HAL Id: jpa-00231155
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00231155
Submitted on 1 Jan 1975
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
To cite this version:
E. Giacobino. Determination of the hyperfine structure of the 2p levels of 21Ne using a cw tunable dye laser. Journal de Physique Lettres, Edp sciences, 1975, 36 (3), pp.65-68.
�10.1051/jphyslet:0197500360306500�. �jpa-00231155�
DETERMINATION OF THE HYPERFINE STRUCTURE
OF THE 2p LEVELS OF 21Ne USING A CW TUNABLE DYE LASER
E. GIACOBINO
Laboratoire de
Spectroscopie
Hertzienne de l’E.N.S.24,
rueLhomond,
75231 Paris Cedex05,
FranceRésumé. 2014 Les structures hyperfines de niveaux 2p de 21Ne ont été mesurées par la méthode des croisements de niveaux. Les niveaux étudiés étaient pompés optiquement par un laser à colorant.
Abstract. 2014 H.f.s. measurements on the 2p levels of 21Ne have been performed using the level- crossing method. The
investigated
levels were optically pumped using a dye laser.Experimentally,
thehyperfine
structures of the excited levels of21 Ne
are ratherpoorly
known. Atthe present
time,
there are availableonly
a few spec-troscopic
determinations[1,2, 3]
and(for
theIs 5 level)
one very accurate atomic beam determinationby
Grosof et al.[4].
From the availableexperimental values,
Liberman[1]
was able to determine the atomic parameters of severalconfigurations
and topredict
their
hyperfine
structures.In this
letter, hyperfine
structure measurements on the2p
series(2ps 3p configuration) by
the level-crossing technique
arereported.
We have determinedthe
position
of thelevel-crossings
between thehyper-
fine sublevels of the
2P2, 2p4, 2ps, 2p6, 2?~, 2p8
states and deduced their
magnetic dipolar
and electricquadrupolar hyperfine
interaction constants a and b.The metastable
(and excited)
states werepopulated by
a R.F.discharge (frequency
1MHz),
andalignment
was induced with a
linearly polarized
CWdye
lasertuned on one of the transitions between the Is states and the state under
investigation.
The transitions weused are
given
in Table I. Theirwavelengths
are allin the laser
spectral
range coveredby
Rhodamine 6G.The laser was a Coherent Radiation
jet
streamdye
laser. Thecavity length
had been increased up to 1.5 mby moving
theoutput
mirror further off. Thus the number ofmodes
in theDoppler profile
wasincreased and the
pumping signal
was much lesssensitive to
intensity
fluctuations between modes andto the
frequency
drift of these modes. The width of the emission spectrum of thedye laser,
in which thewavelength
selection is determinedby
the use of aLyot filter,
varied between 10 and 40GHz, depending
on theoutput power; thus the spectrum
of
thepumping light
was several times broader than thehyperfine
structure and Zeeman
separations.
FIG. 1. - Sketch of the experimental set-up.
A sketch of the
experimental
set-up is shown infigure
1. The cellcontaining
neon, or a mixture ofhelium and neon, was illuminated
by
the laser beamTABLE I
Pumpin-a llnc’,s ii,vt-,d in our experinients for the 2p levels
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyslet:0197500360306500
perpendicular
to the laserpolarization (o Q »
pump-ing).
Themagnetic
field wasswept
around agiven
value with
auxiliary
coils. The fluorescencelight
was detected
perpendicularly
to themagnetic
fieldin two
directions, parallel (7~)
andperpendicular (11)
to the laser
polarization.
The laser waschopped
at360 Hz and a lock-in
technique
was used to monitorthe difference
Iii - Il. Experimental
curves areshown in
figures
2 and 3.’
FIG. 2. - Recording of 2ps C1 crossing in 1.4 torr of neon.
FIG. 3. - Recording of the 2P6 level-crossings. For accurate deter-
mination of the h.f.s., the region around each crossing was observed
~
with a narrow magnetic field sweep.
In this
geometry only
Am = 2level-crossings
canbe observed and show up as lorentzian
absorption
curves. For the J =- 1 levels there are two such cross-
ings (I
=2) (Cl
andC2),
one of which(C2)
is 21 times less intense and 7 times broader than the other. We had to store thesignal during
several hours in a multi- channelanalyser
in order to observe it. For the J = 2levels,
there are seven Am = 2crossings.
