HAL Id: jpa-00247205
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247205
Submitted on 1 Jan 1996
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Speciations and Extinctions in a Self-Organizing Critical Model of Tree-Like Evolution
M. Kramer, N. Vandewalle, M. Ausloos
To cite this version:
M. Kramer, N. Vandewalle, M. Ausloos. Speciations and Extinctions in a Self-Organizing Criti- cal Model of Tree-Like Evolution. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1996, 6 (4), pp.599-606.
�10.1051/jp1:1996232�. �jpa-00247205�
Speciations and Extinctions in
aSelf-Organizing Critical Model of Tree-Like Evolution
M. Kramer
(*),
N. Vandewalle(**)
and M. Ausloos(***)
S.U.P.R.A.S., Institut de
Physique
85, SartTilman,
Universit6 deLibge,
B-4000Libge, Belgium
(Received
4 December 1994, revised 15 December1995 andaccepted
5January 1996)
PACS.87.10.+e General, theoretical and mathematical
biophysics
PACS.05.40.+j
Fluctuationphenomena,
random processes and Brownian motionAbstract. We
study analytically
asimple
model of aself-organized
critical evolution. The model considers both extinction and speciation eventsleading
to thegrowth
ofphylogenetic-like
trees.
Through
a mean-field liketheory,
westudy
the evolution of the localconfigurations
forthe tree leaves. The fitness
threshold,
below which lifeactivity
takesplace through
avalanches of all sizes is calculated. The transition betweenspeciating (evolving)
and dead trees is obtained and is in agreement with numerical simulations.Moreover,
this theoretical work suggests thatthe structure of the tree is
strongly dependent
on the extinctionstrength.
R4sum4. Nous 4tudions
analytiquement
un modAlesimple
d'4volutionauto-organis6e
cri- tique. Le modAle considAre des extinctions et dessp4ciations
conduisant h une croissance d'arbresphylog4n4tiques.
Nous 4tudions ici par une th40rie dechamp
moyen l'4volution desconfigura-
tions des extr4mit4s de l'arbre. Le seuil critique de "fitness" en-dessous
duquel
desexplosions
d'activit6
biologique
de toutes tailles se produisent est calculi. La transition entre arbres crois-sants et arbres 6teints est
4galement
obtenue en accordavec les simulations. En outre, ce travail
th60rique suggAre
que la structure des arbresg6n6r6s d6pend
fortement du paramAtre d'extinc- tions.1. Introduction
Biological
evolution is not considered as a continuous process but isthought
to be like a succession of bursts of lifeactivity separated by long periods
ofquiescence
on ageological
timescale [1]. Such bursts seem to have all sizes
including catastrophic
ones like the Cambrianexplosion
some 570 million years ago.In order to mimic the
intermittency
[2] of anevolving ecosystem,
Bak and coworkers have introduced aninteresting
model of evolution[3,4].
This model(BS)
considers an ecosystem made of N speciesarranged
on a d-dimensionnalhypercubic
lattice. A fitnessf~,
which isa random number between zero and one, is
assigned
to the Ispecies.
Thehigher
the fitness is, the moreadapted
is the species to its environment(the ecology).
At eachstep
of thekramer©gw.unipc.ulg.ac.be (**)e-mail
address:vandewal©gw.umpc.ulg.ac.be
(***)
Author for thecorrespondence (e-mail
address:ausloosflgw.unipc.ulg.ac.be)
©
Leskditions
dePhysique
1996600 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°4Y,
Z+
Y,
~
Y ~,
Zo
Fig.
1. A small part of aphylogenetic-like
tree. The species are labelled "y" and "z" with sublabelsI'), (°)
and(+) according
to the different localconfigurations
as discussed in the text.evolution,
thespecies having
the minimum fitness value is selected and issupposed
to make a so-calledadaptative
moveby receiving
a new random fitness value. Because of interactions m theecosystem,
thisadaptative
move issupposed
to affect also the fitness values ofneighbounng species.
The evolution processgenerated by
this model can beregarded
as aparticular
random walk in a random medium. The interests of this model arei)
that fromsimple rules,
itgenerates
intermittent avalanches of all sizes, andit)
that the process isrecognized
to beself-organized
critical[3],
1e. to reachasymptotically
anapparently
criticalsteady-state (the
so-called "evolution to the
edge
of chaos").
