• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rings whose indecomposable modules are pure-projective or pure-injective

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Rings whose indecomposable modules are pure-projective or pure-injective"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00617486

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00617486

Preprint submitted on 29 Aug 2011

HAL

is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Rings whose indecomposable modules are pure-projective or pure-injective

Francois Couchot

To cite this version:

Francois Couchot. Rings whose indecomposable modules are pure-projective or pure-injective. 2011.

�hal-00617486�

(2)

RINGS WHOSE INDECOMPOSABLE MODULES ARE PURE-PROJECTIVE OR PURE-INJECTIVE

FRANC¸ OIS COUCHOT

Abstract. It is proven each ringR for which every indecomposable right module is pure-projective is right pure-semisimple. Each commutative ringR for which every indecomposable module is pure-injective is a clean ring and for each maximal idealP,RP is a maximal valuation ring. Complete discrete valuation domain of rank one are examples of non-artinian semi-perfect rings with pure-injective indecomposable modules.

In this short note we give a partial answer to the following question posed by D.

Simson in [5, Problem 3.2]:

”Give a characterization of rings R for which every indecomposable right R- module is pure-projective or pure-injective. Is every such a semi-perfect ring R right artinian or right pure-semisimple?”

From a result of Stenstr¨om we easily deduce that each ringR whose indecom- posable right modules are pure-projective is right pure-semisimple.

Theorem 1. LetR be a ring for which each indecomposable right module is pure- projective. Then R is right pure-semisimple.

Proof. LetM be a non-zero right R-module. By [1, Proposition 1.13] M is pure- projective if each pure submoduleN for whichM/N is indecomposable is a direct summand. This last property holds since each indecomposable rightR-module is pure-projective. HenceM is pure-projective andR is right pure-semisimple.

Now we give an example of a non-artinian commutative semi-perfect ring whose indecomposable modules are pure-injective.

Example 2. LetRbe a complete discrete valuation domain of rank one and letQ be its quotient field. By [4, Corollary 2 p.52] each indecomposable module is cyclic or isomorphic to a factor of Qand these modules are pure-injective. ClearlyR is not artinian.

Theorem 3. Let R be a commutative ring for which each indecomposable module is pure-injective. Then R is a clean ring and RP is a maximal valuation ring for each maximal idealP. Moreover, each indecomposableR-module is uniserial.

Proof. By [6, Theorem 9(3)] each indecomposable pure-injective module has a local endomorphism ring. So, if each indecomposable module is pure-injective, then, by [2, Theorem III.7], Ris a clean ring andRP is a valuation ring for each maximal

2010Mathematics Subject Classification. 16D80, 13F30, 13C11.

Key words and phrases. indecomposable module, pure-projective module, pure-injective mod- ule, pure-semi-simple ring.

1

(3)

2 FRANC¸ OIS COUCHOT

idealP. SinceRP is indecomposable for each maximal idealP, it is pure-injective.

It follows thatRP is maximal for each maximal idealP.

LetM be an indecomposableR-module. By [2, Proposition III.1], there exists a unique maximal idealP such thatM =MP and its structures of R-module and RP-module coincide. So, we may assume that Ris local. By [3, Theorem 5.4] M is either the pure-injective hull of an uniserial module or an essential extension of a cyclic module. SinceRis maximal, it follows thatM uniserial.

Remark 4. It remains to characterize maximal valuation rings for which every indecomposable module is uniserial.

Example 5. IfRis the ring defined in [2, Example III.8] or ifRsatisfies the equiva- lent conditions of [2, Theorem III.4] thenRis a ring for which each indecomposable module is pure-injective and uniserial.

Corollary 6. Let R be a perfect commutative ring for which each indecomposable module is pure-injective. Then Ris pure-semisimple.

Proof. R is a finite product of artinian valuation rings by Theorem 3. HenceR is

pure-semisimple.

Now we give an example of ring R whose indecomposable right modules are pure-injective and for which there exists an indecomposable left module which is not pure-injective.

Example 7. LetKbe a field, letV be a vector space overK which is not of finite dimension, letS= EndK(V), letJ be the set of finite rank elements ofSand letR be theK-subalgebra ofSgenerated byJ. Then,Ris Von Neumann regular,V and

RR/J ∼=K are the sole types of simple left modules, andV = HomK(V, K) and RR/J ∼=K are the sole types of simple right modules. It is easy to check thatV andRR/Jare injective, whenceRis a right V-ring. On the other hand each rightR- module contains a simple module. So, every indecomposable right module is simple.

It follows that every indecomposable right module is pure-injective (injective). It is well known that V is FP-injective, V∗∗ is the injective hull ofV andV ⊂V∗∗. So,V is not pure-injective.

References

[1] G. Azumaya. Countabled generatedness version of rings of pure global dimension 0. volume 168 ofLecture Notes Series, pages 43–79. Cambridge University Press, (1992).

[2] F. Couchot. Indecomposable modules and Gelfand rings. Comm. Algebra, 35(1):231–241, (2007).

[3] A. Facchini. Relative injectivity and pure-injective modules over Pr¨ufer rings. J. Algebra, 110:380–406, (1987).

[4] I. Kaplansky.Infinite Abelian Groups. the University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, (1969).

[5] D. Simson. Dualities and pure semisimple rings. InAbelian groups, module theory and topology, volume 201 ofLecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., pages 381–388. Marcel Dekker, (1998).

[6] B. Zimmermann-Huisgen and W. Zimmermann. Algebraically compact rings and modules.

Math. Z, 161:81–93, (1978).

Laboratoire de Math´ematiques Nicolas Oresme, CNRS UMR 6139, D´epartement de math´ematiques et m´ecanique, 14032 Caen cedex, France

E-mail address: francois.couchot@unicaen.fr

Références

Documents relatifs

complete discrete valuation ring in that the only indecomposable modules which exist have rank 1 and so are isomorphic to R itself.. or the field, Q, of fractions

Since for every natural number n and finite subset X of G, the p-adic topology of E is stronger than the p-finite topology; it follows that E is complete in the

C, SnssNr{aNN: Normal bundles for codimension 2locally flat imbedd- ings. E.: Affine structures in

JorrrpN: On the use of Löwner's functions for finding inequalities for the first coefficient body of bounded univalent functions. - Reports of the Department of

The examples of affine varieties of dimension 2 with nonzero Chow group of 0-cycles are given by infinite dimensionality theorems for Chow groups of projective

The question arises as to when a semi-simple near-ring is strictly semi-simple (the converse clearly is always true). case a module M is injective iff it satisfies

(15) (*) A topological space is quasi-compact if one can extract from any open covering a finite open covering.. Show that a Noetherian topological space

Given any ring R, denote by EL n (R) the subgroup of GL n (R) generated by ele- mentary matrices (those matrices with 1’s on the diagonal, and at most one non-zero entry outside