HAL Id: jpa-00208454
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208454
Submitted on 1 Jan 1976
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Crystalline field parameters of Cr2+ and Cr4+ in corundum
J. Pontnau, R. Adde
To cite this version:
J. Pontnau, R. Adde. Crystalline field parameters of Cr2+ and Cr4+ in corundum. Journal de
Physique, 1976, 37 (5), pp.603-610. �10.1051/jphys:01976003705060300�. �jpa-00208454�
CRYSTALLINE FIELD PARAMETERS OF Cr2+ AND Cr4+ IN CORUNDUM
J. PONTNAU
(*)
and R. ADDEInstitut
d’Electronique
Fondamentale(**)
Batiment
220,
Université ParisXI,
91405Orsay,
France(Reçu
le 26 novembre1975, accepté .le 23 janvier 1976)
Résumé. 2014 L’objectif principal de cet article est l’évaluation des paramètres de champ cristallin (B, C, Dq, v, v’) pour les ions
Cr2+(3d4)
etCr4+(3d2)
dans le corindon. L’absence de données expé-rimentales et les résultats médiocres obtenus avec le modèle de champ cristallin utilisé de façon
conventionnelle ont conduit à en effectuer une détermination indirecte. En premier lieu, parmi les
résultats optiques publiés qui concernent les ions 3dn dans le réseau cristallin d’03B1Al2O3 ceux ayant des données optiques connues avec une précision suffisante ont été sélectionnés ou discutés si néces- saire. A partir de ces résultats la variation des paramètres optiques pour des séries d’ions isoélec-
troniques a été déduite ; les paramètres optiques des ions
Cr4(3d2)
etCr2+(3d4)
dans le même réseau cristallin ont alors été évalués. L’appartenance des bandes additionnelles du rubis irradié est discutée.Il est également montré que les valeurs obtenues des paramètres du champ trigonal des ions V3+
et Cr4+ expliquent de façon satisfaisante la séparation en énergie de l’état fondamental de ces deux ions.
Abstract. 2014 The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the crystalline field parameters (B, C, Dq, v, v’) of the
Cr2+(3d4)
andCr4+(3d2)
ions in corundum. The lack ofexperimental
data and the failure of calculations based on the conventional crystal model led to an indirect determination.The published
optical
data for the 3dn ions in the 03B1Al2O3 lattice that is known with sufficient accuracy is discussed. From these results the variation of the parameters is obtained as a function of the elec- tronic charge within the electronic series and the optical parameter values of theCr4(3d2)
andCr2+(3d4)
in the same lattice are evaluated. The additional absorption bands in irradiated ruby arediscussed. The trigonal field parameters of V3+ and Cr4+ ions are shown to be in good agreement with the ground state splitting of both ions.
Classification Physics Abstracts
8.512 - 8.632
1. Introduction. - The
Cr4+ (3d2)
andCr2+
ionshave been detected in irradiated
ruby respectively by
EPR[1, 2]
and APR[3] experiments. Using
EPRwe have
recently
made anexperimental study
of theground
stateincluding
thehyperfine
structure(iso-
tope53)
and the influence of anapplied
electricfield
[4].
Theknowledge
of the differentcrystalline
field
parameters
of these ions in theaA1203
latticeis necessary to
analyse
the above results. These parameters should bepreferably
determined from a fit of theoptical spectroscopic
data. However irradiatedruby
shows in itsoptical
spectrum several additional bands with a rather uncertainidentification,
and this method cannot be used.Consequently
to determinethe
crystalline
field parameters ofCr4+
andCr2 +
we present an indirect
approach
based on the variation of theseparameters
in the same lattice as a function (*) Ce travail se rapporte à la thèse de doctorat d’état de J. Pontnau soutenue le 29 mai 1974 (réf. C.N.R.S. A.O. 10075).(**) Laboratoire associé au C.N.R.S.
LE JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE. - T. 37, N° 5, MAI 1976
of the electronic
charge
within the 3d" electronic series. To arrive at the form of this variation of parameters, we were first led to discussbriefly
theoptical
spectra and the parameter values for the3d2(V3 +)
and3d3(y2+, Mn4+)
ions. The energy levels of both ions are calculated and the additional,absorption
bands in irradiatedruby
are discussed.Finally,
it is shown that thetrigonal
field parameterscan be used to calculate
ground
statesplitting
forV3 +
and
Cr4+,
in agreement withexperiment.
