• Aucun résultat trouvé

The Implicit Function Theorem and the Inverse Function Theorem Sample solutions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "The Implicit Function Theorem and the Inverse Function Theorem Sample solutions"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Sample solutions

Jean-Baptiste Campesato January 1st, 2020

Exercise 1. Let𝐵 = 𝐵(𝑎, 𝑟) ⊂ ℝ𝑛. Let𝑓 ∶ 𝐵 → 𝐵be a contraction mapping

(i.e. a Lipschitz mapping with constant𝑞 ∈ [0, 1), or equivalently∃𝑞 ∈ [0, 1), ∀𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, ‖𝑓 (𝑥) − 𝑓 (𝑦)‖ ≤ 𝑞‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖).

1. Prove that𝑓 is continuous.

Let𝑥 ∈ 𝐵. Let𝜀 > 0.

Set𝛿 = {

𝜀

𝑞 if𝑞 ≠ 0 1 otherwise .

Let𝑦 ∈ 𝐵. If‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖ < 𝛿then‖𝑓 (𝑥) − 𝑓 (𝑦)‖ ≤ 𝑞‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖ < 𝜀.

Hence𝑓 is continuous at𝑥.

We define a sequence inductively by picking𝑥0 ∈ 𝐵and then setting𝑥𝑛+1= 𝑓 (𝑥𝑛).

2. Prove that∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0, ‖𝑥𝑛+1− 𝑥𝑛‖ ≤ 𝑞𝑛‖𝑥1− 𝑥0‖.

Let’s prove it by induction on𝑛.

Base case at𝑛 = 0:‖𝑥1− 𝑥0‖ ≤ 𝑞0‖𝑥1− 𝑥0‖ = ‖𝑥1− 𝑥0

Induction step: assume that the statement holds for some𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0, then

‖𝑥𝑛+2− 𝑥𝑛+1‖ = ‖𝑓 (𝑥𝑛+1) − 𝑓 (𝑥𝑛)‖

= 𝑞‖𝑥𝑛+1− 𝑥𝑛

= 𝑞𝑛+1‖𝑥1− 𝑥0by the induction hypothesis.

3. Prove that∀𝑚, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0, 𝑚 > 𝑛 ⟹ ‖𝑥𝑚− 𝑥𝑛‖ ≤ 𝑞𝑛

1−𝑞‖𝑥1− 𝑥0‖.

Let𝑚, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0. Assume that𝑚 > 𝑛, then

‖𝑥𝑚− 𝑥𝑛‖ =

‖‖

‖‖

𝑚−1

𝑖=𝑛

(𝑥𝑖+1− 𝑥𝑖)

‖‖

‖‖

𝑚−1

𝑖=𝑛

‖𝑥𝑖+1− 𝑥𝑖by the Triangle Inequality

𝑚−1

𝑖=𝑛

𝑞𝑖‖𝑥1− 𝑥0by Question 2.

= 𝑞𝑛1 − 𝑞𝑚−𝑛

1 − 𝑞 ‖𝑥1− 𝑥0

≤ 𝑞𝑛

1 − 𝑞‖𝑥1− 𝑥0

(2)

4. Prove that(𝑥𝑛)𝑛∈ℕ

≥0is a Cauchy sequence.

Let𝜀 > 0.

Case 1: if𝑥1= 𝑥0then for any𝑚, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0satisfying𝑚 > 𝑛,‖𝑥𝑚− 𝑥𝑛‖ ≤ 𝑞𝑛

1 − 𝑞‖𝑥1− 𝑥0‖ = 0 < 𝜀.

