• Aucun résultat trouvé

Guide to a field description of muskeg (Based on the Radforth Classification System)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Guide to a field description of muskeg (Based on the Radforth Classification System)"

Copied!
30
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site

LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Supplement to the Building Code for the North, 1968

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=80d9ce6a-e60d-40f6-b7b5-6fdafe5ccdfa

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=80d9ce6a-e60d-40f6-b7b5-6fdafe5ccdfa

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Guide to a field description of muskeg (Based on the Radforth

Classification System)

(2)

http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

Guide t o a Fie ld De sc ript ion of M uske g

M a c F a r l a n e ,

I . C .

N R C C - 4 2 1 4

A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce

document se trouve dans: Supplement to the Building Code for

the North,1968, Section 6, pp. 81-107

(3)

GUIDZ

t o a

FIELD D3SCRIPTION OF MUSKEG

(4)

Foreword P Muskeg ( o r "Organic T e r r a i n s " c o m p r i s e s a b o u t 1 2 p e r c e n t of t h e t e r r a i n of Canada, It c r e a t e s c o n s i d e r a b l e d i f f i c u l t i e s f o r s u r - Pace t r a n s p o r L a t i o n and o f t e n i n t e r f e r e s w i t h e n g i n e e r i n g works, A s a s t a r t i n t h e s o l u t i o n o f t h e problems c a u s e d by muskeg, it i s

d e s i r a b l e -?la% everyone u s e t h e same t e r n s t o r e f e r t o *.his t y p e of t e r r a i n . S t a n d a r d l - aa-i;ion s f t e m i . n o l o g y c a n b e s t be TuuTnered by a n a d e q u a t e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o r d e s c r i p t i o n of the t e r r a i n . DL-, N,iL ? ? a d f o r t h , P r o f e s s o r of Botany, McP,faster U n i v e r s i t y , h a s developed a d a s c r i p t i v e system f o r muskeg; t h i s bockleC

i s a condensed v e r s i o n of i n f o r m a t i o n con- t a i n e d i n s e v e r a l t e c h n i c a l p a p e r s a u t h o r e d by B-s. X a d f o r t h , These p a p e r s a r e i i s t e d on t h e i n s i d e back c o v e r of t h i s b o o k l e t and mag be o b t a i n e d from t h e N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l ,

The A s s o c i a t e C o n ~ i t t e e on S o i l a n 3 Snow Mechanics i s a n x i o u s t o a s s i s t i n t h e s t a n d a r d i z a t i o n o f muskeg terminology and me%hods i n musireg r e s e a r c h and prac2:ice ; tinis p u b l i c a t i o r l i s b u t one s t e p toward t h i s g o a l , I t i s hoped t h a t the d e s c r i p t i v e system w i l l be widely used bg t h o s e e n ~ a y e d i n e n ~ i ~ e e r i n g p r a c t i c e i n rnuskeg a r e a s I n Canada. T n i s L o o k l e t i s i s s u e d i n a p r e - l i m i n a r y form t o p e r m i t r e v i s i o n a s t h e need a r i s e s , C o m e n t s on i t s u s e f u l r e s s would be a p p r e c i a t e d by t h e A s s o c i a t e Commit-bee,

(5)

1. What is Meant by "Organic Terrain" and "Organic Ifaterial

''

'sOrgar;ic terraine'is a term used to describe what is commonls know- as "muske~",

'Pile surface of this terrain is composed

07

a living organic mat of mosses, sedges and/or grasses, with or without tree and shrub growth, Underneath the surface there is a mixture of partially decomposed and disin-

tegrated commonly h o r n

as

eat"

a rule. this sub- surface material is highly comp&essible compared to most mineral soils. Organic terrain is characterized by its very high water content and its extremely low bearing

capacity.

Because of its biological origin, organic terrain is extremely complex. Owing to this complexity it was thought at first that perhaps no constant relationship existed between various factors of -the terrain.

However, extensive examination of the fossilized pollen and spores preserved in peat samples from various locations across Canada proved that certain qualitative relationships do

exist and this furnished a basis for the

development of the descriptive system, This descriptive system attempts to

record a three-dimensional problem and is

based on surface vegetation which occurs above the ground, topographic features lwhich occur alon the ground, and on composition

and s t d r e of the subsurface material which

occurs in the ground. All sf these factors must be3aken into account to obtain a reason- able em1ua"con of the terrain, Tables IV and B

at the end of this booklet show the rela-tionship between these v a r i o u s factors.

(6)

Surface vegetation is the first factor to be observed in a particular muskeg area and is also the easiest factor to assess.

Table I presents the necessary infor- mation to describe nine vegetal coverage classes. Photographs depicting these classes appear in Figures 1 to 9 . Note that the proper- ties mentioned in Table I do not refer to

but rather to

s stature, deg ess, external texture, and cerzain easily recognized growth habits.

