• Aucun résultat trouvé

Recovering an homogeneous polynomial from moments of its level set

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Recovering an homogeneous polynomial from moments of its level set"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00725422

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00725422

Submitted on 26 Aug 2012

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Recovering an homogeneous polynomial from moments of its level set

Jean-Bernard Lasserre

To cite this version:

Jean-Bernard Lasserre. Recovering an homogeneous polynomial from moments of its level set. Discrete and Computational Geometry, Springer Verlag, 2013, 50 (3), pp. 673-678. �hal-00725422�

(2)

MOMENTS OF ITS LEVEL SET

JEAN B. LASSERRE

Abstract. Let K := {x : g(x) 1} be the compact sub-level set of some homogeneous polynomial g. Assume that the only knowledge aboutKis the degree ofgas well as the moments of the Lebesgue mea- sure onKup to order 2d. Then the vector of coefficients ofgis solution of a simple linear system whose associated matrix is nonsingular. In other words, the moments up to order 2dof the Lebesgue measure onK encode all information on the homogeneous polynomial gthat defines K(in fact, only moments of orderdand 2dare needed).

1. Introduction

The inverse problem of reconstructing a geometrical objectK⊂Rn from the only knowledge of moments of some measure µwhose support isKis a fundamental problem in both applied and pure mathematics with important applications in e.g. computer tomography, inverse potentials, signal process- ing, and statistics and probability, to cite a few. In computer tomography, for instance, the X-ray images of an object can be used to estimate the mo- ments of the underlying mass distribution, from which one seeks to recover the shape of the object that appears on some given images. In gravimetry applications, the measurements of the gravitational field can be converted into information concerning the moments, from which one seeks to recover the shape of the source of the anomaly.

Of course,exactreconstruction of objectsK⊂Rnis in general impossible unlessKhas very specific properties. For instance, ifKis a convex polytope then exact recovery of all its vertices has been shown to be possible via a variant of what is known as prony method. Only a rough bound on the number of vertices is required and relatively few moments suffice for exact recovery. For more details the interested reader is referred to the recent contribution of Gravin et al. [2] and the references therein. On the other hand, Cuyt et al. [1] have shown that approximate recovery of a general n-dimensional shape is possible by using an interesting property of multi- dimensional Pad´e approximants, analogous to the Fourier slice theorem for the Radon transform.

Key words and phrases. homogeneous polynomials; sublevel sets; moments; inverse problem from moments.

1

(3)

2 JEAN B. LASSERRE

Contribution. From previous contributions and their references, it is trans- parent that exact recovery of an n-dimensional shape is a difficult problem that can be solved only in a few cases. And so identifying such cases is of theoretical and practical interest. The goal of this paper is to identify one such case as we show that exact recovery is possible when K ⊂ Rn is the (compact) sublevel set {x ∈ Rn : g(x) ≤ 1} associated with an homoge- neous polynomial g. By exact recovery we mean recovery ofall coefficients of the polynomial g. In fact, exact recovery is not only possible but rather straightforward as it suffices to solve a linear system with a nonsingular ma- trix! Moreover, only moments of orderdand 2dof the Lebesgue measure on K are needed. As already mentioned, exact recovery is possible only if K has very specific properties and indeed, crucial in the proof is a property of levels sets associated with homogeneous polynomials (and in fact, also true for level sets of positively homogeneous nonnegative functions).

2. Main result

2.1. Notation and definitions. LetR[x] be the ring of polynomials in the variables x= (x1, . . . , xn) and let R[x]d be the vector space of polynomials of degree at most d (whose dimension is s(d) := n+dn

). For every d ∈ N, let Nn

d := {α ∈ Nn: |α|(= P

iαi) =d}, and let vd(x) = (xα), α ∈Nn, be the vector of monomials of the canonical basis (xα) of R[x]d. Denote bySk the space of k×k real symmetric matrices with scalar product hB,Ci = trace (BC); also, the notationB0 (resp. B≻0) stands for Bis positive semidefinite (resp. positive definite).

A polynomialf ∈R[x]d is written x7→f(x) = X

α∈Nn

fαxα, for some vector of coefficients f = (fα)∈Rs(d).

A real-valued polynomialg:Rn→Ris homogeneous of degreed(d∈N) ifg(λx) =λdg(x) for allλand allx∈R. Giveng∈R[x], denote byG⊂Rn the sublevel set {x : g(x)≤1}.

If g is homogeneous then G is compact only if g is nonnegative on Rn (and so d is even). Indeed suppose that g(x0)<0 for some x0 ∈Rn; then by homogeneity, g(λx0)<0 for all λ >0 and soGcontains a half-line and cannot be compact.

2.2. Main result. The main result is based on the following result of inde- pendent interest valid for positively homogeneous functions (and not only homogeneous polynomials). A function f :Rn → R is positively homoge- neous of degreed∈Rif f(λx) =λdf(x) for allλ >0 and allx∈Rn. Lemma 1. Let f : Rn → R be a measurable, positively homogeneous and nonnegative function of degree0< d∈R, with bounded level set{x : f(x)≤ 1}. Then for every k∈N andα ∈Nn:

(4)

(2.1)

Z

{x:f(x)≤1}

xαf(x)kdx = n+|α|

n+kd+|α|

Z

{x:f(x)≤1}

xαdx.

Proof. To prove (2.1) we use an argument already used in Morosov and Shakirov [3, 4]. With α ∈ Nn, let ˜α := (α2, . . . , αn) ∈ Nn−1 and define z:= (z2, . . . , zn).