The latterdynamics
is ofphysical
interest [5] sincevarious natural
systems
have atendency
to reach a criticalself-organized
state likesandpiles
[6],earthquakes iii, high-Tc superconductors [8],..
More
recently,
we have extended the BS model for an evolutionallowing
for a non-conservation of the number of species m the ecosystem[9-11].
The tree-like evolution model considersspeci-
ation and extinction events
[11].
Eachspeciation corresponds
to the differentiation of aspecies
made of alarge
group of individuals m apopulation.
The differentiation is considered to lead to abranching
event. The formation of a tree-like structures is obtained with patterns mwhich the different
species
are located on the leaves(see Fig. 1).
The "distance"dmn
between two species(m
andn)
is the number ofsegments
of the tree needed to connect onespecies (m)
to anotherin).
A fitness f~ which is a scalar random number between zero and one isassociated to each I
living
species. At each Monte-Carlo step, the lessadapted
species, i.e. theliving j species having
the minimum fitnessfj
is selected. This species is assumed to become extinct with an apriori probability exp(- fj /r)
or togive
two differentiated species with aprobability (1- exp(- fj /r>).
The latterspeciation
event leads to twoliving
species whichboth receive a new
arbitrary (uncorrelated here>
fitness value. Of course, extinct species donot
participate
further to the evolution process. The parameter r ishereby
called thestrength
of the extinctions
[11].
We also consider the presence of interactions between thespecies,
such that the fitness f~ of all thespecies
which areseparated by
anarbitrary
distance d~j from thebranching
ordying
speciesj
less than a short range k are alsoupdated
with a new random number. This rule mimics the drasticchange
of the "fitnesslandscape"
[12] within a range k due to an evolution event. No correlation is introduced here between fitness values fromancestors to
offsprings,
or betweenoffsprings.
These effects could be examined in further work..6
.4
cl 1.2
fi
'
I-O t$
~ O-B
~/~
~j~
~'~
r=0 25
~' O.4
r=0.45 0.2
O-O
O-O O.2 O.4 O.6 O-B I-O
f
Fig.
2. The distributionn(fmm)
of the minimum fitness valuesfmm
selectedduring
the tree-like evolution process. Three different values of the extinctionstrength
parameter r are illustrated.Moreover,
we consider herein the case k= 2 which is of
biological
interest since themajority
ofliving species (the
so-called"specialists"
[13] occupy narrowecological
niches and areonly
sensitive to their
genetically
nearestneighbounng species [13].
In the next
section,
we will recall the moststriking
numerical results. In Section3,
wetheoretically investigate
this evolutionthrough
anoriginal study
of the localconfigurations
for the leaves of the tree. The critical thresholdfc(r)
below which the lifeactivity
takesplace
is calculated and the transition betweenevolving
and dead trees is obtained inagreement
with the numerical results of Section 2.Finally,
a conclusion will be drawnoutlining
the interest ofthese results and
suggesting
newdevelopments.
2. The
Striking
Numerical ResultsLet us recall the most
important
featurespresented by
the above model as found from numerical work[11].
Without extinctions(for
r=
0),
the model reduces to apreviously
studied model [9]for which the
growth
of trees never stops. As rincreases,
the extinction events becomes more and morefrequent
such that the treestops
to grow above a certain value rc. This critical valuewas
numerically
found to be rc = 0.48 + 0.01[11].
For 0 < r < rc, the evolution process reaches
always
an apparentsteady-state.
The latteris characterized
by
astep-like
distribution of fitness values between a valuefc
and 1. This characterizes the state of themajority
of the species in theecosystem.
On the otherhand,
the fitness values
fmjn
of the selected species are distributed between 0 andfc.
The latter distributionn( fmjn)
is illustrated inFigure
2 for three different values of r. One should note that the distributionn( fmin)
seems to be the sum of arectangular
and atriangular
distribution.When r > rc, the process is limited in "time" since the tree
growth stops.
Figure
3presents fc
as a function of the extinctionstrength
r. For r=
0,
one finds theparticular
and non-trivial valuefc
= 0.445 + 0.010 [9] which was
theoretically predicted
in aprevious
work[10].
