• Aucun résultat trouvé

Irrigated rice practices changes in the Senegal River Valley according to climate and constraints evolutions. [P14]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Irrigated rice practices changes in the Senegal River Valley according to climate and constraints evolutions. [P14]"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Poster Session 3 L3.1 Climate adaptation and mitigation solutions

103

14.

Irrigated rice practices changes in the Senegal River Valley according to climate

and constraints evolutions

Baldé Alpha Bocar1, Muller Bertrand1,2, Van Oort Pepijn3, Ndiaye Ousmane4, Stuerz Sabine5, Sow Abdoulaye1,

Diack Salif6, Ndour Maimouna1, Dingkuhn Michael7

1Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), Saint-Louis, Senegal

2Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD)/AfricaRice, Saint-Louis, Senegal

3AfricaRice/Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

4Agence Nationale de l’Aviation Civile et de la Météorologie (ANACIM), Dakar, Senegal 5Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany

6Société d’aménagement et d’exploitation des terres du delta du fleuve Sénégal et des vallées du fleuve Sénégal et de la Falémé (SAED), Saint-Louis, Senegal

7CIRAD/International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines

More and more irrigated rice farms of the Senegal River Valley (SRV) no longer respect the sowing periods promoted in the 90s to reduce sterility risks due to extreme temperatures. This study aims at understanding that reality and assessing whether new sowing periods must be defined. Combining focus-groups and surveys, climate analysis, field experiments and modeling work with RIDEV model, it addresses the evolution of cropping practices and their constraints, farmers’ climate perception, climate evolution and its consequences on rice development and sowing periods in the SRV.

Data analysis shows rainfalls and temperature increases, and particularly a significant increase between the present decade and the 1950-1980 period which was considered for the establishment of the recommended sowing windows (+1°C to +2°C on monthly averages for Podor), with less extreme cold temperatures and more extreme hot ones. Farmers are very aware about recent climate evolution, with respectively 94% and 72% of them saying that rainfall and temperature patterns have changed. More precisely they commented that “the cold period shifted by about one month, from “October/November – February/March” to “November – March/April”. Nevertheless the majority considers that the recommended sowing periods are still pertinent and explain that late sowings are due to delayed access to tractors, inputs and credits. Only few ones (5 %) intentionally sow late, considering there is no longer a danger in doing that. However, in 2011 farmers who sown later got very bad yield and farmers explain that “because the cold arrived earlier as it happened in the past”. Yet, while farmer’s comments appear coherent with climate data, up to now we can’t totally confirm them by crop modelling since we still have difficulties in the simulation of the sterility despite recent model improvements. Additional work is required to reach a conclusion.

Références

Documents relatifs

We used the disruptant strain ΔClm2D20 to generate 23 add-back strains in which the entire Clm2 gene plus ∼1 kb upstream and 550 bp downstream of the gene were inserted into the

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at A full-scale experimental study of unprotected residential floor

Previous researches in the middle valley of the Senegal River have attributed the formation of saline areas to marine salts deposited in the sediment during the most

In the Sahel cool periods cause yield losses due to spikelet sterility in late sown rice and thus Sahelian rice production systems might benefit from increasing

Senegal River; integrated water resources management; economic analysis; hydrological modelling; sustainability; irrigated agriculture; hydropower; rural

Figure 2: Friction coefficient values by zone obtained with the three different calibration

ه كش ةملك ر ميحرلا نمحرلا للها مسب ىلع ملاسلاو ةلاصلاو ، ؤا ث دازو ؤاسمأ تسدقتو ،همعن تلج يذلا لله دم ا ًاميلست ملسو هيلع للها ىلص دممح ا بيبحو دممح

The microbial composi- tion and abundance in the SML and subsurface water (SSW), the primary production, and Chl a concentration in subsur- face water (1–5 m) were analyzed and