• Aucun résultat trouvé

Spatiotemporal modelling of a synthetic rangeland ecosystem to check ecological hypotheses and theories

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Spatiotemporal modelling of a synthetic rangeland ecosystem to check ecological hypotheses and theories"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02733635

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02733635

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Spatiotemporal modelling of a synthetic rangeland

ecosystem to check ecological hypotheses and theories

Francois Guerrin

To cite this version:

Francois Guerrin. Spatiotemporal modelling of a synthetic rangeland ecosystem to check ecological hypotheses and theories. 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM), Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. (MSSANZ). AUS., Dec 2017, Hobart, Australia. 716 p. �hal-02733635�

(2)

A

3–8 December2017 217

mssanz.org.au/modsim2017

Managing

cumulative risks through

model-based processes

Abstracts

EDITORS: Syme, G., Hatton MacDonald, D.,

Fulton, B. and Piantadosi, J.

Hobart

3–8 December

TASMANIA AUSTRALIA

22nd International Congress on

Modelling and Simulation

25th National Conference of the Australian Society for Operations Research — ASOR 2017

DST Group led Defence Operations Research Symposium — DORS 2017

(3)

Spatiotemporal modelling of a synthetic rangeland

ecosystem to check ecological hypotheses and theories

F. Guerrin a

a UMR Selmet, Cirad, Inra, SupAgro, Montpellier, France

Email: francois.guerrin@cirad.fr

Abstract: The model presented allows the spatial dynamics stemming from the interactions between mobile agents (like herbivores) and their environment (like rangeland) to be simulated. This model thus features a herd grazing on a pasture. For the sake of sustainability a dynamical balance must be found between the grass consumption by the animals and the herbage growth. However, two behaviours may threaten this equilibrium: overgrazing, possibly leading to desertification; under-grazing, that may lead to excessive vegetation growth and the landscape “closure” by invasive shrubs. Both processes may lead the herd to extinction by starving.

This model’s aim is not, actually, to mimic real specific rangelands but to offer a generic simple synthetic ecosystem to check ecological hypotheses and theories. Although deliberately naive, it has been parameterized with real rangeland and cattle values and implemented with the agent simulation platform NetLogo <ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo>.

Simulations have been made to check variants of the ecosystem’s structure and animal behaviours: • Spatial distribution of vegetation and animals;

• Foraging strategies: staying or moving; local or global search;

• Animal ways of movement: directed vs. random walks, short vs. long step length; • Heterogeneity vs. homogeneity among individual animals or land patches.

The main criteria of simulation assessment are the production of animal and vegetal biomasses, herd demography and landscape fragmentation.

In the simulations made, the most sustainable strategies are those emphasizing space occupation, local foraging, short walk steps and anticipating resource exhaustion.

Whereas the main focus to date has been put on the comparison of animal walk types, showing the strong importance of animal movement in the rangeland system’s dynamics, the emphasis has been put, since then, on other uses of the model:

• Exploration of issues regarding ecosystem complexity (e.g. adding trophic levels), percolation of products through space, resilience in front of disturbances;

• Hypothesis testing: optimal foraging, ideal free distribution, marginal value theorem.

Without challenging the deliberately naive approach followed so far, for the sake of realism, some improvements have been (or are being) introduced into the model:

• Interactions among animals to reproduce herding behaviour or sexual mating, interaction among land patches to propagate the vegetation;

• Structuring landscape elements (e.g. water holes) or behavioural features (e.g. preference or aversion for some kinds of vegetation) influencing animal movement;

• Climatic characteristics and seasonality influencing animal behaviour or the herbage growth; • Heterogeneity among individuals in the herd and land patches in the landscape;

• New relevant criteria and metrics for landscape assessment.

The main features of the model and simulations demonstrating its relevance to deal with hypothesis checking will be presented.

Keywords: Agent-based modelling, landscape simulation, grazing ecosystem

B2. Advances in Agent-Based Modelling of complex biological, ecological and agricultural systems

EXTENDED ABSTRACT ONLY

Références

Documents relatifs

Résumé — Dans ce travail nous proposons une extension de la méthode MKF (Modified Kalman Filter), méthode d’assimilation de données basée sur les filtres de Kalman et l’Erreur

At the community level, the error induced by the replacement of missing values with single imputation methods based on ecological hypothesis or with multiple imputation by

For the last twenty years, different research units participating in this project have been developing research activities on socio-ecological systems aiming at

tests of qualitative hypotheses, non-parametric test, test of positivity, test of monotonicity, test of convexity, rate of testing, Gaussian

Ultimately, this demonstrates the generic character of the proposed framework that can be applied for a variety of target ecosystem services, as well as for different

We further develop the concept of ecologi- cal autocatalysis, which is a self-reinforcing circular species interaction structure, captures the nutrient cycling aspect of ecosystems,

316 cants, which are more or less likely to bioaccumulate in the periphyton matrix and Table 10.2 In situ translocation studies of the recovery potential of microbial

Ecological Indicators of Ecosys- tem Recovery : Microbial Communities as Ecological Indicators of Ecosystem Recovery Following Chemical Pollution. Colloque de l’Association