Structural, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of layered perovskite La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7a r t i c l e i n f o
Keywords:
Perovskite Rietveld refinement Magnetic measurements Magnetocaloric effect
a b s t r a c t
The La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7sample was synthesized by coprecipitation method. Its structure has been char- acterized by X-ray powder diffraction. The diffraction patterns are consistent with the I4/mmm symmetry, with tetragonal lattice parameters a ¼ 3.8750 7 0.0001 Å and c ¼ 20.0456 7 0.0002 Å. Magnetic measure- ments have shown a ferromagnetic like ordering with second order magnetic phase transition to para- magnetic states. The magnetic entropy change caused by a magnetic field, (ΔS
max), was estimated on the basis of the Maxwell relation. The maximum magnetic entropy change ( Δ S
max) and the relative cooling power (RCP) are, 1.65 J kg
1K
1and 134.4 J kg
1respectively, for a 5 T magnetic field change at 340 K.
& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The manganese based double layered perovskites, with mixed valence La
22xSr
1þ2xMn
2O
7of a Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) structure Ln
nþ1Mn
nO
3nþ1(n ¼ 2) [1,2], where Ln is an element of the lantha- nides or the alkaline earth metals, have attracted great scienti fi c and technological attention owing to their interesting electrical and mag- netic properties [3 – 5]. Moreover, these systems have gained an in- creasing interest not only for the Colossal Magnetoresistance (CMR) effect [6,7], but also for their large magnetocaloric effect (MCE) [8,9].
The magnetic properties can be described by the double exchange interactions Mn – O – Mn [10] which are associated to the ferromagnetic coupling between Mn
3þ(t
2g3e
g1) and Mn
4þ(t
2g3e
g° ) ions. This can also be explained by the MnO
6octahedral deformation which implies a distortion of the structural network resulting from the Jahn – Teller effect [11]. On the other hand, one of the biggest challenges pre- venting the real use of these materials in spite of their particular properties is that the Curie temperatures of the majority of these materials are relatively too low [12,13]. For example, the lowest T
Cis observed in La
1.4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7which is about 120 K, and their magne- tocaloric effect has shown the existence of a large peak corresponding to a magnetic entropy change ( ΔΣ
Max) ¼ 4.36 J/KgK under a mag- netic fi eld change of 0 – 4 T at T
C[14]. We note that the substitution of Sr
2þwith Ba
2þin the crystalline phases La
1.4(Sr
1xBa
x)
1.6Mn
2O
7with (x ¼ 0, 0.6) leads to the decrease of Curie temperature from 161 to 94 K and an increase in the magnetic entropy values [15]. Therefore, in order to use La
1.4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7for domestic magnetic refrigeration near room temperature, it is important to increase its Curie temperature using appropriate substitutions. In this context, the substitution of La
3þby Bi
3þoffers an advantage due to their close ionic radius.
In this paper, we study the structural, magnetic and magneto- caloric properties of bilayered manganites La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7. The sample was prepared by the co-precipitation method and characterized structurally by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Using the magnetization measurements, the magnetic properties and mag- netocaloric effect were investigated in details.
2. Experimental
Polycrystalline sample of La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7was prepared by the coprecipitation technique. The nitrates (99.99% Purity) La(NO
3)
35H
2O, Sr(NO
3)
2, Bi(NO
3)
35H
2O, and Mn(NO
3)
24H
2O pre- cursors in stoichiometric amounts were dissolved in distilled water, and then preheated to a temperature of 363 K to evaporate the water resulting in a gel. The resulting powder from heating was ground and calcined in air at 973 K for 24 h. The powder was pressed and sintered in several steps from 1173 K to 1723 K for 48 h, with intermediate grinding between each step. The diffraction data were collected at room temperature on a BRUKER D8 Advance ( θ – θ ) diffractometer with Cu K α radiation (40 kV, 40 mA). XRD patterns were recorded in the range of 2 θ ¼ 5 – 100 ° with a step of 0.01 ° . Rietveld re fi nement [16]
was performed using the Fullprof program [17]. The magnetization versus temperature was measured in the temperature range of 2 – 600 K at magnetic fi elds of 0.05 T, using a BS2 magnetometer devel- oped at Néel Institute (Grenoble France). Also, magnetization of the samples was measured in an isothermal regime under an applied magnetic fi eld varying from 0 to 5 T. In the vicinity of Curie tem- perature, isothermal M – H curves were obtained by a step of 5 K.