The
analysis
of eachoptical
spectrum is made in thestrong
field scheme. Thefollowing
parameters are used :B,
C for the Coulombinteraction, Dq
for thecrystalline
field of cubic symmetry, v and v’ for thetrigonal
fieldand (
for thespin
orbit interaction. Aspreviously
mentioned thecrystal
fieldtheory
is unableto account for the
optical
parameter values even in the strongbinding
ioniccrystals,
but it becomes aconvenient tool when the
parameters
are fitted to theexpérimental
data. Anuncertainty
of about 5%
isestimated in the
parameter
values as theapproximate
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01976003705060300
604
TABLE 1
Optical fitting parameters of
the V3 + ion inocAl203
model which we used
neglects
vibronicinteractions, configuration mixing,
manybody
and Jahn-Teller effects.2.
V3+
inaA1203.
- 2.1 THE OPTICAL SPECTRUM OFV3+
INaA1203.
- Theoptical
spectrum of vana- dium corundum(V3+ : aA1203)
has been studiedexperimentally mainly by Pryce
and Runciman[5],
McClure
[6]
and discussedby
Macfarlane[7],
Rahmanand Runciman
[8].
The
analysis
of these data shows that : the obser- vation andassignment
of the two broad bands respec-tively
observed at 25 000cm-1
and 17 500cm - 1
and the
sharp
line at 21025em-l
are well established.However the observation of the 8 770
cm-1 absorption
line
reported by Pryce
and Runciman[5]
isuncertain,
since it was not confirmedby
McClure[6],
Sakatsumeand
Tsujikawa [9].
In the same way theassignment
of the 9 748
cm-1
line within thet2g configuration
from selection rules in
C3,
symmetry is not satisfac- tory. Moreover thetrigonal splitting
of theground
state
3T, (t2 d
in the103 cm - 1 region
a value which would beimportant
toanalyse
theground
state finestructure has never been measured.
We have
performed optical absorption
and fluores-cence measurements in the visible and infrared
region
with a very
high sensitivity
spectrometer and in a wide range ofoperating
conditions(crystal doping, temperature) [10].
Our results are in excellent agree- ment with themajor part
of thepreviously published
data but
again
noabsorption
is detected near,8 770
cm -1 [11].
This result is confirmedby
Runci-man
(1).
In the far infraredregion
thephonon
spectrum oftfie crystal
isresponsible
for toolarge
anabsorption
to allow the observation of the
3T 1(3Ê ~ 3Â2)
ground
statetrigonal splitting
transition.2.2 DETERMINATION OF THE CRYSTALLINE FIELD PARAMETERS AND DISCUSSION. - We have
analyzed
the
V3+ optical
spectrumexcluding
the 8 770cm-’
line and determined the five
crystalline
fieldparameters
from a fit of the four detected transitions and thetrigonal splitting
of the 25 000cm -1
transition(see Appendix A).
The values obtained and the energy levels calculated are listed in table 1 andfigure
1(1) Runciman, W. A., Private communication.
FIG. 1. - Comparison between experimental and theoretical energy levels of the V3+ ion in aA1203.
respectively,
with thosepreviously given by
Mac-farlane
[7],
Rahman and Runciman[8]
forcompari-
son. In the
Appendix
A wegive
theanalytical
expres-sions
for the observed transitions valid for small variations of the parameter values from thosegiven
intable I.
The fact that the
previously reported
line at8 770
cm-’
does notbelong
to the vanadium corun-dum spectrum has the
following
consequences : The 9 748cm-’
line must now be identified with the3Â -> ’T2(’Ê)
transition.The Racah
parameter
C is increasedby about 10 % compared
to theprevious analysis.
This allows abetter fit of the
(3 Â 2 ~ 1 Âl)
transition whilekeeping
a
good agreement
for the(3 Â2 ~T 2( 1 Ê»)
transition.Dq, B, v
and v’ differslightly from
theprevious
determinations
(within
the 5%
estimatederror),
butsimultaneously
conserve the energy centre ofgravity
of the
3T2 ~ 3A2
transition and allow a better fit of thet2g
eg3T1(3A2-3E) trigonal splitting.
3. V2+ and
Mn4+
maA’203-
- The 3d3
ionsV2
and
Mn4+
are isoelectronic withCr3+
and some of theiroptical properties
in the visibleregion
havebeen studied and
analyzed by Sturge [12],
Geschwindet al.
