to t h e exterior cladding and carry the leakage

harmlessly to the outside. If improperly fnstalled, however, it may a c t u a l l y encourage water to penetrate the

wall,

even through t o interior

surfaces.

A t one time, it was required that sheathing paper be wrapped back (or

returned) around the rough f r a d n g of window

and

door openings. This made

I t necessary to apply the sheathing paper before installing the windows,

T h i s

is most desirable if a complete air barrier is t o be achieved, but it is a l s o necessary to assure that, when the w i n d o w is installed, the head

f

lashing goes up behind the sheathing paper t o achieve proper shedding o f

any water that penetrates the exterior f i n i s h abbve the wlndow, T h i s does not u s u a l l y pose a problem for wood windows, b u t m ~ y be a problem f.or flange-mounted metal uindaws.

Metal windows generally have a ~ontinuous flange all around with close f i t t i n g mitered corners that are not sealed or welded. When the window fs p o s i t i o n e d in the opening I t i s fastened by nails or screws through the flanges and sheathing to the rough frame (Figure 4 ) . Some manufacturers recommend t h a t n a i l s n o t penetrate the flanges but be driven at the outer

edge and then bent back over the flange. This is t o minimize stress

transfer t o the window in case of structural movement of the building frame. For water control the sheathing paper needs t o overlap the flange at the head and jambs,

but

the flange must overlap the paper at the sill,

If

the

sheathing paper is applied before the windows are installed t h i s will not

ficcur (Figure ha). Most often in current practice the windows ate i n s t a l l e d

before t l r e sheathing paper is applied (Figure

4b)

and t h i s will not p r e v e n t

(8)

A method for ouercoming

this

problem is

suggested

in Figure 5. The sheathing paper

is

applied after windows have been XataLled, but a separate

piece of sheathing paper or

other watershedding

membrane

is

applied over the

s i l l of the rough open&% before the i e s t a l l a t i ~ r u of the window (Figure 5 ~ ) .

The window f

tame is

see over

this -bra#

f

Figure

5%),

and when the

sheathing paper is applied it

can

k

tucked

under the sill protection and carried up over

the

jamb

flmge

(Figure 5 c ) , A spot a€

caullcing

at the intersectton of the membranes at the flange w i l l m&u-t*e a seal, The s i l l

membrane

mar

be temporarily fastened during

c a n s ~ r y c t i ~

to prevent it from

b e i n g

torn

away

or

damaged by Mad.

Some wlrrdow manuf actufers

have

recojphed this problem, and attach a

bullt-in membrane

flashing

ru the

window

gram,

Ia

this case the membrane

Elashtng should be under t h e sheathing paper at the head and jambs

of

the

window, and b v e r the shearhgng papar a k ttre sill.

F laehing

Flashing is required at the heads of a l l openings, unless the roof overhang projects from the

wall

to a distance equal to at least four times

the distance between t h e fascia and the t o p of the window t r i m . The Flashing must extend n o t less than 50 mi behind t h e building paper. When

the building paper is i n s t a l l e d after the window and flashing are in p l a c e

t h i s would be the n o m l result, but if t h e building paper is i n s t a l l e d

before the windows and flashing it would be necessary to s l i t the paper in order t o slide the f l a s h i n g behind It.

(9)

FIWRE 5

SIl66ESTEl METHOD PA Y E I I I R G WdTER ENTRY A 1 ~ + f s l L E

In the case of flanged metal wledcw~, flashing is not used over the

tops of openings when the flanges

are

imbedded in caulking, and screwed to

the wall

ta

form a waterproof joint. If this

is

done for the frames shown

in F i g u r e 3 , the top of the frames

wfll

collect water flowing d o n the wall* The water will then

flow

t o the jambs and could penetrate at a lower l e v e l , For t h e cype of frames shown, which are common i n t h i s area, t h i s is not

good practice. The flange should extend up under the sheathing paper, since t h e Lap of the frame acts as a flashing,

but it

is preferable t o use proper flashing at: the window head even when the flanges

are

caulked and screwed to the wall-

Caulking

Gaulking is normally provlded between masonry, eiding or stucco and the a d j a c e n t door and window frames or trim, including s i l l s unless these

locations are completely protected from the entry of rain, Caulking has l i m i t e d life, however, especially

when

exposed t o weather. Harrow spaces are hard to caulk effectively and do nut perform well. Therefore, it may

n o t always be very effective in preventing water penetration for a long

(10)