For r close to rc, the thresholdfc
reaches 1 because the mostadapted
species only
can resistagainst
mutation.However,
thefc(r)
curve falls to zero for r close to602 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°4
o
o-B
O.6
O.4
0.2
o-o
o-o r
Fig.
3. The thresholdfc
as a function of the extinctionstrength
r. The continuous curve is theong obtained theoretically with the relations
(2)
and(6).
Data points from reference [11].rc in
Figure
3. This is understood asresulting
from the finite-size effect occurring close to rc.Above rc, the critical threshold
fc
is rathermeaningless
since it is defined forliving
speciesonly
and for r > rc allspecies
are after a finite "time" accumulated atf
= 1 and die.The existence of such a threshold means that the whole life
activity self-organizes
for0 < r < rc and takes
place
belowfc. Physically,
the attractor of thisself-organization
isthus a state where all
species
have a fitness above orequal
tofc.
This state is however unstablesince the
species
with the minimum valuela species
close tofc)
will then be selected.Thus,
some species
having
a fitness belowfc
can appear later and can also induce someperturbation
for the attractor of fitness distribution.
Then,
the newf~'s
are chosen until the unstable stateis
again
reached. This defines an avalanche as a connected sequence ofbiological activity (spe-
ciations and
extinctions)
below the thresholdfc,
one observes anmtermittency
of avalanches of all sizes. The size-distribution of avalanchesn(s)
isnumerically
found to be a power lawn(s>
r~ s~~ with anexponent
T =3/2
which seems to beindependent
of r for 0 < r < rc[11].
This "no-scale" or power law distribution is the
signature
ofself-organized critically
[5]driving
this evolution process.
Beside the
self-organized
criticaldynamics
of this process, it is of interest to observe thestructure of the growing trees. The trees were
numerically
found to be scale invariant for0 < r < rc
[11].
This is anothersignature
ofcritically. However,
the fractal dimensionDf
ofthe trees was
thought
to bedependent
of theparameter
r[11].
This result wasunexpected
and is m contrast with classical
phase
transitions for which the value of the critical exponentsdoes not
change
with anytuning
of the relevant parameter. Infact, Df
wasnumerically
found to decreasecontinuously
from 2(for
r=
0)
towards for r ~ rc[11].
Thisr-dependence
is illustrated in
Figure
4 where three simulated trees are drawn for three different values of the extinctionstrength
r. Each tree contains 2000branching points.
The variation of the treestructure from a two-dimensional
growth
for r= 0 towards a
filamentary-like
gro1&>th for r m r~is well marked.
In the
following section,
wetheoretically investigate
how the system evolvesthrough
localconfigurations
and we extract theoretical values forf~(r>
and rc.00 r=0.
Fig.
4. Threephylogenetic-like
trees simulated for three different values of the extinctionstrength:
r = 0.001, r
= 0.25 and r
= 0.45 close to rc. Each tree is made of 2000
branching
points.3. Theoretical
Investigations
For the k
= 2 process, two different
types
of localconfigurations
can occur on the leaves.They
are labelled"y"
and "z" inFigure
1. The so-called y-species arecoupled by
pairs, while thez-species
are somewhatlonely.
These differenttypes
ofspecies
lead to differentspeciation
processes.
Indeed,
thespeciation
of ay-species gives
a new pair ofy-species branching
out the selectedspecies.
This can also affect the nearestliving neighbour species
since the distance between thespeciating species (the
selectedone>
and the directneighbouring y-species
isequal
to k
= 2. The latter becomes a z-species
(see
anexample
ofy-speciation
mFig.
5>. On the otherhand,
thespeciation
of az-species
cannot affect any other species since the distancebetween the
speciating z-species
and any otherspecies
isalways greater
than k= 2.
The
geometrical configurations
of thetree-leaves,
both g- and z-species, can beput
into three different classes: I> the class withliving species having
a fitness value less thanfc
such that thesespecies
could be selectedby
the process:they
areactive, ii)
the class withliving species having
a fitness valuelarger
thanfc
such thatthey
cannot be selected forspeciation
or extinction:
they
areinactive,
andiii)
the deadspecies.
For furtherdevelopments,
let us cally' (z'>
the activespecies, y° (z°)
the inactive species andy+ (z+>
the deadspecies.
