A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
G. B ANDELLONI C. B ECCHI
A. B LASI
R. C OLLINA
Non semisimple gauge models : II. Renormalization
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 28, n
o3 (1978), p. 255-285
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1978__28_3_255_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1978, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
255
Non semisimple gauge models : II. Renormalization
G. BANDELLONI, C. BECCHI (*),
A. BLASI and R. COLLINA
Istituto di Scienze Fisiche dell’Universita di Genova
e Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova
Vol. XXVIII, n° 3, 1978, Physique theorique.
ABSTRACT- In this paper we discuss the
renormalizability,
withinthe B. P. H. Z.
scheme,
of thenon-semi-simple
gauge models whose classical limit has beenfully exposed
in paper I. Within ourregularization indepen-
dent
approach renormalizability
follows from thecompensability, by
asuitable choice of the radiative corrections to the
Lagrangian,
of the break-ings
which can affect the Slavnovidentity.
Thesebreakings
are « apriori»
controlled
by
the Lowenstein and LamQuantum
ActionPrinciple
andby
a system ofsupplementary
renormalization conditionsprescribing
theequations
of motion of theFaddeev-Popov
c fields and the super-renorma-lizability
of thecouplings
of those c’scorresponding
to the abelian factors of the gauge group. Thesupplementary
conditions inducealgebraic
anddimensional
(power counting)
constraints which insure thecompensability
of all the
breakings
of maximum dimension except, of course, the Adler- Bardeenanomaly
whose absence we assume.Concerning
theremaining
soft
breakings,
we shall show that theCallan-Symanzik equation,
in avery
general
context, also excludes their presence if the hardbreakings
areabsent.
1. INTRODUCTION
In this paper we discuss the
renormalization,
within the B. P. H. Z.scheme
[l],
of the gauge models[2]
whose classical limit(tree approximation)
(*) Partially supported by the Universite d’Aix-Marseille II, U. E. R. Scientifique de Luminy, Marseille, France.
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincare - Section A - Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
has been
fully
described in aprevious
paper, hereafter referred to as I[3].
Here we will focus on the technical aspects and refer the reader to the introduction of paper I for a survey of the
general problems posed by
gauge theories.
Our renormalization method is a non trivial
generalization
of the oneemployed by
Becchi-Rouet-Stora(B.
R. S.[4] [J])
in theanalysis
ofpurely
abelian and
semi-simple
gauge models. Ithinges
on thesystematic study
of the admissible
breaking
terms of the Slavnovidentity (S. I.) [6]
asgiven by
theQuantum
ActionPrinciple (Q.
A.P.)
which is known to hold within the chosen renormalization framework[7].
The recent progress of Clarkand Lowenstein
[8]
on thevalidity
of theQ.
A. P. for theories with masslessparticles
allows an immediate extension of our results also to models of this kind.The B. R. S.
purely algebraic
treatment of thebreakings
of the S. I. isinadequate
for our purposes since here the gauge group is not semi-sim-ple (1)
and the class of the admissiblebreaking
terms is not apriori
restrictedon the basis of discrete
symmetries
as ithappens
e. g. withcharge conju- gation
in the H. K. model[5].
A
possible
way out of these difficulties is exhibitedby
models with aparticularly simple
form of the gaugefunction, namely Feynman’s choice,
where to each abelian invariant component of the gauge group there corres-
ponds
a linear WardIdentity (W. I.), essentially
identical to that ofQuantum Electrodynamics (Q.
E.D.).
Within this scheme the abelian Faddeev-Popov (~.n)
fields[10]
are redundant sincethey
turn out to befree, but,
when the gauge symmetry isspontaneously broken,
we find artificialinfrared
(U. R.) divergencies
which may be avoidedby adopting
the’t Hooft gauge
[77].
In the ’t Hooft class of gauges the situation
is,
of course, different : the abelian 03A6.03A0. fields are ingeneral
nolonger free,
and we have aglobal
Slavnov
identity
for thetheory.