Case 2: otherwise, since lim

𝑛→+∞

𝑞𝑛

1 − 𝑞 = 0(as|𝑞| < 1), (1) ∃𝑁 ∈ ℕ, 𝑛 > 𝑁 ⟹ 0 ≤ 𝑞𝑛

1 − 𝑞 ≤ 𝜀

‖𝑥1− 𝑥0Let𝑚, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0, if𝑚 ≥ 𝑛 > 𝑁 then

‖𝑥𝑚− 𝑥𝑛‖ ≤ 𝑞𝑛

1 − 𝑞‖𝑥1− 𝑥0by Question3

≤ 𝜀by(1)

We proved that∀𝜀 > 0, ∃𝑁 ∈ ℕ≥0, ∀𝑚, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0, 𝑚 ≥ 𝑛 > 𝑁 ⟹ ‖𝑥𝑚− 𝑥𝑛‖ ≤ 𝜀 i.e. (𝑥𝑛)𝑛∈ℕ

≥0is a Cauchy sequence.

5. Prove that(𝑥𝑛)𝑛∈ℕ

≥0is convergent in𝐵.

Since(𝑥𝑛)𝑛∈ℕ

≥0is a Cauchy sequence in𝑛, it admits a limit𝑥 ∈ ℝ𝑛.

And since∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑥𝑛 ∈ 𝐵and𝐵 ⊂ ℝ𝑛is a closed subset, its limit𝑥must lie in𝐵.

6. Prove that𝑓 admits a fixed point, i.e. ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑓 (𝑥) = 𝑥. By the previous question, there exists𝑥 ∈ 𝐵such that lim

𝑛→+∞𝑥𝑛 = 𝑥.

Hence, by continuity of𝑓 (cf Question 1.), lim

𝑛→+∞𝑓 (𝑥𝑛) = 𝑓 (𝑥).

Since∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ≥0, 𝑓 (𝑥𝑛) = 𝑥𝑛+1, by uniqueness of the limit, we get that𝑓 (𝑥) = 𝑥.

7. Prove that𝑓 admits only one fixed point (i.e. if𝑦 ∈ 𝐵is another fixed of𝑓 point then𝑥 = 𝑦).

Assume by contradiction that there exists𝑦 ∈ 𝐵another fixed point, i.e.𝑥 ≠ 𝑦and𝑓 (𝑦) = 𝑦.

Then‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖ = ‖𝑓 (𝑥) − 𝑓 (𝑦)‖ ≤ 𝑞‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖.

Since‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖ > 0, we get that𝑞 ≥ 1, which contradicts the assumption𝑞 ∈ [0, 1). You just proved the

Theorem 2(Banach fixed point theorem). A contraction mapping𝑓 ∶ 𝐵(𝑎, 𝑟) → 𝐵(𝑎, 𝑟)admits a unique fixed point.

(3)

Exercise 3. Let 𝑈 ⊂ ℝ𝑛 be an open subset containing 0 and𝑓 ∶ 𝑈 → ℝ𝑛 be a𝐶1 function satisfying 𝑓 (0) = 0 and 𝐷𝑓 (0) = 𝐼𝑛,𝑛.

1. Prove that there exists𝑡 > 0such that𝐵(0, 𝑡) ⊂ 𝑈 and∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑡), det(𝐷𝑓 (𝑥)) ≠ 0.

Since 𝑓 is𝐶1, 𝑥 ↦ 𝐷𝑓 (𝑥)is continuous (the entries of 𝐷𝑓 (𝑥)are the partial derivatives of the components of𝑓 which are continuous by definition of𝐶1).

Then𝜑 ∶ 𝑈 → ℝdefined by𝜑(𝑥) =det(𝐷𝑓 (𝑥))is continuous too by composition of continuous functions.

Since𝜑is continuous at0, there exists𝑡1 > 0such that

‖𝑥 −0‖ < 𝑡1 ⟹ |𝜑(𝑥) − 𝜑(0)| < 1 2 i.e.

‖𝑥‖ < 𝑡1 ⟹ |𝜑(𝑥) − 1| < 1 2 Since𝑈 is open, there exists𝑡2> 0such that𝐵(0, 𝑡2) ⊂ 𝑈.

Set𝑡 =min(𝑡1, 𝑡2).

Then𝐵(0, 𝑡) ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑡2) ⊂ 𝑈.

