Outils pour la Biologie de synthèse :Micro et Milli fluidique !
Jérôme Bibe+e
Laboratoire Colloïdes et Matériaux Divisés
ESPCI ParisTech
Must be suitable for micro organism growth: example of yeast growth.!
t = 0 t = 17 h
1 mm
Croissance d’amas cellulaires!
collaboration avec l’Institut Curie (ANR CAPCELL)
Cellules ct26 (cellules cancéreuses de souris)
! Study over numerous cells: sta2s2cal power
RDT-‐ Confiden2al
10X
4X
2X
!
Collander (1954) !Glucose, salts!
!
Overtonʼs rule!A!
low solubility! high solubility!
‣
Osmotic contraction while growing S. cerevisiaeRequirements
At the time scale of the experiment (A few hours)
1) Nutrients (salts, carbohydrates) must not permeate
2)Products of the bioactivity (CO2, Ethanol, etc) must permeate almost instantaneously, or get trapped or degraded into cells (ATP) 3)Relaxation of osmotic missmatch must be governed by water permeation only
HOW TO MAKE SUCH SYSTEM? And
make it extremely sensitive and quantitative
‣
cell encapsulationCELL COMPARTEMENTALIZATION
λ=1/10 λ=1/5 λ=1/2
Confined 2d Droplet Array
100 µm
x
y x y
100 µm 4 cm
40 µm
10
Limiting factor Exponential growth
Constant yield
‣
Monodʼs teachings‣
Modelisation of droplet shrinkage in the exponential phase~600 colonies
time (min) V (pL)
: substrat quantity
time (min)
Y=0.15g(biomasse)/gglucose ; τ =120 min.
‣
Non-glucose limitedV/V0
time (min)
‣
Modelisation of droplet shrinkage in the stationnary phaseFor time (min)
V (pL)
time (min)
Slope is conserved Volume follows substrat consumption
: substrat quantity
68
V/V0
Time (min)
~ single cell glucose consumption
Single cell bloked in G1 phase
‣
Single cell metabolism: auxotrophic decoupling95
‣
Identifying the best performing individualsStrain Growth Ethanol
Turbo yeast 48 +++ ++
CEN PK ++ +/-
TMB 3001 + +/-
C5 + -
Y55 +/- ++
CLIB 413 Agregats -
YJM 454 - ++
CLIB 192 - +++
(Batch experiment, Raphaël Calbrix)
102
‣
Identifying the best performing individualsStrain Growth Ethanol
Turbo yeast 48 +++ ++
CEN PK ++ +/-
TMB 3001 + +/-
C5 + -
Y55 +/- ++
CLIB 413 Agregats -
YJM 454 - ++
CLIB 192 - +++
(Batch experiment, Raphaël Calbrix)
time (min) V*
103
‣
Identifying the best performing individualsStrain Growth Ethanol
Turbo yeast 48 +++ ++
CEN PK ++ +/-
TMB 3001 + +/-
C5 + -
Y55 +/- ++
CLIB 413 Agregats -
YJM 454 - ++
CLIB 192 - +++
(Batch experiment, Raphaël Calbrix)
time (min) V*
104
‣
Identifying the best performing individualsStrain Growth Ethanol
Turbo yeast 48 +++ ++
CEN PK ++ +/-
TMB 3001 + +/-
C5 + -
Y55 +/- ++
CLIB 413 Agregats -
YJM 454 - ++
CLIB 192 - +++
(Batch experiment, Raphaël Calbrix)
time (min) V*
105
‣
Identifying the best performing individualsStrain Growth Ethanol
Turbo yeast 48 +++ ++
CEN PK ++ +/-
TMB 3001 + +/-
C5 + -
Y55 +/- ++
CLIB 413 Agregats -
YJM 454 - ++
CLIB 192 - +++
(Batch experiment, Raphaël Calbrix)
time (min) V*
106
‣
Selecting indivuduals on aptitute to metabolize certain substrates criterion: growth vs no growth = shrink vs no shrinkglucose
(maize, beet, sugar canne, starch...)
fermentation
ETHANOL 1st generation bioethanol:
2nd generation bioethanol: cellulose & lignocellulose
(forests, wastes, miscanthus...)
saccharification
sugar (C6+C5)
fermentation
ETHANOL enzymes
NEW STRAINS
116
‣
Screening for xylose metabolizing strains117
V*
time (min)
Strain Growth Ethanol
Turbo yeast 48 +++ ++
CEN PK ++ +/-
TMB 3001 + +/-
C5 + -
Y55 +/- ++
CLIB 413 Agregats -
YJM 454 - ++
CLIB 192 - +++
25g/L glucose - 25g/L xylose
LCMD-ESPCI
Laurent Boitard Denis Cottinet Nicolas Bremond
Enric Santanach-Carreras Leslie Rolland (PhD)
Hugo Doméjean (PhD) Institut Curie-UMR 168
Pierre Nassoy
Christophe Lamaze Kévin Alessandri(PhD) Bibhu-Ranji Sarangi
THANKS
Co-extrusion dans l’air!
Fragmentation
Cœur hydrophobe : liquides non mouillants
Cœur aqueux : liquides miscibles
Gélification
Goutte d’eau!
Goutte d’eau + SDS!
La précipitation du SDS à l’interface inhibe
le mélange avec le bain de gélification.
Cœur aqueux , alginate + tensioactif (SDS)!
membrane fine, h ~ 50 µ m
Growth Mechanics, HTS against
therapeutic candidates
Capsules sub-millimétriques!
Forçage de la déstabilisation capillaire d’un jet composé de 2 liquides
d
jet= 200 µ m f = 1.5 kHz
Capsules:
Supplementary Figure 4
Growth of spheroids inside alginate capsules and after capsules bursting.
(a) Representative plots showing the time evolution of the spheroid’s radius RMCS normalized to the initial inner capsule radius R0 for different CT26 spheroids grown in thin capsules. Time t=0 is taken at confluency. The steep increase of RMCS in the later stages corresponds to capsule bursting. The spheroid grows freely at a rate similar to that observed in the very early stages following encapsulation. (b) Typical sequence of phase contrast images showing the different stages of MCS growth, before confluency, after confluency, and after capsule bursting. Scale bar, 100 µm.