HAL Id: jpa-00208314
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208314
Submitted on 1 Jan 1975
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
The vibration-rotation bands v2 and v5 of methyl bromide
G. Graner, W.E. Blass
To cite this version:
G. Graner, W.E. Blass. The vibration-rotation bands v2 and v5 of methyl bromide. Journal de
Physique, 1975, 36 (9), pp.769-771. �10.1051/jphys:01975003609076900�. �jpa-00208314�
769
THE VIBRATION-ROTATION BANDS v2 AND v5 OF METHYL BROMIDE
G. GRANER
Laboratoire
d’Infrarouge,
Laboratoire Associé auCNRS,
Université ParisXI,
Bâtiment350,
91405Orsay,
Franceand W. E. BLASS
Molecular
Spectroscopy Laboratory, Department
ofPhysics
andAstronomy,
The
University
ofTennessee, Knoxville,
Tennessee37916,
U.S.A.(Reçu
le20 février 1975, accepté
le 4 avril1975)
Résumé. 2014 Le spectre infrarouge de
CH3Br
a été analysé entre 1 200 et 1 500 cm-1 en tenant compte de la résonance de Coriolis en x- y entre les deux niveauxfondamentaux v2
= 1 et 03C55 = 1.Les centres de bande ont été trouvés
respectivement
à 1 305,907 et 1 442,885 cm-1 et le terme decouplage 03B6x2,5
vaut 0,617.Abstract. 2014 The infrared spectrum of
CH3Br
has been analyzed between 1 200 and 1 500 cm-1 taking into account the x - y Coriolis resonance between the two fundamental levels 03C52 = 1 and 03C55 = 1. The band centers were foundrespectively
at 1 305.907 and 1 442.885 cm-1 and the03B6x2,5 coupling
term was determined to be 0.617.LE JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE TOME 36, SEPTEMBRE 1975, 1
Classification Physics Abstracts
5.444
1. Introduction. - The infrared spectrum of
CH3Br
between 1200-1500
cm-1
has not so far been studied under ahigh
resolution. In1965,
Morino and Naka-mura
[1] reported
astudy
of theperpendicular
fun-damental v-, with
only
the unresolvedQ-branch positions being
measured. In1966, Jones, Popplewell
and
Thompson [2] reanalyzed
the same band witha somewhat
higher
resolution andassigned
aboutone hundred ’P and RR lines.
They
alsoreported
astudy
of theparallel fundamental v2
withoutbeing
able to resolve any of the K structure,
fitting
theP(J)
andR(J)
lines to apolynomial
in m.In
1969,
Kurlat[3]
recordedthe V2
and vsregion
with
higher resolving
power at the Ohio State Univer-sity, using
apath
of one meter and pressures of one to two torr. The half-width of atypical
recorded linewas 0.15
cm-1
and the transitions due to theisotopes
of bromine were not resolved. The
spectra
were cali- bratedusing absorption
standards after the method of Rao et al.[4]. Preliminary assignments
were madeby
Kurlatexploring
the use of ageneralized
molecularprediction
model forassignment
ofcomplicated
spectra
[3].
The results obtainedby
Kurlat indicated the existence of strong, non-localized resonancebetween states
of v2 and v. ; using
aTaylor expansion
of the upper state energy in terms of
J, K,
andlt,
anda
physical expression
for theground
state[5],
hefound that 32
parameters
wererequired
torepresent
the
assigned vs
transitions for K9,
J30,
witha standard deviation a = 35 x
10- 3 cm-’,
and17
parameters
wererequired
torepresent v2 frequen-
cies for K
7,
J35,
with (1 = 17 x10-’ cm-’.
We have now decided to
reanalyze
the sameexperi-
mental data with the introduction of
the x - y
Coriolis interaction.
2.
Analysis
of the spectrum. - Acomplete
re-appraisal
of Kurlat’sassignments
was undertaken.Weights
weregiven
to eachline,
some wrong or dubiousassignments
were corrected and a few new ones were madepossible by
thepredictions.