Now let𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑡), then, since‖𝑥‖ < 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡1,

1 = |1 − 𝜑(𝑥) + 𝜑(𝑥)| ≤ |1 − 𝜑(𝑥)| + |𝜑(𝑥)| < 1

2 + |𝜑(𝑥)|

Hence|𝜑(𝑥)| > 12 and therefore𝜑(𝑥) ≠ 0.

We just proved that∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑡), det(𝐷𝑓 (𝑥)) ≠ 0.

2. Define𝐹 ∶ 𝑈 → ℝ𝑛by𝐹 (𝑥) = 𝑓 (𝑥) − 𝑥.

(a) Compute𝐷𝐹 (0).

𝐷𝐹 (0) = 𝐷𝑓 (0) − 𝐷id(0) = 𝐼𝑛,𝑛− 𝐼𝑛,𝑛= 0 ∈ 𝑀𝑛,𝑛(ℝ)

(b) Prove that there exists𝑟 ∈ (0, 𝑡)such that∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑟), ‖𝐷𝐹 (𝑥)‖ ≤ 1

2. Since𝐹 is𝐶1,𝐷𝐹 is continuous, hence there exists𝑟1 > 0such that

‖𝑥 −0‖ < 𝑟1 ⟹ ‖𝐷𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝐷𝐹 (0)‖ < 1 2 i.e.

‖𝑥‖ < 𝑟1 ⟹ ‖𝐷𝐹 (𝑥)‖ < 1 2 Therefore we can take𝑟 =min(𝑟1, 𝑡

2). (c) Prove that there exists𝑠 ∈ (0, 𝑟)such that

∀𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠), ‖𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝐹 (𝑦)‖ ≤

⎛⎜

⎜⎝ sup

𝑧∈𝐵(0,𝑠)

‖𝐷𝐹 (𝑧)‖

⎞⎟

⎟⎠

‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖

Comment: we use the Frobenius norm for matrices as in PS4 (recall that‖𝐴𝐵‖ ≤ ‖𝐴‖‖𝐵‖).

Take𝑠 = 𝑟

2 and then follow one of the proofs from the document “an MVT-like inequality”.

(d) Prove that∀𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠),‖𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝐹 (𝑦)‖ ≤ 1

2‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖.

Let𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠), then

‖𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝐹 (𝑦)‖ ≤

⎛⎜

⎜⎝ sup

𝑧∈𝐵(0,𝑠)

‖𝐷𝐹 (𝑧)‖

⎞⎟

⎟⎠

‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖by Question2.(c)

≤ 1

2‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖by Question2.(b)since𝐵(0, 𝑠) ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑟)

(4)

3. Let𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (0,𝑠

2). Define𝜃𝑦∶ 𝑈 → ℝ𝑛by𝜃𝑦(𝑥) = 𝑦 − 𝐹 (𝑥).

(a) Prove that𝜃𝑦(𝐵(0, 𝑠)) ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑠).

Let𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠)then

‖𝜃𝑦(𝑥)‖ = ‖𝑦 − 𝐹 (𝑥)‖

≤ ‖𝑦‖ + ‖𝐹 (𝑥)‖

< 𝑠

2 + ‖𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝐹 (0)‖ since‖𝑦‖ < 𝑠

2 and𝐹 (0) =0

≤ 𝑠 2 +1

2‖𝑥 −0‖ by Question2.(d), since𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠)

≤ 𝑠since𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠) Hence∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠), ‖𝜃𝑦(𝑥)‖ < 𝑠.

(b) Prove that𝜃𝑦∶ 𝐵(0, 𝑠) → 𝐵(0, 𝑠)is a contraction mapping with constant 12.

We first notice that since𝜃𝑦(𝐵(0, 𝑠)) ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑠) ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑠), the function𝜃𝑦 ∶ 𝐵(0, 𝑠) → 𝐵(0, 𝑠)is well-defined.

