Water relation characteristics and photosynthesis of
saline-stressed seedlings of non-halophyte species
T. Suzaki H. Yahata H. Shigenaga
Laboratory
of Silviculture,Department
of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University,Fukuoka, Japan
Introduction
Most
plants
showgrowth
retardation at lowsalinity
and die inhigh salinity.
Thecauses are considered to be
mainly
waterstress and/or ion excess. Plants may be able to cope with an adverse water rela-
tion,
ifthey
absorb salts in leaf cells toadjust osmotically.
But, without efficientcompartmentation
in vacuoles or exclu- sion of excessive salt in osmoticadjust-
ment, which arerecognized
inhalophytes, plants
will suffer from ion excess. Theobjective
of the presentstudy
was to ex-amine the distribution of salts and its effect
on
photosynthesis
fornon-halophyte woody species.
Inaddition,
the contribu- tion of sodium and chloride to osmoticadjustment
is discussed.Materials and Methods
The seedlings of each
species,
Osmanthusasiaticus var. aurantiacus, Distylium racemo-
sum, Cinnamomum camphora and
Euonymus japonicus
were established in 1/5000 a Wagner pots. Salt treatments (0, 5, 10, 20 and 40%artificial seawater) were
imposed
by daily irriga-tion of 100 ml for 40 d. Time-course
changes
in photosynthetic rates were determined using anopen gas-exchange system with an infrared gas
analyzer. The conditions of measurement were
that light intensity was 40 klx, leaf temperature
was 25°C, and the air flow rate was 1.2 I/min.
Pressure-volume curves were constructed at the termination of treatment. After treatment, sodium,
potassium
and chloride concentrationswere determined for leaves, stem, main root and fine roots. Sodium and potassium were
estimated by flame photometry. Chloride was
determined by silver ion titration.
Results
Time course
changes
inphotosynthetic
rates were shown as relative values
against
0% treatment.Photosynthesis by
O. asiaticus var. aurantiacus decreased
progressively
as thesalinity
level in-creased and time
lapsed (Fig. 1 a).
In D.racemosum, the lower
salinity
treatmentsstimulated
photosynthesis
on d 10. After that, whiledeclining substantially
above20% treatment, it remained
high
in 10%and 5% treatments
(Fig. 1b).
In C. cam-phora,
there were nosignificant
effectsunder 10% treatment but
gradual
de-creases above 20%
(Fig. 1 c).
Ejapo-
nicus showed some decreases for
higher
salt treatments, which were less
compared
to the other
species (Fig. 1d).
The extent of sodium accumulation in leaves and fine roots showed marked dif- ferences between O. asiaticus var. auran-
tiacus and the other 3
species.
In O. asia-ticus var.
aurantiacus,
sodium concentra- tions in leaves increased as the salt level increased. The other 3species
maintainedlow concentrations for lower salt treat-
ments, but further treatments caused increases.
However,
that in fine roots for lower salt treatment increased in the order: O. asiaticus var.aurantiacus,
E.japonicus,
D. racemosum, and C. cam-phora.
Stem and main root concentrations tended to increasegradually
in all 4 spe- cies. On the otherhand,
thechanges
ofsodium concentration per whole
plant
tis-sues, which indicated the differences in the amounts of
absorption,
showed similar increases in all 4species except
for 40%treatment.
The
changes
in the chloride concentra- tion were similar to that of sodium.There were no clear concentration dif- ferences among the
species
forpotas-
sium.The relative values of net
photosynthetic
rates on d 32 tended to decrease as the sodium concentration in leaves increased.
The
changes
of sodium and chloride concentration in leaves and of osmoticpotential
at fullturgor
arecompared (Fig.
2).
The broken linerepresents
the calcu- lated value of osmoticpotential
under theassumption
that all sodium and chlorideare
sequestered
in cells andgenerate
osmoticpotential.
O. asiaticus var. auran-tiacus maintained an almost constant osmotic
potential,
but increased thepoten-
tial athigh
concentration in leaves(Fig.
2a).
In D. racemosum and C.camphora,
itdecreased for lower salt treatments
(Fig.
2b, c).
These reductions were considered to be causedmainly by
other solutes and notby
sodium or chloride. At thehigher concentration,
osmoticpotential
becamehigher
than that of the calculated value.E.
japonicus
seemed to use sodium andchloride for osmotic
adjustment, while,
inthis
situation,
the sodium and chloride concentration in leaves was low(Fig. 2d).
Discussion and Conclusion
O. asiaticus var.
aurantiacus,
which accu- mulated more sodium and chloride in itsleaves,
showedconspicuous
decreases ofphotosynthesis. However,
the other spe- cies,except
for theseedlings subjected
tohigher
salt treatments, did not showconspicuous
reduction ofphotosynthesis
under the low sodium and chloride concentration in leaves.
Therefore,
it is considered that salt tolerancedepends
upon an
ability
to avoid the accumulation of salts in leaves. Thisability
seems to beattained
mainily by sequestering
salts infine roots to alter the distribution. It is known that the characteristics of salt distri- bution differ in
species (Grieve
and Wal-ker, 1983).
Walker(1986) reported
that themechanism to avoid the accumulation of sodium in leaves in trifoliate orange exist- ed in
proximal
root and basal stem, which withdraw sodium from thetranspiration
stream. Suberized endoderms located in fine roots are considered to have selective
permeability,
which acts as a barrier to theflow of soluble salts into
xylem.
Furtherstudy,
to determine whether structural dif- ferences in fine roots exist between spe-cies,
may berequired.
As for the
primary
cause of death ofleaves,
thepossibility
that excessive accu-mulation of salts in
apoplast brings
aboutdehydration
of cells was discussed(Munns
andPassioura, 1984).
If the salt concentration increases outside theliving
cells, the value of osmoticpotential
at fullturgor
may be estimatedexperimentally
tobe
higher
than the true value.Therefore,
thehigh
osmoticpotential
calculatedabove
suggests
that ion accumulation inapoplast
occurred. Itmight
be considered that fornon-halophytes, absorbing
salts inleaves does not seem to be useful for osmotic
adjustment, although
itmight
contribute to some extent but
only
at lowconcentrations.
References
Grieve A.M. & Walker R.R. (1983)
Uptake
anddistribution of chloride, sodium and potassium
ions in salt-treated citrus
plants.
Aust. J.Agric.
Res. 34, 133-143
Munns R. & Passioura J.B.
(1984)
Effect of pro-longed
exposure to NaCi on the osmotic pres-sure of leaf
xylem
sap from intact,transpiring
barleyplants.
Aust. J. PlantPhysiol.
11, 497-507
Walker R.R. (1986) Sodium exclusion and
potassium-sodium
selectivity in salt-treated tri- foliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) andCleopatra
mandarin
(Citrus
reticulata)plants.
Aust. J.Plant