• Aucun résultat trouvé

Key questions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Key questions"

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS FOR PREVENTING MOTHER-TO- CHILD TRANSMISSION (OPTION B):

Pharmaceutical considerations for a public health approach

Mohammed Lamorde1, Jonathan M. Schapiro2, David Burge3, David J. Back4

1Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda

2National Hemophilia Center in Tel Aviv, Israel

3Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

4Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

(2)

WHO/HIV/2013.63 © World Health Organization 2013

Background

• Antiretroviral drugs critical for preventing mother-to- child transmission of HIV (PMTCT)

• Antiretroviral therapy (cART) preferred strategy

• Option B: discontinue cART at the end of

breastfeeding or at childbirth (if not breastfeeding)1

• WHO 2010 guidelines recommend discontinuation of NNRTI-based ART with an NRTI tail of at least 7 days

1WHO (2010). Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants.

(3)

Background

• Efavirenz (EFV) preferred for first-line treatment of HIV-1 infection, including among pregnant women1

• However, concern about discontinuing EFV-based cART because EFV has:

– Low genetic barrier to resistance – Prolonged elimination half-life

• Increased risk of emergence of NNRTI-associated resistance

1WHO (2012) Technical update on treatment optimization. Use of efavirenz during pregnancy: a public health perspective.

(4)

WHO/HIV/2013.63 © World Health Organization 2013

Proposed nucleoside backbones for EFV-based cART:

– zidovudine, lamivudine (ZDV, 3TC)

– tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine (TDF, 3TC)

Background

(5)

7 h

22 h

91 h

22 h

91 h 150 h

ZDV-TP 3TC-TP EFV TFV-DP 3TC-TP EFV

Half-life

3TC-TP, lamivudine triphosphate; EFV, efavirenz (plasma); TFV-DP, tenofovir diphosphate; ZDV-TP, zidovudine triphosphate.

FTC=39 h

(6)

WHO/HIV/2013.63 © World Health Organization 2013

Key questions

Assuming viral suppression, what is the risk of

selecting NNRTI resistance among women stopping ZDV, 3TC, EFV versus TDF, 3TC, EFV?

Is a tail required?

If a tail is required, what should the recommended duration be?

(7)

Search strategy

Aim: Identify studies reporting resistance following EFV- discontinuation

– Pubmed.gov – Clinicaltrials.gov – Reviews & Reports

Fifteen (15) reports met criteria

SEARCH TERMS

•(("HIV"[Mesh]) AND "efavirenz" [Supplementary Concept]) AND "Drug Resistance, Microbial"[Mesh]).

•“Drug Resistance, Viral"[Mesh] AND "Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical"[Mesh] AND

"lamivudine"[Supplementary Concept]

•"Drug Resistance, Viral"[Mesh] AND "Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical"[Mesh] AND

"zidovudine"[Supplementary Concept]

• ("Pregnancy"[Mesh] OR "Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical"[Mesh]) AND

"tenofovir"[Supplementary Concept]

(8)

WHO/HIV/2013.63 © World Health Organization 2013

Findings

• No head-to-head comparison between

ZDV, 3TC, EFV versus TDF, 3TC, EFV.

(9)

ZDV,3TC, EFV

• SMART study1: ≥ 1 NNRTI mutation (EFV patients only)

– Without tail: 20.7%

– With tail*: 15.6%

• Darwich et al.2

– Without tail: 14% (nevirapine and EFV combined)

• STACCATO3

Without tail: 12.5%

• TRIVACAN4 : ≥ 1 NNRTI mutation

– With tail: 10%

1. Fox Z et al. (2008); 2. Darwich et al .(2008); 3. Ananworanich (2003); 4. Danel (2009)

*7 days NRTI or replace with PI. Note: study tails ranged 5 days to 7 days.

(10)

WHO/HIV/2013.63 © World Health Organization 2013

TDF, 3TC, EFV

• Scarce data

• Case report1: TDF, 3TC, EFV, ddI

– Without tail: 1 NNRTI mutation

• STOP22 :Simultaneous stop followed by lopinavir/r * 4 weeks

– No NNRTI mutations (4 subjects)

1. Sadiq (2005); 2. Taylor et al. (2012).

(11)

Other considerations

• Different study designs and suboptimal timing for resistance testing

• Limited knowledge on EFV variability due to genetics, sex, postpartum state

• EFV true elimination half-life known to be nearly twice what was previously reported1

• Resistance test measurements: population testing versus more sensitive techniques

1. Jackson et al. (2012).

(12)

WHO/HIV/2013.63 © World Health Organization 2013

Resistance risk:

ZDV, 3TC, EFV versus TDF, 3TC, EFV

No data

Tail required?

ZDV, 3TC, EFV Yes

TDF, 3TC, EFV Probably not*

Duration of tail ? 2 weeks* NA

Recommendation

* Suggested based on PK characteristics; clinical studies required.

Références

Documents relatifs

Coupez et collez le prochain object qui devrait apparaître dans la suite.. À

En comparant les résultats obtenus par la prédiction du potentiel de génotoxicité des NPs en utilisant le modèle QSAR avec d’autres travaux, on remarque que les méthodes in

Preliminary results have been presented from the SIMBA trial carried out in Rwanda and Uganda in which infants born to HIV- infected women who received ZDV plus didanosine

The 2006 WHO guidelines, Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants, represented a major advance from previous recommendations

Because the Motherisk program is consulted by up to 200 women and their health professionals every day about the use of drugs and exposure to chemicals in pregnancy, we are

While  information  about  how  psychotropic  medica- tions  and  substance  use  affect  individual  patients  has  increased  steadily  over  the  years,  data 

Casein hydrolysate for- mula was eff ective for managing colicky symptoms associated with protein sensitivity in 15 of 22 infants in a study conducted in Sweden, 8 and colic

Development of resistance mutations in women receiving standard antiretroviral therapy who received intrapartum nevirapine to prevent perinatal human immunodefi ciency virus type