To describe the evolution process
only
9 differentconfigurations
of tree leaves as shown inFigure
6 have to be considered.They correspond
to 6 pairs:y'y', y'y°, y'y+, y°y°, y°y+
andy+y+,
as well as to 3z-configurations: z',
z° and z+ One should note that 5configurations
do not
participate
m the evolution sincethey
are dead or screened from the process. These blockedconfigurations
are they+y+, y°y°
andy°y+
pairs as well as the z° andz+ species.
604 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQIJE
I N°4Y,
Y Z,
Fig.
5. Anexample
of evolution event occurring on ay'-type
leaf(on
the t.op of the smallbranch).
This
example
is a speciationleading
to the formation of a newy°y' pair
and to a z'-species. Theprobability
of occurrence of the latter event isii p)(1 fc) If.
The state of thez°-species
on the
bottom of the branch remains
unchanged
since the distance from the latter species to the speciatingone is 3
(> k).
,-~
W/~/f
Y°N/ /
Y+, ~/ Y~'j~z° "j~z+
. . ,
blocked
(b)
~~ ~~~ ~
Y~
~'~
~'~ ~/ ~ ~/
,. .,
N/
evolving
Fig.
6. Th~ 9locally
differentconfigurations
which are sufficient to describe the evolution processm our mean-field like theoretical
development.
One candistinguish
between the(a)
blocked and the(b) evolving configurations
with either one or two active species.By
comparison toequations ii),
onecan
easily
see how the(b)
cases can lead to new
(b)-like configurations.
0lhe(b) configurations leading
to
(a)
ones are irrelevant fordescribing
the life process since such(a) configurations
do not evolve anymore.For a mean field-like
approximation,
we can assume that all the activespecies speciate
or become extinct in asingle
mean-field timestep
t. One should note that the latter time is notequiv~lent
to the Monte-Carlo time. In order tokeep
some essence of the process, we also consider the restriction that for theparticular g'g' configuration only
one species speciates orbecomes extinct. A
possible
evolution of ag'g' configuration
is illustrated inFigure
5 as anexample.
The latterparticular example
is aspeciation leading
to a newg°y'
pair and to a z'species.
Let p be theprobability
that a chosenspecies
becomes extinct(+).
One shouldnote that the
probability
to have a nevzliving
and active speciesI')
isii p) f~
while theprobability
tn have a newliving
and inactive species(°)
is(1- pill f~).
One can writethe mean-field evolution for the number of
configurations participating
to the processthrough
recurrence relations:
Ny,y, it
+II
=
ii P)f/iNy,y, it)
+ Ny,~Oit)
+Ny,y+ it)
+N~,it)i ila) Nyoy, (t
+1)
=2(1 P)fc(I fc)iNy,y, (t)
+Ny,yO it)
+Ny,~+ (t)
+N~, (t)i lib) N~+y, (t
+I)
=
PfciN~,~, it)
+ N~,~Oit)i ilc)
N~, (t
+i)
=
ii pj f~jN~,~, it)
+N~,~a jt)j (id)
where the factors are
probabilities
forcreating
suchconfigurations.
One can find that the abovesystem
satisfies asteady-state
solutiononly
foril-P)if/-f/-2f~)+1=0 12)
The
probability
p is a function of both r andf~.
One should remark that the case p= 0 is
equivalent
to consideronly speciations (r
=
0)
without extinctions.Then,
the relation(2)
reduces to the relation found in reference
[10] having
asingle
root between 0 and 1, I-e- a threshold atf~
m 0.445.In order to find a relation between
f~
and the extinctionstrength
r, one has to calculate theprobability
p forextincting
a selectedspecies.
Indoing
so, one needs to know the distribution for the whole set of minimum fitness valuesRI fmin),
I-e- the distribution of the selectedspecies.
