C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
E. B ALLICO
On secant spaces to projective curves
Compositio Mathematica, tome 85, n
o3 (1993), p. 311-313
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1993__85_3_311_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1993, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
311
On
secantspaces to projective
curvesE. BALLICO
Dept. of Mathematics, University of Trento, 38050 Povo (TN), Italy
Received 27 November 1991; accepted 31 January 1992 Compositio Mathematica 85: 311-313, 1993.
(Ç) 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
In this note we
give
an affirmative answer(in
astronger form)
to aquestion
raised in a recent paper
([1], problem 1.4).
The main tool for theproof
will be[1],
th. 1.2. To state thequestion,
we need to introduce a notation.Let r,
d, e, n
beintegers
with2 n
+ 1 r and e n +1,
C a smoothcomplete
connected curve and T agd
onC;
letC(e)
be thesymmetric product;
set(as
in[1]) Vne(T):= {D~C(e):D imposes
at most n + 1 conditions toT}.
SetBy
a standard determinantaldescription,
every irreduciblecomponent
ofVne(T)
has dimension at least
t(r,
n,e) (see
e.g.[1], §1).
The
question
will be answeredproving (over
anyalgebraically
closed basefield)
thefollowing
theorem 0.1.THEOREM 0.1. Fix
integers
r,d,
e, n, with e n +1,
r > n2, d
2e - 1.Let C be a smooth
complete
connected curve and0393agrd
on C which is not acomplete
linear system. Assume
Then
Vne(0393) is
not empty.Note that the bound
"t(r,
n,e)
0"required
in(2)
fornon-complete
linearsystems
is weaker than the boundrequired
in[1],
th.1.2,
in the case ofcomplete
linear
systems,
and that it is"sharp".
The condition"d
2e - 1" will be usedonly
toapply
the statement of[1],
th.1.2;
hence anyimprovement
of[1],
th.1.2,
related to this condition shouldgive
acorresponding improvement
of 0.1(see
the related discussion in
[1], 1.3).
The fact that the bound(2)
in 0.1 is better than the one in[1],
th.1.2,
occursessentially
for numerical reasons. Indeed theorem 0.1 will be provenby
a reduction to the case proven in[1],
th. 1.2.312
A few words on the case of
positive
characteristic. Theorem 1.2 of[1]
wasclaimed
only
in characteristic 0. However thatproof (and
inparticular [1],
lemma
1.2.1 )
works withoutchanges
inpositive
characteristic if all the references used thereare justified (mainly [2]).
Thekey
tool for[1],
lemma1.2.1,
and for[2]
is a section of[3]
which works in any characteristic(and
this wasexplicitly
remarked in
[3],
Remark2.8).
Proof of
0.1. We mayeasily
reduce to the case(which
will be assumed fromnow
on)
that r has no basepoint.
Since r is notcomplete,
itcorresponds
to ahyperplane of a gr+1d,
03A6(or,
ingeometric language,
"the P"corresponding
to r isseen as the
projection
from apoint
u of thepr+1 corresponding
to03A6").
IfVne(03A6) ~ QS,
then it is obvious thatv:(r) =1- 0.
Hence we may assume thatVne(03A6) = 0.
Thisimplies
that if we take anydegree e
effective divisor Z ofC,
there is at most one(n
+l)-dimensional subspace
of 03A6containing
it. Setk:= r - n. Note that
by (2)
we have:If 03A6 is
complete, by (2)
we mayapply [1],
th.1.2,
and findVn+1e(03A6) ~ QS.
If 03A6 is notcomplete,
we may workby
induction on the codimension of r in thecomplete
linearsystem |0393|;
in both cases we may assumeVé"’«D) :0 0.
Asremarked in
[1], by
the determinentaldescription
ofVn+1e(03A6)
every irreduciblecomponent, T,
ofV: + 1 (03A6)red
has dimension at leastt(n
+1,
r +1, e)
kby (2).
Fix any such T and let S be the
"complete integral subvariety of Pr+1
which isthe union of all
(n
+1)-dimensional
linear spacesparametrized by T";
S iscomplete
because T iscomplete.
It is sufficient to check that u E S. Hence we mayassume
by contradiction S ~ pr+ 1,
i.e.dim(S)
n + k. Sincedim(S)
n +k, using
a suitable incidencevariety
andcounting
dimensions we see that for ageneral
x~S there is at least a 1-dimensionalfamily, T(x),
of elements of T. Takeas x a smooth
point
of S.Every
LeT(x)
is contained in the Zariskitangent
spaceTx S,
i.e. in a fixedhyperplane.
Sinceby
definition of linearsystem
theimage
of Cby
the mapcorresponding
to 03A6 spanspr+1,
we see that the union of the effective divisors contained in these linear spaces issupported by
at most dpoints
of C.Since a set with d elements has
finitely
manysubsets,
the contradiction comesfrom the
assumption "Vne(03A6)
=0",
i.e.by
the fact that every L E T isuniquely
determined
by
thedegree e
effective divisor of C contained in L.D
Acknowledgements
The author want to thank the authors of
[1]
forsending
it inpreprint
form andfor
keeping
himupdate
with their work. The author waspartially supported by
MURST and GNSAGA of CNR
(Italy).
313 References
[1] Coppens, M. and Martens, G., Secant spaces and Clifford’s theorem, Compositio Math. 78 (1991), 193-212.
[2] Fulton, W., Harris, J., and Lazarsfeld, R., Excess linear series on an algebraic curve, Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc. 92 (1984), 320-322.
[3] Fulton, W., Lazarsfeld, R., On the connectedness of degeneracy loci and special divisors, Acta Math. 146 (1981), 271-283.