• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fire behaviour of FRP wrapped square reinforced concrete columns

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Fire behaviour of FRP wrapped square reinforced concrete columns"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

CDCC-2007: 3rd International Conference on Durability & Field Application of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction [Proceedings], pp. 83-90, 2007-05-22

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=b37e3b71-830f-4f8c-91c5-7b48309d031a https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=b37e3b71-830f-4f8c-91c5-7b48309d031a

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at Fire behaviour of FRP wrapped square reinforced concrete columns

(2)

http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

F i r e b e h a v i o u r o f F R P w r a p p e d s q u a r e

r e i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e c o l u m n s

N R C C - 4 9 2 3 1

C h o w d h u r y , E . U . ; B i s b y , L . A . ; G r e e n , M . F . ;

B é n i c h o u , N . ; K o d u r , V . K . R .

A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans: CDCC-2007: 3rd International Conference on Durability & Field Application of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction, Quebec City, May 22-24, 2007, pp. 83-90

The material in this document is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission. For more information visit http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/C-42

Les renseignements dans ce document sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur, par les lois, les politiques et les règlements du Canada et des accords internationaux. Ces dispositions permettent d'identifier la source de l'information et, dans certains cas, d'interdire la copie de documents sans permission écrite. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements : http://lois.justice.gc.ca/fr/showtdm/cs/C-42

(3)

FIRE BEHAVIOUR OF FRP WRAPPED SQUARE REINFORCED

CONCRETE COLUMNS

E. U. Chowdhury1, L. A. Bisby2, M. F. Green3, N. Bénichou4, and V. K. R. Kodur5

1 Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s University, Canada 2 Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s University, Canada

3 Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s University, Canada 4 Senior Research Officer, National Research Council, Canada

5 Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environ. Engineering, Michigan State University, USA

ABSTRACT

Numerous applications of fibre reinforced polymers (FRPs) have demonstrated good performance in retrofitting and repairing deteriorated reinforced concrete structures, both through research studies and through field applications. Due to lack of available information and the perceived susceptibility of these systems in fire, an experimental and analytical study is being conducted on the fire behaviour of FRP-strengthened square reinforced concrete columns. The ultimate goal of the study is to provide design recommendations and guidelines that can be suggested for these structural members. This paper presents the explicit finite difference procedure used in developing a coupled heat transfer and structural analysis behaviour in numerical fire models. The paper also discusses the procedure for fire endurance tests on two FRP-strengthened square concrete columns which will be performed in an attempt to validate the numerical models. 1. INTRODUCTION

In recent years, existing concrete structures in North America have reached a state where many of them can no longer safely resist the loads acting on them. This is due to deterioration caused by electro-chemical corrosion and to increased load requirements, among other factors. Demolishing and rebuilding these structures is not an economically viable option, therefore new repair methods and materials such as fibre reinforced polymers (FRPs) are being used in retrofitting many of these structures. Due to their numerous advantages, which includes high strength-to-weight ratios in comparison to steel and resistance to electro-chemical corrosion, FRP materials have been already successfully used in the rehabilitation of bridges in Canada, such as Champlain Bridge, Webster Parkade, Country Hills Boulevard Bridge and Ste-Émélie-de-l’Énergie Bridge [1]. However, the sensitivity of FRP materials to elevated temperatures, as in the case of fire,

(4)

and lack of information on their behaviour in fire, has thus far limited the use of FRPs in buildings and parking garages. A research study has been ongoing for more than 5 years at Queen’s University, Canada in collaboration with the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada and industrial partners to investigate the fire performance of FRPs and FRP-strengthened concrete structural members. The current paper presents an analytical model and details of an experimental study that is being conducted on FRP-strengthened square columns. Preliminary results and partial validation of the analytical component of this study are also presented in the current paper.

2. BACKGROUND

Several studies evaluating structural performance in fire have been conducted on concrete structures incorporating FRP materials in recent years. The following is a brief review of these studies.