Manufacturers usually recummend, for flangelnounted metal windows, that

a bead of caulking b e placed on the underside of the flanges prior t o

mounting. The caulking is not always used in practice, because of

insulation d i f f i c u l t i e s . The window frame usually f i t s loosely in the rough

opening, and has to be held in place against the sheathing and then slid

around u n t i l properly located- This actfan will frequently d i s p l a c e the

bead of caulking.

The

practice of caulking, however, should be encouraged,

to provide a proper s e a l between the flange and the sheathing.

As already indteated in the dismasion an flaching, metal frames with

flanges are sonetimes considered to be

self-flashing

at the head despite the turned-up exterior edge. They have to be set: in caulking as noted, but it

may b e very difficult with some frames t n achfeve a good watertight or watershedding d e t a i l . If it is not achieved, water penetration is

i n e v i t a b l e .

Mast windows seem to function satisfactorily when they are protected by eaves or other overhangs,

or

are in sheltered locations. Wlndcrws w i t h

current d e t a i l s w i l l have leakage

problems

when they are exposed to wind and r a i n , u n l e s s a good d e a l

of

care

is

taken in relation t o rain control and airtightness. Where rain penetration does take place there is u s u a l l y

s t a i n i n g and deterioration of interfur w a l l finishes around windows, p e e l i n g

of paint, staining of drapes, and in the worst cases, wetting of floor

finishes and growth of mold on walls, This also occurs in other parts of Canada and I s a130 telated to the window d e t a i l s (BRN

NQ.

210).

S m a l l amounts of rain leakage may be tolerated without any serious deteri-oration taking place

if

there is

ad:

opportunity for drying between the. periodic wettfng. The potential for drying may be reduced

in

highly

i n s u l a t e d energy-efficient walls,

arid this in

fact could produce an additional risk of rain penetration. S o m e forms of insulation may be wetted, and t h i s could l e a d to wood rot in the walls.

Ir

is d e s i r a b l e to maintain good p r i a c l p l e s of water c o n t r o l around windows to achieve long service life, The watershedding function of

building paper and flashings must be Insured.

CaulkXng

may also be

e s s e n t i a l t o eliminate problems. Whaa problems do occur they are usually

Figure

FIGURE  1  DETAIL  OF  EARLIER  W5OD  UfHDOY

Références

Documents relatifs

Keywords: Purple loosestrife; Lythrum salicaria; Galerucella calmariensis; Control agent establishment; Insect outbreak; Predation; Plant quality; Tidal disturbance;

cependant utiliser la terminologie existante (voir par exemple [ScS00]) de suite d’interpolation faible dans X, ce qu’on notera Λ ∈ Int w (X). On vient d’expliquer que la

Figure 10. a) Looking south at section 1 of the Besa River Forma- tion showing the lowermost 15 m of this formation sitting on top of dunedin Formation carbonate rocks; b)

Although Introductory Grade 11 is usually offered in Grade 11, to alleviate scheduling pressure 

The general purposes of the program of regular assessment are: (1) to inform professionals and the public at large about strengths and weaknesses of the education system; (2) to

The anxious concern with maintenance of social and economic stability that characterizes the Report of the Royal Commission, and the narrowed mandate for education that this

34 The Ministry of Education has contributed to the same perception through such actions as highlighting in its annual report a public opinion survey indicating that, ``if money

government departments, Crown corporations and any other organizations owned, controlled or supported by the Government of British Columbia. Introduce, where appropriate,