[13]
and Crozier[14].
The number of transition detected and measured withenough
accuracy for both ions is less than five and does not allow aunique
determination of the five
crystalline
field parametersab m the more favorable case of the
V3+
and Cr3 + ions. Theimpurity
ions which enter in substitution ofAl3+
ions aregenerally
of theM3+
type in orderto maintain the electrical
neutrality
of thecrystal.
The formation of
M2+
and M4+ ions derived from theM3+
may occurthrough ionizing
irradiation(X,
yrays)
at a rate of a few per cent of theM3+
concentration.
Simultaneously,
other colour centres are createdduring
the irradiation’ process but thelarge
M3+ spectrumintensity
may blur the additional bands. ForV2+ [12]
and Mn4+[13, 14]
ions thedetection of fluorescent lines allows a
positive
iden-tification of the ionized state and a selective
absorption study
of theoptical
spectrum. We have found it necessary toanalyse
the available dataconceming V2+
and
Mn4+
ionsalongside
the moreprecisely
knownparameter
values forCr3+ [15]
andV3+,
in order toobtain the evolution
of B, C, Dq,
v and v’ in theisoelectronic series.
3.1 CRYSTALLINE FIELD PARAMETERS OF THE V2+
AND Mn4+ IONS IN
aA1203.
- Theexperimental optical
data used toanalyse
theV2 +
andMn4+
ionsand the
corresponding
values of thecrystalline
field parameters are listed infigure
2 and table IIrespecti- vely.
They
are determined as follows :Dq
is obtained in the cubicapproximation
from the energy transition4A (t3 g) --->4T(t2 eg) equal
to 10Dq.
B and C are obtained
simultaneously
from a fitof the fluorescence transition
2E(t2g) ~ 4A2(tig)
observed with both ions and the
CIB
ratio.This ratio is deduced from the free ion value and the
CIB
values forCr3+
andV3+
in the same lattice.The
trigonal
field parameters v and v’ are obtainedby fitting
the 2 D andsplittings arising respectively
from the
4A2(t2g)
and’E(t3d
states which are knownwith great accuracy for both ions.
For
V2+
we use also thetrigonal splitting
of the4T2
excited state which is
approximately equal
tov/2,
and for Mn4+ we choose the
’1’0
value about half way between the 0.66Cr3+
value and the 0.5 extreme value in the case of electronic delocalization.The 2 D and A
splittings
are calculated with theDq, B,
C valuespreviously determined, using
Macfar-lane’s formalism
[16].
Theanalytical expressions
as afunction of v and v’ are
given
inAppendix
B. We haveFIG. 2. - Experimental energy levels of the V2+, Cr3 and Mn4l
ions in (XAI203’
checked that in our range of
Dq/B
values theirvalidity
is
good compared
to an exactdiagonalization.
3.2 DISCUSSION. - The
experimental
data forthe
V2+
andMn4+
ions do not allow a determination of theoptical fitting parameters
in a self consistent way.For the Racah
parâmeters B
and C we have found it convenient to take into account theCr3+
andV3+
values known with a
good
accuracy. Thetrigonal
field parameters are determinedusing
Macfarlane’s work.When the
crystal
field calculations are carried outusing
manyperturbation loops they
can accountquite accurately
for theground
statesplitting
as wellas for the
splitting
of the2E
excited state.The
optical
parameters determined in this wayexplain properly
the knownoptical
transitions for TABLE IIOptical fitting parameters of
theV2+ , Cr3 +
and Mn4 + ions inaA1203
606
both ions and the A
splitting
but underestimateslightly
the zero fieldsplitting
2 D of theground
state. In table II are listed for
comparison
the valuespreviously given by
Feher andSturge [17].
These values are
given by
the authors asrough
estimates to
explain
stress effects on thetrigonal splitting.
Their calculations were carried outusing
areduced number of
perturbation loops
and an over-estimated
covalency
reduction factor of thespin
orbit
coupling
forMn4+ (Ç/Ço
=0.50)
which leadrespectively
to v’ values 30%
less and v value of Mn4 +40 % greater
than ours.4.
Cr4+
andCr2+
inaA1203.
- TheCr4+ (3 d2)
and
Cr 21 (3d4)
were first detected in irradiatedruby by
Hoskins and Soffer[1] using
EPRtechnique
andby
Guermeur et al.[3] using
APRtechnique.
