• Aucun résultat trouvé

Semantic annotation workflow using bio-ontologies.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Semantic annotation workflow using bio-ontologies."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Semantic Annotation Workflow using

Bio-Ontologies

Castanier E.

1

, Jonquet C.

2

, Melzi S.

2

, Larmande P.

3

, Ruiz M.

4

, Valduriez P.

1

1 – Zenith, INRIA‐LIRMM 2 – SMILE, UM2‐LIRMM  3 – DIADE, IRD

4 – AGAP, CIRAD

NCBO Annotator: Ontology-based annotation workflow

Customized IBC Annotator for database schemas

• First, direct annotations are created by

recognizing concepts in raw text.

• Second, annotations are semantically

expanded using knowledge of the

ontologies.

• Third, all annotations are aggregated and

scored according to the context in which

they have been created.

Introduction

Biologists have adopted ontologies:

•To provide canonical representation of scientific knowledge

•To annotate experimental data to enable interpretation, comparison, and discovery across databases

•To facilitate knowledge-based applications for decision-support, natural language processing, and data

integration

But off-the-shelf solutions for the biologist to use ontologies are rare (versions, format, availability, license, overlap, etc.)

Automatically process complex biological resources text content and generate annotations :

• Large-scale – to scale up to many resources and ontologies

• Automatic – to keep precision and accuracy

• Easy to use and to access – web service approach • Customizable – to fit very specific needs

• Smart – to leverage the knowledge contained in ontologies There have been success stories to reproduce: GO

annotations, PubMed indexing, etc.

The challenge

R. Coletta, E. Castanier, P. Valduriez, C. Frisch, D-H. Ngo, Z. Bellahsene: Public data integration with WebSmatch. Workshop on Open Data. 2012, pp. 5-12.

C. Jonquet, N. H. Shah, M. A. Musen. The Open Biomedical Annotator, In AMIA

Symposium on Translational BioInformatics. 2009. pp. 56-60.

C. Jonquet, P. LePendu, S. Falconer, A. Coulet, N. F. Noy, M. A. Musen, N. H. Shah. NCBO

Resource Index: Ontology-Based Search and Mining of Biomedical Resources, Web

Semantics. 2011. Vol. 9 (3), pp. 316-324.

J. Wollbrett, P. Larmande, F. De Lamotte, M. Ruiz. Clever generation of rich SPARQL

queries from annotated relational schema: application to Semantic Web Service creation for biological databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14:126.

• Convert SQL database schemas to RDF/RDFS with BioSemantic

• Annotate with NCBO Annotator and WebSmatch using customized NCBO services

• Annotator relies on WebSmatch to create mappings between elements of schemas and ontological concepts

• Indexing IBC related data with the workflow to enhance semantic search and mining of data

Montpellier, France

In collaboration with

Références

Documents relatifs

The new field of Semantic Data Mining, which has emerged in the past few years, has suggested a possible solution to this problem: Domain knowledge can be derived from semantic

Symbolic types are described by a type name (Food Product,

Los resultados son evaluados en t´erminos de pre- cisi´on obtenidos sobre los primeros k t´erminos extra´ıdos (P @k) para las medidas propuestas y las medidas base (referencia) para

Figure 2: Graph of electronic music genre con- structed using the corresponding semantic related- ness and visualized using the Force Atlas 2 algorithm of Gephi.. nodes and 37044

r esuLts in addition to the chromosome numbers found in tribe Helieae by Weaver (Weaver 1969, 1975; Weaver and Rudenberg 1972), we obtained new counts for four species of

known as the “father of biodiversity” said: “It is reckless to suppose humanity

Using input from [3], the current work focuses on integration and searching multiple open drug Linked Data sources for general information needs proposed by at least 25% of

TaggerOne achieves state of the art performance on diseases (NCBI Disease corpus [11]) and chemicals (BioCreative 5 CDR corpus [12]) and is being used to tag