National Agriculture and Food Research Organization
Dynamics of radioactive cesium behavior in agro-environment
Noriko Yamaguchi, Kazunori Kohyama, Yusuke Takata, Sadao Eguchi
National Institute for Agro-environmental Sciences, NARO
RCs concentration in farmland soils
Plant uptake
Criterion to decide whether or not decontamination is necessary
Soil to water distribution
What causes changes in RCs concentration in farmland soils?
3. Radiocesium Interception
Potential (RIP) of farmland soils
1. Changes in RCs
concentration of farmland soils for 5 years
2. Loss of RCs
from paddy fields Radioactive cesium (RCs):
134Cs+
137Cs
Three topics in this presentation
1/15
2. Loss of radiocesium from paddy fields
3. Radiocesium Interception Potential of farmland soils
Contents
1. Changes in radiocesium concentration of farmland soils over 5 years
RCs deposition
Plough
15 cm
composite sample from 5 plots in each field
0-15cm
Ge detector
134Cs and 137Cs activity
Yamaguchi et al., J. Environ. Radioactiv. (2012) 2/15
RCs level in soil
(Bq / kg) Technology
~5,000
Inverting plow, reduction of RCs uptake by crop, topsoil removal
(uncultivated field)
5,000 ~10,000
Topsoil removal,
inverting plow, removal of soil after paddling with water
10,000 ~25,000 Topsoil removal
25,000 ~ Topsoil removal after solidification
RCs distribution map of farmland soils in Fukushima
8900 ha (2011)
2015
2200 ha (2015)
Kohyama, Takata, unpublished
0-500 500-1000 1000-5000 5000-10000 10000-25000 25000-50000 50000<
(Bq kg-1)
Farmlands over 5000 Bq/kg
Technologies sorted by RCs levels in soil 2011
Decontamination Radioactive decay Erosion
3/15
Rates of RCs decrease were typically faster than radioactive decay
RCs decrease over 5 years without decontamination
Paddy fields (average of 16 fields) Upland fields (average of 14 fields)
Relative RCs activity
year RCs concentration (Bq/kg)
RCs concentration in 2012
4/15
Wind erosion
Surface run-off
Downward migration
Accelerated by soil perturbation due to agricultural practices
Loss of RCs-bearing soil particles
17 y (9-24 y) 17 y (8-26 y) Paddy field Upland field
(wheat)
Effective half life of 137Cs in ploughed layer Monitoring of 137Cs
concentration in farmland soils for 25 years
(Komamura et al., 1999, 2004)
Global fall-out by atmospheric nuclear weapons test
137 Cs (Bq/kg DW)
Rates of decrease were faster than radioactive decay (T1/2=30.1yr)
Radioactive decay
Average of 15 paddy fields
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
5/15
1. Changes in radiocesium concentration of farmland soils for 5 years 2.
3. Radiocesium Interception Potential of farmland soils
Contents
2. Loss of radiocesium from paddy fields
Soil perturbation event by soil puddling with
irrigation water before transplanting rice seedlings Irrigation water
Atmospheric deposition
Surface drainage Tile drainage
Input
Output
Surface drainage during puddling
Surface drainage before transplanting
(5 days after puddling) SS: 65000 mg/L
6/15
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
日和田 降下物 日和田 灌漑水
日和田 表面排水 慣行 日和田 表面排水 節水 日和田 暗渠排水 小浜 降下物 小浜 灌漑水 小浜 表面排水 小浜 湧水 大波 降下物 大波 灌漑水 大波 表面排水 大波 暗渠排水 月舘 降下物 月舘 灌漑水 月舘 表面排水 月舘 暗渠排水 日和田・畑 表面排水 猪苗代・草地 降下物 猪苗代・草地 表面排水 比曽 降下物
比曽 表面排水 比曽 河川水 樋渡 降下物 樋渡 河川水 南相馬 灌漑水
SS (>0.025 μm) concentration (mg/L)
Total RCs vs suspended solids (SS)
Total RCs(Bq/L)
-3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
RCs balance/inventory (%)
RCs Inventory (Bq/km2)
500 103 to 104
Input and output of RCs was associated with those of suspended solids.