Thereremains,
however a memory of the old status, true in theFeynman
gauge : the abelian 03A6. FL fieldshave,
at least in the treeapproximation super-renormalizable couplings,
and hencethey
are free athigh
momenta.The essenial
improvement
of our method with respect to the B. R. S.one, is to introduce the renormalization condition that the
couplings
ofthe abelian C. II. fields remain
super-renormalizable
to all orders of per- turbationtheory. Taking
into account this condition in a powercounting analysis
of thebreakings,
we shall be able to exclude all the terms of maxi-mum dimensions
escaping
the B. R. S.algebraic
treatment, except, of course the Adler-Bardeen[12] anomaly (A.
B.A.).
The absence of the lower
dimensionality (soft)
anomalies will be discussed e) The situation here is similar to that shown in I when discussing the classical stability.Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincare - Section A
by
means of theCallan-Symanzik [l3] (C. S.) equation,
somewhat inanalogy
with what is done
by
B. R. S. in Ref.[l4].
In Section 2 we recall a number of results obtained in paper I and illustrate the main ideas which will
guide
ourapproach
to the renormalizationproblem :
i. e. to the discussion of thebreakings
of the S. I.Section 3 contains the detailed
study
of the external fieldsdependent
and of the maximum
dimensionality (hard)
anomalies. We shall showthat,
apart from the A. B.A.,
all otherbreakings
in this class arecompensable.
In Section 4 we
complete
our treatment of therenormalizability
of theS.
1., excluding
the presence of the soft anomalies with arguments basedon the
Callan-Symanzik equation.
In the
concluding Section,
besides a summary of theresults,
we commentupon their extension to theories with massless
particles
and illustrate the non-renormalizationproperties
of some parameters of these models.Appendices
A and B contain the more technical aspects of theproofs
of statements in the text.
2. GENERAL STRATEGY
In this section we
recall,
for the convenience of thereader,
some results and notationsappearing
in paper I[3],
and illustrate thegeneral
strategy toward renormalization.The
quantized
fields arefor which we introduce the sources
The set of Greek indices will be
split,
whenconvenient,
into a « semi-simple »
subset as, ... , S =1,
...,Ns
and an « abelian » one ...A =
1,
... ,NA corresponding
to thesemi-simple
and abelian components of the Liealgebra ~
associated with the gauge group.The
Lagrangian
involves also the external fieldscharge [10],
definedby
the operatoraccording
tois conserved.
Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978. 17
To both
quantized
and external fields a naive dimension isassigned
where dim ~pi is either 1 or
3/2 according
to the boson or fermion character of the matter field.The classical action
is the most
general
dimension four local functionalsatisfying
theidentity
exhibiting
the Slavnov[6]
invariance of thetheory,
and the massdegeneracy
condition for theghost particles
discussed in paper I.In terms of the connected tree
approximation
Green functionalr~) (the Legendre
inverse transform ofr~)) Eq. (7)
writesA
quantized
extension of the model is definedby
means of an effectiveLagrangian
equipped
with anappropriate
set of substractionprescriptions,
which forthe sake of
definiteness,
we shall assume to be those of the B. P. H. Z.scheme with substraction index
equal
to four(in
the Zimmermann’s notation theLagrangian
is an.,~4 [7~] operator).
The
Lagrangian
is a formal power series in ~Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincare - Section A
The coefficient of the zeroth power in
Eq. (10)
is the classicalLagrangian
of
Eq. (6),
hence inparticular
where
and t03B1ij
are the structure constants and therepresentations
ofthe Lie
algebra
~.The main purpose of this paper is to show that the Slavnov
identity, Eq. (8),
for the connected functionalZc(J, ’1)
orequivalently Eq. (7)
for1]),
can be solved in terms of the coefficients of1])
to all ordersin ~.
In
practice
this means that we willstudy
the violations inducedby
anarbitrary
renormalization process in the S. I. and in the other functionalequations characterizing
thetheory,
withoutlooking,
from the start, fora « clever »
regularization procedure preserving
the relevant identitiesorder
by
order in ~.According
to this crudepoint
ofview,
the admissiblebreakings
are « apriori » controlled,
within the Zimmermannformalism, by
theQ.
A. P. hereemployed
in the weak formgiven by
Stora in[4].
Inthis formulation the
Q.
