• Aucun résultat trouvé

A note on minimal Galois embeddings of abelian surfaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A note on minimal Galois embeddings of abelian surfaces"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A Note on Minimal Galois Embeddings of Abelian Surfaces

HISAOYOSHIHARA

ABSTRACT- We show that the least numberNsuch that an abelian surface has a Galois embedding inPNis seven and then we give examples of such surfaces.

1. Introduction.

This is a continuation of our previous paper [7]. The least numberN suchthat an abelian surface can be embedded inPNis four, and in that case the abelian surface has a special structure, see for example [3]. Similarly it might have some interest to study the least numberNsuchthat an abelian surfaceAcan be Galois-embedded inPN. Moreover, in that case we want to know the structure of A. In this short note we give the answer to the problem. Before stating it, we recall from [7] some of the definitions and properties of Galois embeddings of algebraic varieties.

Let kbe the ground field of our discussions, which is assumed to be algebraic closed. Let V be a nonsingular projective algebraic variety of dimensionnandDa very ample divisor. We denote this by a pair (V;D).

Let f ˆfD:V,!PNbe the embedding ofV associated withthe complete linear system jDj, wh ere N‡1ˆdimH0(V;O(D)). Suppose thatW is a linear subvariety of PN suchthat dimW ˆN n 1 and W\f(V)ˆ ;.

Then consider the projectionW,pW:PN >W0withcenterW, whereW0 is an n-dimensional linear subvariety not meeting W. The composition pˆpWf is a surjective morphism fromVtoW0Pn. LetK ˆk(V) and K0ˆk(W0) be the function fields ofV andW0 respectively. The covering map p induces a finite extension of fields p:K0,!K of degree dˆdegf(V)ˆDn, which is the self-intersection number ofD. It is easy to see that the structure of this extension does not depend on the choice ofW0

(*) Indirizzo dell'A.: Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan.

E-mail: yosihara@math.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp

(2)

but only onW, hence we denote byKWthe Galois closure of this extension and byGW ˆGal(KW=K0) the Galois group of KW=K0. Note that GW is isomorphic to the monodromy group of the coveringp:V !W0.

DEFINITION1. In the above situation we callGWthe Galois group atW.

If the extensionK=K0is Galois, we callf andWa Galois embedding and a Galois subspace for the embedding, respectively.

DEFINITION2. A nonsingular projective algebraic varietyV is said to have a Galois embedding if there exist a very ample divisorDsuch that the embedding associated withthe complete linear system jDj has a Galois subspace. In this case the pair (V;D) is said to define a Galois embedding.

In this note we use the following notation.

Zm : the cyclic group of orderm Dm : the dihedral group of order 2m jGj: the order of a groupG

r: exp (2p 

p 1

=6)

Aut(V) : the automorphism group of a varietyV ha1;. . .;ami: the subgroup generated bya1;. . .;am 12 : the unit matrix of degree two

We shall make use of the following criterion (cf. [7, Theorem 2.2]).

THEOREMA. Let V and D be as above. The pair(V;D)defines a Galois embedding if and onlyif the following conditions hold:

(1) There exists a subgroup G of Aut(V)such thatjGj ˆDn.

(2) There exists a G-invariant linear subspace L of H0(V;O(D)) of dimension n‡1such that, for anys2G, the restrictionsjLis a multiple of the identity.

(3) The linear system L has no base points.

The original form of the study of the Galois embedding is given in [5] or [6]. We have applied the above method to abelian surfacesAoverkˆC and obtained some results.

2. Statement of Theorem.

LetAbe an abelian surface defined overkˆCandGbe a finite sub- group ofAut(A). Fix a covering morphismC2 !A. An elementg2Ghas

(3)

a representation eg on the universal covering C2 suchthat egzˆM(g)z‡t(g), where M(g)2GL(2;C),z2C2 andt(g)2C2. We call M(g) andt(g) the matrix and translation part of the representationeg, re- spectively. PutG0ˆ fg2GjM(g)ˆ12gandHˆ fM(g)jg2Gg. Then, we have the following exact sequence of groups

1 !G0 !G !H !1:

ClearlyBˆA=G0is also an abelian surface andHG=G0is a subgroup of Aut(B).

Hereafter we assume that (A;D) defines a Galois embedding inPNand let G be the Galois group. Then G is a subgroup ofAut(A) and B=His isomorphic toA=GP2. With the notation above, we have:

THEOREM B. [7, Theorem 3.7] If an abelian surface A has a Galois embedding, then H is isomorphic to D3, D4or a semidirect product Z2j K, where KD4or ZmZm (mˆ3; 4; 6)

Now, the answer to the question in the introduction is given as follows:

THEOREMC. Suppose that(A;D)defines a Galois embedding. Then (1) The least number N is seven, i.e., there exists an abelian surface A such that it can be embedded into P7 with a Galois subspace, and no abelian surface embedded inPN(N6)has a Galois subspace.

