• Aucun résultat trouvé

A WORLD WITHOUT ‘WHOM’: THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LANGUAGE IN THE BUZZFEED AGE by Emmy J. Favilla

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A WORLD WITHOUT ‘WHOM’: THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LANGUAGE IN THE BUZZFEED AGE by Emmy J. Favilla"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02482590

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02482590

Submitted on 18 Feb 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

A WORLD WITHOUT ‘WHOM’: THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LANGUAGE IN THE BUZZFEED AGE by

Emmy J. Favilla

Linda Pilliere

To cite this version:

Linda Pilliere. A WORLD WITHOUT ‘WHOM’: THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LANGUAGE IN THE BUZZFEED AGE by Emmy J. Favilla. 2019, pp.49. �hal-02482590�

(2)

Published in Babel The Language Magazine, November 2019, p.49 https://babelzine.co.uk/babel-no29-november-2019/

A WORLD WITHOUT ‘WHOM’: THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO LANGUAGE IN THE BUZZFEED AGE

Emmy J. Favilla

Bloomsbury Press, 2017, 392 pages, RRP £12.99 Linda Pillière

Style and usage guides have been setting the standard in writing since the eighteenth century, debating such issues as dangling modifiers, when to use

‘which’ or ‘that’, and whether it should be ‘lie’ or ‘lay’. Some of these old chestnuts have evolved over time. Advice to not split infinitives is a thing of the past, stranding prepositions is something we don’t bat an eye at (even if a few die-hard prescriptivists still drag their feet over that one) and a world without

‘whom’ is pretty well-established. Emmy Favilla’s take on style and language in the twenty-first century is refreshingly aware of the fact that language is fluid and fast-changing in the age of the internet (or should that be the ‘Internet’?).

Language is alive and change is to be embraced, not feared. As copyeditor at BuzzFeed, Favilla found herself called upon to issue language guidelines that quickly morphed from a four-line intranet page to a full-blown style guide. She may not be a professional linguist, but she is fascinated with how usage and punctuation affect style and tone.

The book’s twelve chapters focus on various themes: writing about

sensitive topics, words and language trends to embrace, email etiquette, and

the internet’s effect on punctuation. The book’s aim is less to offer guidance on

familiar usage problems (although many of these do feature in the index) than

to focus on language difficulties in the age of social media, including the

evolution of ‘because’ from conjunction to preposition, the introduction of

gender-neutral pronouns (‘xe’ and ‘ze’) and the honorific ‘Mx’, the use of

shruggies, and expressions such as ‘nom’. Some of the contemporary language

featured in the book is probably ephemeral (Favilla herself admits doge-speak

(3)

is already on its way out and describes ‘lol’ as “an empty shell of an abbreviation” reduced to a pragmatic marker).

However, Favilla offers informative insights into contemporary language use and, unlike most of her usage-guide predecessors, she acknowledges that English is now a global language with regional differences. She also provocatively questions reference works such as Merriam-Webster and Strunk and White (a well-established US style guide), arguing that no reference work should be blindly followed. Screenshots of her tweets and emails to colleagues over correct usage further emphasise that any decision on style and usage is both individual and open to challenge.

So is this a revolutionary book? For Favilla, there is “no such thing as correct style”, and a “one-size-fit-all approach to language” is impossible. It is, she says, a book about feelings, not rules. Nevertheless, just like the more prescriptive guides, she justifies her preferences on the grounds of concision and clarity. Her decisions on style and usage are often more conservative than at first appears.

Overall this is a highly readable book, and - as one might expect from a book dealing with language in the BuzzFeed age - fast-paced, lively and humorous.

Linda Pillière is professor of English language at Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA,

Aix-en-Provence, France. She recently co-edited Standardising English: Norms

and Margins in the History of the English Language CUP.

Références

Documents relatifs

In this paper, the determinants of unemployment duration among the leavers of higher education are analysed using a number of different survival models.. Following our

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Il était allongé sur le canapé, dans un sommeil de la mort comme de plomb qui, pour le moment du moins, n'a même pas été perturbé par la présence de Régine Charles!. -Ce dernier

This paper presents an in-depth case study of an English language provider, its specific in-context method of teaching English as foreign language, and the

 The combination of screen exposure in the morning before nursery or primary school and rarely or never discussing screen content with parents was associated with a six-fold

The distinction between thinking and reasoning will allow us to apply a structural equivalent of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument to the domain of mind and

ACTIVITÉS DE PROMOTION DE LA CONFORMITÉ, DE CONTRÔLE DE LA CONFORMITÉ ET D’APPLICATION DE LA LOI TOUCHANT LES RAPPORTS DE L’INDUSTRIE DU TABAC Comme il a été

Some of these factors were already in the literature and some were added by the researcher i.e., whether the words are content or function words, the length of the