A L
E S
E D L ’IN IT ST T U
F O U R
ANNALES
DE
L’INSTITUT FOURIER
Herwig HAUSER & Luis NARVÁEZ-MACARRO
Continuous division of differential operators Tome 51, no3 (2001), p. 769-778.<http://aif.cedram.org/item?id=AIF_2001__51_3_769_0>
© Association des Annales de l’institut Fourier, 2001, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux articles de la revue « Annales de l’institut Fourier » (http://aif.cedram.org/), implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://aif.cedram.org/legal/). Toute re- production en tout ou partie cet article sous quelque forme que ce soit pour tout usage autre que l’utilisation à fin strictement per- sonnelle du copiste est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
cedram
Article mis en ligne dans le cadre du
Centre de diffusion des revues académiques de mathématiques http://www.cedram.org/
CONTINUOUS DIVISION OF DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS
by
H. HAUSER and L.NARVÁEZ-MACARRO (*)
Introduction.
The classical Weierstrass Division Theorem for
convergent
power series was extendedby
Hironaka and Grauert to the case of divisionby
several series.
Galligo put
these extensions on firmground by providing
asystematic
treatment andproving
the continuousdependence
ofquotients
and remainder of the division on the
given
data. The formal casebeing straightforward,
theproof
of convergence andcontinuity requires
to workwith suitable
polycylinders
and to establish intricate norm estimates for the involved series. Thegeneral
idea that a power series can beinterpreted
as an
arbitrarily
smallperturbation
of its initial monomial isdisguised by
the technicalities of theproof.
This defect was overcomeby
Hauserand Muller
[HM] by approximating
instead of the seriesdirectly
theOn-
linear map between power series spaces
Opn
definedby
thegiven
series. Ashort and direct
proof
became thus available. Thisquite general strategy
is valid for different situations and can beapplied equally
in thepolynomial
context or for solutions of certain differential
equations [HRT], [H].
Theonly ingredient
fromanalysis
is the convergence of thegeometric
series ofa linear map between Banach spaces,
provided
this map has norm 1. As such theargument is, though comparable
inspirit,
much less difficult than(*)
Supported by DGICYT PB97-0723 and DGES PR97.Keywords: Differential operators - Division theorems - Continuity.
Math. classification: 32C38 - 14F10.
the
proof
of the Constant Rank Theorem foranalytic
maps between power series spaces or the Nash-MoserImplicit
Function Theorem.Briançon-Maisonobe
in one variable and Castro ingeneral
firstproved
division theorems for differential
operators [BM], [C].
Full details appear in Castro’s thesis but have not beenpublished. Recently,
Mebkhout andNarvaez
[MN]
considered a canonicaltopology
on therings
of lineardifferential
operators
withanalytic
coefficients andproved
thecontinuity
of division. Their ad-hoc
proof
is rather technical andlong. They give
lots of
applications
and show how instrumental continuous division of differentialoperators
is in thetheory
of D-modules. Inparticular, they
obtain a short
proof
of thefaithfully
flatness of thering
of infinite order differentialoperators
over thering
of finite order differentialoperators.
The method of
proof
of[HM]
is taken up in thepresent
paper to establish thecontinuity
of divisionby
differentialoperators
withanalytic
coefficients in a
simple
andtransparent
way. Due to thenon-commutativity
the same routine
requires
additional efforts toget
the correct norm esti-mates.
Actually,
thepseudo-norms
on thering
of differentialoperators
haveto be chosen with
particular
care in order to make thearguments
work.Slight
deviations from thesetting immediately
cause serious obstructions.We thank Antonio
Rojas
forpointing
out a gap in an earlier draft of this work. The second author isgrateful
to the Institute for AdvancedStudy, Princeton,
for itshospitality.
1.
Topological
structure on thering
ofdifferential operators.
Let
DCn
be the sheaf of linear differentialoperators
with coefficients in the sheaf ofholomorphic
functions on en. Denoteby C7n
andby Dn
the stalk at theorigin
of the sheaves andDc. respectively.
In
[MN], §2,
Mebkhout and Narviez have introduced a natural metrizablelocally
convex structure on Forinstance,
if U C C’ isan open
poly-cylinder
ofpolyradius a = (ai)
and E =is a differential
operator on U,
where x -(x 1, ... , xn ) ,
~ is the vector of
partial
derivativesDi - 9~
and theare
holomorphic
functions onU,
thetopology
ofDcn (U)
is determined
by
the normswhere p is a
polyradius with pi
ai and L =(Li,..., Ln)
> 0. It turns out that thistopology
does notdepend
on the local coordinates and that thecompletion
ofDCn (U)
is the space of infinite order differentialoperators
on
U,
see loc. cit.In this paper we shall consider another ,-,,-,...,...,-,... ’L’U"’’’’’-’ v...’-’. way of
indexing
the normsabove. For
s, t
>0, weights À, J1
EQi
and J weset
where we omit any reference to the
weights,
oftenfixed,
forsimplicity.
Wehave
obviously
=The factorial of
I (31
iscrucial,
as in[MN],
and appears also in thepresent proof.