(2) The abelian surface BˆA=G0 is isomorphic to the self-product EE of an elliptic curve, such that HˆG=G0acts on B and HD4or Z2j D4.

REMARK1. The minimal Galois embedding for an elliptic curve E is given as follows. If E can be Galois-embedded in P2, th en E must have an automorphism of order three with a fixed point. In fact, the elliptic curve is unique and is defined by Y2Zˆ4X3‡Z3. Th e centers of the projections are (1:0:0);(0: 

p 3

:1) and (0: 

p 3

:1). How- ever, note that every elliptic curve has a Galois embedding in P3, where the group is isomorphic to Z2Z2 (further, if the j-invariant is 1728, then it has another projection center whose Galois group is isomorphic to Z4).

In what follows we shall give the proof of Theorem C and some examples.

In particular, there is an example whereBis the Jacobian of a curve. Indeed,

(4)

let J(C) be the Jacobian of the normalization C of the curve y2ˆ x(x4‡ax2‡1); a6ˆ 2, and letAbe an abelian surface which is an etale double coveringq:A !J(C). Then we shall show that (A; q(C‡C0)) gives a minimal Galois embedding, whereC0is a translated ofC.

3. Proof.

By Theorem B we havejHj ˆ2a3b, wh ere (a;b)ˆ(3;0), (4;0), (5;0), (1;1), (1;2) (3;2). We consider the possible values ofjGj ˆD2ˆ2m. SinceAcan be embedded inPm 1by the complete linear systemjDj, we havem 14 by [3]. In view of Theorem B we havem6ˆ5, hencem6. Suppose thatmˆ6.

Then, from Theorem B again we infer thatHD3andjG0j ˆ2. Every two dimensional complex crystallographic group G with X=GP2 has been classified in [4]. Referring to it, we see thatAcan be expressed asAˆC2=V suchthatVis the period matrix

Vˆ 1 r2 v r2v

1 r v rv

ˆ 1 r2

1 r

1 0 v 0

0 1 0 v

; wherevis a complex number withIv>0.

Define four vectors as follows:

v1ˆ 1 1

; v2ˆ r2

r ; v3ˆ v v

ˆvv1; v4ˆ r2v rv

ˆvv2: LetLAbe the lattice inC2generated byv1;v2;v3andv4. Letg1be a gen- erator ofG0whose representation iseg1zˆz‡e, wherez; e2C2. Sinceg12

is the identity onA, we have 2e2 LA. LetLBbe the lattice generated byLA ande. Then BˆC2=LBˆA=hg1iis also an abelian surface on which the groupHacts. As shown in [4],His generated byg2 andg3, whose matrix parts are

M2ˆM(g2)ˆ 0 1 1 0

andM3ˆM(g3)ˆ r 0 0 r2

respectively. Since 2e2 LA, the vectorecan be expressed as eˆ1

2 X4

iˆ1

nivi;

where niˆ0 or 1 (1i4). Since G0 is a normal subgroup of G and jG0j ˆ2, g1 commutes witheachelement of G. Therefore, we infer that

(5)

Mie e2 LA(iˆ2;3). Indeed we have

M2e eˆ f (2n1‡n2)v1 (2n3‡n4)v3g=2 2 LA: Thus we have

( n2v1 n4v3)=22 LA: (1)

Similarly, consideringM3e e, we have

f n2v1‡(n1 n2)v2 n4v3‡(n3 n4)v4g=22 LA: (2)

From (1) we getn2ˆn4ˆ0, hence from (2) we getn1ˆn3ˆ0. Since e2 L= A, this is a contradiction. Thus we havem7. From Theorem B we inferjGj 6ˆ14, hence we havem8. We conclude that the least numberm is 8 by the examples in the next section.

REMARK 2. Referring to [4, Theorem 1], we see that in the case (i) HD4 the dimension of the moduli space is 1, but in the case (ii) HZ2j D4the dimension is zero.

4. Examples.

When we make examples, the following lemma is useful.

LEMMA3. If M(g) 12is a nonsingular matrix for g2G, then we can assume t(g)ˆ0.

PROOF. We consider tGt 1 instead of G, where t is a translation

etzˆz‡`. If M(g) 12 is nonsingular, then by putting `ˆ

(M(g) 12) 1t(g), we gett(tgt 1)ˆ0. p

In casemˆ8 we haveHD4orZ2j D4by Theorem B. We shall give examples of both. If (i) HD4, thenjG0j ˆ2. Since G0 is a normal sub- group of G and jG0j ˆ2, we infer that GˆG0H. Suchexamples are given in Examples 4 and 5. On the other hand, if HZ2j D4, we have GH. Suchan example is given in Example 7.