3. Results and discussions
3.1. Structural characterization and resolution
The structure of La
1,1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7sample has been de- termined from powder X-ray diffraction patterns using Fullprof software based on the Rietveld re fi nement method. Fig. 1 illus- trates the fi nal pro fi le fi t and the difference pattern from the Rietveld analyses. The results show that the sample is a single phase and all diffraction peaks are indexed in the quadratic system isotypic to that of Sr
3Ti
2O
7-type structure with the limiting con- dition h þ k þ l ¼ 2 n and I4/mmm as a space group. We noticed that inside the structure of this compound exist two separate sites that Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmmm
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.076 0304-8853/& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 403 (2016) 114–117
can host La
3þ, Bi
3þ, and Sr
2þcations. The fi rst one is the per- ovskite cage of dodecahedral coordination (2b site) while the other one is of a particular coordination as it is coordinated to nine oxygen atoms: 1 þ 4 þ 4 (site 4e). Moreover, we noticed that man- ganese ions Mn
3þand Mn
4þare located in an octahedral environ- ment site 4(e). The structure of La
1,1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7was generated by Vesta software [18] and presented in Fig. 2. Re fi nement of all para- meters leads to the following reliability factors: R
B¼ 6.54%, R
F¼ 4.66%, χ
2¼ 2.56 and the lattice parameters of La
1,1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7sample. Table 1 summarizes the obtained crystallographic char- acteristics as well as the atomic positions, while the distances and interatomic angles are gathered in the Table 2.
The comparison of the unit cell parameters a, c and ratio c/a of our compound structure with those of a close structure La
1,4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7is summarized in Table 3. As a conclusion from this comparison, the parameter c and c/a of the lattice of our com- pound are smaller than those of the similar structure of La
1.4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7. This is partly due to the difference between the ionic radius of Bi
3þand La
3þ, which are respectively R
[9](Bi
3þ) ¼ 1.15 Å, R
[9](La
3þ) ¼ 1.21 Å in a 9-fold coordination and R0
[12](Bi
3þ)
¼ 1.30 Å, R
[12](La
3þ) ¼ 1.36 Å in a 12-fold coordination[19 – 21].
The Mn – O (1), Mn – O (2) and Mn – O (3) distances are respec- tively 1.938, 1.938 and 2.103 Å. Besides, the O(1) – Mn – O(2), O(2) – Mn – O(2), and O(2) – Mn – O(3) angles are respectively 89.20 ° 178.46 ° and 90.80 ° . Thus, the manganese is surrounded by six oxygen atoms forming distorted MnO
6octahedral which is at- tributed to the Jahn – Teller distortion [11].
3.2. Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties
The temperature dependence of the magnetization (Fig. 3) reveals the presence of a single ferromagnetic (FM) to paramagnetic (PM) phase transition at the Curie temperature which is about T
C¼ 340 K, de fi ned as the in fl ection point of the dM/dT curve. This result con fi rms the purity of our sample. The highest T
Ccan be correlated with the structural changes that lead to a distortion of the Mn – O – Mn angle which induced an increase of the exchange interaction strength.
Fig. 4 shows the plots of magnetization versus applied mag- netic fi eld obtained at various temperatures for the sample of La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7. Below T
C, the M – H curves exhibit a ferro- magnetic behavior which is due to the double-exchange interac- tions Mn
3þ(t
2g3e
g1) – O – Mn
4þ(t
2g3e
g° ).