TheR Ra
andRPo
linesof v.
which had beenassigned by
Kurlat but not used
by
him were reintroduced. In contrast, it was decided not to use K > 5 lines in v2 sincethey
areoverlapped by
low K lines.A
difficulty
arose due to the fact that the linesbelonging
to the twoapproximately equiabundant isotopic species, CH379Br
andCH381Br
were notresolved. From
high-resolution
studies of2 vs [6]
and
2 v2 [7],
weexpect
the band-center to beslightly
lower for
81 Br
than for79Br, by
about 0.009 cm-1for vs
and 0.028cm -1
for v2, but because B-values are, smaller for81 Br by
about 0.0012cm -’,
theisotopic
shift should grow ratherquickly
for theR(J)
lines(up
to 0.100cm-1
around J =30)
whileit cancels and
eventually changes sign
in the P-Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01975003609076900
770
branches. We therefore used
throughout
this workan average bromine with
ground-state
molecularconstants obtained
by averaging
the valuesgiven
in
[8]
for the twospecies :
This
procedure
will of course .limit the accuracy of our results. In the finalcomputational
stage, 346 transitions wereused, namely
110for v2
and 236for Vs.
3. Model used. - We have used the
least-squares
program described in reference
[9, 10].
The energy-expression
includesMaes’ qj and ’IK
terms from thethird-order Hamiltonian. We solve 3 x 3 Hamilto- nian matrices
taking
into account notonly
the x - y Coriolis interaction[11-13J,
but also thel(2, 2)-type
resonance. All
computations
wereperformed
atOrsay ’on
a Univac1110 computer.
Although
17parameters
can vary in the program,we found that several of them are not
significantly
determined from the data. Therefore
Dj, D;’lK
andD’
were constrained to their
ground
state values forTABLE 1
Molecular constants
derived for
an average bromineGround state values fixed. Distorsion constants fixed to ground
state values. All values except Cx2., in cm-1. The errors quoted are
standard deviations given by the least squares calculation.
both vibrational levels
and q
as well as ilj were set to zero. A fit with theremaining
9parameiers gives
the results listed in Table 1 and a standard deviation
on residuals of 25.3 x
10-3 cm-l.
A somewhat better standard deviation was obtained withD’
free to float but the fit
yields
anunacceptable
valueof - 3 x
10-4 cm-l
for thisparameter.
In Table 1 we
quote
the standard deviationsgiven by
theleast-squares
calculation. The real uncertaintiesare
probably
muchlarger, especially
forA 2 - Ao
which is not well known because we could not find K values
larger
than 5 inthe V2
band.TABLE II
Comparison
withprevious
studiesof
v2 and v 5(all
cm-1)
... ,
TABLE III
Comparison
with indirect determinationsof
a2 and ce,(all cm-1)
771
4. Discussion. - The values found in this work
can be
compared
with ones obtainedpreviously
fromdirect studies
of v2
and v.,by
infrared[1, 2, 3]
ormicrowave
[14] spectroscopy
which have been sum- marized in TableII,
and also to indirect determina- tions of the same constantsby
studies of overtones[6, 7, 15]
or combinations bands[16],
which are collectedin Table III.
As mentioned
above,
Kurlat[3] treated v2 and v5 independently.
Hisprediction
modelrequired
49 para- meters to fit the observed spectra(32 for v5
and17 for
v2) compared
to theonly
9 free parameters and 5 fixed knownground-state
values for the combin- ed V2and Vs
data set used here. In anattempt
toextract
physically meaningful
parameters from theseverely perturbed spectra,
Kurlat then used aphysical
model for each band
limiting
theinput
data to very low J and K-values.Fitting
the thus restricted datarequired only
three and five parametersfor v2
and v.respectively
- a result notunexpected
in the presence of an x - y Coriolis resonance.Morino and Hirose
[14]
recorded two micro-wave transitions of
CH3Br (J
= 1 -0,
K =0)
and(J
= 2 -1,
K =1)
inthe V2
= 1 and v5 = 1 vibra- tional states.They
treated the Coriohs resonance.explicitly, finding 2,5
values between 0.60 and0.67,
as
compared
with0.616s
here.Table II shows that the band-centers are reaso-
nably
determined from any model. Fora5,
olddeterminations as well as the
physical
model ofKurlat
give surprisingly good
results. Fora2,
whichwas taken as zero in reference
[2]
theprediction
model
gives
a nonsensicalvalue ;
thesurprising
valueof + 23.1 x
10-3 given by
thephysical
model[3]
is due to a clerical error in the value of
a2 - a2,
which should be - 0.021 instead of + 0.021
giving
a derived value of
a2
of - 18.9 x10-3.