EXAMPLE4. LetAbe the abelian surface with the period matrix

1 0 v 0

0 1 0 v

suchthatIv>0:

(6)

LetLAbe the lattice generated by the column vectors of the period matrix.

Let us consider the automorphismsg1,g2 andg3ofA, whose representa- tions onC2are as follows:

ge1z ˆ z‡12 n1‡n3v n2‡n4v

; ge2z ˆ 0 1

1 0

z‡ a1 a2 ; ge3z ˆ 0 1

1 0

z

where (n1;n2;n3;n4)ˆ(0;0;1;1);(1;1;0;0);(1;1;1;1);

a1‡a2 a1‡a2

2 LAand 2a1 0

2 LA:

We haveg12ˆg22ˆg34ˆid,g2g3g2ˆg3 1andgig1ˆg1gi(iˆ2;3) onA.

Putting Gˆ hg1;g2;g3i, we have G0ˆ hg1i and GˆG0H where Hˆ hM(g2);M(g3)i. ClearlyHD4. The groupGis a subgroup ofAut(A) and A=GP2. The very ample divisor D is given by p(L), where p:A !A=GP2andLis a line inP2(cf. [7, Lemma 3.5]). We infer from Theorem A that (A;D) defines a Galois embedding.

By [7, Corollary 3.8], if A has a Galois embedding, then the abelian surfaceBˆA=G0is isomorphic toEEfor some elliptic curveE. On th e other hand,EEcan be a Jacobian of a curve for someE(cf. [2]). So one may ask what type of genus 2 curve can give the Jacobian whose double covering has a minimal Galois embedding. Let us consider this question in the next example.

EXAMPLE 5. Let G be the curve defined by y2ˆx(x4‡ax2‡1), where we assumea6ˆ 2 (cf. [1, Theorem 4.8]). This curve has a singular point at1. LetCbe the normalization ofG. The genus ofCis two. Lets andtbe the birational transformations ofG defined by

s(x)ˆ x; s(y)ˆiy and t(x)ˆ1=x; t(y)ˆy=x3

respectively. Clearly we have s4ˆt2ˆidandtstˆs 1. LetHbe the group generated bysandt. Then we haveH D4. This group acts onC.

LetC(x;y) be th e function field ofC, wh erey2ˆx(x4‡ax2‡1). Clearly the invariant field of C(x;y) bys is C(x2). Let w1 andw2 be a basis of holomorphic 1-forms on C induced from dx=y and xdx=y respectively.

(7)

We have

s(w1)ˆiw1; s(w2)ˆ iw2 and t(w1)ˆ w2; t(w2)ˆ w1: LetJ(C) be the Jacobian ofC. Taking a base pointP2C, the Abel-Jacobi mapjP is given as

jP :C !J(C) such th at jP(Q) ZQ

P

w1; ZQ

P

w2

0

@

1

A …modulo the lattice†;

whereQ2C. If Pis a fixed point of s, then we have Zs(Q)

P

wˆ ZQ

P

s(w);

forQ2C, wh erewˆw1orw2. Similarly ifP0is a fixed point oft, th en we have

Zt(Q0)

P0

wˆ ZQ0

P0

t(w);

whereQ02C. Note that ifjP:C !J(C) is defined witha base pointP, and jP0 :C !J(C) is defined witha base pointP0, thenjP0 ˆtjP, wheretis a translation inJ(C). Assume thatPis a fixed point ofs. Then, lettingesandet be the representations ofsandtonC2respectively, we obtain that they can be expressed aseszˆM(s)zandetzˆM(t)z‡v, wherez2C2,v2C2and

M(s)ˆ i 0

0 i

andM(t)ˆ 0 1

1 0

:

PutHˆ hM(s);M(t)i. Then we haveHD4. Note that the curvejP(C) is fixed bysandC=hsiis isomorphic to a smooth rational curve. We infer from the above arguments thatJ(C)=His isomorphic toP2andC=hsiis a line.

Letp:J(C) !J(C)=HP2be the quotient morphism. Thenp(L) can be expressed asC‡C0, wh ereLis the line andC0is a translation ofConJ(C).

Let A be an abelian surface suchthat q:A !J(C) is an etale double covering given as follows. ExpressJ(C)ˆC2=LandAˆC2=L0, whereL andL0 are lattices satisfyingjL:L0j ˆ2. Take an element`2 L n L0 so that r(z)ˆz‡` is a translation of order two on A. Then we have L ˆ hL0; `i. Since 2`2 L0, we have M(2`)ˆ2M(`)2 L0, where M2H.