For Afixed,
denoteby Dn (s)
thesubspace of Dn
ofoperators
of finite norm w.r.t. s
(and
w.r.t. some or anyt, /-t),
filteredby
the Banachspaces
Dn (s)d
ofoperators
oforder ~
d. The inducedtopology
onDn
doesnot
depend
on the choice of A and M.For U C C’ an open
poly-cylinder
ofpolyradius a = so (A fixed),
the
topology
ofÐCn (U)
is determinedby
anyfamily
ofnorms I - with
0 s so and t-~ » 0 w.r.t. the
componentwise
order(for instance,
0 t to
and 1L fixed,
or tE]0, 1[
fixed and all M »0).
2.
Continuity of
division.Any
monomial order in allows to associate to a differential oper- ator its initial monomial as the monomial of minimalexponent occurring
in its
symbol [C].
Forfinitely
manygiven
differentialoperators Mi
thereexists
(A, JL)
EN2,
such that for each i there is aunique (ai, (3i)
in thesupport
ofMi
withAai -
minimal and such that x‘x2 is the initial monomial ofMi
w.r.t. the chosen monomialorder,
see the addendum for aproof.
Infact, taking weights (a, p)
EN2n
which induce the monomial orderon a
sufficiently large
subset ofN2n
one may choose A == a-and /-t
= k - p where k denotes the vector(k,..., k)
in l~n for somelarge
k.Write
M.
= =Then À(o. -0)
~c(,~2 - {3)
for all(0152, {3)
in thesupport
ofMi.
Let T = be the shift
operator given by Ti
For
Mi,..., Mp
EDn
definesubspaces
L ofDj§
and J ofDn
asfollows. For P
= ~
EÐn,
letP" = E c’Y8x’YT8
and P’ = P - pobe the induced
operators
onÐn.
Consider the mapf : D§§
-~D~z given by
The kernel and theimage
off
admit directcomplements
L and J inDj§
andD~z given by support
conditions: Set F = +N2n
and let F =Ui Fi
be apartition
of F with(0152i, {3i) E Fi.
ThenWe shall show that
f
is asufficiently precise approximation
of theOn-linear
mapDj§ - Dn given by A - E Ai Mi .
THEOREM. For
(A, JL)
as above with ~c » Àcomponentswise,
themap
- - , . -,
is a bicontinuous
compatible isomorphism.
Assume that >JL(3
for all/3
in thesupport
Then there are constants so > 0 and C > 0 such that for all E E theunique
elements A EL(s)
and B EJ(s)
withE
= ~ Ai Mi
+ Bsatisfy
Compatible
means that urespects
the filtrations ofDn by Dn (s)
forsufficiently
small s. Observe that theopposed
map(A, B) -~ ~ Mi Ai + B
isnot
compatible
since derivations alter the radius of convergence of a series(however,
it can be shown that thecorresponding
division iscontinuous).
The
assumption
on > is satisfied in case that(a, 0) (a’, (3’) implies (0,..., 0, (3) (0,..., 0, ,~3’)
w.r.t. the monomial order on Without thatassumption
on M, the estimate of the theorem holds for 0 s so, t =s, A = a
and M = k - p, k »0,
with Cindependent
of k.Varying k,
this case covers in
particular
the estimate of Theorem 3.1.2 of[MN].
Example.
- We show that theassumption
on p cannot be omitted if t is allowed toapproach
0 for fixed s. Take lVl =axay - X02
with(A, I-t) _ (1, 2
Assume thatpi. 54
p2 andthat I Pl - P21
a1.Then is the initial monomial of
M,
anddividing
Aby
Myields
the remainder R =
x8;
+ with normIRlst ==
+t-t’2).
Thereis no constant C such that this norm remains bounded
by C -
=C . t-J-ll -J-l2 for fixed s and t
going
to 0.Proof. - We show that u is bicontinuous
by interpreting
it as aperturbation
of apurely
combinatorial and bicontinuousbijective
map v.As such u is shown to be
bijective
and its inverse will begiven
asv-1
times a
geometric
series in v - u.Bounding uniformly
the norm of therestrictions of v - u to
L(s)
eJ(s)
for s > 0sufficiently
smallyields
therequired
estimate foru- 1
The map u is
On-linear
anddecomposes
into u = v -- wl -- w2 whereThe definition of L and J is chosen so that v is a bicontinuous
compatible isomorphism.
We shall show that there arepositive
constantsso, r and
CI, C2
such that for all 0 sso, t
>0,
and E EDn(s)d
we have
and
Choosing
sosufficiently
small and0 s so, 0 t - s’
theseinequalities imply
that thegeometric
series(Id -f- (wl -~- w2 ) v-1 ) -1
convergesto a map on the space of differential
operators
of infinite orderAs
wlv-1
andW2V-l
do not increase the order of a differentialoperator
the series defines anautomorphism
of the Banach spacesI - 1st)
for each d and
t,
and in fact anautomorphism
of thelocally
convex spaceÐn(s).
