• Aucun résultat trouvé

Annex 3 Analytical calculation of []

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Annex 3 Analytical calculation of []"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Annex 3 Page 217

Annex 3

Analytical calculation of [ ]

V

and [ ]

IH

Content

A3.1. Basic model 218

A3.2. Analytical integration of [ ]V over a triangle 220

A3.3. Analytical integration of [ ]IH over a triangle 223 A3.4. Special case: the edge AB crosses the axis of negative X 225

(2)

Annex 3 Page 218

A3.1. Basic model

Consider a LFMVC as shown in the figure A3.1 where X and Y are the local axes associated with the crack tip.

Figure A3.1. A LFMVC divided into triangles

We divide it into several triangles. The integration of [ ]V and [ ]IH over the domain thus transforms into the sum of integrations over these triangles.

Let us consider the integration over the triangle OAB as an example.

Figure A3.2. Equation of edge AB

O

BY

X

θB θA A

rB

rA

r θ

α O

X

Y

θ r(θ)

A

B

θA

θB

O

(3)

Annex 3 Page 219

A B

A A

B A

Y Y

Y Y X X

X X

=

θ θ

= r( )cos X

θ θ

= r( )sin Y

A B

A A

B

A

Y Y

Y sin ) ( r X

X

X cos ) ( r

θ

= θ

θ θ

Hence

θ

θ

=

θ (X X )sin (Y Y )cos X

Y X ) Y

( r

A B A

B

A B B A

In this formula, the term (XBXA)sinθ(YB YA)cosθ can be equal to zero only if the edge AB is radial (i.e. if the line containing A and B also contains point O), which is impossible in the present context.

Let

A B B AX Y X Y

a=

A

B X

X

s=

A B Y Y c= Hence

θ

= θ

θ ssin ccos ) a

( r

For any function F(r,θ)we have:

( ) θ θ

=

∫ ∫

θθ

θ F(r, )rdrd dA

F B

A

r

OAB 0

(4)

Annex 3 Page 220

A3.2. Analytical integration of

[ ]

V over a triangle

[ ]

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{ }

v v dA

v v dA

H D H dA

H D H

dA H D H dA

H D H V

OAB OAB

I OAB

I

OAB

I OAB

I

OAB

=

=

Σ Σ

Σ Σ

Σ Σ

Σ Σ

22 21

12 11 2

2 1

2

2 1

1 1

Introducing the values of

{ }{ }

HΣ1 , HΣ2 given by the equations (V.20) and (V.21) and using the expression of [ ]D appearing in (V.25), we get:

[ ]

*

*

*

E r

cos ) (

cos

v π

θ ν

+ +

θ ν

= 2

1 2 3

2 11

[ ]

*

*

*

E r

sin cos ) v (

v π

θ θ ν

+ +

= ν

= 2

1 1

21 12

*

*

*

*

E r

cos ) (

cos ) v (

π

θ ν

+ + θ

ν + ν

= +

8

2 1

3 1

4 9

22

Consequently,

( ) ( )

θ

=

θ

=

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫

θθ

θ θ

θ

θ drd

w w

w d w

dr v r

v v dA v

v v

v

v B

A B

A

r r

OAB 0 21 22

12 11

0 21 22

12 11 22

21 12 11

with:

[ ]

*

*

*

E

cos ) (

cos

w π

θ ν

+ +

θ ν

= 2

1 2 3

2 11

[ ]

*

*

*

E

sin cos ) w (

w π

θ θ ν

+ +

= ν

= 2

1 1

21 12

*

*

*

*

E

cos ) (

cos ) w (

π

θ ν

+ + θ

ν + ν

= +

8

2 1

3 1

4 9

22

Hence,

22 21

12 11

w w

w

w is not a function of r.

(5)

Annex 3 Page 221 Therefore,

( ) ( ) ( )θ

=

=

rθ vv vv rdr rθ ww ww dr ww ww r

22 21

12 11

0 21 22

12 11

0 21 22

12 11

Finally,

[ ] ( )θ θ

=

=

θθ r d

w w

w dA w

v v

v

V v B

OAB A

OAB 21 22

12 11 22

21 12 11

Define the following constants and functions

2 22 2

12

2 11 2

03 0

0

2 2

3 2 3

1

1 2

3 4

s ) (

c ) (

C

s c ) (

C

s ) (

c ) (

C

E R C a

q R

s c q

*

*

*

*

*

*

ν +

ν

= ν +

=

ν +

ν

=

= π

= +

=

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

θ + θ

= θ

θ

θ

= θ

θ +

θ

ν

= θ

θ

θ

ν

= θ

θ

θ

= θ

+ θ

= θ

sin s cos c ) ( f

cos s sin c ) ( f

) ( f c s ) (

) ( f

) ( f s c ) (

) ( f

sin s cos c ln ) ( f

R tan c s tanh arc ) ( f

*

*

6 5

2 4

2 3

2 1 0

1 1 2

2

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{

C f ( ) R ( ) f ( ) f ( )