A. P. assertsthat, given
anidentity,
verified at thetree
approximation
andexhibiting
the invariance of the action under atransformation of the fields into local operators
(N-products [7] ] [7J]
inZimmermann’s
notation),
anarbitrary
renormalizationprocedure
pre-serving
powercounting
introduces quantumbreakings
which are alsolocal operators. Furthermore the N
product
index of thesebreakings, summarizing
their powercounting properties,
is boundedby
the dimensionof the naive variation of an
arbitrary
renormalizableLagrangian.
Now the
renormalizability
of thetheory
isproved
if the system of equa- tionsexpressing
thevanishing,
orderby order,
of thebreakings
can besolved,
in the sense of formal powerseries,
in terms of the parameters of theLagrangian.
It is an essentialpoint,
for ourmethod,
that the quantum corrections to thebreakings
to order n in hdepend
on the parameters of up to order n - 1.As shown
by
B. R. S.(Ref. [4])
theanalysis
of thebreakings
to the S. I.is
simplified by selecting a priori
those effectiveLagrangians (or,
moreprecisely,
the term inEq. (9))
whose related connected functional1])
satisfies theequation
bl. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
which is a necessary condition for the
validity
ofEq. (8).
From thisequation
it follows a set of
consistency conditions, which,
in thesemi-simple
case,allow a
purely algebraic
treatment of thebreakings.
In terms of the vertex functional
r( 1/1, r~), Eq. ( 12)
becomeswhich turns out to be
equivalent
to the linear relationsIndeed,
theseequations,
which arenothing
but theequations
of motionof the c
fields, give
in the treeapproximation
the mostgeneral
solutionof
Eq. (13) ; consequently,
ifthey
arerenormalizable, they
alsogive
thegeneral
solution ofEqs. (12) (13)
to all orders. The above mentioned massdegeneracy
condition for theghost particles [3]
is writtenAs
pointed
out in theIntroduction,
in the nonsemi-simple
case thealgebraic
conditions are nolonger
sufficient and must be enriched with theprescription
that the abelian c fields(i.
e. thosecorresponding
to theabelian factor of
~)
haveonly super-renormalizable couplings
except forthe external field vertex This
prescription is,
of course, verifiedin the classical limit.
Indeed, by substituting Eqs. (11 b) (11 c)
intoEq. (14)
we have an
explicit
solution for the term in where thecouplings
of the abelian c fields are all
super-renormalizable.
The.
problem
is toimplement
thissuper-renormalizability
conditionto all orders of
perturbation theory.
This can be doneintroducing
a set{~}
of external fields with dimension 2charge -
1 andprescribing, by
means of the functionalequation
that the sources of the and of the fields coincide to all orders. Here
YaA(x)
is alocal,
dimension threefunctional,
linear in thefields,
expectfor the
term which cannot be avoidedbeing
theonly
dimensionAnnales de l’Instituf Henri Poucare - Section A
four
coupling
with the fields present at the classical level. In the treeapproximation
the natural choice iswhich
corresponds
to the classical vertex functionalbut, keeping
renormalization inmind,
we are forced to choose the moregeneral expression
where the parameters
Z03B1Ai, y03B203B1A
remain to be determined.Of course
Eq. (17)
must be satisfiedtogether
withEq. (15) which, however,
in the presence of the fields must be modified to the form
Our program is to discuss first the
renormalizability
ofEqs. (17) (21)
which will be used as
supplementary
conditions to the S. I.thereby limiting
ourselves to the
study
of theories in which the fields can be introducedso as to
satisfy
them(2).
Exploiting
the consequences of thesesupplementary
conditions we shall be able to reabsorb all thehighest dimensionality breakings,
except the A. B. A. which couldonly
be eliminated in view of an hithertounproved
non-renormalization theorem.
For what concerns the
remaining
softanomalies,
we shall show that the. Callan-Symanzik equation,
in a verygeneral
context, excludes their pre-sence.
3 . RENORMALIZATION
OF THE SLAVNOV IDENTITY - HARD ANOMALIES In this Section we
begin
toanalyze
thebreakings
to the S. I.r~)
=0,
and
following
thegeneral
strategy we will first discuss the renormaliza-bility
ofEqs. (17) (21)
after the introduction in thetheory
of the set of exter-nal fields mentioned in the
previous
Section. We shall takeadvantage
of this
opportunity
to work out in detail anexample
of ourapproach
torenormalization which may serve for future reference.
e) There might be the doubt that Eqs. (17), (21) essentially restrict the class of quantum extensions of the model under consideration. That this is not the case follows from the
stability proof of the classical action given in I.
Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
According
to theQ.
A. P.[7]
illustrated in Section2, Eqs. (17) (21)
admitbreakings
which areN3-products.
We havethus,
ingeneral,
where the r. h. s. means the insertion of the vertices and into the
appropriate
Green functions.Since the vertices
~«
and arepolynomials
in the fields and theirderivatives,
whose coefficients are formal power seriesin n,
i. e.the
equations
=Ea(x)
=0, ensuring
thevalidity
ofEqs. (17) (21)
to all orders of
perturbation theory,
can be solved if for any n 1 the equa- tionsare solvable in terms of the coefficients of
To prove the
solvability
ofEqs. (24 a)
and(24 b)
remark that[4] :
where
Qan’(x, Leff)
andLeff)
sum up the quantum correctionsimplied by
theQ.
A. P. andconsequently depend
ononly
for v n ;clearly
we have to show that : andfor the same local functional of dimension four.
Now the coefficients of the fields in have at most dimension
one and null C.IY.
charge ;
it follows that thepossible dependent
terms in whose
general
structure is can be writtenin the form
(26 a)
with thecorresponding
termin L given by
In much the same way the contributions and in
can be
compensated by introducing
in~
thecouplings
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Section A
and Now since in the
inhomogeneous
term shownin
Eq. (20)
the coefficients of themonomials yi
and are left undeter-mined,
we are free to transfer these monomials from toOnce these
adjustements
are done we remain with :where the kernels and
depend only
on the and~
fields.Due to their ~ . n. character the operator and anticommute among themselves and with each other. This
leads, picking
out the ordern > 1 in
Eqs. (22 a) (22 b),
to thefollowing consistency
conditions for the n-th order quantum corrections :Substituting
intoEqs. (28 a) (28 b)
theexpressions (27 a) (27 b) yield
thatare
antisymmetric
in the first two indices and that L03B3S03B1A03B2A isantisymmetric
in the indices Notice that theanti symmetry
ofand can be maintained for a
generic
value of~3
as a definition.The mixed
integrability
conditionEq. (28 c) yields :
It thus follows from the
consistency
conditions(28 a) (28 b)
and(28 c)
that the quantum correction terms and
QaA(x)
can begiven
the form(26 a)
and(26 b)
with the choiceThis proves the
compensability
of thebreakings Ea(x),
and hencethe
renormalizability
of thesupplementary
conditions( 17) (21 ).
We have thus shown that
Eqs. (17) (21)
andconsequently
theequation 1])
= 0 can be solved to all orders ofperturbation theory by
asuitable choice of the term in
Eq. (9)
and of the bilinearcouplings
Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
of the abelian
c’s,
theremaining 11 dependent
part ofbeing arbitrary.
Hence we restrict from now on the effective
Lagrangians
under consi- derationby imposing
this choice for the abelian c’scouplings.
Such arequirement gives
the necessarycomplement
to the B. R. S.algebraic
treatment of the
highest dimensionality breakings
to the S. I.by fixing
the
asymptotic
U. V. behaviour of the vertices with ac03B1A external leg.
Forinstance :
We
begin
now the mainsubject
of ourstudy
i. e. the discussion of the renormalization of the Slavnovidentity, analyzing,
as a first step, the break-ings by
means of theconsistency
conditions which follow fromEq. (21).
In this
exposition
we shall repeat without the details of the calculations the essential steps of the B. R. S.[4] method, treating
at samelength
thoseaspects for which the
algebraic
conditions do notprovide enough
informa-tion,
due to the nonsemi-simple
character of the gauge group.The
breakings
of the S. I. are defined in terms of the vertex functionalAccording
to theQ.