Let𝑥, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠), then

‖𝜃𝑦(𝑥) − 𝜃𝑦(𝑥)‖ = ‖𝑦 − 𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝑦 + 𝐹 (𝑥)‖

= ‖𝐹 (𝑥) − 𝐹 (𝑥)‖

≤ 1

2‖𝑥 − 𝑥by Question2.(d) Therefore𝜃𝑦is a contraction mapping with constant 12. (c) We set𝑉 = 𝐵 (0, 𝑠) ∩ 𝑓−1(𝐵 (0,𝑠

2))and𝑊 = 𝐵 (0,𝑠

2).

Prove that𝑓 ∶ 𝑉 → 𝑊 is a well-defined bijection between two open subsets of𝑛containing0.

We first notice that𝑉 and𝑊 are obviously open subsets.

Then we check that𝑓 ∶ 𝑉 → 𝑊 is well-defined:

• Since𝐵(0, 𝑠) ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑡) ⊂ 𝑈, we have well that𝑉 ⊂ 𝑈. Hence𝑓 is well-defined on𝑉.

• Moreover𝑓 (𝑉 ) ⊂ 𝑊 by definition of𝑉. Finally, we check that𝑓 ∶ 𝑉 → 𝑊 is a bijection:

Let𝑦 ∈ 𝑊.

We know from Question3.(b)that𝜃𝑦 ∶ 𝐵(0, 𝑠) → 𝐵(0, 𝑠)is a contraction mapping, hence, by the Banach fixed point theorem, there exists a unique𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠)such that𝑥 = 𝜃𝑦(𝑥).

Notice that𝑥 = 𝜃𝑦(𝑥) ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 − 𝑓 (𝑥) + 𝑥 ⇔ 𝑦 = 𝑓 (𝑥). Hence𝑥 ∈ 𝑓−1(𝐵 (0,𝑠

2))since𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (0,𝑠

2).

Moreover, by Question3.(a),𝑥 = 𝜃𝑦(𝑥) ∈ 𝐵(0, 𝑠). So𝑥 ∈ 𝑉. To summarize, we just proved that

∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 , ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 , 𝑦 = 𝑓 (𝑥) i.e. 𝑓 ∶ 𝑉 → 𝑊 is a bijection.

(5)

4. (a) Prove that𝑓−1∶ 𝑊 → 𝑉 is Lipschitz with constant2and then that it is continuous.

Let𝑦1, 𝑦2 ∈ 𝑊.

Set𝑥1 = 𝑓−1(𝑦1)and𝑥2= 𝑓−1(𝑦2)which are well-defined by Question3.(c).

Notice that

‖𝑥1− 𝑥2‖ = ‖(𝑓(𝑥1) − 𝑓 (𝑥2)) − (𝐹 (𝑥1) − 𝐹 (𝑥2))‖

≤ ‖𝑓(𝑥1) − 𝑓 (𝑥2)‖ + ‖𝐹 (𝑥1) − 𝐹 (𝑥2)‖ by the Triangle Inequality So

‖𝑥1− 𝑥2‖ − ‖𝑓 (𝑥1) − 𝑓 (𝑥2)‖ ≤ ‖𝐹 (𝑥1) − 𝐹 (𝑥2)‖

≤ 1

2‖𝑥1− 𝑥2by Question2.(d) Hence

‖𝑥1− 𝑥2‖ ≤ 2‖𝑓 (𝑥1) − 𝑓 (𝑥2)‖

i.e.

‖𝑓−1(𝑦1) − 𝑓−1(𝑦2)‖ ≤ 2‖𝑦1− 𝑦2We just proved that𝑓−1is Lipschitz with constant 2.

Then𝑓−1is continuous as a Lipschitz function (you can adapt Question 1. of Exercise 1.).

(b) Prove that𝑓−1∶ 𝑊 → 𝑉 is differentiable.

(Hint: use the very definition of differentiability together with Question 1.) Let𝑦0∈ 𝑊 and set𝑥0 = 𝑓−1(𝑦0).

