• Aucun résultat trouvé

Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Figure  1:  Schematic  illustration  of  differential  effect  of  spatial  smoothing  at  different  frequencies
Figure 2: Schematic view of different biophysical scenarios for explaining differences  between EEG and MEG spectra
Figure 3: Illustration of the simulation framework. a) Examples of levels of brain parcellation
Figure  4:  EEG  and  MEG  spectra  obtained  for  the  different  configuration,  with  a  scale  parameter  c=1  (only  1/3  of  channels  are  shown)
+3

Références

Documents relatifs

As a means of discussing the use of existing software, this first part describes a selected list of such exist- ing software: the Eclipse IDE as graphical user front-end, Maven for

These results indicate that bladder cancer cell-endothelial cell adhesion is mainly mediated by the interactions of MUC1 and CD43 with endothelial ICAM-1 for invasive

Public regulation of agri-environmental processes has to cope with two different problems : on the one side, there are asymmetric information between the regulator and the farmers

Human ad ipose t issue macrophages are of an an t i-inf lamma tory pheno type bu t capab le of excess ive pro-inf lamma tory med ia tor produc t ion. The N-CoR-HDAC3

word initial Cs in Georgian considered as complex onsets: results confirm that indeed 2-3C clusters reflect a global, prototypical c-center coordination. however, when speech system

Pour cela, nous proposons d’adapter un mécanisme de re- cherche de motifs séquentiels multidimensionnels, comme proposé dans (Plantevit et al., 2010), à la fouille de séries

1.5.1 Deterministic slow evolution of the zonal jets through kinetic theory and the S3T-CE2 system As explained in section 1.2.2, the statistical average of the momentum