}

C ) ( s

) ( f ) ( f ) (

R ) ( f C C ) ( s

) ( f ) ( f ) (

R ) ( f C C

) ( s

*

*

*

θ + θ ν

+

θ

= θ

θ + θ ν

+ +

θ

= θ

θ + θ ν

+ +

θ

= θ

3 5

0 1

22 0

22

4 6

0 1

12 0 12

3 5

0 1

11 0

11

1 3 2

1 2

1 2

Then

( )

θ θ

θ

= θ θ

θ

ww ww r d ss (( )) ss (( ))

22 21

12 11

22 21

12 11

(6)

Annex 3 Page 222 We finally get :

θ θ

θ

θ

θ θ

θ

= θ

vv vv dA ss (( )) ss (( )) ss (( )) ss (( ))

A A

A A

B B

B B

OAB 12 22

12 11

22 12

12 11

22 21

12 11

For the practical calculation, we use the following sequence to avoid the difficulties linked with the evaluation of the arctanh which is a complex number when its argument is not in the domain [1,+1] :

[ ]

[ ]

[ ] [ ]

[ ]

[ ]

) sin (sin

s ) cos (cos

c f

) cos (cos

s ) sin (sin

c f

f c ) (

s ) (

f

f s ) (

c ) (

f

sin s cos c ln sin

s cos c ln f

c if u

ln f

c if u

ln f

sin sin

sin sin

u

) u ( ) u (

) u ( ) u u (

R tan c s u

R tan c s u

A B

A B

AB

A B

A B

AB

AB A

* B AB

AB A

* B AB

A A

B B

AB

limAB AB

AB AB

A B B

A

A B B

A limAB

B A

A AB B

B B

A A

θ

θ +

θ

θ

=

θ

θ

θ

θ

=

+ θ

θ

ν

=

θ

θ

ν

=

θ

θ

θ

θ

=

=

=

=

θ

θ θ + θ

θ

+ θ

θ + θ

=

+

= + + θ

= + θ

=

6 5

2 4

2 3

2 1 1

0 0

1 1 2

2 0 1 2 0 1

2 2

2 2

1 1

1 1

2 2

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{ }

[ ]

{

* AB AB

}

AB AB

AB

* AB AB

AB

AB

* AB AB

AB

f f

) (

R f

C C

s

f f

) (

R f

C C s

f f

) (

R f

C C

s

3 5

0 1

22 0

22

4 6

0 1

12 0 12

3 5

0 1

11 0

11

1 3 2

1 2

1 2

+ ν

+

=

+ ν

+ +

=

+ ν

+ +

=

[ ]

=

AB AB

AB OAB s AB s

s V s

22 12

12 11

(7)

Annex 3 Page 223

A3.3. Analytical integration of

[ ]

IH over a triangle

[ ]

( )

( )

θ θ

=

⎪⎪

⎪⎪

=

∫ ∫

∫ ∫

θ θ

θ Σ

θ θ

θ Σ

Σ Σ

d dr r H

d dr r H dA

H dA H IH

B A B

A

r r

OAB

I OAB

I OAB

0

2 0

1

2 1

Introducing the values of

{ }{ }

HΣ1, HΣ2 given by the equations (V.20) and (V.21), we get:

( )

( ) [IHr( )]

) ( IHr ) ( IHr ) ( IHr

) ( IHr ) ( IHr ) ( IHr dr

r H

dr r H

r r

θ

=

θ θ

θ

θ θ

= θ

θ Σ

θ Σ

23 22

21

13 12

11

0

2 0

1

with:

[ ]

π

= θ

θ 3 2

2 3

1 r( )

) ( C

) ( IHr ) ( IHr

) ( IHr ) ( IHr

) cos cos

( sin ) ( C ) ( IHr

sin cos

cos ) ( C ) ( IHr

) cos (

cos ) ( C ) ( IHr

) cos cos

( cos ) ( C ) ( IHr

θ

= θ

θ

= θ

θ + θ θ +

θ

= θ

θ θ θ θ

= θ

θ θ

θ

= θ

θ + θ θ

θ

= θ

11 23

13 22

2 2 4

21

2 2 3 2 2

13

2 2 3

2 12

2 2 2

11

1 1 1 3 1

Then

[ ]

θ θ

θ

θ θ

= θ θ

IHr(θ) d pp1121(( )) pp1222(( )) pp1323(( )) with

π

= θ

θ 3 2 2

2 q

) ( r ) a

( C

(8)

