A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
J.-P. N ICOLAS
Scattering of linear Dirac fields by a spherically symmetric Black-Hole
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 62, n
o2 (1995), p. 145-179
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1995__62_2_145_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1995, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
145
Scattering of linear Dirac fields by
a
spherically symmetric Black-Hole
J.-P. NICOLAS
Mathematical Institute 24-29 St-Giles’, Oxford OX1 3LB, England
or
CeReMaB, Universite Bordeaux-I, Unite de Recherche Associee au CNRS n° 226, 351, cours de la Liberation, 33405 Talence Cedex, France.
Vol. 62, n° 2, 1995, Physique , théorique ,
ABSTRACT. - We
study
the linear Diracsystem
outside aspherical
Black-Hole. In the case of massless
fields,
we prove the existence andasymptotic completeness
of classical waveoperators
at the horizon of the Black-Hole and atinfinity.
On etudie Ie
sy steme
lineaire de Dirac a Fexterieur d’un Trou Noirspherique.
Dans Ie cas deschamps
sans masse, on montre 1’ existenceet la
completude asymptotique
desoperateurs
d’ ondeclassiques
a 1’ horizondu Trou Noir et a Finfini.
1. INTRODUCTION
We
develop
atime-dependent scattering theory
for the linear Diracsystem
on
Schwarzschild-type
metrics. The firsttime-dependent scattering
resultson the Schwarzschild metric were obtained
by
J. Dimock[8]. Using
theshort range at
infinity
of the interaction betweengravity
and a masslessscalar
field,
heproved
the existence andasymptotic completeness
ofclassical
wave-operators
for the waveequation.
The case of the MaxwellAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
Vol. 62/95/02/$ 4.00/@ Gauthier-Villars
146 J.-P. NICOLAS
system
in which the interaction ispseudo long-range
has been worked outby
A. Bachelot
[2],
and for theRegge-Wheeler equation,
acomplete scattering theory
has beendeveloped by
A. Bachelot and A. Motet-B achelot[3 ] .
Ourpurpose in this work is to
study
the classical waveoperators
and theirasymptotic completeness
for the linear massless Diracsystem
on ageneral
"Schwarzschild-type"
metric which covers all the usual cases ofspherical
black-holes. The main tools are Cook’s method for the existence and the results obtained in
[3]
for theasymptotic completeness.
Let us consider the manifold +00
[r x Se, ~
endowed with thepseudo-riemannian
metricwhere E C°°
(]0,
We assume the existence of three values rv of r, 0 r- ro r++00,
which are theonly possible
zerosof
F,
such thatWhen
they
are finite and non zero, r-, ro and r+ are the radii of thespheres
called: horizon of the black-hole(ro), Cauchy
horizon(r-)
and
cosmological
horizon(r+).
/~ is the surfacegravity
at the horizon{r
=r"}.
If r+ isinfinite,
we assume moreover thatAll these
properties
are satisfiedby
usualspherical
black-holes(see [13]).
NOTATIONS. - Let
( M, g )
be a Riemannianmanifold, Co ( M)
denotesthe set of Coo functions with
compact support
inM, ~f~ (M,
isthe Sobolev space,
completion
ofCo (M)
for the normwhere and
(, )
arerespectively
the covariantderivatives,
themeasure of volume and the hermitian
product
associated with the metric g.We write
L2 (H, g)
=g) .
If E is a distribution space on
M, Ecomp represents
thesubspace
ofelements of E with
compact support
in M.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
The 2-dimensional euclidian
sphere 8;
is endowed with its usual metric2. THE COVARIANT
GENERALIZATION
OF THE LINEAR DIRAC SYSTEM ONSCHWARZSCHILD-TYPE
METRICS The covariantgeneralization
of the Diracsystem
on themetric g
hasthe form
for a
particle
with mass m, where & is a Dirac4-spinor,
the are thecontravariant Dirac matrices on curved
space-time
and~’~
is the covariantderivation of
spinor
fields. We make thefollowing
choices of flatspace-time
Dirac matrices
where
are the Pauli
matrices,
and of local Lorentz frameWe recall that flat
space-time
Dirac matrices are a set of 4 x 4 matrices{~}oc.3
such thatwhere
is the Minkowski metric. The indices with a tilde refer to flat
space-time
and can be raised or lowered
using r~a~,
whereas the indices without tilde refer to curvedspace-time
and are raised or loweredusing
the metric g.With these
definitions,
the and are then definedby (see
forexample [5], [7])
Vol. 62, nO 2-1995.