Indeed,
p is givenby
~,
p "
/ il(fmin
eXp
(-
f~'~~ djmin (3)
o T
For the BS
model,
then( fmin)
distribution was found to be linearvanishing
to zero atf
mf~
[3,4]. However,
thepresent
model shows a differentRI fmin)
distribution which seems to be the sum of atriangular
and arectangular
distribution as noted in Section 2. This difference is understood from the fact that eachspeciation
event in the present model creates newoffsprings
with new
uniformly
distributed random fitness values. Thiscorresponds
to add arectangular (flat)
distribution on thetriangular
distribution of the BS model.For r m r~, the distribution for the minimum fitness values is found to be linear
RIjmin)
"
3/2 jmin 14j
with a
slope
-1.Moreover,
for all 0 < r < r~values,
theRI fmin)
distributioncollapses
forfmin
<f~(r)
on the above distribution3/2 fm;n using
anappropriate scaling
factor. Thisis shown m
Figure
2. The normalization for 0 <f~;~
<f~(r)
of theRI fm;n)
distribution ofequation (4)
gives~~~~~"~~ ~jc~~)i~
~~~~~~"
~~~~~~ lsl
R(fm~n) =0,
forfm;n
abovef~
Using
the latter ad hoc distributionR(fm;n),
one can find the extinctionprobability
P -
~j~
i
ji
3 2T) Ii
exP~
+
2fc
exP~
)1 16)
Using
this definition for p mequation (2)
andsearching numerically
for the solution of theresulting
transcendentalequation,
one findsf~(r).
The result is drawn mFigure
3. This curve isroughly
linear in the range of interest.Moreover,
theagreement
with the numerical valuesis
quite good
as seen inFigure
3. Sincef~(r~)
=
1,
one can then deduce the critical extinctionstrength
r~ for growing or dead trees. Our theoretical estimate gives r~ m 0.495 which is alsom
quite good agreement
with the numerical value r~ = 0.48 + 0.01[10].
606 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°44. Conclusion
In the
preceding section,
we have described the evolution process for leafconfigurations.
Twohypotheses
have been made:i)
correlations areneglected
eventhough
more than one activespecies
is selected at eachstep
fordescribing
the processthrough
the set ofequations ii),
and
it)
the distributionRI fm;n)
is ad hoc. Thepresent
mean-fieldapproximation
can thus be considered to bevanationally
based.However,
theagreement
is quite remarkable. This method is thus useful fordescribing
sucha kind of
self-organized
critical processes.A further comment is however in order. As
pointed
out in Section2,
the moststriking
result for the tree evolution model is theunexpected
variation of the fractal dimensionDf
of thetrees with the parameter r. The present theoretical
investigations
cannotpredict
theglobal
structure of the
growing
tree since the mean-field time t cannot be related to anygeometrical
property of the tree.
However,
our theoreticalinvestigations
show also that the local structure of the tree(leaf configurations)
isstrongly dependent
on the extinctionstrength
r(see
the set ofEqs. (1)).
Further work should be made m order to test whetherDf
vary with r.Acknowledgments
Part of this work was
financially supported through
theImpulse Program
onHigh Temperature Superconductors
of theBelgium
Federal Services forScientific,
Technical and Cultural(SSTC)
Affairs under contract SU
/02 /013.
This work was alsosupported through
the ARC(94-99 /174)
contract of the
University
ofLiAge.
N-V- thanks theBelgium
Research Funds forIndustry
andAgriculture (FRIA, Brussels).
Aspecial grant
fromFNRS/LOTTO
allowed us toperform specific
numerical work.References
iii
GouldJ., Paieobioiogy
3(1977) 115; Eldregde
N. and GouldS-J-,
Natttre 332(1988)
211.[2]
BergA P.,
Pomeau Y. and VidalCh.,
L'ordre dans le chaos(Hermann, Paris, 1984).
[3] Bak P. and
Sneppen K., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 71(1993)
4083.[4]
Flyvbjerg
H.,Sneppen
K. and BakP., Phys.
Rev. Lett.71(1993)
4087.[5] Bak
P.,
Chen K. and CreutzM.,
Nature 342(1989)
780.[6] Dhar D. and
Ramaswamy R., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 63(1989)
1659.[7] Somette A. and Somette
D., Ettrophys.
Lett. 9(1989)
197.[8] Pla O. and Non
F., Phys.
Rev. Lett. 67(1991)
919.[9] Vandewalle N. and Ausloos
M.,
J.Phys.
15(1995)
1011.[10]
Vandewalle N. and AusloosIll., Physica
D 90(1996)
262.[11]
Vandewalle N. and AusloosM., Ettrophys.
Lett. 32(1995)
613.[12] Zhang Y-C-, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 56(1986)
2113.[13] Lewm