2.1. FRP-Strengthened Beams and Slabs

Deuring [2], Blontrock et. al. [3], Williams [4], Chowdhury [5], and Bisby et. al. [6] have reported on fire endurance tests on FRP-strengthened concrete beams and slabs. Without supplemental fire protection applied to the exterior of the FRP strengthening system, FRP-strengthened concrete beams have shown marginally superior performance in fire in comparison to steel plate-strengthened concrete beams [2]. However, the fire endurance of reinforced concrete members strengthened with FRP can be considerably improved by providing supplementary fire protection systems of various types [3, 4, 5, 6], which can maintain the internal concrete and reinforcing steel temperatures at relatively low temperatures [4] at which the materials do not experience significant deterioration in their mechanical properties [7, 8]. Hence, loaded and insulated reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP are able to endure the elevated temperatures during fire for more than four hours in some cases [4, 5]. Furthermore, maintaining low internal temperatures in the concrete and reinforcing steel is beneficial to the post-fire (i.e., residual) behaviour of these concrete members [5, 7, 8]. By providing supplementary fire protection, the temperatures of the FRP could be maintained below its glass transition temperature for less than about one hour in all cases [4].

There is little available information on the temperature at which a specific FRP strengthening system will fail (i.e., cease to perform structurally) during heating. Blontrock et. al. [3] conducted fire tests on FRP-strengthened beams where the FRP was entirely protected by insulation and also where only the anchorage zone was protected by insulation. In this study, loss of bond between the FRP and the concrete was observed around temperatures between 66°C to 81°C [3].

2.2. FRP Wrapped Columns

Bisby et. al. [9] reported on fire endurance tests on insulated FRP confined reinforced concrete circular columns, which also endured a standard fire for more than four hours in some cases. The temperature of the steel reinforcement and concrete for the columns was maintained below 200°C in some cases, and therefore the column was able to maintain

(5)

essentially all of its original room temperature strength during the fire test. This was evident in the fact that the column failed after more than five hours of fire exposure at a higher axial load than its predicted nominal (unfactored) compressive strength for the unwrapped condition. In this study, the insulation protecting the FRP confined reinforced concrete column was able to maintain the temperature of the FRP below 100°C, which was higher than the glass transition temperature of 91°C, for up to four hours during fire. However, without any supplemental fire protection, the FRP begin to combust within minutes of exposure to fire, thus raising the surface temperature of the structural member above the surrounding temperature [10]. This effect could potentially create a more severe fire exposure than the unstrengthened reinforced concrete member.

3. ANALYTICAL MODELLING

Previous experimental and modelling work on the fire performance of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete columns has focused primarily on the performance of circular members. While this research has provided a wealth of useful information on the important factors to consider in designing fire protection schemes for FRP-strengthened columns, it must be recognized that the majority of columns in structures are rectangular and square, and very little information on the performance of these types of members when strengthened with FRPs is available in the literature.

In the current preliminary study, a numerical model was developed to predict the heat transfer and structural behaviour of FRP-strengthened square concrete columns in fire. An explicit finite difference method was used in predicting the heat transfer within the column, since a similar technique has been successfully used in the past for modelling the fire performance of square reinforced concrete columns and circular FRP-strengthened columns in fire [8, 9]. A numerical integration method presented by Chen and Atsuta [11] was used in determining the load-moment interaction diagram of the square column at elevated temperatures. A flowchart of the overall program logic is shown in Figure 1.

3.1. Heat Transfer Model

Initially, all required information is inputted into the analytical program. This includes cross-section details, concrete aggregate type, FRP thickness, etc. The fire temperature is then calculated at each instant for the required fire duration according to the standard temperature-time curve described by ULC S101 [12]. Because FRP-strengthened square columns should have rounded or chamfered corners, a different approach than that taken by Lie [8] or Williams [4] was used in discretizing the column cross-section in the current model. Note that round corners are approximated by the analysis as chamfered (refer to Figure 2). The cross-section is divided into a number of square and triangular elements at the fire-exposed chamfered corners, as shown in Figure 2. The maximum allowable time step to ensure stability of the explicit finite difference algorithm is then calculated. The heat transfer from the centreline to the column’s exterior surface is subsequently calculated using a series of two-dimensional explicit finite difference formulae based on elemental energy balance. The formulation of the finite difference equations and the maximum allowable time step were based on theory described by both Cengel [13] and Lie [8]. A series of slightly different heat transfer equations was developed for the insulation-fire

(6)

interface, FRP-insulation interface, concrete-FRP interface, and inside the concrete, FRP and insulation, to calculate the temperature distribution throughout the column cross-section at any instant during exposure to the ULC S101 standard fire. Variations of the thermal properties of constituent materials with temperature and the effects of moisture evaporation from the concrete were taken into account using relationships described by Lie [8] and Bisby [14]. Once the column temperatures at each element in the cross-section are calculated, the time is stepped forward and the procedure is repeated. The temperature of the central node of each element is assumed to be that of the entire element.