Howeververy little is known about their
optical properties.
We have
performed optical
spectra measurements at low temperatures(77 K)
with X irradiation in situ in order to stabilize the created colour centres. Other measurements were made at heliumtemperatures
after room temperature y irradiation at a ratevarying
between
104
and106
R. Our purpose was to ionize and stabilize ionic centres withoutcreating
newdefects inside the lattice. The
experimental
resultsare found in
good
agreement withpreviously published
data and show
essentially
several broad bands the identification of which is rather uncertain[18, 19, 20].
From a
comparison
between the additional bands observed in irradiated pure corundum[21]
and inirradiated
ruby,
it canonly
be stated that the additional bandspeaking
at 21000cm - 1
and 26 000cm-’
1are due to centres derived from a
Cr3+
ion or associat- ed with the mechanism ofcharge compensation
whenCr3+
ionization occurs. Under these conditions theoptical fitting
parameters of theCr2+
andCr4+
ions cannot bedirectly determined.
We have used an indirectapproach
based on theprogression
of theseparameters for the
3d3
series as a function of elec- troniccharge
and the known results for theTi3 +(3d’) [22, 23], V3+
andMn3+ [6]
in the samelattice. With these values the energy levels of both ions are calculated in the cubic
approximation
andthe identification of the two additional bands
(21 000 cm - 1,
26 000cm - 1)
is discussed.4.1 CRYSTALLINE FIELD PARAMETERS OF THE
Cr2 +
AND Cr4+ IONS. -
Figure
3 shows that for the 3d3 ions(Cr3+, BV2 +, Mn4+)
inaA’203
latticeDq
increaseswith the nominal
charge
of theimpurity
ionby approximately
20%
whengoing
from a divalent to atrivalent ion
(V2 +, Cr3 +)
or from a trivalent to atetravalent ion
(Cr3+, Mn4+).
We also note that forthe
following
trivalent ionsTi3+, V3+, Cr3+
andMn3 +, Dq
has values very close to 1 850cm-1
within themargin
ofexperimental
error. The Racah para- metersB,
C are estimated from the free ions valuesBo, Co
and with the conditionCo/Bo C/B
as occurs forthe
neighbouring
3dn ions[10].
Thetrigonal
field parameters v, v’ are estimated from the3d 3(V2 + , Cr3 +, Mn4 +)
and3d2(V3 +)
valuespreviously given,
with the
hypothesis
of a similarprogression
withinan isoelectronic series. The values obtained in this way are listed in table III.
FIG. 3. - Variation of the crystalline field parameters as a function of electric charge.
TABLE III
Optical fitting parameters of
theCr2 +
and
Cr4+
ions inocA1203
4.2 DISCUSSION OF THE ADDITIONAL BANDS IN IRRADIATFD RUBY. -
Using
the cubic fieldapproxi-
mation we have
represented
infigures
4 and 5 theCr2 +
and
Cr4+
energy levelsdependence
in reduced units of B as a function of the dimensionless parameterDq/B. Dq/B
= 2.67 is the strong field limit for theCr2+
ion above which theSE ground
state nolonger
obeys
Hund’s rules and becomes3T 1 (tig).
The vertical dotted linescorrespond
to theDQIB
values listed in the table III for both ions andgive
the theoreti- cal energy transitions. The identification of the 21 000cm -1
and 26 000cm -1
additional bands canFIG. 4. - Theoretical energy levels of Cr4+ in aA’203.
be made easier
by comparison
with theexperimental
results of the isoelectronic ions
Mn3+(3d4)
andV3+(3d2).
As theonly
observedMn3+
transitionbetween the
SE(t2g eg)
~ST2(t2g e2)
is centred at 20 000cm-1,
one would expect to observe the cor-responding absorption
band for theCr2+
ion near16 000
cm-1
since this energy transition islinearly dependent
ofDq
and the ratioWe
are led to conclude that the two additional bands cannotbelong
to theCr2+ spectrum.
On the other hand
V3+
has twostrong absorption
bands
peaking
at 17 500 cm - 1 and 25 000cm - 1 .
Thecorresponding Cr4+
transitions areexpected
near 20 000
em -1
and 30 000cm -1
with theDq
and B values listed in table III. It would be
tempting
to
assign
the additional bandpeaking
at 21 000cm-’
to the
3T1(t2g) ~ 3T2(t2g eg)
transition of theCr4+
ion.
