• Aucun résultat trouvé

Distributed Best Response Algorithms for Potential Games

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Distributed Best Response Algorithms for Potential Games"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Fig. 1: Reaching time for Algorithm 1 with IID revision.
Fig. 2: Illustration of the proof of Lemma 1
Fig. 5: Mean execution time and reaching time of Algorithm 4 over 10,000 random samples of the routing game displayed in Figure 3, when the relative speed of the central player ( λ λ 0

Références

Documents relatifs

Roubens, Equivalent Representations of a Set Function with Applications to Game Theory and Multicriteria Decision Making, Preprint 9801, GEMME, Faculty of Economy, University of

To explore how large groups engage with nanotechnologies, we focus on the worldwide largest R&D spenders - groups which were selected because they already have research

For general games, there might be non-convergence, but when the convergence of the ODE holds, considered stochastic algorithms converge towards Nash equilibria.. For games admitting

Fortunately, this is possible to go further, observing that many of the previous classes (ordinal, (exact) potential, continuous potential, load balancing games, congestion games,

In our experiment the control did not produce results in line with the theoretical expectations (Shapley value, or even a payoff allocation residing in the

Under the Intersection Free Approximation, every time a new player who is not satisfied (in the algorithm, that correspond to a player not in L) has to compute its best response in

Player C (or a bot) can peek at A’s and B’s actions first, before deciding his/her moves.. Player C (or a bot) can peek at A’s and B’s actions first, before deciding

Player C (or a bot) can peek at A’s and B’s actions first, before deciding his/her moves.. Player C (or a bot) can peek at A’s and B’s actions first, before deciding