Hence we infer thatsandtinduce automorphisms onA. We use the same

(8)

letterHto denote the group consisting of the elements which are induced fromH. LetGbe the automorphism group onAgenerated byHandr. Then putpˆpq:A !A=GP2. Since deg (p)ˆ1610, we see thatp(L) is very ample (cf. [7, Lemma 3.5]). From Theorem A we infer that (A; p(L)) defines a Galois embedding inP7.

REMARK6. Note thatq(C)ˆCeis irreducible. Because, if not so, then q(C) can be written asC1‡C2. We have (q(C))2ˆ4 and C12ˆC22ˆ2.

SinceC1 is ample, we have (C1;C2)1. This is a contradiction. Similarly q(C0)ˆCe0is also irreducible. The divisorCe‡Ce0gives the minimal Galois embedding ofA. IfLis the image ofC, thenCe‡Ce0ˆp(L).

EXAMPLE7. LetAbe the abelian surface with period matrix 1 0 i (1‡i)=2

0 1 0 (1‡i)=2

:

This abelian surface has the automorphisms g1, g2 and g3, whose repre- sentations onC2are as follows:

ge1z ˆ 1 0 0 1

z‡ e11 e12

; ge2z ˆ 0 1

1 0

z‡ e21 e22

; ge3z ˆ i 0

0 i

z;

where the following vectors belong to the lattice generated by the column vectors of the period matrix:

2e012

; e21‡e22

e21‡e22

; e11 e12 2e21

e11‡e12

; (1 i)e11

(1 i)e12

; e21 ie22

e22‡ie21

:

We haveg12ˆg22ˆg34ˆid,g1g2g1ˆg2g23,g1g3g1ˆg3andg2g3g2ˆg3 1. Putting Gˆ hg1;g2;g3i, we see that G is isomorphic to the semidirect productZ2j D4 andGis a subgroup ofAut(A) andA=GP2. Th e very ample divisorDis given by p(L), wherep:A !A=GP2 andL is a line in P2. We infer from Theorem A that (A;D) defines a Galois em- bedding.

(9)

REMARK 8. The abelian surface A in Example 7 is isogenous to EiEi, whereEiˆC=(1; i). (In fact, we can show thatAis isomorphic to EiEi. ) Thanks to [2], this abelian surface cannot be a Jacobian of a curve.

REFERENCES

[1] A. FUJIKI,Finite automorphism groups of complex tori of dimension two, Publ. RIMS. Kyoto Univ.,24(1988), pp. 1-97.

[2] T. HAYASHIDA- M. NISHI,Existence of curves of genus two on a product of two elliptic curves, J. Math. Soc. Japan,17(1965), pp. 1-16.

[3] K. HULEK- H. LANGE,Examples of abelian surfaces inP4, Journal Reine Angew. Math.,363(1985), pp. 200-216.

[4] J. KANEKO- S. TOKUNAGA- M. YOSHIDA,Complex crystallographic groups II, J. Math. Soc. Japan,34(1982), pp. 595-605.

[5] K. MIURA- H. YOSHIHARA,Field theoryfor function fields of plane quartic curves, J. Algebra,226(2000), pp. 283-294.

[6] H. YOSHIHARA, Function field theoryof plane curves bydual curves, J.

Algebra,239(2001), pp. 340-355.

[7] H. YOSHIHARA,Galois embedding of algebraic varietyand its application to abelian surface, Rend. Sem. Mat. Universita di Padova,117(2007), pp. 69-85.

Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 14 aprile 2010.

Références

Documents relatifs

Wojtkowiak, On ℓ -adi iterated integrals, III Galois ations on fundamental groups, Nagoya Math. Wojtkowiak, A Note on Funtional Equations of ℓ -adi Polylogarithms, Journal of

“polar”, “extent” or “intent” on the other side), such that the resulting two closure systems of polars are dually isomorphic; more surprising is the fact that, conversely,

is a canonical decomposition of the collineation group 0152 == G fG with respect to its reduced symplectic structure (cf. III below). They play a very useful role

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » ( http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/ ) implique l’accord

Yinlong Qian, Jing Dong, Wei Wang, and Tieniu Tan, ”Deep Learning for Steganalysis via Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proceedings of SPIE Media Watermarking, Security, and

Seemingly inescapable consequences of the physiologist's account of perception appear to demolish not just the credentials of some other theory of perception, but the

To be sure, sortalist theories aren’t without controversy, but despite the controversy we can see from the foregoing considerations the deep confusion in the

The problem of deciding the existence of a SEPI from G to G’ is NP-complete, but show that when G is fixed, this problem can be decided in constant-time (hint: this