Unfortunately
thefollowing points
must beemphasized : (i)
If the 21 000cm - 1
band isassigned
to the
3T,(t22g)
~3T2(t2g eg) Cr4+
spectrum, the other3Tl (t2 g)
~3T 1 (t2 g eg)
band should be observed with about the sameintensity (as
forV3+)
near 30 000cm-1.
FIG. 5. - Theoretical energy levels of Cr2 + in ceA1203.
(ii)
As the Cr4+ concentration deduced from EPR measurements is less than 5%
of the nominalCr3 +
concentration andconsidering
theabsorption
inten-sity
observed with theV3+
isoelectronic ion as afunction of
impurity concentration,
we should observea
Cr4+
additional bandintensity
about two ordersof
magnitude
less thanreally
observed if they3+
andCr3 +
oscillatorstrengths
are similar.(iii)
Thepeak
value of the 21000
cm -1 absorption
band seems to becorrelated with the number of defects and other
impurities
present into the lattice[24].
These consi-derations lead us to rule out the
assignment
of the21 000
cm-1
band toCr4+
and to correlate the two observed additional bands to colour centres asso-ciated with
charge compensation
mechanisms whenCr3+
ions areionized.
This conclusionsuggested previously by Stickley et
al.[24]
and Hoskins and Soffer[1]
is now based onconverging
observations both fromexperimental
EPR andoptical
results and from the estimatedoptical
spectra. Due to its lowintensity
the 21 000cm -1
estimatedtransition of
Cr4+
is then hidden in the 21000cm - 1
colour centre band. At 4 K theionizing
centres arethermally quenched
and recombination isprevented
608
leading
to a situation more favourable to anoptical
detection of
Cr2 +
andCr4 + .
4.3 TRIGONAL FIELD PARAMETERS AND GROUND STATE SPLITTING OF V3 + AND Cr4+. - Under the combined action of the
trigonal
field and thespin orbit-coupling
on theground
statetriplet of
the3d 2
ions we have
by increasing
order of energy aspin singlet
and aspin
doublet with asplitting
D whichis known with great accuracy for both ions
[4].
Alarge
part of thissplitting (~
70%)
arises from asecond order
perturbation loop
between3T1(3Â2)
and
3T1(3E)
statesinteracting
via thespin-orbit coupling.
Thisapproximation
whichgives
a((214
d(3Â2-3Ê)) dependence
must beimproved
consi-derably
tointerpret
the evolution of the Dsplitting
of the
V3+
andCr4+
ions which differonly by
10%.
A more
precise analysis
of the Dsplitting
can beperformed
in thefollowing
way.The
application
of theWigner-Eckart
theoremallows one to treat the
3T1
mixedground
state asa
3Tl (t2d
pure state[25].
The hamiltonian of thetrigonal and spin orbit interactions acting
on this
3T1(t2d
state is as follows :The
multiplying
factors oci aregiven by
the ratio of thecorresponding
operator values between mixed andpure 1 ’Tl >
wave functions :From the wave function of the
3T1
mixed state weobtain :
with
with
After
diagonalization
of the hamiltonian(1)
thesplitting
of the two lowest energy levelsgives
thefollowing analytical
D value :In table IV are listed the
experimental
and calcu-lated D values with the
crystalline
fieldparameters previously given.
The fit issatisfaétory
with thetrigonal
parameters determined above forV3+
andCr4+
andÇ/Ço
values ingood
agreement with theincrease of
covalency
as a function of theimpurity
ionic
charge.
A more detailed
analysis including
the fit ofLandé g
factors and a discussion of the action of the Jahn- Teller effect on the
ground
state will begiven
in aforthcoming
paper.TABLE IV
Comparison
betweenexperimental
and theoreticalground
statesplitting
Dof
the V3+ andCr4+
ionsin
aA1203.
4.4 CONCLUSION. - The
crystalline
field para- meters ofCr4+
inaAl203
evaluatedindirectly
aregiven
withenough
accuracy toanalyse
theground
state structure of
Cr4+.
Theprogression
of the Dsplitting
for the two3d2
known ions(V3+, Cr4+)
is
explained
in asatisfactory
way. Theoptical
spectra ofCr2+
andCr4+
deduced from the estimated parameters confirm that the two additional bands of irradiatedruby peaking
at 21 000cm-’
and26 000
cm-’ probably
do notbelong
to theCr4+
or
Cr2+
ions.Comparison
with theV3 ’
andMn 31
spectra
suggests
thatthey
arise from colour centres causedby compensating
electriccharges
whenCr3 +
centres are
ionized,
contrary to someprevious
inter-’pretations.