Calculation of maximum time step Calculation of fire temperatures Discretization of column into elements

Calculation of element temperatures using explicit finite difference method

Calculation of thermal properties of constituent materials

Output: Temperature data for

specified elements Start

Calculation of mechanical properties of constituent materials for specified temperatures

Determine load-moment interaction diagram for various temperatures

• For given loads, determine moment-curvature relationship using equilibrium and compatibility relationship

• Using the moment-curvature relationship, determine the load and deflection at mid-height; subsequently determine the load-moment interaction diagram.

Input:

Member details (e.g. cross section, concrete aggregate type, FRP thickness,

etc.), fire duration, etc.

Output: Load-moment interaction

diagrams at specified temperatures

End

Fig. 1: Flowchart showing the procedures for the fire resistance calculation of columns 3.2. Load Capacity Model

After the temperature distribution of the column cross-section has been determined at each time step, the mechanical properties of the materials in each element are determined using relationship described by Lie [8] and Bisby [14]. The confinement pressure due to the FRP wrap is then determined using the FRP confinement model proposed by Lam and Teng [15] for square reinforced concrete columns. For each element, the stress and strain are assumed

(7)

to be those at the nodes. The objective of the load capacity model is to determine the load-moment interaction diagram, from which the failure load of the column specimen can be approximated at any instant in time. This information can be used to predict the time at which the column will fail during fire under a given service load. The method of analysis is based on the following assumptions: (1) plane sections remain plane; (2) strain in the reinforcement is equal to the strain in the concrete at the same location, (3) longitudinal stress at any point in the section is dependent on the longitudinal strain; (4) the tensile strength of concrete is negligible and can be ignored.

Using an incremental iterative procedure, the moment-curvature for a given axial thrust is calculated. A strain profile is proposed across the section from which the axial thrust and bending moment are obtained; if the axial thrust is in close agreement with the given axial thrust being applied on the section, the curvature corresponding to the proposed strain profile is taken to be accurate. Otherwise, the strain profile is modified and the procedure is repeated. This procedure is repeated for increasing applied loads. Once the moment-curvature for a given load is determined, the slope and deflection are calculated along the longitudinal height of the column using the Column Deflection Curve method described by Chen and Atsuta [11].

y

x

Insulation FRP Concrete

Fig. 2: Discretization of one-quarter cross-section of a square FRP-strengthened and insulated reinforced concrete column for the numerical model (nodes on the FRP and insulation layer not shown)

3.3. Initial Results

Preliminary results from the heat transfer model on square reinforced concrete column are shown in Figure 3, since experimental tests on FRP-strengthened square columns are planned for 2007 and have not yet been performed. Temperature variations at various locations within the column cross-section for a reinforced concrete column have been validated using experimental data presented in Lie and Woollerton [16] on a 305 mm square siliceous aggregate concrete column, which was reported to have a moisture content of 5% prior to its fire test. It was found that the predictions from the current heat transfer model agreed well with the experimental results from Lie and Woollerton. As shown in Figure 3, temperatures calculated along the line AC within the concrete were higher than along the line AB, as should be expected.

(8)

Time (min) 0 60 120 180 Te m pera ture (°C ) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 ULC S101

standard fire / Furnace TC26 (140, 0) TC27 (127, 0) TC28 (114, 0) TC29 (89, 0) TC30 (51, 0) Predicted Experimental y x 305 mm 30 5 mm (0, 0) A C B Time (min) 0 60 120 180 Te m per atu re (° C ) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 ULC S101

standard fire / Furnace TC31 (0, 0) TC32 (45, -45) TC33 (81, -81) TC34 (108, -108) (a) (b) Predicted Experimental

Fig. 3: Variation in temperature within a siliceous aggregate concrete column (a) along the line AB, and (b) along the line AC.