148 J.-P. NICOLAS
and
where
are the
generators
of thespinor representation
of the proper Lorentz group andare the coefficients of the
spin connection, , ~ standing
for the derivationwith
respect
to the variable. Wecompute
the apriori
non zerocomponents:
Annales de l’Institut Poincaré - Physique theorique
Vol. 62, n° 2-1995.
150 J.-P. NICOLAS
and we obtain the
following expression
for the linear massive Diracequation
outside a
spherical
black-hole:.
We introduce the frame with
respect
to which we shall express theequation, ’", - ( 1 â: 1 â: image
of R =~ ~, 201420142014 9~) by
thespatial
rotation/
with Eulerangles
forexample [15]) (~, 8, ’1/;)
==(0, Tr/2, 1r),
and theRegge-Wheeler
variabler~ defined
by
The
spinor
where is the
spin
transformation associated with the rotationf -1,
satisfies
on the domain
Rt
xRr*
x83 representing
the exterior of the black-hole in the variables(t,
r*,cc;).
We recall
(see [7] ) that, given
aspatial
rotationf
ofangle
() around aunit vector n = n2 ,
n3 ) ,
its associatedspin
transformationT f
iswhere
Exp
is theexponential mapping.
3. GLOBAL CAUCHY PROBLEM We introduce the Hilbert space
l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
THEOREM 3.1. - Given
~o
E~, equation (15)
has a ,unique
’such that
Moreover, for
any t E RProof. -
We show that theoperator
is
self-adjoint
with dense domain on 7~. Wedecompose
7lusing generalized spherical
functions ofweigths
1/2 and-1/2.
Letand for any
half-integer
mFor
( l ,
m,n )
ET,
we define " the function of{ cp 1, ~ , ~p2 ) ,
~i,~2~[0,2~[,~E[0,7r],by
where satisfies the
following ordinary
differentialequations
and the normalization condition
We know from
[ 12],
that is a Hibert basis ofVol. 62, n ° 2-1995.
152 J.-P. NICOLAS
Thus,
for anyhalf-integer
m,is a Hilbert basis of
L2 (6~; 6~).
Inparticular,
where
or
equivalently,
where the
T~ ~ , n
are seen as functions ofonly
~, 9. LetDenoting
0~ = the fourcomponents
of areRelations
(25)
and(26) yield
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique " theorique "
and we also have
Thus,
the fourcomponents
of H 03A8 areWe see that on has the form
where the matrices L et
M,
definedby
are hermitian and L is invertible. Since the function
a r-1 belongs
toL°° is
self-adjoint
with domaindense in On
Dln,
we choose thefollowing
normand we introduce the dense
subspace
of HVol. 62, nO 2-1995.
154 J.-P.NICOLAS
H
isself-adjoint
on H with domainD ( H ) ,
isself-adjoint
andbounded
therefore,
H isself-adjoint
with dense domainD (H) .
Theorem 3.1 follows from Stone’s theorem.Q.E.D.
4. WAVE OPERATORS AT THE HORIZON When r -~ ro , the
operator
H has the formal limitwhich is a
self-adjoint operator
on~C
with dense domainThe
spectrum
ofNo
ispurely absolutely
continuous. We define thesubspaces
ofincoming
andoutgoing
waves associated withHo :
7~
as well as the remain stable underHo
and we haveSince we want to compare H with
Ho
in theneighbourhood
of thehorizon,
we introduce the cut-off function
together
with theidentifying operator
We consider the classical wave
operators
THEOREM 4.1. - The
operator Wo (resp. Wo-)
iswell-defined from ~lo
(resp. H-0)
toH,
isindependent of
the choiceof ~0 satisfying (44),
moreoverProof. -
Weapply
Cook’s method.~7o being
a boundedoperator,
it suffices to prove that forAnnales de l’Instatut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
we have
then
and
~o being compactly supported,
for tlarge enough,
a is
rapidly decreasing
in r* when r 2014~ ro, thereforeand
Wo
is well-defined. The sameproof
can of course beapplied
toWo .