Annex 3 Page 224 2

3 13 2

5

2 3 5 2

3

2 3 3 2

11

2 3 5 2

3 5 2 3 2

2 6 3

2 5 3

3 4 2

3 3 2

2 2 2

2 1 2

θ + θ

= θ

+ θ

θ

= θ

+ θ

θ

= θ

+ θ

θ

= θ

θ θ +

+

= θ

θ θ

= θ

cos q c cos ) s c c

( ) ( g

cos q c cos ) s c c ( ) ( g

cos q s cos ) s s c ( ) ( g

cos q s cos ) s s c ( ) ( g

sin ) cos q s c ( ) ( g

sin ) cos q s c ( ) ( g

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

) ( p ) ( p

) ( p ) ( p

) ( g s ) ( g ) ( C ) ( p

) ( g s ) ( g ) ( C ) ( p

) ( g c ) ( g ) ( C ) ( p

) ( g c ) ( g ) ( C ) ( p

θ

= θ

θ

= θ

θ

θ θ

= θ

θ

θ θ

= θ

θ +

θ θ

= θ

θ

θ θ

= θ

11 23

13 22

2 21

2 13

2 12

2 11

2 6

2

1 5

2

1 4

2

2 3

2

Finally

[ ]

θ θ

θ

θ θ

θ

θ θ

θ

θ θ

= θ

) ( p ) ( p ) ( p

) ( p ) ( p ) ( p ) ( p ) ( p ) ( p

) ( p ) ( p ) ( IH p

A A

A

A A

A B

B B

B B

OAB B 21 22 23

13 12

11 23

22 21

13 12

11

(9)

Annex 3 Page 225

A3.4. Special case: the edge AB crosses the axis of negative X

In a LFMVC, the segment AB will never cross the axis of negative X but, in chapter 6, the situation of figure A3.3 is encountered.

Figure A3.3. line AB crosses the negative X axis

In this case, the calculations of the preceding sections must be corrected to take account that θ jumps from π to +π when the line AB crosses the crack.

Consequently, for any function g(θ), we have in this case:

θ θ +

θ θ

= θ

θ

∫ ∫

θπ

π

θ g( )d g( )d d

) (

g B

A

B A

Let

θ θ

=

θ)

g( )d

( G Then

[G( ) G( )] [G( ) G( )]

) ( G ) ( G ) ( G ) ( G d ) (

g A B B A

B

A θ θ= π θ + θ π = θ θ + π π

Hence, the previous results obtained for an edge AB not intersecting the axis of “negative X”

must be corrected.

After some calculations, the correction on [VOAB] is found to be :

[ ]

ν

+

=

π

π

π

π

π π

π

= π

c s

s c E q

) (

a ) ( s ) ( s

) ( s ) ( s ) ( s ) ( s

) ( s ) ( V s

on

correction *

*

OAB 1

22 12

12 11

22 12

12 11

O O B

Y

X

θA

A θB

rA

rB

r θ

α

(10)

Annex 3 Page 226 In a similar way, the correction on [IHOAB] is

[ ]

= π

π π

π

π π

π

π π

π

π π

= π

2 2

3

2 3 2

3 2

2 8

23 22

21

13 12

11 23

22 21

13 12

11

s c s c s

s c c s c q

c a a

) ( p ) ( p ) ( p

) ( p ) ( p ) ( p ) ( p ) ( p ) ( p

) ( p ) ( p ) ( IH p

on

correction OAB

Note that c=YB YA 0 because c=YB YA =0 would mean that the edge is parallel to X, that is parallel to the crack.

In such a case, the edge cannot intersect the crack.

Références

Documents relatifs

o exchange. Tn general unique solutions are found or solutions with overlapping errors as it can be seen in fig. In the D t u wave there is weaker but very significant

The PRDO “authorizes State fish and wildlife agencies, Federally recognized Tribes, Wildlife Services [and designated agents of these agencies and tribes] to prevent

The Limits of Market Action to Build Consumers’ Political Awareness of Sustainable Development It seems important to place the development of a supply of ethical

Several reasons can account for these actors ’ perception of mobile telephony as an issue, including: the fact that mobile telephony had aroused media interest following a lawsuit

Figure 2: Illustrating the interplay between top-down and bottom-up modeling As illustrated in Figure 3 process modelling with focus on a best practice top-down model, as well

Note also that the solutions of the Monge problem in many geodesic space X can be disintegrated along transport rays, i.e parts of X isometric to intervals where the obtained

Loïc Francon, Thierry Ameglio, Erwan Roussel, Irène Till Bottraud, Guillaume Charrier, Christophe CoronaB. To cite

Actually, for stacks we show an even stronger result, namely that they cannot be encoded into weakly (asyn- chronous) bisimilar processes in a π-calculus without mixed choice..