The temperature within the concrete rose steadily until 100°C, after which the rise in temperature increased more rapidly. This is due to moisture evaporation from the concrete as heat is consumed by the latent heat of evaporation of moisture within the concrete. Temperatures at greater depths within the concrete showed a slower heating rate, as well as longer duration of moisture evaporation near 100°C. In the heat transfer model, the effect of moisture was taken into account by assuming that, in each element, the moisture starts to evaporate when the temperature of that element reaches 100°C. Movement of moisture within the elements has not been accounted for in the heat transfer model. The emissivity of the concrete surface was taken to be a constant value of 0.9, as suggested by Lie [8]. 4. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

To gain further insight into the behaviour of FRP-strengthened square reinforced concrete columns, two full-scale square columns have been fabricated and will be fire tested under the ULC S101 standard fire [12] and full sustained service load. Details of the cross-section and reinforcements are shown in Figure 4. Prior to the fire tests, these reinforced concrete columns will be wrapped with FRP and insulated with a supplementary fire protection system. Both columns have been instrumented internally with Chromel-alumel (Type K) thermocouples and 5 mm high temperature electrical resistance strain gauges. These square column specimens will be tested in the column furnace at the National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, using a fixed-end condition. Results from the fire tests will be used to validate as well as refine the numerical model.

There is little information on the mechanical and thermal behaviour of the materials used in these FRP-strengthened concrete members, especially currently available FRP systems and

(9)

insulation. As part of this experimental investigation, tensile strength tests will be conducted on reinforcing steel and FRP, and compressive strength tests on concrete under elevated temperatures. Results from these tests will be used in developing analytical models representing the stress-strain behaviour of FRP and validating existing thermal-stress-strain models for concrete and steel. Further thermal analysis will be conducted through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), thermal conductivity testing and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on concrete, FRP, and insulation materials.

864 190 305 3734 3810 15 15 25M rebar through and welded to the steel plate 38 mm thick steel plate 25M Rebar 10M Ties 305

864 NO. OF SPECIMENS: 2 square columns CONCRETE:

28 MPa 28-day design strength REINFORCEMENT: 4 - 25M longitudinal rebars

10M ties spaced at 305 mm c/c and 136 mm overlap 40 mm concrete cover to ties

50 mm concrete cover to principal reinforcement

*N.T.S **All dimensions in mm A A 38 mm thick. Steel Plate Weld 15 mm chamfered corners machined to 25 mm rounded corners SECTION A-A

Fig. 4: Details of the reinforced concrete square column 5. SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK

The discussion and results presented herein show preliminary study on a numerical model that has been developed to predict the thermal and structural behaviour of FRP wrapped square reinforced concrete columns under exposure to a standard fire. Experimental studies on FRP-strengthened concrete columns are necessary to validate and refine the numerical model before it can be used with confidence. Nonetheless, the numerical model is able to make reasonable predictions of the internal temperatures within square reinforced concrete columns. The key aspects of the numerical model that must be modified and evaluated relate to the moisture migration and thermo-mechanical properties of FRP and insulation materials. Therefore, further studies will be performed on these materials at elevated temperatures.

(10)

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures Network (ISIS Canada) and the Networks of Centres of Excellence Program of the Government of Canada and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Queen’s University, the National Research Council of Canada, and industrial partners (Fyfe Company LLC and Degussa Building Systems).

7. REFERENCES

1. Rizkalla, S., Labossière, P., ‘Structural Engineering with FRP – In Canada’, ACI

Concrete International, 21 (10), 1999, 25-28

2. Deuring, M., ‘Brandversuche and nachtraglich verstarkten tragern aus beton’, Research Report EMPA No. 148’795, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Dubendorf, Switzerland, 1994, 97 pp.

3. Blontrock, H., Taerwe, L., Vandevelde, P., ‘Fire testing of concrete slabs strengthened

with fibre composite laminates’, 5th

Annual Symposium on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-5), Thomas Telford, London, UK, 2001, 547-556.

