• Aucun résultat trouvé

Bitung as a future Hub port in the eastern part of Indonesia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Bitung as a future Hub port in the eastern part of Indonesia"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Bitung as a Future Hub Port in The Eastern Part of Indonesia

Prasetyadi(a), Rheo Hary Widianto(b)

(a)Assistant Senior Manager, Indonesia Port Coorporation IV (b)Staff of Port Planning, Indonesia Port Coorporation IV

Abstract

The issue of the development in eastern part of Indonesia is complicated. For the last 10 years, the eastern part of Indonesia has become a central point in the context of national development, considering its limitations in several economy and social sectors. In spite of its abundant natural resources, in some aspects of development the eastern part of Indonesia is left behind the western part, indicated as follows : a. Respectively only 15% and 9% of the local and foreign investment is absorbed in this area, while the rest is given to the western area.; b.The quality of human resource in eastern part of Indonesia is below the national average. One of the dominant constraints faced by the eastern part of Indonesia in economic development is that export commodities from this area should go first to Tanjung Priok in Jakarta and Tanjung Perak in Surabaya, while in fact it is nearer for the cargo to reach their destination countries, especially in Asia Pacific region, from the eastern part of Indonesia. It resulted in the high transportation cost and it is difficult for products from the eastern Indonesia to compete in the global market, as well.

1.Preface

1.1.General

Tarakan

Sorong Biak

Jayapura Pantoloa

n Kendari Makassar

Ambon

Indonesia Port Corporation I Indonesia Port Corporation II Indonesia Port Corporation III Indonesia Port Corporation IV

Samarind a

Merauke Gorontalo rnateTe

Fak-Fak Manokwar Parepare i

Balikpapan

Bitung Nunukan

INDONESIA PORT CORPORATION IV

Figure 1. Areas of Indonesia Port Corporation (IPC)

(2)

1.2.Container Movement In Indonesia

Figure 2.Existing Condition of Container Sea Transportation Network

Table 1. Container Traffic at Major Port In Indonesia YEAR (TEUs)

No NAME OF

PORTS 2000 2001 2002 2003* REMARKS

A. IPC I :

1 Belawan 312.781 372.883 408.666 437.847 2 Pekanbaru 86.721 98.354 117.946 170.366

3 Dumai 464 170 217 313

Total IPC I : 399.966 471.407 526.829 608.527

B. IPC II :

1 Tanjung Priok 2.494.596 2.524.396 2.607.144 2.968.230 2 Panjang 7.690 76.469 76.134 103.782 3 Pontianak 83.093 100.813 112.240 121.206

Total IPC II : 2.585.379 2.701.678 2.795.518 3.193.218

C. IPC III :

1 TPKS Semarang 0 135.467 315.071 320.000 2 Tanjung Perak 305.514 399.928 341.480 586.432 3 Banjarmasin 0 138.840 149.302 159.500

4 Benoa 0 19.972 22.413 24.500

5 Sampit 0 11.188 18.276 20.453

6 Tenau Kupang 0 7.840 8.865 10.750 7 TPS Surabaya 0 876.136 936.166 1.500.000 8 BJTI Surabaya 0 0 511.953 682.600 Total IPC III : 305.514 1.589.371 2.303.526 3.304.235

D. IPC IV :

7 Makassar 164.684 177.416 208.384 221.479 8 Bitung 66.737 80.386 84.680 87.894 9 Balikpapan 22.401 34.210 52.632 55.540 10 Samarinda 68.685 71.618 88.043 132.887 Total IPC IV : 322.507 363.630 433.739 497.800 Total IPC I ~ IV 3.613.366 5.126.086 6.059.612 7.603.780

*estimated

(3)

Table 2. Container handling movement by composition in Indonesia

CONTAINER TRAFFIC 2003

8%

42%

43%

7%

IPC I IPC II IPC III IPC IV

2.The Existing Condition of Bitung Port

2.1.Existing Port Facilities

Container Terminal

Wharf 130 M

Stacking Yard 44.000 M2 Traditional Wharf 60 M

CFS 42 X 30 M2

Head Truck and Chasis

1 UNIT

Top Lifter 1 UNIT

Forklift 5 Ton 4 UNIT Tug Boat 1.500 HP 1 UNIT Mooring Boat 160

HP

1 UNIT

Pilot Boat 1 UNIT

Wharf

- Ocean Going 605 M

- Domestic 602 M

- Chemical Industry 146 M

- Traditional 60 M

Container Wharf

- Conblock Yard 27.311 M2 - Hotmix Yard 2.735 M2 Transhit shed 13.392 M2 Passenger Terminal 3.195 M2 Mobile Crane 25 Ton 1 Unit Reach Stacker 42

Ton

1 Unit Forklift 5, 3, & 2 Ton @1 Unit Fire Fighting 25 Ton 1 Unit

Tronton 18 Ton 2 Unit

Electricity 99 KVA

Water Supply (owned)

200 Ton/Hour Water Supply (PAM) 100 Ton/Hour Tug Boat (1.160 HP) 2 Unit

Pilot Boat 2 Unit

Barge 1 Unit

Conventional Terminal

Reach Stacker, 48 Ton 1 Unit Crane Mobile, 150 Ton

& 25 Ton

2 Unit Forklift 28 Ton 3 Unit Forklift 7, 3.5 & 2

Ton

@1 Unit Forklift 5 Ton 4 Unit Forklift 3 Ton 3 Unit

(4)

