Deterministic submanifolds and analytic solution of the stochastic differential equation
describing a continuously measured qubit
Joint work with A. Sarlette,P. Campagne-Ibarcq, P. Six, L. Bretheau, M. Mirrahimi, and B. Huard IMA, Quantum and Nano Control, April 11-15, 2016
Pierre Rouchon
CAS, Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University
QUANTIC, Inria-Paris
1 / 11Outline
Measuring fluorescence of a qubit (slides of Benjamin Huard)
A positivity preserving numerical scheme for quantum filtering
The deterministic surface and integral quantities
When is a qubit confined to a deterministic surface ?
Conclusion
2 / 11
A positivity preserving numerical scheme: diffusive case
1With a single imperfect measuredyt=√ ηTr
(L+L†)ρt
dt+dWtand detection efficiencyη∈[0,1], the quantum stateρtis usually mixed and obeys to
dρt=
−i
~[H, ρt] +LρtL†−1 2
L†Lρt+ρtL†L dt
+√ η
Lρt+ρtL†− Tr
(L+L†)ρt
ρt
dWt
driven by the Wiener processdWt(Gaussian law of mean 0 and variancedt).
WithIt¯o rules, it can be written as the following "discrete-time" Markov model
ρt+dt = MdytρtM†dy
t + (1−η)LρtL†dt Tr
MdytρtM†dy
t+ (1−η)LρtL†dt withMdyt =I+
−i
~H−12 L†L
dt+√
ηdytL. The probability to detectdytis given by the following density
P
dyt∈[s,s+ds]
= Tr
MsρtM†s+ (1−η)LρtL†dt
√
2π e−s
2 2dt ds
close to a Gaussian law of variancedtand mean√ ηTr
(L+L†)ρt
dt.
1H. Amini, M. Mirrahimi, P.R. IEEE CDC, 2011. P.R., J. Ralph PRA 2015.
3 / 11
A positivity preserving numerical scheme: diffusive/jump case
2The quantum stateρtis usually mixed and obeys to
dρt= −i[H, ρt] +X ν
LνρtL†ν−1
2(L†νLνρt+ρtL†νLν) +VµρtVµ†−1
2(Vµ†Vµρt+ρtVµ†Vµ)
! dt
+X ν
√ην
Lνρt+ρtL†ν−Tr
(Lν+L†ν)ρt ρt
dWν,t
+X µ
θµρt+P
µ0ηµ,µ0VµρtVµ† θµ+P
µ0ηµ,µ0Tr Vµ0ρtV†
µ0 −ρt
dNµ(t)− θµ+X
µ0 ηµ,µ0Tr
Vµ0ρtV† µ0 dt
whereην∈[0,1],θµ, ηµ,µ0≥0 withηµ0=P
µηµ,µ0≤1 are parameters modelling measurements imperfections.
If, for someµ,Nµ(t+dt)−Nµ(t) =1, we haveρt+dt=
θµρt+P
µ0ηµ,µ0Vµ0ρtV† µ0 θµ+P
µ0ηµ,µ0Tr Vµ0ρtV†
µ0 . When∀µ,dNµ(t) =0, we have
ρt+dt=
MdytρtM†
dyt+P
ν(1−ην)LνρtL†νdt+P
µ(1−ηµ)VµρtVµ†dt Tr
MdytρtM†
dyt+P
ν(1−ην)LνρtL†νdt+P
µ(1−ηµ)VµρtVµ†dt
withMdyt =I+
−iH−1 2
P
νL†νLν+12P µ
ηµTr
VµρtVµ† I−Vµ†Vµ
dt+P
ν
√ηνdyνtLνand
wheredyν,t=√ ηνTr
(Lν+L†ν)ρt
dt+dWν,t.
2H. Amini, C. Pellegrini, P.R.: Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2014.
P.R:. Proceedings of International Congress of Mathematicians, Seoul 2014 (arXiv:1407.7810).
4 / 11
The deterministic surface
3The SME (γ1=1 here) dρt=
σ-ρσ+−σ+σ-ρ+ρσ+σ-
2
dt
+ qη
2 σ-ρ+ρσ+− Tr(σxρ)ρ dWI+
qη
2 iσ-ρ−iρσ+− Tr(σyρ)ρ dWQ
reads with the Bloch coordinates(x,y,z)
dxt =−12xtdt+ qη
2
(1+zt−xt2)dWI−xtytdWQ dyt =−1
2ytdt+ qη
2
−xtytdWI+ (1+zt−yt2)dWQ
dzt =−(1+zt)dt−q
η 2(1+zt)
xtdWI+ytdWQ
For any realization of starting from the same initial point(x0,y0,z0)we have
1
2 xt2+yt2
+ct(1+zt)2−(1+zt) =0
wherect = (c0−η2)et+η2 remains in[12,+∞)andc0= x
2 0+y02 2(1+z0)2+1+z1
0.
3Ph. Campagne-Ibarcq et al. PRX 2016.
5 / 11
The quantum filter is "solvable by elementary quadratures"
4The solution of
dxt =−1
2xtdt+ qη
2
(1+zt−xt2)dWI−xtytdWQ
dyt =−12ytdt+ qη
2
−xtytdWI+ (1+zt−yt2)dWQ dzt =−(1+zt)dt−
qη
2(1+zt)
xtdWI+ytdWQ
can be computed from simple integrals of the signalsdIt=q
η
2xtdt+dWIand dQt =
qη
2ytdt+dWQ. This results from d
x 1+z
=12 x
t 1+zt
dt+
qη
2dIt, d
y 1+z
=12 y
t 1+zt
dt+
qη 2dQt
This provides a completion of12 xt2+yt2
+ct(1+zt)2−(1+zt) =0 with
xt 1+zt =et/2
x0 1+z0 +
qη 2
Z t
0
e−τ /2dIτ
, 1+zyt
t =et/2
y0 1+z0+
qη 2
Zt
0
e−τ /2dQτ
.