It follows t hat u =(Id
+-~ w2 ) v -1 ) v -1
is anisomorphism
fromthe spaces to
Dn(s)
whose inverse has norm C w.r.t. s and t for some constant C > 0. This isjust
the assertion of the theorem.Choose so > 0 such that
Mi
and all its derivatives EN~’~, belong
toDn(s)
for all i and all 0 s so. Let E EDn. Decompose
Einto E =
~i,~~
with B E J and A = EL,
The
equality
follows from the fact that allexponents
are distinct. Set(a)
We estimate first the norm ofwiv-1. Denoting by /3
thecomponentwise
order in we haveSet
Then
We have
The last
inequality
follows fromHere we use that for a,
/3
E N" with a x13
one hasCombining
the above
gives
1/ , 1, -,
for some constant
Ci
> 0. Choose r such thatAe x
r ~ J-Le for all 0 e x ai and all i. This ispossible
since p » A. We obtain for suitableCl
> 0 that(b)
We estimate the norm ofW2V-1 .
The
inequality
need not be anequality
since certainc~-t-~2013~, respectively
/3 + 6 -
e, may coincide. SetThen
’¿up
for some constant
C2
> 0 andusing
theassumption 101 -
. For each(3
which is anexponent
of D in the monomials ofMi
let(ai,3, 0)
be anelement of the
support
ofMZ
with minimal firstcomponent:
Aa for all a with(a, ~3)
E suppMi .
Thenwhere r > 0 is chosen such that r ~
~c(,~2 -,~)
for every i and{3 (here
theassumption (3)
> 0 isused).
The last series converges and remains bounded for ssufficiently
small becauseof A(a -
0.This shows _ -
for
C2
> 0 suitable and concludes theproof
of the theorem.In case
~c(~32 - /3)
isarbitrary
but tequals
s, the first estimate for R holdsagain,
and the secondinequality
iswhere a is a
positive
constant such thatfor all i and
/3.
Thenfor 0 s so and
C2
> 0 suitable butindependent
of k » 0(since
theseries remains bounded for k »
0).
0As in
[MN], 4.1,
we can follow Serre’s idea in the case of thecompletion
of a local noetherian commutative
ring
and deduce from the theorem abovea very short
proof
of thefaithfully
flatness of the extensionDn
CD~, originally
provenby
Sato-Kashiwara-Kawaiby using
microlocaltechniques.
Addendum.
Fix a monomial order E in We prove that for
finitely
many differentialoperators Mi
there exists(A, Jl)
EQ2n,
with A « Jl, such thatfor each i there is a
unique (ai, (3i)
in thesupport
ofMi
withminimal and such that is the initial monomial of
Mi
w.r.t. e.Recall that on any finite subset of ~Tn every monomial order can be defined
by
an N-linear mapq :pulling
back the natural orderon N.
Identify
q with a vector in Nn . Let(~, p)
EN2n
beweights
whichinduce the same order as e on a
sufficiently big
subset ofN2n [including
the
finitely
many monomials ofMi
which have minimalx-exponent
and maximalD-exponent
w.r.t. thecomponentwise
order on Set A = aand p = k - p, where k is a
positive integer
and k =(k,..., k)
E Then= 2013~ -
1{31
+(aa
+p,~3) .
For ksufficiently large
and for each i thepair (a, (3)
in thesupport
ofMi
with A. a - p.{3
minimal satisfies1(31
ismaximal,
i.e.(a, 0) belongs
to thesupport
of thesymbol
ofMi.
(a, (3)
is minimal in thesupport
of thesymbol
ofMi
w.r.t.(a, p).
This
implies
that the monomial ofMi
withexponent (a, 0)
minimal w.r.t.À. a - M.
{3
coincides with the minimal monomial of thesymbol
ofMi
w.r.t.e.
By taking
ksufficiently large
we obtain A « p. For e the inversegraded
order as in
[C]
let(7F, T)
EN2n
beweights
which define in the chosen finite subset ofN2n
the inverselexicographic
order(not
thegraded one).
Thenwill work for l~
sufficiently large.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[BM]
J. BRIANÇON, P. MAISONOBE, Idéaux de germes d’opérateurs différentiels à unevariable, Enseign. Math.
(2),
30(1984),
7-38.[C]
F. CASTRO, Calcul de la dimension et des multiplicités d’un D-module monogène, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. I Math., 302(1986),
487-490.[H]
H. HAUSER, Singular differential equations, to appear.[HM]
H. HAUSER, M. MÜLLER, A Rank Theorem for analytic maps between power series spaces, Inst. HautesÉtudes
Sci. Publ. Math., 80(1994),
95-115.[HRT]
H. HAUSER, J.-J. RISLER, B. TEISSIER, The reduced Bautin index of planarvector fields, Duke Math. J., 100
(1999),
425-445.[MN]
Z. MEBKHOUT, L. NARVÁEZ-MACARRO, Le théorème de continuité de la division dans les anneaux d’opérateurs différentiels, J. reine angew. Math., 503(1998),
193-236.
Manuscrit reCu le 24 aloft 2000, accepté le 16 novembre 2000.
Herwig HAUSER, Universitat Innsbruck Mathematisches Institut A-6020
(Austria).
Luis
NARVAEZ-MACARRO,
Universidad de Sevilla Departamento de Algebra
Facultad de Matemiticas E-41012