A. P. thesymbol
in the r. h. s. ofEq. (32)
means theinsertion of the vertex
carrying
thecharge -
1. Defin-ing
the functional operatorthe vertex 4 is related to the effective
Lagrangian by
where
Q(x, ~)
sums up the radiativecorrections ; ~(x)
can also bewritten as a formal power series in h as
30
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincare - Section A
Picking
out ofEq. (34)
the n-th order terms andselecting
the contributions from11),
the n-th order coefficients can becomputed
accord-ing
towhere and
fP(Û)
are the n-th and zeroth order terms in the h power series ofgiven
inEq. (33)
and.x) depends
on the coefficients of up to the order n - 1. The gauge parameterspa
are absent sincethey
do not contribute for n > 0.The
renormalizability
of the S. I. isproved by showing
that theequation
is solvable for any n 1. In the course of the
proof
we shall first eliminate fromA~(~-)
the termsdependent
on the external fields and then discuss theremaining, independent,
part.a)
External fielddependent breakings.
Writing explicitely
thedependence
of~~"’(x)
on the fields in the form :we shall discuss the
solvability,
in terms of the coefficients in of the systemRecall
that,
in order not to violate theasymptotic
behaviours(Eqs. (31
a,b, c)), only
the coefficients of the termsinvolving
thesemi-simple
cfields,
of
caA
andaucaA
inPan’
are at ourdisposal
to solveEq. (39),
the other ccouplings being already
determined so as tosatisfy Eqs. (17) (21).
At thispoint
the coefficients of are still undetermined and will be used to solve theequation
= 0.The
consistency
conditions obtainedby
B. R. S.JVJ
fromEq. (21)
readin terms of the operator
The relevant
properties
of thebreakings, ensuing
from theseconsistency
Vol. XXVIII, nO 3 - 1978.
conditions,
can be summarized in thefollowing relations,
whose rather involved deduction isperformed
at the end of this subsection :where
and the field
polynomials satisfy
From this results we can
easily
show that thedependent breakings
are
compensable
within the allowed class of effectiveLagrangians.
Infact a
comparison
ofEq. (42)
withEq. (36)
shows that the corrections to be introduced in the n-th order fieldcouplings
in order to solveEq. (37)
are
just given by
thepolynomials
inEq. (42).
Furthermore the condi- tion(43) guarantees
that thiscompensation
does notmodify
the n-thorder
couplings h’Y~S~~ ~~A,
thuspreserving
theprescribed
powercounting
behaviours. Moreexplicitely
fromEqs. (36) (42)
we see that thecontribution of the radiative corrections to has the form
where the field
polynomials
=depend
on the coeffi-cients of up to order n - 1. From
Eq. (43)
we get that the n-th order coefficients of thepreviously
mentionedcouplings,
which werealready
determined to preserve the
prescribed
powercounting behaviours,
com-pensate
thecorresponding
contributionscoming
from radiative correc-tions.
Then,
the obvious solutionP~ = - (equivalent
to =0)
of the system
A~ =
0 does not break thesuper-renormalizability
of theabelian c
couplings.
Thus,
to conclude our discussion of the external fielddependent
break-ings,
it remains to show thatEq. (42)
can be satisfiedtogether
withEq. (43).
In order to arrive at
Eqs. (42
a,b, c)
we writeexplicitely
the fielddepen-
dence in
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
Omitting
thecalculations,
which can beperformed by
the co-homolo-gical
methods of B. R. S.(Appendices A,
B in ref.[9]),
wegive
thegeneral
solutions ofEqs. (40 a, b, c)
in terms of the coefficientsappearing
inEqs. (45 a, b, c) :
The same solutions in the functional form are written :
where
The coefficients in the
preceding
formulaeobey
theequations
’and
the coefficients0~, 0~
aregiven by (see
B. R.S., Appendix B)
Analogous expressions
hold for~~S
andtr.
The factors cl, C2 and C3 areproportional
to the values of thequadratic
Casimir operator of the gauge group in theadjoint
and matter fieldrepresentations respectively
and~~
are solutions of thehomogeneous equations corresponding
to
Eqs. (46).