Related toPicard-Vessiot and Liouvillian extensions of differential fields: the solution of the quantum filter is an algebraic function of some integrals and exponentials of integral of its two inputsIt andQt.
4Ph. Campagne-Ibarcq et al. PRX 2016.
6 / 11
The second case where the qubit is confined to a deterministic surface
5Superconducting qubit dispersively coupled to a cavity traversed by a microwave signal (in- put/output theory). The back-action on the qubit state of a singlemeasure- mentof both output field quadratures It and Qt is described by a simple SME for the qubit density operator. (M. Hatridge et al.: Science, 2013).
dρt= γ(σzρσz−ρt) dt+
qηγ
2 σzρt+ρtσz−2 Tr(σzρt)ρt
dWI+i qηγ
2 [σz, ρt]dWQ withdIt=q
ηγ
2 Tr(2σzρt)dt+dWI anddQt =dWQ, whereγ≥0 is related to the measurement strength andη∈[0,1]is the detection efficiency.
The deterministic surface is given here by another ellipsoid of revolution axisz:
xt2+yt2+bt(zt2−1) =0 wherebt =b0e−2(1−η)t andb0=x02+y02 1−z20 .
5A. Sarlette, P.R.: preprint 2016 (arXiv:1603.05402).
7 / 11
There are only two cases where the qubit is confined on an evolving surface
σz case σ-case−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1
−1
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1
−1
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Theorem[A. Sarlette, P.R.: arXiv:1603.05402]For any initial stateρ0, the qubit state ρt, solution of the SME (ην∈(0,1))
dρt= X
ν
LνρtL†ν−12(L†νLνρt+ρtL†νLν)
! dt
+X
ν
√ην
Lνρt+ρtL†ν− Tr
(Lν+L†ν)ρt
ρt
dWν,t,
is restricted to a deterministically evolving 2-dimensional manifold if, and only if, I either existβν, αν∈Cand U∈U(2)such that Lν=βνVσzV†+αν,∀ν I or existβν∈Cand V ∈U(2)such that Lν=βνVσ-V†,∀ν.
8 / 11
Sketch of the proof (1)
Stroock-Varadhan theorem6
Consider a stochastic differential equation
dxt=F(xt)dt+
m
X
j=1
Gj(x)◦ dWtj,
with xt ∈RN the state, dWt1,dWt2, ...,dWtmindependent Wiener processes, x0fixed and the dynamics to be understood in the Stratonovitch sense (we therefore put the◦ symbol).
The support of the distribution of xtcan be described as the closure, for the natural Banach topology on C([0,1],RN), of the set of solutions of the following controlled system:
d˜xt =F(˜xt)dt+
m
X
j=1
Gj(˜x)dutj,
with˜x0=x0, for all possible control signals u1t,ut2, ...,umt in H1([0,1],Rm).
6D.W. Stroock and S.R.S. Varadhan, "On the support of diffusion processes with applications to the strong maximum principle", Proc. 6th Berkeley Symp. Mathematical Statistics and Probability vol.3, pp.333-359, 1972.
9 / 11
Sketch of the proof (2)
I Strong accessibility theorem7The control system
d
dtx=F(x) +Pm
j=1Gj(x)ujwith analytic vector fields F,G1, ...,Gmis strongly accessible at x0if, and only if, thedrift-preserved Lie algebraGF 8has full dimension N at x0.
Moreover, ifGFhas dimension at most N−n<N for all x0, then the system stays on a (time-dependent) manifold of dimension N−n, independently of the control inputs.
I Stratonovitch form of the SME:
dρt=X ν
(1−ην)
LνρtL†ν−1
2(L†νLνρt+ρtL†νLν) dt
− X ν
ην 2
L†νLνρ+ρL†νLν+ (Lν)2ρ+ρ(L†ν)2
! dt
+ X
ν ην
2 Tr
L†νLνρ+ρL†νLν+ (Lν)2ρ+ρ(L†ν)2
ρ
! dt
+ X
ν ηνTr
Lνρ+ρL†ν
(Lνρ+ρL†ν)−ην
Tr
Lνρ+ρL†ν2 ρ
! dt
+X ν
√ην
Lνρt+ρtL†ν−Tr
(Lν+L†ν)ρt
ρt
◦dWν,t.
7A. Isidori,Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction, Springer, Berlin, 1985
8GFis the smallest Lie algebra containingG(the Lie algebra generated by vector fieldsG1,G2, ...,Gm) and closed under Lie brackets withF, i.e. for anyG∈GF we have[F,G]∈GF.
10 / 11
Concluding remarks
1. Stochastic master equations govern the dynamics of open quantum systems by taking into accountmeasurement back-actionanddecoherence(unread measurement).
2. Future work could investigate how general confinement of the density operator to submanifolds is in higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
3. Interest of continuous fluorescence signals(dIt,dQt)for the characterization of a dephasing noiseξt:
dxt = −γ22xt+ξtyt−v(t)zt dt+
qηγ1 2
(1+zt−xt2)dWI−xtytdWQ dyt = −ξtxt−γ22yt+u(t)zt
dt+ qηγ1
2
−xtytdWI+ (1+zt−yt2)dWQ dzt = v(t)xt−u(t)yt−γ1(1+zt)
dt− qηγ1
2 (1+zt)
xtdWI+ytdWQ dIt =
qηγ1
2 xtdt+dWI
dQt ==
qηγ1
2 ytdt+dWQ
whereu(t)andv(t)are well chosen open-loop controls (see Lorenza Viola presentation and work).
11 / 11