A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
H ISASI M ORIKAWA
On a definition of abelian variety
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 3
esérie, tome 18, n
o1 (1964), p. 161-163
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1964_3_18_1_161_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1964, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
ON A DEFINITION OF ABELIAN VARIETY
HISASI
MORIKAWA (*)
1. In the
present
note we shallgive
thefollowing
criterion ofabelian variety
which does not contain the associative law:THEOREM. Let V be an irreducible
projective variety
defined over afield k. Let
f
be aneverywhere
definedregular
map of V X V ontoV,
1be an k-rational
point
on 1T such thatf (a,1) = f (1, a)
= a,(a
EP), and g
bean
everywhere
definedregular
map of ~P into V such thatf (a,
g(a)) = 1, (a
EV),
wheref and 9
are also defined over k. Then if for every a in V theregular
map of V into V is abiregular
map of V ontoV,
it follows that V is an abelianvariety
with the law ofcomposition (f~ 1~ g).
This theorem
suggests
that it is seldompossible
togive
a nice. law ofcomposition
on agiven
irreducibleprojective variety.
2. PROOF OF THEOREM. Let
( f,1, g)
be a law of acomposition
on anirreducible
projective variety
Vsatisfying
the condition in Theorem and k be the field of definition of 7 and the law ofcomposition ( f,1,
For the_sake
ofsimplicity
weput
a o b= f (a, b)
and(a), (a, b E V). By
virtueof the condition in Theorem there exists a map T: a -~
Ta
of V into the group Q~ ofautomorphism
of thevariety
V. Since(Tb T ~ 1) (a) = b
for everya and
b
inV,
the group Q’operates
on >rtransitively.
Hence V is a non-singular
irreducibleprojective variety,
and thusby
virtue of Matsusaka’s result(~)
G contains thelargest
irreduciblealgebraic
groupQ’o
defined overk. W6 denote
by
.K and H thesubgroups (a E G Q (1 ) =1 )
and(a E Q (1 ) =1 ),
respectively.
andr~ (a) = T~~i) Q,, (o E Q~o). Then $ and
areregular
maps ofGo
into V andH, respectively,
becauseGo
is also transi-Pervenuto alla Redazione il 22 Novembre 1963.
(~) The author was sponsored by Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche at Centro Ricerche Fisica e Matematica in Pisa.
(t) See [1] p. 45-48.
162
tive on V and for a
generic point
a inQ~o
over k the unit element e inQ’o
is the
unique specialization of q (o)
over thespecialization
o --~ e. The mapse
are also defined over k. Since a -(0), (a
E andTa (1)
= a, the maps :Q-~ ~ (o)
X ’1(o),
o -~T’(a)
X t’J(a)
arebiregular
maps ofQ’o
ontoVXH and
respectively,
y whereT ( V )
means theimage
of V inGo by
T.By
virtue of the structure theorem ofalgebraic
group(2)
thereexists an irreducible linear group Z in
Q~o
such that L is defined over k and thequotient
A = is an abelianvariety.
We shall next prove that T(V)
11 L is zero-dimensional. Assume for a moment that T(V)
f1 L containsan irreducible
subvariety
W of dimension at least one and w be ageneric point
of ~P over a common field k’ of definition of Wand L.Then,
since the linear group ~L is an affinevariety
andT (V)
is acomplete variety,
thevariety
W is notcomplete
and there exists aspecialization t
of w over k’ such that t E
T (V)
and This is acontradiction,
becauseand L is closed in This shows that
with
points
Cl , 02, ON in V.Let 99
be the naturalhomomorphism
ofGo
onto A and
put ~, (a) _ ~(Ta), (a E V),
then A is aregular
map of V into Asuch that A
(1)
=0,
where 0 is theorigin
of A. We denoteby p
the regu- lar -map of V into A definedby p (a
Xb)
- À(a
ob), (a,
b EV ),
thenby
the
property
of a map of aproduct variety
into an abelianvariety (3)
thereexist two
regular
maps g1 and g2 of V into A such that g1(1)
= 0 andY).
Sincep, (1) + ~ (1) ==~(1x1)==
(1
01)
_ ~,(1)
=0,
L92(1)
is also theorigin
of A. We shallshow e1 (a)
==(a)
- I(a), A (a
ob)
== A(a) (b)~ ~ (a;-l)
= - A(a)
as follows:This shows that H :) L
implies
Theorem. Next we shall show that ~, is afinite
regular
map of V onto the of V in Aby
~,. SinceA
(a) (Ta),
the relation A(a)
_ ~(b) implies
0 = A(a)
- A(b)
= A(a) + +
’1(b-l)
f’ A(a
ob.,-’)
f’(T
GOb-1 )
r and b-i r E T.L. Hence
a o = 0, with a 0, in 9 ..., I and a =
T b 11
r 0,.Namely
A
(a)
= A(b)
if andonly
if a = c, with a ei in{Cf’...’ CN).
This pro-(2) See
[2]
p. 425.(3) See [3] II.
163
ves the finiteness of A.
Finaly
we shall proveH2
L. Assume for a momentH ’1l
L.Then,
since Land H areirreducible,
theimage
L of L in Vby
thenatural H -+ V is at least one-dimensional.
Moreover,
since ~,is a finite
regular
map of V ontoA (V),
theimage A (L)
is also at leastone dimensional. This is a
contradiction,
because theimage
of linear group in an abelianvariety
isalways
zero. dimensional. Thiscompletes
theproof
of Theorem.
3. COROLLARY. If a law of
composition ( f,1, g)
on an irreducible pro-jective variety
V satisfiesf ( f (b, a), g (a)) = b
for a and b inV,
then V isan abelian
variety
with the law ofcomposition ( f,1, g).
PROOF. Since
( T_i
ø rTa) (x)
=(x
oa)
o r(a,
x EV), Ta
is a bire-gular
map of V onto V for every a in V. Henceby
virtue of Theorem V is an abelianvariety
with the law ofcomposition ( f,1, g),
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] MATSUSAKA T., Polarized varieties, fields of moduli and generalized Kummer varieties of polarized abelian varieties, Amer. J. of Math. 80 (1958).
[2] ROSENLICHT M., Some basic theorems on algebraic groups, Amer. J. of Math. 78 (1957).
[3] WEIL A., Variétés abèliennes et courbes algébriques, (1948).
Centro Ricerche Fisica e Matematica Pisa and Nagoya University