Forinstance,
thegeneral
solution of thehomogeneous
versionVol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
of
Eq. (46 d),
obtainedby equating
to zero its 1. h. s.,is,
for the abelian indexwhere
A J
is anarbitrary
matrix.The above rather tedious
display
of formulaeexplicitely
shows thealge-
braic consequences of the
consistency conditions, evidentiating
the noncompensable
contributions to thebreakings
which have still to be discussedat the
light
of theprescribed
powercounting
rules. It is indeed clear fromEqs. (47),
thatEqs. (42)
hold trueprovided
the coefficients0~,
in
Eqs. (46) (49)
vanish. For this purpose it is sufficient that inEqs. (45)
On the other hand we see that
Eqs. (43)
can be satisfied if there existsa choice of the coefficients
03B103B2A03B3S, 03B2A03B1S03B3S, 03B1Aij
inEqs. (50),
for which0~
vanish. With theobviously possible
choicethe
vanishing
of and followsimmediately
from the relationswhich are
proved, together
withEqs. (52),
inAppendix A, making
use ofthe
super-renormalizability
of the abelian ecouplings.
Thepossibility
ofsetting
to zero theremaining term 0~,
with0~
as inEq (51),
in ensuredif the coefficients
039803B103B3Aij
have thefollowing
structurefor some suitable BCX matrix. This is also
proved
inAppendix
A.So ends the
analysis
of therenormalizability
of the external fieldcoupl- ings
and we shallpretend,
from now on, that the n-th orderbreakings
donot
depend
on the external fields. With thisproviso
we now discuss theremaining independent breakings.
b)
External fieldindependent breakings.
After B. R.
S.,
theconsistency
condition for the~a~x) independent
n-thorder
breaking
isand the
compensability
condition for the same isOur
task,
to which the rest of this paper isdevoted,
is to proveEq. (57)
in the
hypothesis
that the A. B. A. is absent.Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincare - Section A
The contributions to are classified
according
to the O.n. field content as follows :where
~), depend
upon the fields and theirderivatives and have maximum naive dimension four and two
respectively.
Considering first,
asusual,
theequation (JP(O)2LB~) =
0 we getwith =
and,
as in paperI,
,~~l~c)~ _
+ . Somemore information about the coefficient comes from power
counting
and the
super-renormalizability
of the abelian ecouplings. Indeed,
fromthe definition of 0394 we obtain
and,
with a powercounting analysis
similar to the one carried out inAppendix
A for the external fieldsdependent breakings,
weget
from which the
vanishing
of followsimmediately.
Now the consis- tency conditionEq. (56)
writesfrom
which, separating the c" dependent
terms, we find = 0. Hence thesupplementary
conditions(17)
and(21)
reduce the admissible break-ing
to thesimple
form :which has still to
satisfy
theconsistency
condition(56).
Let us now recall that
Pb Pus, ~ C03B2A are nothing
but the gauge variations of the fields 03C6i, A03B2S,A03B2A respectively
with the infinitesimal gauge para-Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
meters
bc,~«
substitutedby
ca.Writing
the gauge variation of the functionalF(d
Jl’((J)
asðF(d
Jl’qJ)
= dx 11OJp(x),
weexplicitely
haveRecalling
also thatWe can write the
consistency
conditionEq. (56)
for thebreaking
inEq. (63)
as
which,
upon differentiation with respect toCp(y), gives
forW(x)
theWess-Zumino
[16] consistency
condition :The discussion
of Eq. (67) parallels
the one in B. R. S.(Refs. [4] [9] [77]).
The
starting point
is that thegeneral
solution ofEq. (67)
has the formwhere the dimension of the
functional A
can be madeequal
to that ofis the Adler-Bardeen
[12] anomaly (A.
B.A.),
is inva-riant under
global
gauge transformations(i.
e. those with constant para-meters)
and is determined up to fourdivergencies (i.