RCs was lost from paddy fields at rates of less than a few % per year of the soil RCs inventory
RCs balance/Inventory
RCs inventory (Bq/m2)
RCs balance/inventory (%)
8
7/15
1.E+2 1.E+3 1.E+4 1.E+5 1.E+6 1.E+7
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
日和田 降下物 日和田 灌漑水 日和田 表面排水 慣行 日和田 表面排水 節水 日和田 暗渠排水 小浜 降下物 小浜 灌漑水 小浜 表面排水 小浜 湧水 大波 降下物 大波 灌漑水 大波 表面排水 大波 暗渠排水 月舘 降下物 月舘 灌漑水 月舘 表面排水 月舘 暗渠排水 日和田・畑 表面排水 日和田・果樹 表面排水 日和田・果樹 浸透水 猪苗代・草地 降下物 猪苗代・草地 表面排水 比曽 降下物
比曽 表面排水 比曽 河川水 樋渡 降下物 樋渡 河川水 南相馬 灌漑水
Electrical conductivity (EC) (dS/m) K
d(L/ kg )
K
d10
3~ 10
7L/kg
Decrease with increasing EC
Bq/L
filtrate in
conc Cs
Bq/kg SS
in conc L/kg Cs
K
137137
d
1 10 100 1000 10000
103 104 105 106 107
K d
RIP (mmol kg-1)
Distribution coefficient
Source of plant uptake
K
d(L/ kg)
103 104 105 106 107
1 0.1
102 0.01 0.001 9
8/15
Intrinsic parameter describing RCs mobility in soil independent of various environmental factors
1. Changes in radiocesium concentration of farmland soils for 5 years 2. Loss of radiocesium from paddy fields
Contents
Reflect the soil characteristics of RCs adsorption
Variable depending on water quality/plant type, growing &
nutrient condition
=
RCs in plant RCs in soil Transfer factor (TF)
Simple and Important parameters to describe/predict RCs behavior
Water Soil
Plant
RIP
TF
Kd
= RCs in soil RCs in water Distribution coefficient
3. Radiocesium Interception Potential (RIP) of farmland soils
9/15
Radiocesium interception potential (RIP)
Parameter to evaluate selectivity and quantity of highly selective sites for Cs sorption
Cation exchange sites except FES masked by Ca2+
FES saturated by K+
Spiked 137Cs is exchanged with K on FES
COO-
O O COO
HO --
-
-
- -
- -
-
-
- - -
-
-
- -
-
-
- -
- -
-
-
Experimental method
137Cs
10/15
Geometric mean: 1280 ± 2.16 mmol/kg Minimum: 73 mmol/kg
Maximum: 12700 mmol/kg Median: 1300 mmol/kg
RIP distribution map
11/15
<500 500 - 1000 1000 - 1500 1500 - 2000 2000 - 2500 2500 - 3000 3000 - 3500
>3500
RIP (mmol kg-1)
Fluvisols Cambisols Andosols Soil Group
Values within a column followed by different letters are significantly different according to Steel-Dwass test at p≦0.01 for soil group and p≦0.005 for clay mineral composition
Mica ×
× 〇
Sm ×
〇 〇
Ave 625 1530 1560
N 37 28 487
a b b
Andosols Fluvisols Cambisols TC % >6% 3~6
%
<3% >3% <3%Average 486 812 1360 1260 1870 2410
N 52 69 96 79 486 143
a b c c d e
Mica: vermiculite, illite Sm: smectite
Soil Group Clay mineral composition
Low RIP Andosols, High TC, w/o crystalline clay minerals
12/15
RCs distribution map RIP map
Prediction of RCs uptake by crop +
RCs concentration of farmland soil changes over time Loss of Cs-bearing soil particles by erosion
Summary
14/15
Acknowledgement
This work was performed under a contract with the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council, MAFF, Japan.
We wish to thank the staff at prefectural institutes and farmers in Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi for their cooperation with
sample collections.
15/15