Furthermore,
if?-~o ,
weget
from(43)
that the energy ofin a domain of x
83
bounded to the left in r* vanishes when t tends toinfinity,
whichgives (47).
If now we consider two different cut-off functions xo and~
and the associatedidentifying operators ~7o
and:1¿,
the difference is
compactly supported,
thusREMARK 4.1. - In the case where r+ is
finite,
we construct in the sameway classical wave
operators
at thecosmological horizon
Vol. 62, n ° 2-1995.
156 J.-P. NICOLAS
where the
identifying operator :Ii
isdefined by
x 1
being a cut-off function
Wi (resp. W1-) is an isometry from (resp.
and isindependent of
the choiceof
x1satisfying (53).
5. WAVE OPERATORS AT INFINITY
(MASSLESS CASE)
In all this
paragraph,
we shall assume that r~ ==+00;
the metric( 1 )
is then
asymptotically
flat in theneighbourhood
ofinfinity
and we chooseto compare H to an
operator
which isequivalent
to the hamiltonianoperator
for the Diracequation
on the Minkowskispace-time.
We alsomake the
hypothesis
that m = 0 in order to avoidlong
rangeperturbations
at
infinity.
Let us consider on the Minkowski metricthe massless Dirac
system
The associated hamiltonian
operator,
definedby
is
self-adjoint
with dense domain on~LZ
x~y
x and ifI> E x
Ry
x is a solution of(55),
its energy ina
compact
domain goes to zero when t goes to Inaddition,
for any E~Lz
xlRy
x with acompact support
contained intothe solution ~ of
(55)
associated with the initial data satisfiesAnnales de l’Institut Henri Physique theorique
At the
point
ofspherical
coordinates( p, 8, ~),
weapply
thespatial
rotation
f
with Eulerangles (Tr/2, 6~,
7r -~).
The local frameaz )
is thus transformed
by f -1
intoThe
spinor
where
T f
is thespin
transformation associated withf
defined in( 16),
satisfies
The
operator
onis
unitarily equivalent
to~f~
onTherefore, H~
isself-adjoint
with dense domain on and if 03A8 EC satisfies
(61),
then its energy in acompact
domain goes to zero when t goesMoreover,
forIn order to avoid artificial
long-range interactions,
we chooseand we introduce the cut-off function
Vol. 62, n ° 2-1995.
158 J.-P. NICOLAS
together
with theidentifying operator
We define the classical wave
operators
THEOREM 5.1. - The
operators W~
arewell-defined from
to~C,
areindependent of
the choiceof
andFor
(~ ~) ~ ~,
we introduce thesubspaces
ofT~oo
the direct sum of which is dense in For
DC;:,
where the matrices Land M are defined
by (36),
andbeing
a boundedoperator,
it suffices to prove that forwe have
(63) yields
Thus, for I t I large enough
A~~le~ c~ Henri Physique ° theorique °
We
study
theasymptotic
behavior ofwhen r* goes to +00. The
Regge-Wheeler
variables r* is defined withrespect
to rby
where 2 ~o
= ~ (~o).
For rlarger
than ro +1,
we havewhere
F and 03B4
satisfy
and therefore
which
implies
The
operators M±~
arethus well-defined.
The fact thatthey
areisometries
and
do notdepend
upon the choice of the cut-offfunction
can beverified
using exactly the
sameremarks
as in the case of thehorizon.
Q.E.D.
62. n° 2~199.5.
160 J.-P. NICOLAS
6. ASYMPTOTIC
COMPLETENESS
OF OPERATORS~
AND~ (MASSLESS CASE)
We assume
again
that m = 0 and r+ _ +00. We introduce the inversewave
operators
at the horizon and atinfinity,
defined forby
where
..10*
and..1:0
arerespectively
theadjoints
of~7o
and We alsodefine the wave
operators W +
and W -by
as well as the inverse wave
operators W+,
W - .Eventually,
we define thescattering operator
THEOREM 6.1. -
Operators Wo (resp. W~ )
are welldefinedfrom
~C into(resp. from ~
into areindependent of
the choiceof
xo(resp. x~ )
and their norm is lower or
equal
to 1. MoreoverProof. -
For any solution 03A8 of(15)
in(l, n)
EZ1,
weconstruct
asymptotic profiles
at the horizon and atinfinity.