Since𝑓 is differentiable at𝑥0, we have (2) 𝑓 (𝑥) = 𝑓 (𝑥0+ 𝑥 − 𝑥0) = 𝑓 (𝑥0) + 𝑑𝑥

0𝑓 (𝑥 − 𝑥0) + 𝐸(𝑥) where

(3) lim

𝑥→𝑥0

𝐸(𝑥)

‖𝑥 − 𝑥0‖ =0 Since𝑉 ⊂ 𝐵(0, 𝑡),𝑑𝑥

0𝑓 is invertible by Question 1.

Hence we may compose(2)with(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1in order to obtain that

(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝑓 (𝑥) − 𝑓 (𝑥0)) = 𝑥 − 𝑥0+ (𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸(𝑥)) which we may rewrite in terms of𝑦 = 𝑓 (𝑥):

(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝑦 − 𝑦0) = 𝑓−1(𝑦) − 𝑓−1(𝑦0) + (𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸 (𝑓−1(𝑦))) Hence

𝑓−1(𝑦) = 𝑓−1(𝑦0) + (𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝑦 − 𝑦0) − (𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸 (𝑓−1(𝑦)))

We already know that(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1is linear, so, to prove that𝑓−1is differentiable at𝑦0, it is enough to check that

𝑦→𝑦lim0

(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸 (𝑓−1(𝑦)))

‖𝑦 − 𝑦0‖ =0

We first notice that‖𝑥 − 𝑥0‖ = ‖𝑓−1(𝑦) − 𝑓−1(𝑦0)‖ ≤ 2‖𝑦 − 𝑦0by Question4.(a)from which we derive that 1

‖𝑦 − 𝑦0‖≤ 2

‖𝑥 − 𝑥0

(6)

and next that

‖‖

‖‖

(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸 (𝑓−1(𝑦)))

‖𝑦 − 𝑦0

‖‖

‖‖

≤ 2‖(𝑑𝑥

0𝑓 )−1( 𝐸(𝑥)

‖𝑥 − 𝑥0‖ )‖

When𝑦 → 𝑦0we have𝑥 → 𝑥0by continuity of𝑓 (Question4.(a)) and hence that ‖𝑥−𝑥𝐸(𝑥)

00by(3).

We know that(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1is continuous (since linear) and that‖ ⋅ ‖is continuous too, hence

‖‖

‖‖

(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸 (𝑓−1(𝑦)))

‖𝑦 − 𝑦0

‖‖

‖‖

≤ 2‖(𝑑𝑥

0𝑓 )−1( 𝐸(𝑥)

‖𝑥 − 𝑥0‖ )‖−−−−→

𝑦→𝑦0 0 Therefore

𝑦→𝑦lim0

(𝑑𝑥0𝑓 )−1(𝐸 (𝑓−1(𝑦)))

‖𝑦 − 𝑦0‖ =0 and𝑓−1is differentiable at𝑦0.

(c) Prove that𝑓−1∶ 𝑊 → 𝑉 is𝐶1.

(Hint: study𝐷 (𝑓−1)using the Chain Rule.)

Since 𝑓−1 is differentiable, we may apply the chain rule to the LHS of the identity 𝑓 ∘ 𝑓−1 = idin order to obtain

𝐷𝑓 (𝑓−1(𝑦)) 𝐷 (𝑓−1) (𝑦) = 𝐼𝑛,𝑛

Since𝐷𝑓 (𝑓−1(𝑦))is invertible by Question 1, we deduce that

𝐷 (𝑓−1) (𝑦) = (𝐷𝑓 (𝑓−1(𝑦)))−1

The entries of the RHS matrix are continuous by the formula giving the matrix inverse in terms of the cofactor matrix, hence the entries of the LHS matrix are continuous too.

But the entries of the LHS are the partial derivatives of the components of𝑓−1, so they are continuous.