As the last rone is much less intense than the
other,
we didnot study
it. Severalphenomena
can introduce an asym-metry
in the curves.First,
if there is aslight
error in thedetection directions of the fluorescence
light,
a dis-persion
curve issuperimposed
on theabsorption
curve. Second in
high magnetic fields,
when themetastable state
(ls5
orls3)
wassufficiently populated,
ing
thelength
of the cell. In addition to theseexperi-
mental causes, there can be more fundamental defor- mations of the resonance curves. The
energies
of thelevels do not vary
strictly linearly
with themagnetic
field near the
level-crossing point.
When one takesinto account the curvature of the
levels,
onegets
aslight
shift of the lorentzianabsorption
curve and anadditional
dispersion
curve. In our case, one cancalculate that the shift is at most 5 x
10-3
of the width of thelevel-crossing signal (1),
and that the relativeamplitude
of thedispersion
curve is of theorder of 1
%.
Anotherperturbation
is due to thevariation of wave-functions with the
magnetic
field.These variations also introduce a
dispersion
curvewith relative
amplitude
of a fewpercent.
In view of the above reasons, we made acomputer
fit of theexperimental
curves to a sum ofabsorption
anddispersion shapes
ofadjustable heights,
and withthe same width and center. The fit to the
dispersion
curve is
only significant
when thesignal
to noiseratio is
sufficiently large.
In the other cases, we took into account apossible
asymmetry inevaluating
theaccuracy of our results. The effects of the variation of the
discharge
level withmagnetic field,
and thewings
of theneighbouring level-crossings
have alsobeen taken into account in the computer fit.
We have
measured
theposition
of each level-crossing
under variousexperimental
conditions(neon
and helium pressures,
discharge level,
laserintensity).
No
significant
shifts appear in our results.Examples
of such measurements are
given
in Tables II and IIIfor the
2ps
and2ps
levels. A computer calculation allows one to find the values of~j
andb/g J
whichminimize the mean square deviation of the calculated
positions
of thelevel-crossings
from theexperimental
data. Tables II and III also
give
thesea/g J
andb/g J
values and the
positions
of thelevel-crossings
calcu-lated with these values. All the calculated
positions
agree with the
experimental
results within the errorbars. This is not
surprising
when there areonly
twocrossings,
but this fact shows that there is noimportant systematic
error on theposition
of eachcrossing
whena and b are determined from the
positions
of six level-crossings.
Table IVgives
the~j, blgf
and a and bvalues for all the
investigated
levels. To deduce the a and bvalues,
we used gJ values from the litterature[5].
Theoretical considerations show that the fine struc- ture
decoupling
corrections can beneglected
for themagnetic
fields we used. Let uspoint
out that ourexperiments give only
the relativesign
of a and b.We assumed the
sign
of a asgiven
eitherby previous
e) Except for the 2p2 level-crossing. The corresponding correc-
tion has been taken into account in the results given in Table IV.
TABLE II
Crossings of
the2ps
level(J
=1).
AsC2
is much moredifficult
to observe thanCl,
it has beenstudied in less various
experimental conditions ;
the a and b values have beencalculated from
the meanvalues
of
thepositions of C1
andC2.
TABLE III
Crossings of
the2ps
level(J
=2)
TABLE - IV
Hyperfine
structures’
Note. - We were not able to observe the second level crossing (C2). But calculation shows that if b is small, the position of C1 depends significantly only on a. Reciprocally, if b is small, a is given by the position of Cl. Here we assumed (in agreement with the theoretical
prediction) that b a/20.
References
[1]
LIBERMAN, S.,
LIBERMAN, S., Thesis Paris Physica69 (1973)
(1971).598.[2] CHAMPEAU, R. J., KELLER, J. C., J. Phys. B 6 (1973) L 76.
[3] RASMUSSEN,
E., MIDDELBOE,
V., Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid.Selsk. 32 (1960).
[4] GROSOF, G. M., BUCK, P., LICHTEN, W., RABI, I. I., Phys. Rev.
Lett. 1 (1958) 214.
[5] PINNINGTON, E. H., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57 (1967) 271.
[6] GIACOBINO-FoURNIER, E., C.
R.
Hebd. Séan. Acad. Sci. 276(1973) B 535.