The idea is that eachcomponent
of 03A8 satisfies anequation
of the formwhere the
potential
V has thefollowing properties
We then
apply
thescattering
results of[3].
This suffices to defineW~,
but to prove the existence of
W~ ,
we need to recover a solution of(c~t -
= 0 from theasymptotic profile
atinfinity.
Annales de l’Institut Poincaré - Physique theorique
Firstly,
westudy
somespectral properties
of theoperator
H:PROPOSITION 6.1. - The
point spectrum of
H isempty.
A
straightforward
consequence ofproposition
6.1 isCOROLLARY 6.1. - For the direct sum
of
the setsis dense in ~l.
Proof of proposition
6.1. - Letsuch that
Equation (87)
isequivalent
toWe first consider the case A = 0.
Putting
we see that 91 and 93 are solutions of
while g2 and g4
satisfy
Thus A == 0 is an
eigenvalue
for H if andonly
if there existsl
= ~
+ > such that bothequations ( 90 )
and( 91 )
have solutionsin
L2 being
smooth onR,
any solution of(90)
or(91 )
inL1loc (R)
isnecessarily
smooth.Moreover, 03B2l
decreasesexponentially
/whenr* goes to 2014oo, thus
Vol. 62, n ° 2-1995.
162 J.-P. NICOLAS and both
integral equation
have a
unique
solution in L°°(]
- oo,rT [),
which can be extended on R asa smooth but not square
integrable
function.Therefore, (90)
and(91)
haveno non trivial solution in
L2 (R)
and a = 0 is not aneigenvalue
for H.If now we
suppose 03BB~ 0,
thecomponents of 03C6 satisfy
Functions 91
=fl
+f2
and 93 =f3
+f4
areeigenvectors
inLZ (IR)
forthe
operator
associated with the
eigenvalue ,B2
>0,
whereas 92 ==f2 - 11
and94
= f4 - f3
areeigenvectors
inL2 (IR)
for theoperator
associated with the
eigenvalue ~2
> 0. It iseasily
seen thatpotentials
and
satisfy (84). Therefore,
theoperators Ll
andL2
are of the sametype
as the second orderoperators
studied in[3]
and have nostrictly positive eigenvalue.
Q.E.D.
then ~
belongs
to D~l
is well-defined and is a subset of To provecorollary
6.1 it suffices to establish that for( l , n )
EI 1 2
andAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
jb E
N, ~l
is dense in Letbe
orthogonal
toThen, for 03C6
E[C~0 (IRr* )]4
Hk being
here considered as anoperator
on[£2
We havewhere
D’
is the space of distributions on From(100),
we deducethat BlIo belongs
to andWe know
by proposition
6.1 that( 101 )
has no non-trivial solution in Thus~kln
is dense inHln.
Q.E.D.
We also
study
thespectral properties
ofoperators Li, £20
We recall their definition for l -1 / 2
E NPROPOSITION 6.2. - For l -
1/2
EN,
thespectrum of operators £1
andL2
ispurely absolutely
continuous.Proof. -
Wealready
know thatpotentials Yl and V2 satisfy (84), which,
from
[3] implies
that thesingular spectrum
of£1
andL2
isempty,
that theirabsolutely
continuousspectrum
is[0,
+oo[
and that theirpoint spectrum
contains at the most a finite number of
negative
or zeroeigenvalues,
all ofthem
being simple. Furthermore, Yl and Y2
decreaseexponentially
whenr,~ 2014~ -00 and 0 is not an
eigenvalue.
We show that£1
andL2
do nothave any
strictly negative eigenvalue
eitherby
a method similar to the oneused in
[3].
We recall that for l -1/2
EN, equations
both have on a
unique
continuousstrictly positive solution, given respectively by (93)
and(94).