In order to determine the magnetic transition nature. The Ar- rott plots M
2versus m
0H/M extracted from the experimental iso- thermal M(T, H) curves are reported in Fig. 5. These plots give a
positive slope in the complete M
2range which con fi rms that our sample exhibits a second order FM – PM phase transition, according to the Banerjee criterion [22].
The magnetocaloric effect (MCE) is de fi ned as the heating or cooling of a magnetic material due to the application of a magnetic fi eld. MCE has been calculated in terms of isothermal magnetic entropy change using magnetization isotherms obtained at various temperatures (Fig. 5). The magnetic entropy change, resulting from the spin ordering and induced by the variation of the applied fi eld from 0 to m
0H
Max, is given by:
∫
( )
Δ = μ − ( ) = ∂
∂ μ
( )
μ
⎛
⎝ ⎜ ⎞
⎠ ⎟
S S T H S T M
T d H
, , 0 ,
M M M
1
H
0 0 0
0 max
where m
0H
Maxis the maximum external fi eld.
Fig. 1. Final Rietveld plots for La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7at 300 K. The upper symbols illustrate the observed data (circles) and the calculated pattern (solid line). The vertical markers show calculated positions of Bragg reflections. The lower curve is the difference diagram.
Fig. 2. Unit cell structure of La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7.
M. Oubla et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 403 (2016) 114–117 115
In practice, an alternative formula is usually used for numerical calculation:
∑
Δ ( Δ ) = μ − Δ
− ( )
Δ +
+
S T H M M
T T H
, 2
M H i i
i i
i
0 1
1
Where μ
0is the vacuum permeability, M
iand M
iþ1are the magnetization values measured at temperatures T
iand T
iþ1in a fi eld change Δ H
i.
Fig. 6 shows the thermal variation of the magnetic entropy for different magnetic fi eld changes for the compound La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7. The maximum peak value of ( Δ S
M) for this compound is 1.65 J/kg.K under a magnetic fi eld change of 0 – 5 T.
The ( Δ S
M) is found to increase monotonically with increasing temperature and magnetic fi eld change from 0 to 5 T to reach a Table 1
Refined structural parameters for La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7.
Atom Position x y z Biso (Å
2) Occupancy
La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7Mn 4e 0.00 0.00 0.0967(2) 0.79340 2.0000
I4/mmm Sr(1) 2b 0.00 0.00 0.50000 3.76225 0.350(10)
Z¼2 La(1) 2b 0.00 0.00 0.50000 3.76225 0.570(10)
a¼(3.875070.0001) Å Bi(1) 2b 0.00 0.00 0.50000 3.76225 0.08035
c¼(20.0456 70.0002) Å Sr(2) 4e 0.00 0.00 0.31732(9) 1.21298 1.250(10)
R
B¼6.539% La(2) 4e 0.00 0.00 0.31732(9) 1.21298 0.530(10)
R
F¼ 4.660% Bi(2) 4e 0.00 0.00 0.31732(9) 1.21298 0.21965
χ
2¼ 2.56 O(1) 2a 0.00 0.00 0.00000 0.90713 1.0000
V¼301 Å
3O(2) 8g 0.00 0.50 0.0954(6) 5.4(3) 4.0000
O(3) 4e 0.00 0.00 0.2016(7) 0.71436 2.0000
Table 2
Bond lengths and angles for La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7.
