• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Proceedings of the SICSA Workshop on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence:

SICSA XAI 21

Kyle Martin, Nirmalie Wiratunga, Anjana Wijekoon Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland

{k.martin3, n.wiratunga, a.wijekoon1}@rgu.ac.uk

Preface

The use of AI and ML systems is increasingly becoming more commonplace in ev- eryday life. In everything from recommender systems for media streaming services to machine vision for clinical decision support, intelligent systems are supporting both the personal and professional spheres of our society. However explaining the outcomes and decision-making of these systems remains a challenge. As the prevalence of AI grows in our society, so too does the complexity and expectation surrounding the ability of autonomous models to explain their actions.

Regulations increasingly support users rights to fair and transparent processing in automated decision-making systems. This can be difficult when the latest trends in data- driven ML systems, such as deep learning architectures, tend to be black-boxes with opaque decision-making processes. Furthermore, the need for accountability means that pipeline, ensemble and multi-agent systems may require complex combinations of ex- planations before being understandable to their target audience. Beyond the models themselves, designing explainer algorithms for users remains a challenge due to the highly subjective nature of the explanation itself.

The Event

The SICSA Workshop 2021 was designed to present a forum for the dissemination of ideas on domains relating to the explainability of AI and ML methods. The event was organised into several themed sessions.

– Session 1- Applying and Evaluating Explanations

– Session 2- Roles within an XAI System and Accountability – Session 3- Searching for Explanations

The SICSA XAI Workshop 2021 was an incredible success. We were proud to wel- come 49 attendees from a mix of industrial organisations and academic institutions across Europe. A total of 13 papers were submitted for peer review by the programme committee, of which 12 were accepted and presented during the workshop (10 short pa- pers and 2 position papers). Of the presented papers, we share 11 in these proceedings.

(2)

2 K. Martin et al.

The workshop featured an invited talk from Professor Bel´en D´ıaz-Agudo of Universi- dad Complutense de Madrid. She presented an examination of the relationship between Case-Based Reasoning and XAI and discussed how this had lead to the formation of the iSee project to share explanation experiences.

Organising Committee

This workshop was only possible through the hard work and dedication of a number of individuals.

Workshop Chairs – Dr Kyle Martin

– Prof Nirmalie Wiratunga – Dr Anjana Wijekoon

Local Organisers

– Anuja Vats (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) – Martin Fyvie (Robert Gordon University)

Programme Committee

– Ikechukwu Nkisi-Orji (Robert Gordon University) – Pamela Johnston (Robert Gordon University) – Chamath Palihawadana (Robert Gordon University)

– Gayani Nanayakkara (Robert Gordon University University) – Jin Zhang (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) – Nektaria Kaloud (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

Supporting Organisations

This workshop is produced using funding from the Scottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance (SICSA).

It has been developed in collaboration between the Robert Gordon University Artifi- cial Intelligence and Reasoning (AIR) research group, and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology Idun research group. This collaboration has been partially sup- ported by NFR 295920 IDUN. The workshop was also supported by the iSee project (a CHIST-ERA project under grant agreement CHIST-ERA-19-XAI-008), a collaboration between Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Robert Gordon University, University College Cork and BT France.

The organising committee would like to thank all of our authors and attendees.

Without you, this event could not have happened.

Références

Documents relatifs

The project will: (1) Develop new and alternative feeds and feed technologies to make better use of local feed resources, green biomass and by-products of the food and

Following this line of thought, I argue that this trend could be traced back to the early origin of scientific approaches—the disciplines of general biology that separated from

Llama la atención el alto número de profesores contratados por horas (58,7 %) y el bajo porcentaje de docentes con doctorado (5,2 %), que además están concentrados en pocas

With the works cited above, we can see how the coupling of choreography and landscape led to new landscapes/dansecapes (Igloo), mise en mouvement with nature (Eiko and

The aim of the 2 nd Workshop on Innovative Software Engineering Education 1 is to bring software engineering educators together to actively work and discuss the most important

Como una alternativa para rescatar las bondades de los MOOC, así como de otras alternativas de la denominada “era post-MOOC” como son los SPOC, pero a su vez

Because The Project Game was developed as a service design tool and it was used as a tool in actual project work instead of being a research object, exact metrics or

Out of the 48 spaces surveyed, 8 are located in municipalities of less than 1,000 inhabitants. The interview grid addressed the following points: i) Legal