Letφ:R+→Rbe measurable and consider the integralR

Rnφ(g(x))xαdx.

Using the change of variable x1 = t and xi = tzi for all i = 2, . . . , n, and invoking homogeneity, one obtains:

Z

Rn

φ(f(x))xαdx = Z

Rn

φ(tdf(1, z2, . . . , zn))tn+|α|−1zα˜d(t,z)

= d−1 Z

0

u(n+|α|)/d−1φ(u)du

×Aα withAα =

Z

Rn−1

zα˜f(1,z)−(n+|α|)/ddz.

Hence the choices t7→φ(t) := I[0,1](t) and t7→φ(t) :=tkI[0,1](t) yield d

Z

{x:f(x)≤1}

xαdx = Aα Z 1

0

u(n+|α|)/d−1du= Aαd n+|α|

d Z

{x:f(x)≤1}

f(x)kxαdx = Aα Z 1

0

u(n+kd+|α|)/d−1du= Aαd n+kd+|α|,

respectively. And so (2.1) follows.

With g ∈R[x]d being an homogeneous polynomial of degreed, consider now the matrixMd(λ) of moments of order 2dassociated with the Lebesgue measure onG={x : g(x)≤1}, that is,Md(λ) is a real square matrix with rows and columns indexed by the monomials xα, α∈Nn

d, and with entries (2.2) Md(λ)[α, β] =

Z

{x:g(x)≤1}

xα+βdx =: λα+β, ∀α, β∈Nn

d. So all entries of Md(λ) are moments of order 2d. Our main result is as follows:

Theorem 2. Let g ∈ R[x]d be homogeneous of degree d with unknown co- efficient vector g ∈ Rs(d) and with compact level set G = {x : g(x) ≤ 1}.

Assume that one knows the moments λ= (λα)for the Lebesgue measure on G, for everyα∈Nn with|α|= 2dand |α|=d. Then:

(2.3) g = n+d

n+ 2dMd(λ)−1λ(d) where λ(d)= (λα), α∈Nn

d, is the vector of all moments of orderd.

(5)

4 JEAN B. LASSERRE

Proof. Use (2.1) withk= 1 and |α|=dto obtain X

β∈Nn:|β|=2d

gβλα+β = n+d

n+ 2dλα, ∀ |α|=d, or in matrix form

Md(λ)g = n+d n+ 2dλd,

from which the desired result follows if Md(λ) is non singular. But this follows from the fact thatG has nonempty interior.

There are alternative ways for obtaininggfrom the momentsλ. It suffices to apply (2.1) for a family F of multi-indices α ∈ Nn whose cardinal |F|

matches the dimension n+d−1d

of the vector g.

For instance, withn= 2 andd= 2 (g is a quadratic form with vector of coefficients g= (g20, g11, g02)), g can also be obtained by:

g =

λ20 λ11 λ02 λ30 λ21 λ12 λ21 λ12 λ30

−1

n n+2λ00

n+1 n+3λ10

n+1 n+3λ01

,

provided that the above inverse matrix exists.

Similarly, with n = 2 and d = 4 (g is a quartic form with vector of coefficients g= (g40, g31, g22, g13, g04)), g can also be obtained by

g =

λ40 λ31 λ22 λ13 λ04 λ50 λ41 λ32 λ23 λ14 λ41 λ32 λ23 λ14 λ05 λ60 λ51 λ42 λ33 λ24 λ42 λ33 λ24 λ15 λ06

−1

n n+4λ00

n+1 n+5λ10

n+1 n+5λ01

n+2 n+6λ20

n+2 n+6λ02

 ,

provided that the above inverse matrix exists.

References

[1] Cuyt, A., Golub, G., Milanfar, P., Verdonk, B.: Multidimensional integral inversion, with applications in shape reconstruction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27(3), 1058–1070 (2005) (electronic)

[2] Gravin, N., Lasserre J., Pasechnik, D.V., Robins, S.: The Inverse Moment Problem for Convex Polytopes. Discrete Comput. Geom., to appear.

DOI 10.1007/s00454-012-9426-4

[3] Morosov, A., Shakirov, S.: New and old results in resultant theory, arXiv:0911.5278v1, 2009.

[4] Morosov, A., Shakirov, S.: Introduction to integral discriminants, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2009),arXiv:0911.5278v1, 2009.

Références

Documents relatifs

Construct a second family of lines contained in

Finally, we provide a Gaussian-like property of non Gaussian integrals for homogeneous polynomials that are sums of squares and critical points of a specific

influenced by exercise intensity, the direct autonomic nervous action upon the heart (i.e. with- drawal of the sympathetic nervous system and up-regulation of the

The structure constants for the quantum product in K-theory are rather complicated alternating sums of Gromov-Witten invariants, so a direct proof of finiteness involves

James presented a counterexample to show that a bounded convex set with James’ property is not necessarily weakly compact even if it is the closed unit ball of a normed space.. We

In this paper we study representations of skew group algebras ΛG, where Λ is a connected, basic, finite-dimensional algebra (or a locally finite graded algebra) over an

In Section 4, we deal with the case where the matroid is 4–connected up to separators of size 4, and in Section 5 we complete the proof of Theorem 1.2.. Section 5 begins with

Joint distribution of direction and length of the typical I-segment in a homogeneous random planar tessellation stable under iteration. Length distributions of edges in