Pure classes seldom exist by themselves but rather are in combination with other

classes. Only 18 such combinations occur most frequently in Northern Canada and are listed in Table V , The complete description of a particular area may be given by two or three letters, never by four. If one coverage class property is not present to the extent of 25 per cent of the terrain, it is not

abundant enough to be included in the composite cover description. In the combination of letters, that letter which represents the most prominent set of properties is placed first, and other lettersinvolved follow in order of prominence,

This system can be applied to a complex area consisting of several distinctly different combinations of vegetative classes and equally well to an area of uniform coverage made up

(7)

Pig,

1 Class

" A t f

-

Woody;

15

feet

OF over-

Fig,

2

Class

"B"

-

Woody;

5

f e e t

(8)

-

Nsn-wsdy; 2

f e e t

t o

5

f e e t

F i g ,

4

Class

'TIIF'

-

Wtsdy;

2 f e e t

t o

5

Pest

(9)

F i g ,

5

C l a s s

BBEE!

-

hioady;

up

$ 0

2

f e e t

F i g ,

6

Class

P I F s L

Non-wsdy; up

t o

2

feet

(10)

Section 6

F i g ,

7

Class

" G t t

-

Non-woody; up

t o 2

feet

Fig.

8

Class

f ' H t f

-

Non-woody;

up

to

4

inches

(11)

-

Non-wody; up

(12)

Section 6

"rrain uneveaqess is imporbant in the appraisal of organic terrain, Changes in topography are sometimes caused by irregu- larities in the mineral substrata but much o f the unevenness of the surface is due to

stwctuxal changes within the organio material itself. Table I1 gives the descriptive infomation for identifying topographic features of organic terrain. Several. sf these features are not peculiar to muskeg areas, but do occur and therefore should be described,

5.

Subsurface Characteristics

In addition to describing muskeg by its surface features, it is equally necessary to describe the subsurface material (i.e, peat). Based on examination of peat samples from

various sites, sixteen categories of peat were established. mese categories vary in accordance with variation in the organic terrain [see Table V). The description of organic material is based on the' extent to which wood and fibres are present. Organic material can be roughly grouped into three types :

(1) Material composed chiefly sf soils

o f an amorphous-granular base;

(2) ?&aterial chiefly made up of fine fibres. These fibres may be woody or non-woody;

( 3 ) Material predominantly of wood particles and coarse fibres. The coarse fibres are always woody.

Table I11 lists these sixteen cate- gories. Figures 10 to 25 show photographically the general appearance of these sixteen cate- gorles of organic material.

(13)

These categories are qualitative only, Therefore, a successful application of this system will necessarily involve comparing a particular peat sample with the photographs and selecting the appropriate category. 6, Qplication of the System

lo integrate all the information that has been collected on muskeg and peat from field observations, all details should be recorded on data sheets. Suggested sheets for recording surface and subsurface investigations are included in this booklet. They include most of tne specific details required; other pertinent information may be added. Naturally the amount and type of information required will depend largely upon the use for which it

(14)

Fig* 10

(15)

Section 6

Pig. 12

(16)
(17)

Fig.

16

(18)

Fig.

18

Fig. 19

(19)

Fig.

20

F i g ,

2 1

(20)

Fig.

23

(21)
(22)

Site :

-

-

Date : Detailed Location: bkp

-

Aerial Photos

-

Surface Elevation: Water Conditions: Evidence of draizage pattern

Depth to water table Colour of water P H value (acidity) Remarks Description: Surface Coverage Photographs : ITumber

Approx. Area of Terrain:

Physiographic Features:

Notes on Climatic Conditions.

Topogra2hic

Description

Remarks

General Remarks:

---

(23)

S i t e : Date : H o l e N o ( s ) : S u r f a c e E l e v a t i o n : C o l o u r o f P e a t y S o i l : Type o f M i n e r a l S u b s o i l :

Peat Profile

Number

o

Mineral Subsoil:

Description

General

Remarks

:

(24)

---

---

---

*-

verage VJoadLness Stature

Texture

Gronkh Example Type vs, ?Jan- ( a p p r o x , (where Habit

l a s s ) woodiness height) reg9dd)

---

---

--=---

---

A woody

15

ft, t r e e S p m ~ ~ 7 0 e

ox over

f o m Larch

---

-

B

woody

5

- -

es

- -

--

young or 9pav a e

i% Pi;, dwarfed Larch

t r e e o r $IiS3.ow hush Birch C non-woody 2 to

---

t a l l Grasses

5

%ts grass-bike v -

-"---

=---

"--

I) W Q ~ ~ Y 2 to - - & - - - - ta31. s h r u b F i l l o m

5

P t . or verg Birch dwarfed k b r a d o s %ea

tree

%

E

woody. u p to - - - . Pam

Blueberry

2 f t e

shrub

L a u r e l

P

non-woody n p -GO --- mats, clumps Sedges

2 ft,

or patches,

Grasses

sometimes -:ouchin&

G

non-woody up to

---

singly or O r c h i d

2

f t , l o o s e Pitcher g l a associa'tion

%1. non-woody up to leathery mostly

Liehens

4

in, to crisp continuous mats

1: non-woady up

to

soft or often Mosses

4

in. velvety continuous

mats,

some- times in humocks

(25)