4. Williams, B.K., ‘Fire Performance of FRP-Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members’, PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng., Queen's Univ., Kingston, Ontario. 389 pp. 5. Chowdhury, E.U., ‘Performance in Fire of Reinforced Concrete T-beams Strengthened

with Externally Bonded Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Sheets’, M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng., Queen’s Univ., 2005, 251 pp.

6. Bisby, L., Chowdhury, E., Kodur, V, Green, M, ‘Residual Strength of Fire-Exposed

Strengthened Concrete Beam-Slab Assemblies’, 3rd

Int. Conf. on Const. Materials: Performance, Innovations & Structural Implications, Vancouver, Canada, 2005.

7. Drysdale, D.D., Schneider, U., Babrauskas, V., Grayson, S.J., ‘Repairability of Fire Damaged Structures CIB W14 Report’, Fire Safety Journal, 16 (4), 1990, 251-336. 8. Lie, T.T., ‘Structural Fire Protection’, American Society of Civil Engineers Manuals

and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 78. ASCE, New York, NY, 1992, 241 pp. 9. Bisby, L.A., Kodur, V.K.R., Green, M.F., ‘Fire Endurance of Fiber-Reinforced

Polymer-Confined Concrete Columns’, ACI Structural Journal, 102 (6), 2005, 883-891. 10. Chowdhury, E.U., Bisby, L.A., Green, M.F., Kodur, V.K.R., ‘Performance in Fire of

Insulated FRP-Wrapped Reinforced Concrete Columns’, 4th

International Workshop – Structures in Fire, Aveiro, Portugal, 2006.

11. Chen, W.F., Atsuta, T., ‘Theory of Beam-Columns: V. 1’, McGraw Hill, 1976, 513 pp. 12. CAN/ULC-S101-04 ‘Standard methods of fire endurance tests of building construction

and materials’, Underwriters’ Laboratories of Canada, Scarborough, 2004, 49 pp. 13. Cengel, Y.A., ‘Heat transfer: a practical approach’, WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1998, 1006 pp. 14. Bisby, L, ‘Fire behaviour of FRP reinforced or confined concrete’, Ph.D. thesis, Dept.

of Civil Eng., Queen’s Univ., Kingston, Ontario, 2003, 268 pp.

15. Teng, J.G., Chen, J.F., Smith, S.T., Lam, L., FRP-Strengthened RC Structures, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK, 2002. 245 pp.

16. Lie, T.T., Woollerton, J.L., Fire resistance of reinforced concrete columns, Internal

Report No. 569, Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of

Figure

Fig. 1: Flowchart showing the procedures for the fire resistance calculation of columns  3.2
Fig. 2: Discretization of one-quarter cross-section of a square FRP-strengthened and  insulated reinforced concrete column for the numerical model (nodes on the FRP and  insulation layer not shown)
Fig. 3: Variation in temperature within a siliceous aggregate concrete column (a) along the  line AB, and (b) along the line AC
Fig. 4: Details of the reinforced concrete square column  5.   SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK

Références

Documents relatifs

Seasonal habitat drives intestinal microbiome composition in anadromous Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus).. Element, Geraint; Engel, Katja; Neufeld, Josh D.; Casselman, John M.; van

Mecanum wheels can do this, or at least, can manipulate the performance of the Omniwheel. Suppose these rollers were instead mounted parallel to the motor

We argue that despite the different structuration and history of climate and biodiversity regime complexes, the notion of ecosystem services (ES), in developing specific

These ratios indi- cate that the trend of the centrality dependent baryon enhancement, apparent in the jet-associated conditional yields, is similar to that observed for the

These three papers invite us to think about potentiality as a vocabulary that may produce a new imaginary space for rethinking humanness (Helmreich 2013), to critique poten-

NGOs (IRPAA, Chapada, Sasop) around the Semi-arid Articulation (ASA) International: World Bank, IFAD Public: Ministry of National Integration (MI), Regional organizations and

The output of the experiment included the air-leakage rate for different levels of static pressure across the wall assembly, pressure equalization of the wall assembly under

To gain a better understanding of what was clearly a larger structure than shown by the Electrospray MS and MS/MS data in Figure 3, full profiling of the S-layer