A successfuloptical study
wouldprobably
require
a simultaneous detection of the EPR andoptical
spectra under X irradiation in situ at helium temperatures. Ouranalysis gives
agood
indicationof the
Cr2+
andCr4+
transitionenergies
for theirexperimental investigation.
,Appendix
A. -V3+ optical fitting parameters. -
The fine structure ofV3+
inaA’203 resulting
fromspin
orbit interaction is not resolvedexperimentally
in the two broad bands and the energy levels of the
sharp
lines are shiftedonly by
a fewcm - 1 by
thespin
orbit interaction
(second-order perturbation).
Conse-quently
thecomputations
are limited to thetrigonal
field
approximation.
- In a crude
analysis
v’ isneglected ( « v).
The central
positions
of band 1(25
000cm-’)
andII
(17 500 cm - 1),
thetrigonal splitting
of band 1( ~ v/2)
and thesharp
line III(21025 cm-’)
are fittedwith the
following
first-order values :- In a second step the wave functions of the
3T 1 (t2g e)
state are calculated with the above values in atrigonal
basis :with
with
giving
thefollowing analytical expression
for thetrigonal splitting
of the3T 1 (t2 g eg
state :The 380 cm-1
splitting
is fitted with v = 800cm-’,
v’ - 150
cm - 1.
With thiscomplete
set ofvalues,
we calculate all the energy levels within thet2g
confi-guration
and noticeparticularly
thefollowing
values :The line IV
(9
748cm-1)
may then beassigned
tothe
t2g IT 2(lÊ) ~ t2g(3A)
transition.- In the third step we calculate
analytical
expres- sions for the energysplittings
of the different levels with theground
state. The final values listed in table 1give
the best fit with theexperimental
data.The
analytical
energysplittings
valid for small variations of theparameters
listed in table 1 are as follows :Band I
Trigonal splitting
Band II
Trigonal splitting of
band IILine I
Levels with symmetry
1 E
Trigonal splitting of
theground
stateAppendix
B. -V2+
and Mn4+optical fitting
para- meters. - The B and C Racah parameters cannot be obtaineddirectly
from theoptical
data.The
4A2(t2g) ~ 4T1(t2g eg) absorption
banddepends only
onDq
and B.However it was not observed for
Mn4+
and was610
only
detected in the case ofV2+ through
the exci-tation spectrum of the
2E --> 4A2
fluorescence line and there are indications that the measured value isperturbed by
the existence of the verystrong absorp-
tion band
of V3 +. Consequently
theonly
otheroptical
result is the fluorescence
transition 2E(t3 g) ~ 4A 3
situated
respectively
at 11691 em -1 and 14 781 cm-’for
V2+
and Mn4+ which has an energydepending simultaneously
ofDq, B
and C. There it is necessary to define the value of the ratioC/B
from other data.This was done from a
comparison
of the ratioCo/Bo
of the Racah parameters for the free ions and the values for
Cr3+
andV3+. Co/Bo
increases with the ioncharge
within an isoelectronic series andC/B
>C,IB,
for agiven
ion. Therefore we choose forV2 +
andMn4+ CIB
valuesequal
to 4.65 and 4.9respectively.
Then wediagonalize
the2E
levels matrix and draw the normalised curveas a function of
C/B.
With the aboveC/B
values andthe
experimental
energy transitions AE we obtain the values of B and C listed in table II. We use thefollowing procedure
to evaluate thetrigonal
field parameters :- The
trigonal splitting
of the4T2
excited state isapproximately equal
tov/2
and is knownexperi- mentally
forCr3+
andV2+
but not for Mn4 +. Thetrigonal splitting
of the4T1
excited state which isis also known
experimentally
forCr3 +
andV2 + ,
However it has been shown
by
Rimmer and John-ston
[26, 27]
that it is not fittedcorrectly
in theoptical spectrum
and we shall not use this result.The other available
experimental
results are the 2 Dand A
splittings
of the4A @(t3 2 d
and2 E(t3 2 d
states.Macfarlane has
performed
aperturbation
calculation of thesesplittings
for3d3
ions intrigonal
and tetra-gonal
symmetryusing
manyloops
with excited states and obtainedanalytical expressions.