Therefore𝑓−1is𝐶1. You just proved that

Claim 4. Let𝑈 ⊂ ℝ𝑛be an open subset containing0and𝑓 ∶ 𝑈 → ℝ𝑛be of class𝐶1such that𝑓 (0) =0and𝐷𝑓 (0) = 𝐼𝑛,𝑛. Then there exist𝑉 , 𝑊 ⊂ ℝ𝑛two open subsets such that0∈ 𝑉 ⊂ 𝑈,0∈ 𝑊 and𝑓 ∶ 𝑉 → 𝑊 is a𝐶1-diffeomorphism (i.e.

𝑓 is𝐶1, bijective and𝑓−1is𝐶1).

(7)

Exercise 5. Prove the Inverse Function Theorem (the statement is below).

(Hint: reduce to the case considered in the above claim.)

Theorem 6(The Inverse Function Theorem). Let𝑈 ⊂ ℝ𝑛open,𝑓 ∶ 𝑈 → ℝ𝑛 of class𝐶1 and𝑎 ∈ 𝑈. Assume that 𝐷𝑓 (𝑎)is invertible.

Then there exist𝑉 , 𝑊 ⊂ ℝ𝑛two open subsets such that𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ⊂ 𝑈,𝑓 (𝑎) ∈ 𝑊 and𝑓 ∶ 𝑉 → 𝑊 is a𝐶1-diffeomorphism (i.e.𝑓 is𝐶1, bijective and𝑓−1is𝐶1).

Notice that𝑓 (𝑥) = (𝑑̃ 𝑎𝑓 )−1(𝑓 (𝑎 + 𝑥) − 𝑓 (𝑎))is well-defined in a neighborhood of the origin.

Moreover𝑓 (0) =̃ 0and𝐷 ̃𝑓 (0) = 𝐼𝑛,𝑛by the chain rule.

So we may apply the previous claim to𝑓̃in order to deduce the statement for𝑓.

(8)

Exercise 7. Derive the Implicit Function Theorem from the Inverse Function Theorem (the statement is below).

Theorem 8(The Implicit Function Theorem).

Let𝑈 ⊂ ℝ𝑛and𝑉 ⊂ ℝ𝑝be two open subsets. Let(𝑥0, 𝑦0) ∈ 𝑈 × 𝑉. Let𝐹 ∶ 𝑈 × 𝑉 → ℝ𝑝

(𝑥, 𝑦) ↦ 𝐹 (𝑥, 𝑦) be of class𝐶1.

If𝐷𝑦𝐹 (𝑥0, 𝑦0)is invertible then there exist𝑟, 𝑠 > 0such that𝐵(𝑥0, 𝑟) ⊂ 𝑈,𝐵(𝑦0, 𝑠) ⊂ 𝑉 and there exists𝜑 ∶ 𝐵(𝑥0, 𝑟) → 𝐵(𝑦0, 𝑠)of class𝐶1such that

∀(𝑥, 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵(𝑥0, 𝑟) × 𝐵(𝑦0, 𝑠), 𝐹 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹 (𝑥0, 𝑦0) ⇔ 𝑦 = 𝜑(𝑥)

Hint: apply the Inverse Function Theorem to𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦) = (𝑥, 𝐹 (𝑦)).

Références

Documents relatifs

Prove the Inverse Function Theorem (the statement is below). (Hint: reduce to the case considered in the

In contrast to the latter, the proof does not rely on the Newton iteration procedure, but on Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem and Ekeland’s variational principle.. All

Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention

Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention

No calculators are to be used on this exam. Note: This examination consists of ten questions on one page. Give the first three terms only. a) What is an orthogonal matrix?

The proof relies on the correct aymptotics of the variance of the eigenvalue counting function of GUE matrices due to Gustavsson, and its extension to large families of Wigner

Various techniques have been developed toward this goal: moment method for polynomial functions ϕ (see [2]), Stieltj`es transform for analytical functions ϕ (see [4]) and

In particular, cyclic invariant subspaces are generated by LP-inner functions.. Finally, in w we prove an interesting inequality with a strong connection to the