TABLE I1

TOPOGRPIPWIC FEATURES

Contour F e a t u r e Type

D e s c r i p t i o n

a Hummock i n c l u d e s "-hassockw and "nigger-head': h a s t u f t e d t o p u s u a l l y v e r t i c a l s i d e s , o i n p a t c h e s , s e v e r a l t o n m m u s b Mound rounded t o p , o f t e n e l l i p t i c o r c r e s - cent-shaped i n p l a n e view c Ridge s i m i l a r t o Mound b u t e x t e n d e d , o f t e n i r r e g u l a r and numerous; v e g e t a t i o n o f t e n c o a r s e r on one s i d e

d 3ock FTava D b i n e x t e n s i v e exposed a r e a s

e Gravel b a r e s k e r s and o l d beaches ( e l e v a t e d ) -- - -

f Rock e n c l o s u r e grouped b o u l d e r s overgrown w i t h o r g a n i c d e p o s i t g Exposed b o u l d e r v i s i b l e b o u l d e r i n t e r r u p t i n g o r g a n i c d e p o s i t h Bidden b o u l d e r s i n g l e b o u l d e r overgrown w i t h o r g a n i c d e p o s i t - i P e a t p l a t e a u u s u a l l y e x t e n s i v e and i n v o l v i n g ( e v e n ) sudden e l e t a t i o n ---

-

---

j P e a % p l a t e a u o f t e n wooded, l o c a l i z e d and mueh

( i r r e g t a l a r )

---

c o n t o r t e d

----

k Closed pond f i l l e d w i t h o r g a a i c d e b r i s , o f t e n w i t h l i v i n g coverage

----

--

I Open pond w a t e r r i s e s above o r g a m c d e b r i s

m Pond o r %&e margin ( a b r u p t )

--pp

--

n Pond o r l a k e margin ( s l o p e d )

----

a-

o ~ r e e polygon forming a rimmed d e p r o s s i o n n

- -

p J o i n e d polygon formed by a system o f banked c l e f t s i n t h e o r g a n i c d e p o s i t

(26)

TABLE

T I T

- -

1,

h ~ r g h o u s - ~ r m k ~

psat

-

2.

Eon-woody, fine-fibrsus peat

3 ,

Amorphous-granular

peat csntaiGlng

non-moody fine fibres

4,

horphous-grmular peat containing

moody fine fibres

5 ,

Peat, predominamatly aaorphous-gsmu-

L

CQ

B

6,

Peat,predomPnantly elmorphous-grmla1

containing woody fine fibrestheld

in

a

woody,coarse-fibrous framework

3

7.

Alternate layering of non-woody,fine-

fibrous peat and morphous-granular

peat

con-taining

n o n - m d y fine f i b s

*n

V d

5

taining a mound of coarse fibres

0

%

9,

Woody, fine-fibrous peat held in a

W

Fc

A

W

---

!z

b l .

Woody

and

non-woodjr particles held

in Pine-fibrous

eat *

--

$2,

Waadg,

coarse-fibrous ~ e a t

-

-

- .

1 3 ,

Coarse fibres

criss-crossing fine-

-

fibrous peat

--

3.4, Nsn-woody and woody fine-fibrous pea%

held in a coarse-fibrous frmework

15.

Woody mesh of fibres

a n d

p a r - t i c l e s

enclosing amorphous-granular peat

containing fine

fibres

P

16,

Woody,

coarse-fibrous

peat

eontain-

ing scattered mcody chunks

(27)

TABLE

P V

amorphous

woody, fine-fibrous.

(28)

Section 6

TABLE V

-

(29)

Section 6

(30)

Figure

Table I presents the necessary infor-  mation to describe nine vegetal coverage  classes
Fig,  2  Class  "B"  -  Woody;  5  f e e t
Fig.  8  Class  f ' H t f   -  Non-woody;  up  to  4  inches
Table  I11  lists these sixteen cate-  gories.  Figures 10 to 25 show photographically  the general appearance of these sixteen cate-  gorles of organic material

Références

Documents relatifs

Surprise lexemes do not always convey surprise but may be exploited pragmatically within complex argumentative strategies – hence confirming the need to distinguish between

Control, control shocked mice; ACEI, shocked mice treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ACEI + icatibant, shocked mice treated with both ACEIs and a single injection

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB..

The absence of glycerol adsorption onto Accurel support after immobilization was verified using a medium containing tert- butanol or a mixture of tert-butanol and hexane

The model takes into account four important local scale nonlinear physical phenomena in RC structures: (i) concrete damage due to micro-cracking in compression, resulting in

The cytotoxicity of NK cells can be broken down into several steps, leading to the formation of the immunological synapse (IS) and achievement of the cytotoxic function by

A building and its heating system should be designed to maintain the inside temperature at some pre-det,ermined level. To do this it is necessary to know the most

swelling clay soils, like those in Regina, the horizontal pressures exerted on retaining walls can range from no p:o:essure where the clay remains standing unsupported in a