e. terms of the typeAssuming
from now on that the A. B. A. is absent to all orders of pertur- bationtheory,
we also see that if is likewise absent thebreaking ao’
is
compensable. Indeed,
in such a case, fromEq. (68)
it follows thatIn other
words,
fromEq. (68)
we can concludethat,
if the A. B. A. isabsent, by
a suitable choice of~e~(~)
we can reduce thebreaking
to the minimalform
Annales de l’Institut Herrri Poincare - Section A
with and
In
Appendix
B we prove that theanomaly 039403B1A0
has no contributions of maximum dimension.In the
following
Section we shallcomplete
ourinvestigation
of thebreakings
to the S. I.by showing
that vanishes if it does not contain terms of maximum dimension.4. RENORMALIZATION
OF THE SLAVNOV IDENTITY - SOFT ANOMALIES The
analysis
of theprevious
Section and ofAppendix
Bpoints uniquely
to the Adler-Bardeen
anomaly
as theonly
noncompensable breaking
ofdimension five to the Slavnov
identity ;
here we shallcomplete
the investi-gation by treating
the soft contributions in thehypothesis
that the Adler-Bardeen
anomaly
is absent.The
proof
is an extension to the gauge models of the onegiven by
B. R. S.for
Lagrangian
theories[14]
with brokensymmetries,
where the presence of soft anomalies was excludedby
means of theCallan-Symanzik [13]
equation.
This extension involvesmainly
thetechnique
of theproof,
whilethe
guiding lines,
which we are nowgoing
toillustrate,
remainunchanged.
We want to
show,
at the lowest order in h at whichthey
appear, that thebreakings
to the S. I. must have contributions of maximumdimensionality.
The basic ideas of the
proof
are thefollowing :
let ~, be the massscaling
parameter of the
theory
andbi’s
the coefficients of theindependent
mono-mials which appear in the
breaking
Ll. These coefficients are homo- geneous functions of 03BB withdegrees xi = 5 - dim (0394i)
and henceAccording
to theCallan-Symanzik equation,
the massscaling
transfor-mation
applied
to the Green functions isequivalent,
up to radiative correc-tions,
to the insertion of a soft vertex. From this property there follows afunctional differential
equation
for thebreaking
Ll.Indeed, defining
thementioned soft insertion
by coupling
it to an external field Q we haveNow,
since the field Q hasstrictly positive dimension,
the aboveequation relates,
at the lowest orderin h,
thecoefficients bi
of the softbreakings (i.
e. the oneswith xi ~ 0)
with those of terms ofhigher dimensionality.
Vol. XXVIII, nO 3 - 1978.
Thus,
if the terms ofdimensionality
five are absent in thebreaking d,
allthe
b/s
arerecursively
zero.As
already pointed
out there are some technicalpoints
to be takencare
of ;
in fact thepossibility
ofapplying
this methoddepends strictly
on the condition that the Q field does not alter the
properties
of the break-ing by reintroducing
contributions of maximum dimension. Inparticular,
the mass
scaling
operator we arelooking
for must commute with the func- tional differentialoperator ~ appearing
in the S. I. for the connectedGreen functional
which, taking
into account thebreaking A,
writes(the Legendre
transformation ofEq. (32)).
Thisrequires
a correction of the naive~;
Î. operator which does not commute with thepa
gauge para- meters in V.Our program is then the
following ;
first find theappropriate (i.
e. sym-metric)
massscaling
operator and second check that the Q field does notreintroduce in the
theory
newanomalies,
which either are hard or violate conditions(71), (72). Finally
these results are puttogether
toyield
the Callan-Symanzik equation
which allows acomplete
treatment of the soft break-ings.
The mass
scaling
operator~ obeys
the commutation rulethe first step will thus consist in
adding
to~,a~,
those terms liable to compen- sate the r. h. s. ofEq. (75).
With this inmind,
consider the bilocal functional differential operator _where is the gauge matrix
appearing
in the solution of the c fieldsequation
of motion(Eq. (12))
here written in terms of the disconnected Green functional
Z(J, ~).
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
The operator has the
following properties :
From
Eqs. (77), (79), recalling
theghost
massdegeneracy
condition=
0,
we can writeso we
immediately
deducethat,
once the E -~ 0 limit issuitably defined,
the o p erator
lim i h{Q(~)03C1, G}
is thea pp ro p riate
t er m which should be added to03BB~03BB (sec Eq. (75))
in order tosymmetrize
it.We are
going
to translate thesymmetric
massscaling
operator so indi-viduated,
into a form useful for thesubsequent developments.