He has alsoshown that their
validity
isgood compared
to anexact
diagonalisation
for theDq/B
values of the3d3
ions in
A1203. Using
Macfarlane’sresults,
we obtainedthe
following expressions
for the 2 D and Asplittings
as function of the
trigonal
parameters v and v’ and the reducedspin
orbitparameter 03B6/03B6o
Splitting
2 D :Splitting A :
The relations
(1)
and(2)
showdistinctly
that 2 Dis
mostly
determinedby
thetrigonal
parameter v’and A
by
v.Using
for theV2+
andCr3+
ions the first order value of v obtained from the4T2
bandtrigonal splitting
and the
experimentàl
values of 2 Dand ,
we obtaina first determination of v’ and
(/(0’
In the case ofMn4+,
as we do not know the4T2(4E 4Â1) splitting,
we must choose one of the three unknown parameters.
Consequently
we fix the value of(/(0
for Mn4+ to0.60,
abouthalf-way
between the 0.66Cr3+
value and 0.5 which may bethought
as an extreme valueof the
spin-orbit
reduction factor in the case of strongcovalency
and obtain v and v’.References [1] HOSKINS, R. H. and SOFFER, B. H., Phys. Rev. 133 (1964) 499.
[2] STANDLEY, K. J. and VAUGHAN, R. A., Proc. Phys. Soc. 86 (1965) 861.
[3] GUERMEUR, R., JOFFRIN, J., LEVELUT, A. and PENNE, J., Phys.
Rev. 187 (1969) 1153.
[4] PONTNAU, J. and ADDE, R., J. Phys. & Chem. Solids 36 (1975)
1023.
[5] PRYCE, M. H. L. and RUNCIMAN, W. A., Discuss. Faraday Soc.
26 (1958) 34.
[6] MCCLURE, D. S., J. Chem. Phys. 36 (1962) 2757.
[7] MACFARLANE, R. M., J. Chem. Phys. 40 (1964) 373.
[8] RAHMAN, H. U. and RUNCIMAN, W. A., J. Phys. C 4 (1971) 1576.
[9] SAKATSUME, S. and TSUJIKAWA, I., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 19 (1964) 1080.
[10] PONTNAU, J., Thesis, Orsay (1974) unpublished.
[11] PONTNAU, J. and ADDE, R., C.R. Hebd. Séan. Acad. Sci.
278B (1974) 943.
[12] STURGE, M. D., Phys. Rev. 130 (1963) 639.
[13] GESCHWIND, S., KISLIUK, P., KLEIN, M. P., REMEIKA, J. P.
and WOOD, D. L., Phys. Rev. 126 (1962) 1684.
[14] CROZIER, M. H., Phys. Lett. 18 (1965) 219.
[15] MACFARLANE, R. M., J. Chem. Phys. 39 (1965) 3118.
[16] MACFARLANE, R. M., Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970) 989.
[17] FEHER, E. and STURGE, M. D., Phys. Rev. 172 (1968) 244.
[18] MARUYAMA, T. and MATSUDA, Y., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 19 (1964) 1096.
[19] Low, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 5 (1964) 35.
[20] ARKHANGELSKII, G. E., MORGENSHTERN, Z. L. and NEUSTRUEV,
V. B., Phys. Stat. Sol. 29 (1968) 831 and 36 (1969) 451.
[21] GAMBLE, F. T., Ph. D. Thesis (1963) University of Connecticut.
[22] NELSON, E. D., WONG, J. Y. and SCHAWLOW, A. L., Phys.
Rev. 156 (1967) 298.
[23] WONG, J. Y., BERGGREN, M. J. and SCHAWLOW, A. L., J.
Chem. Phys. 49 (1968) 835.
[24] STICKLEY, C. M., MILLER, H., HOELL, E. E., GALLAGHER, C. C.
and BRADBURY, R. A., J. Appl. Phys. 40 (1969) 1792.
[25] ABRAGAM, A. and BLEANEY, B., Electron paramagnetic reso-
nance of transitions ions (London : Oxford University Press) 1970.
[26] RIMMER, D. E. and JOHNSTON, D. F., Proc. Phys. Soc. 89 (1966) 943.
[27] RIMMER, D. E. and JOHNSTON, D. F., Proc. Phys. Soc. 89 (1966) 953.