Atoms Bond lengths (Å) Atoms Bond angles (°)
Mn–O (1) 1 * 1.938 (4) O(1)–Mn–O(2) 89.2 (4) Mn–O (2) 4 * 1.93770 (17) O(1)–Mn–O(3) 180.0 (9) Mn–O (3) 1 * 2.103 (15) O(2)–Mn–O(2) 178.459 (7) La /Bi/Sr(1)–O
(1)
4 * 2.740075 (3) O(2)–Mn–O(2) 89.990 (7) La /Bi/Sr(1)–O
(2)
8 * 2.722 (8) O(2)–Mn–O(3) 90.8 (7) La /Bi/Sr(2)–O
(2)
4 * 2.611 (8) O(1)–La /Bi/Sr (1)–O (1)
90.0 (17) La /Bi/Sr(2)–O
(3)
4 * 2.7662 (19) O(2)–La /Bi/Sr (1)–O (2)
180.0 (2) La /Bi/Sr(2)–O
(3)
1 * 2.430 (14) O(3)–La /Bi/Sr (2)–O (3)
88.92 (6)
Table 3
Unit cell parameters a, c and ratio c/a of our sample and those of La
1.4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7.
Structure a (Å) c (Å) c/a Reference
La
1,4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
73.864 20.076 5.19 [14]
La
1,1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
73.8750 20.0456 5.17 Our work
-0,6 -0,5 -0,4 -0,3 -0,2 -0,1 0,0
0 300 600
0 6 12
dM/dT(emu/g K)
dM/dT
T (K)
M(emu/g)
M(emu/g)
Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of magnetization in a magnetic field of 0.05 T for La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7. The inset shows the temperature derivative dM/dT with T
C¼340 K.
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10 20 30 40
M(emu/g)
µ0H (T)
250K
380K
T=5K Δ
Fig. 4. Magnetization vs. applied magnetic field, measured at different tempera- tures around T
C, for the compound La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7.
0,0 0,2 0,4
0 600 1200
380K 250K
M 2 (emu/g) 2
µ0H/M (T g/emu)
T=5 K Δ
Fig. 5. Arrott plots of the sample La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7at different temperatures near T
C.
M. Oubla et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 403 (2016) 114–117
116
broad maximum at T
C. In addition, the relative cooling power (RCP) is also an effective parameter for the evaluation of the magnetocaloric potential and allows better comparison between different magnetocaloric materials. The RCP was evaluated by considering the magnitude of Δ S
M, and its full width at half maximum δT
FWHMwas represented as follows [23 – 26]:
Δ δ
= − S × T ( )
RCP
mmax FWHM3
where (−Δ S
Mmax) and δ
TFWHMare the maximum of the entropy variation and the full-width at half maximum in the temperature dependence of the magnetic entropy change ( Δ S
M) respectively.
The RCP factor represents a good way for comparing magneto- caloric materials. A summary of RCP values and other magnetic characterization parameters for La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7compound are listed in Table 4. These values of ( Δ S
M), the interesting RCP factor and the low-cost of preparation allow us to conclude that this double layered perovskite La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7is one suitable candidate for a magnetic refrigerant in the temperature range close to 340 K.
4. Conclusion
A new compound La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7has been synthesized by the conventional co-precipitation method. The structure re fi nement leads to the tetragonal lattice with the I4/mmm as space group. The magnetic measurements revealed that the compound shows
ferromagnetic behavior with a Curie temperature of 340 K. Besides, the Arrott plots showed that the magnetic phase transition is of the second order in nature. Then, the maximum entropy change of 1.65 J/
kg K was observed in a 5 T magnetic fi eld.
References
[1] S.N. Ruddlesden, P. Popper, Acta Crystallogr. 10 (1957) 538.
[2] S.N. Ruddlesden, P. Popper, Acta Crystallogr. 11 (1958) 54.
[3] Y. Moritomo, A. Asamitsu, H. Kuwahara, Y. Tokura, Nature 380 (1996) 141.
[4] T. Kimura, Y. Tomioka, H. Kuwahara, A. Asamitsu, M. Tamura, Y. Tokura, Science 274 (1996) 1698.
[5] T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30 (2000) 451.
[6] H. Asano, J. Hayakawa, M. Matsui, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 (1996) 3638.
[7] A.P. Ramirez, Condens. Matter 9 (1997) 8171.