This is doneby introducing,
almost for the lasttime,
an external field of dimen-sionality
one neutraland,
to first order inr(x)
the new discon-nected functional
(see Eq. (78)) :
with
corresponding
connected generator :Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
The Slavnov
identity
forZ~f:)(J, 11, r)
can be obtainedby
directcomputation
to first order in
r(x)
and up to radiative corrections fromEqs. (74), (82)
as : "
The contributions on the r. h. s. of this
equation
are allregular
in the 8 ~ 0limit ;
inparticular
the second term vanishesby Eq. (77)
while the lastone can be
rewritten,
alsoby Eq. (77),
asDefining
the connected functionalr)
in the 8 ~ 0limiting theory by separating
out thesingular
contributions in the Wilsonexpansion [18] [7] ]
of the bilocal
operators
in the second term on the r. h. s. ofEq. (82),
allothers
being clearly
convergent, we canimmediately
write the S. I. forThis
equation
showsthat,
since the fieldr(x)
is notcoupled
to a Slavnovinvariant vertex, the
operator [/
has to bereplaced by [/(r" and,
moreimportant,
that thebreaking ~,
at its lowest nonvanishing order,
is notaltered
by
the introduction ofr(x).
It follows from the above
analysis
that the massscaling
operator needed for the construction of theCallan-Symanzik equation
of the model is :Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Section A
whose commutator with the Slavnov operator is
straightforwardly computed
to beand vanishes at the
point r(x)
= 0.The second step toward the
Callan-Symanzik equation requires
charac-terizing
all the soft(less
than fourdimensional)
invariant insertions of thetheory
andchecking
that these same insertions do not alter the relevantproperties
of thebreakings.
The set of these insertions is incorrespondence
with the soft Slavnov invariant terms in the action which are
compatible
with the mass
degeneracy
condition = 0. Some elements within this classcorrespond
to invariant vertices whileothers, typically
satisfy
the invariancerequirement only
after xintegration.
In order to define the soft insertions in the renormalized
theory
weintroduce
(for
the lasttime) a
set of external scalar whichare
coupled,
at the treeapproximation,
with the above mentioned Slavnov invariant terms, thusyielding
for the generator of the connected Green functionsNow, following
the distinction among theinsertions,
we divide the set{
into with theproperties
An examination of the classical
theory
leads to the result that the fields{ /~(x) }
contribute to the classical action a term(3) :
(3) Obviously terms of the
type
do satisfy Eq. (90 b), but they corres-pond to vanishing insertions and hence we will exclude them at least in the tree approxima- tion.
Vol. XXVIII, n° 3 - 1978.
where,
in order to preserve the massdegeneracy condition,
the matrices~
are constrained
by
Of course, since
the 03B2i
fieldcouplings
are not Slavnovinvariant,
theirintroduction modifies the S.
I.,
which at the treeapproximation
becomes :with
In order to
define, through
fields the soft insertions in the renormalizedtheory
and toverify
how the new fields contribute to thebreakings,
we shouldanalyze
this modified S. I. at thehigher
orders in ~.Usually
thisprocedure requires
a functional translation ofEq. (93)
sincea field
product
as inEq. (94)
has nomeaning beyond
the treeapproximation
However the present case is much
simpler (and,
aspromised,
we can avoidintroducing
a new externalfield)
since the fields are free except for thecouplings
with the As a consequence thebreaking
due tothe 03B2i fields,
defined inEqs. (93), (94)
can be maintained unaltered to all orders ofperturbation theory. Thus, extending
the O.n.equations
of motion(Eqs. (17), (21)) by appropriately modifying
theinhomogeneous
termsYa(x), XaA(x)
tocomprehend
thenew ~3t couplings,
we can repeat as in theprevious
Section and without any effect
arising
from the lack of Slavnov invariance of theclassical 03B2i vertices,
the wholeanalysis
of thebreakings
which arenow defined
by
_It follows
that,
also in the presence of the Qfields,
thebreakings
can bereduced to the
soft,
Qdependent
term :where
Q)
is constrainedby
conditions(71), (72).
We have now
gathered
all the necessary information to arrive at theCallan-Symanzik equation
which we shall write in a short-handform,
sufficient to our purposes. As a first step, let us remark that in the treeapproximation,
the action of thesymmetric
massscaling
operatorD~,
onthe connected Green functional is
equivalent
to the introduction of asuitable linear combination of the
previously
defined soft invariant inser- tions :Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A