Themajor
effect of the Coriolis interaction is
apparent
in theaB values.
Previous valuesof oc2 quoted
in Tablè IIare too
large by
a factor of 2 or 3. Eventhough
Morinoand Hirose treated the Coriolis
interaction,
theirhigh
value isprobably
due to the fact thatonly
lowJ lines were
used,
as waspointed
out in reference[17].
Similarly,
it seemslikely
that thea’
are closer tozero than was
suggested by previous
work.Overtone and combination bands
yield
similarresults. In reference
[1],
the2 v2
band was treatedas if it were
unperturbed.
The same data treated in reference[15] by taking
into account a Coriolis inter- action with(V2
+V.) gives a2
much closer to the present results. In reference[16],
constants are deter-mined for the
(v3 + vs
+v6) (A 1
+A2)
band whichinteracts with vl, but the very
likely
Coriolis interac- tion between(v3 + v_,
+v6)
and(v2
+ V3 +v.)
couldnot be taken into account; moreover the values of
as
andas
obtained in reference[16] rely
on the cor-rectness of v3 and V6 - values from other works.
Finally,
thepresent
results comparereasonably
withthe values obtained in reference
[6] by
at treatment of the interaction of 2vs(A1)
with(v2
+vs) although
the small values
of oej
haveconflicting signs.
Thesecould result from the limited resolution data used for
(v2
+v.) [6]
or the limited data set usedfor v2
in this work.
5. Conclusions. - This work does not
by
anymeans conclude the
analysis of v2
and Vs. We have nevertheless shown for the first timedirectly
thatx - y Coriolis resonance is
actually present
andimportant.
The molecular constantsgiven here, although
not final areprobably
closer to the realvalues than
previous
ones. We areplanning
extendedwork with a
higher resolution,
atOrsay
as well as atKnoxville,
on these fundamentals and their overtone and combination bands.Acknowledgments.
- The spectra used in the ana-lysis
were taken from the doctoral dissertation of M.Kurlat, who,
while a student at theUniversity
of
Tennessee,
waspermitted
to use thespectroscopic
facilities at Ohio State
University
in 1969 with thecompliments
of Professor K. Narahari Rao of Ohio StateUniversity.
Portions of this work weresupported by
NASA grant NGL-43-001-006.References
[1] MORINO, Y. and NAKAMURA, J., Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan, 38 (1965) 443.
[2] JONES, E. W., POPPLEWELL, R. J. L. and THOMPSON, H. W., Spectrochim. Acta. 22 (1966) 647.
[3] KURLAT, M., Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1969.
[4] NARAHARI RAO, K., HUMPHREYS, C. J. and RANK, D. H., Wavelength Standards in the Infrared (Academic Press, New York) 1966.
[5] BLASS, W. E., NIELSEN, A. H., in Methods of Experimental Physics, 3A, 2nd ed. D. Williams, ed. (Academic Press, New York) 1974.
[6] GRANER, G., J. Mol. Spectrosc., 51 (1974) 238.
[7] BETRENCOURT-STIRNEMANN, C. and MORILLON-CHAPEY, M.,
J. Mol. Spectrosc., 46 (1973) 171.
[8] BETRENCOURT-STIRNEMANN, C., GRANER, G. and GUELACH- VILI, G., J. Mol. Spectrosc. 51 (1974) 216.
[9] DEROCHE, J. C., GRANER, G. and ALAMICHEL, C., J. Mol.
Spectrosc., 43 (1972) 175.
[10] DEROCHE, J. C., Thèse de 3e Cycle, Paris 1971.
[11] DI LAURO, C. and MILLS, I. M., J. Mol. Spectrosc. 21 (1966) 386.
[12] DILLING, R. L. and PARKER, P. M., J. Mol. Spectrosc. 28 (1967) 178.
[13] BLASS, W. E., J. Mol. Spectrosc. 31 (1969) 196.
[14] MORINO, Y. and HIROSE, C., J. Mol. Spectrosc. 24 (1967) 204.
[15] BETRENCOURT-STIRNEMANN, C., Thèse, Orsay 1975.
[16] BETRENCOURT, M., MORILLON-CHAPEY, M., GUELACHVILI, G.
and AMIOT, C., to be published in J. Mol. Spectrosc.
[17] GRANER, G., J. Physique 31 (1970) 435.