[8] A. Tozri, E. Dhahri, E.K. Hlil, M.A. Valente, Matter. Lett. 64 (2010) 2138.
[9] A. Tozri, E. Dhahri, E.K. Hlil, Solid State Commun. 151 (2011) 315.
[10] C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 403.
[11] A.J. Millis, P.B. Littlewood, B.I. Shraiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 5144.
[12] R. Seshadri, C. Martin, M. Hervieu, B. Raveau, Chem. Mater. 9 (1997) 270.
[13] M. Matsukawa, M. Narita, T. Nishimura, M. Yoshizawa, Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003) 104433.
[14] L. Han, C. Chen, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 26 (2010) 234.
[15] K. Cherif, S. Zemni, J. Dhahri, M. Oumezzine, M. Saida, H. Vincent., J. Alloy.
Compd. 432 (2007) 30.
[16] H.M. Rietveld, J. Appl. Cryst. 2 (1969) 65.
[17] T. Roisnel, J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, in: Proceedings of the Seventh European Powder Diffraction Conference, EPDIC7, 2000.
[18] K. Momma, F. Izumi, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44 (2011) 1272.
[19] R.L. Frost, A.R. McKinnon, P.A. Williams, K.L. Erickson, M.L. Weier, P. Leverett, Neues Jb. Min. Abh. 181 (2005) 11.
[20] J.R. Gomah-Pettry, A.N. Salak, P. Marchet, V.M. Ferreira, J.P. Mercurio, Phys.
Stat. Sol. 241 (2004) 1949 (B).
[21] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A32 (1976) 751.
[22] B.K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 16.
[23] A. Boutahar, H. Lassri, K. Zehani, L. Bessais, E.K. Hlil, J. Mag. Magn. Mater. 369 (2014) 92.
[24] A. Boutahar, A. Ettayfi, G. Elouhmi, H. Lassri, E.K. Hlil, D. Fruchart, J. Supr., Novel Mag. 27 (2014) 2401.
[25] J.S. Lee., Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 241 (2004) 1765.
[26] T.J. Zhou, Z. Yu, W. Zhong, X.N. Xu, H.H. Zhang, Y.W. Du, J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 7975.
M. Oubla
n, M. Lamire Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie des Matériaux Inorganiques, Faculté des Sciences Aïn-Chock, Université Hassan II Casablanca, B.P. 5366 Mâarif, Morocco E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Oubla) A. Boutahar, H. Lassri Laboratoire de Physique des Matériaux, Micro-électronique, Auto- matique et Thermique, Faculté des Sciences Aïn-Chock, Université Hassan II Casablanca, B.P. 5366 Mâarif, Morocco B. Manoun Univ. Hassan 1er, Laboratoire des Sciences des Matériaux, des Milieux et de la Modélisation (LS3M), 25000 Khouribga, Morocco E.K. Hlil Institut Néel, CNRS et Université Joseph Fourier, BP 166, F-38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France Received 24 June 2015 12 November 2015 26 November 2015 Available online 29 November 2015
250 300 350
0,0 0,6 1,2
T (K) -S M (J/ kg K)
5T 4T 3T 2T 1T
Δ
Fig. 6. Temperature dependence of the magnetic entropy change (ΔS
M) under different magnetic fields for the compound La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7.
Table 4
Summary of magnetocaloric properties of the La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
7compound compared with other magnetic materials.
Sample l
0H (T) T
C(K) ΔS
Mmax(J/kg K)
RCP (J/
kg)
Ref.
Gd 2 294 5 196 [25]
La
1.4Sr
1.6Mn
2O
74 120 4.36 – [14]
La
1.1Bi
0.3Sr
1.6Mn
2O
75 340 1.65 134.4 This work La
1.4(Sr
0.4Ba
0.6)
1.6Mn
2O
72 190 2.84 560 [15]
La
1.6Ca
1.4Mn
2O
71.5 166 3.8 – [26]
n