We consider thegeneral
caseof
apotential
such that there exists a
function g,
continuous andstrictly positive
onsatisfying;
Vol. 62, n° 2-1995.
164 J.-P. NICOLAS
Let
f
E be such thatwhich
implies
We define the cut-off function
Putting
for n > 1we
easily
see thatThus,
for nlarge enough
The
operator -d2=
+ V onL2 ([-??,, n~)
with domain{~/
EHz (~-n, ~]);
?/(=b~)
=0}
has astrictly negative eigenvalue -~~
associated with aneigenvector u
Even if it means
changing
u into -u, there exist a and/3
such thatWe denote
On the one
hand,
we can writeHenri Poincaré - Physique theorique
g
being strictly positive
onR, ( 112) yields
On the other hand
thus
We end up with a
contradiction,
which means thatLv
has nostrictly negative eigenvalue.
Q.E.D.
We now prove the existence of the inverse wave
operators Wo
andW~ .
For
(l, n)
EI 1 2,
we consider theorthogonal decomposition
ofEach
~i
is stable under H andby corollary 6.1,
for( l , n )
E EN,
the sets
are
respectively
dense in and For~o
E we establish theexistence of the
strong
limits(78)
and(79) defining Wo 03A80 and W±~ 03A80.
The
following
lemmaguarantees
the existence ofasymptotic profiles
for~o .
The details of itsproof
will begiven
after theproof
of theorem 6.1.LEMMA 6.1. - Given
~2±ln, (l, n) E
there existssuch that
and
Vol. 62, n ° 2-1995.
166 J.-P. NICOLAS
Any
solutionof (116) in
C~-L)
and inparticuliar W 1
can beexpressed
in the form
where
Thus,
for a cut-off function x~satisfying (44),
we haveThat is to say that for
WoE ~2~ln, {l, n) E I 12, ~ = +?
-, there ’ existssuch that
and of course, we can
similarly
prove the existence ofsuch that
From
( 121 )
to( 124),
we conclude thatW~
is well-defined o for(l, n)
EI1 2, ~ = +,
-, and oThen, corollary
6.1yields
that theoperator Wo (resp. Wo )
is well-defined from ~-l to(resp. ~-lo )
and its norm is lower orequal
to 1.In order to prove the existence of
W~,
we need to compare in theneighbourhood
of the futureinfinity
theoutgoing part
ofWl (t)
with asolution of
LEMMA 6.2. - The
operator Wo
is well-defined from Hü
to and isindependent of
thechoice of
~~satisfying (65). of
courseW©
isdefined
as wellfrom H+0
toand for
~Q
E~-~Co
.
l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physijque ’ théorique "
Lemma
6.2,
and(118), (119) yield
the existence ofsuch that
and therefore
which enables us to define
W~
on~ln , (l, n)
EIl
andby density
on7~. The same
thing
can be done forW~ .
Let and~
be two cut-off functions
satisfying (65)
and and~
the associatedidentifying operators .
For t ER,
and
Thus,
theoperators W~
areindependent
of the choice of andby
asimilar
argument, Wo
areindependent
of the choice of ~o .We still have to prove that
W ~
andW ~
arebijective isometries,
whichyields
that 6’ is abijective isometry by
construction. Let 03A8~ H
andFor xo
satisfying (44)
andsatisfying (65),
we haveJ*~ being simply
themultiplication by
The local energy ofeiHt03A8
goes to 0 when t goes to therefore
(132), (133) and (134) imply
~2, n" 2-1993.
168 J.-P. NICOLAS
which means
If on the other hand we consider
and
put
we have
(135)
from which weget
The local energy of and
eiH~t 03A8±~
goes to 0when |t| I
goes to+00,
therefore( 139)
and( 140)- yield
and
thus
(136)
and( 143)
show thatW ~
and are allbijections
and if we choosexo and such that their
supports
have nointersection,
we deduce from(135)
’ 6.1. - Let
(l, n) +,
-. There existssuch that
and
Annales de l’Institut Poincaré - Physique theorique
such that
We denote
and
On the one
hand, applying 8t
+ i H toequation
we obtain
which, taking
into account the factthat 03A8
takes its values inHln
canalso be written
On the other hand
and since
~o
==The
scattering
results obtained in[3] together
withproposition
6.2imply
that for any solution
of
equation
Vol. 62, n° 2-1995.
170 J.-P. NICOLAS
with initial data
such that
there exists a solution
of
such that
W
is the solution of( 15)
with initial datatherefore in
particular,
and
( 151 )
to( 155 ) yield
the existence ofsuch that
and
from which we deduce
Annales de l’Institut Poincaré - Physique theorique
BlI 0 being
an element of~l~
c~,
we canapply
theprevious
constructionto Bl1 o.
We find that there existssolution of
such that
From
( 159)
and( 160)
we deduceeiHt Wo being
a solution of(15)
in C we haveand
by (158)
c~t ~ ~
isidentically
zero inwhich is not true in
general for 03A81,
thereforeand
( 161 ), ( 162)
and( 163) give
Vol. 62, n ° 2-1995.
172 J.-P. NICOLAS
and
(dt - W1 being
an element of C7~)
andsatisfying
we must have
Proof of
lemma 6. 2. - Letwith
w 0
can be writtenand
f
is the solution ofassociated with the initial data
Instead of
applying
Cook’s method tooperators
andHo,
which wouldgive
anapparently long-range perturbation
atinfinity,
we work on thesecond order scalar
equations
and establish the existenceof g~
solution ofAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
where is a cut-off function
satisfying (65);
the solution 97]being
suchthat
In the case where l =
1 /2
and 7y == -,equations ( 168)
and( 170)
are thesame and it suffices to take g- =
f .
Let us now assumeWe write
equations (168)
and( 170)
in their hamiltonian formThe
operator
iAo
isskew-adjoint
with dense domain oncompletion
of~Go
for the normand i
A~
isskew-adjoint
with dense domain(cf [3])
oncompletion
of for the normUnder
assumption ( 173),
the norm( 179)
isequivalent
toV3l.62,n° 2-1995.
174 J.-P. NICOLAS
Moreover,
any solutiont (g, at g) E
C of(170)
satisfies thefollowing
energy estimate: for
r* r*
and t E Rwhich is very
easily
obtainedby multiplying ( 170) by
andintegrating by parts
on the domainf o being
inCo (RrJ,
we can consider thatand we
apply
Cook’ s method to prove the existence in H of the limitWe shall denote
We have
and for r*
large enough
thus
and
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
The limit
(183)
is therefore well-defined and if 91] is the solution of( 170)
such that
then
This last limit
together
with theequivalence
of norms( 179)
and( 180) gives ( 171 )
and(172). Moreover, for r*
t - RIndeed,
for t E > 0 we choose T E R such that/2)
EH, II,
we denoteLet us consider
( 181 )
and( 189) yield
and this last
integral
is zero since( 188)
is therefore satisfied and for tlarge enough 91]
is a solution ofLet us now introduce
Vol. 62, nO 2-1995.
176 J.-P. NICOLAS
There exists
to
> 0 suchthat,
and g-êsatisfy
with
Moreover,
for t >to
Thus,
thequantities
belong
to +00[; ~-l )
and( 171 ), ( 172) yield
In
particular,
we haveSince
eiH0t 03A80
is a solution ofAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
we have
and therefore
We introduce
The
quantities
From
(200),
weget
and,
the functionsatisfies
Therefore,
we must have for t >to
Vol. ~2, nO 2-1995.
178 J.-P. NICOLAS
Hi being
a distribution space, we can write in the sense of distributionsfor t ~ t0
which
implies
thatc~t
is a solution in C(~to, [; ?-~~ )
ofThis solution can be extended to C
~~ )
and we denoteits initial data at t = 0. From
( 196), ( 197),
weget
The value
of ~t (eiHot 03A80)
at t = 0 is iHo 03A80. Ho
is aself-adjoint operator
with dense domain on7~,
itspoint spectrum
isempty
and the spaces7~, 7~
are invariant underHo.
Therefore the direct sum of the setsis dense in
(206)
shows that for an initial dataH003A80
in a set oftype (207),
the limitexists in The
operator Wg~
isconsequently
well-defined from~Co
into Since the local energy of the solution
eiH0tH0 Bl1 0
goes to zerowhen |t| I
goes to+00,
the limit03A80~
isindependent
of the choice of ~~satisfying (65).
Q.E.D.
7. CONCLUSION
The
scattering theory developed
in this paper isonly
valid for the linear massless Diracsystem.
In the case of a massive field and whenspace-time
is
asymptotically flat,
the mass of the field induceslong-range perturbations
at
infinity
and classical waveoperators
willprobably
not exist.However,
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
using
the methodsdeveloped by
J. Dollard and G. Velo[10]
andby
V. Enssand B. Thaller
[11]
about the relativistic Coulombscattering
of Dime fielclsas well as the works of A. B achelot
[1]
and J. Dimock and B.[9]
onthe Klein-Gordon
equation
on the Schwarzschildmetric,
it must bepossible
to show the existence and
asymptotic completeness
of Bollard-modifiedwave
operators
atinfinity.
REFERENCES
[1] A. BACHELOT, Asymptotic completeness for the Klein-Gordon equation on the
Schwarzschild metric, Internal publication, U.R.A. 226, 1993, to appear in Ann. Inst.
Henri-Poincaré, Physique Théorique.
[2] A. BACHELOT, Gravitational Scattering of Electromagnetic Field by Schwarzschild Black- Hole, Ann. Inst. Henri-Poincaré-Physique théorique, Vol. 54, No. 3, 1991, pp. 261-320.
[3] A. BACHELOT and A. MOTET-BACHELOT, Les résonances d’un Trou Noir de Schwarzschild, Ann. Inst. Henri-Poincaré, Physique théorique, Vol. 59, No. 1, 1993, pp. 3-68.
[4] D. R. BRILL and J. A. WHEELER, Interaction of Neutrinos and Gravitational Fields, Revs.
Modern Phys. Vol. 29, 3, 1957, pp. 465-479.
[5] Y. CHOQUET-BRUHAT and C. DEWITT, Analysis, manifolds and physics, Part I: basics,
Revised edition, 1982, Part II: 92 applications, 1989, North Holland.
[6] Th. DAMOUR, Black-Hole eddy currents, Phys. Rev. D18, Vol. 10, 1978, pp. 3598-3604.
[7] B. S. DEWITT, The space-time approach to quantum field theory, in Relativité, groupes et
topologie, les Houches, 1983, North Holland, 1984.
[8] J. DIMOCK, Scattering for the wave equation on the Schwarzschild metric, Gen. Relativ.
Gravitation, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1985, pp. 353-369.
[9] J. DMOCK and B. S. KAY, Classical and Quantum Scattering theory for linear scalar fields
on the Schwarzschild metric I, Ann. Phys. Vol. 175, 1987, pp. 366-426.
[10] J. DOLLARD and G. VELO, Asymptotic behavior of a Dirac particle in a Coulomb field, Il
Nuovo Cimento, Vol. 45, 1966, pp. 801-812.
[11] V. ENSS and B. THALLER, Asymptotic observables and Coulomb scattering for the Dirac equation, Ann. Inst. Henri-Poincaré, Vol. 45, 2, 1986, pp. 147-171.
[12] I. M. GEL’FAND and Z. Ya. SAPIRO, Representations of the group of rotations of 3- dimensional space and their applications, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl., Vol. 2, 2, 1956, pp. 207-316.
[13] J.-P. NICOLAS, Non linear Klein-Gordon equation on Schwarzschild-like metrics, to appear in J. Math. Pures et appliquées.
[14] J.-P. NICOLAS, Opérateur de diffusion pour le système de Dirac en métrique de Schwarzschild, to appear in C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Vol. 318, 1994.
[15] R. PENROSE and W. RINDLER, Spinors and space-time, Cambridge monographs on
mathematical physics, Vol. 1, Two-spinor calculus in relativistic fields, Cambridge University Press, 1984.
[16] M. REED and B. SIMON, Methods of modern mathematical physics, Vol. III, 1979, Academic Press.
(Manuscript received April, 12, 1994.)
Vol. 62, n 2-1995.