WINARSO TRISALYONO WINARSO TRISALYONO ASM. PLAN OF PORT FACILITY

SM. PORT DEVELOPTMENT

TECHNICAL DIRECTOR

LOCATION SUDARMADJI SUDARMADJI ACKNOWLEDGED/AGREED CHECKED BY/AGREED BY KUSMAHADI SJ DEBBY DUAKAJU RHEO HARY WIDIANTO

SUPERVISOR BY DRAFTER

PO RT O F B ITUN G EXIS TIN G 2 0 0 3 PICTURE OF

SCALE 4 TIERS

4 X 9 4 X 9 GS GS4 X 9 GS 4 X 1 4 X 10 GS0 GS 4 X 10 GS

4 X 1 4 X 0 GS 10 GS 4 X 10 G

S

182 6015

225 150

11 14 13

10 9

7 10 12

8 6

LAND WORKING BOUNDARY 300 dm

150 dm 100 dm 80 dm 150 dm

100 dm

80 dm

70 dm

60 dm 50 dm

30 dm

1

2 5 2

2

4 3 3

3

3

3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3

PO RT O F B ITU N G

EXIS TIN G 2 0 0 3

140

10

22 175

250 242 190

205

145

1. PASSENGER TERMINAL 2. CONVENTIONAL YARD 3. SHEDS 4. OFFICE IPC IV 5. NAVIGATION OFFICE 6. C F S 7. PARKING AREA 8. OFFICE AREA 9. GATE 10. OFFICE AREA 11. MULTI PURPOSE AREA 12. ASDP AREA 13. TREATMENT PLANT AREA 14. CONTAINER YARD

PARKING AREA

OFFICE AREA SHEEDS

PASSENGER TERMINAL EXISTING WHARF YARD

Table 3. Container handling movement by composition in Indonesia

2.2.Container Traffics Container Cargoes at Bitung Port

0 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 70.000 80.000 90.000

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

TEU's

Figure3 Container Cargo Throughput at Bitung Port (TEU’s) (1993-2002)

(5)

0 200.000 400.000 600.000 800.000 1.000.000 1.200.000

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

Ton

Figure 4 Container Cargo Throughput at Bitung Port (Ton) (1993-2002)

Table 4 Container Cargo Traffic at the ports of Bitung,

Balikpapan, Samarinda, Tarakan, Pantoloan, Gorontalo, Kendari, Ternate, Ambon

Unit 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Bitung TEUs 3.811 8.576 14.239 19.869 43.760 41.929 48.674 66.737 80.386 83.861 Pantoloan TEUs 44 435 660 1.423 5.977 6.908 8.740 15.083 20.791 28.348

Gorontalo TEUs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kendari TEUs 211 295 804 1.467 2.502 74 40 0 6.216 8.216 Ternate TEUs 422 550 1.608 2.734 4.914 4.244 5.068 2.112 2.504 3.691 Ambon TEUs 971 1.207 2.124 7.257 15.092 13.630 6.634 12.607 18.452 21.139

Tarakan TEUs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.014 17.454

Balikpapan TEUs 3.111 4.133 4.245 7.641 28.583 13.435 20.684 22.401 34.210 52.632 Samarinda TEUs 1.513 1.296 1.450 28.499 52.413 50.548 54.569 68.685 71.618 88.043 TOTAL TEUs 57.079 90.219 114.469 140.569 245.732 130.768 145.323 189.788 256.088 313.543 3.Bitung Port Developtment Plan

Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan, Hongkong, Vietnam & China

Others

Figure 5 Interaction between Bitung Port and other ports in Container Sea Transportation Network Nearby International Linkage Area

(6)

3.1.Forecasting of Container Cargoes

Table 5 Container Forecast at Bitung, Balikpapan, Samarinda, Ambon, Pantoloan, Ternate, Kendari, Tarakan, Gorontalo

YEAR (TEU's)

2003 2007 2015 2020 2025

BITUNG 87.894 128.686 553.325 891.135 1.137.339 AMBON 25.764 53.424 123.118 198.283 319.337 PANTOLOAN 31.007 43.769 87.212 140.456 179.262

TERNATE 4.462 6.533 14.004 22.553 33.020

KENDARI 10.498 15.370 22.709 28.983 36.990

TARAKAN 16.909 18.303 39.234 63.186 101.762 GORONTALO 12.428 16.565 24.474 31.236 39.865 BALIKPAPAN 55.540 81.918 107.378 140.750 182.041 SAMARINDA 132.887 160.369 228.508 295.814 386.059 TOTAL 377.389 524.936 1.199.961 1.812.396 2.415.675

- 500 1.000 1.500 2.000

2.500 TEU's (Thousands)

2002 2003 2007 2015 2020 2025

Container Forecast

SAMARINDA BALIKPAPAN GORONTALO

TARAKAN TERNATE PANTOLOAN AMBON BITUNG

2007-2 015

2003 2007-2015 2015-2025

1. PASSENGER TERMINAL 2. CONVENTIONAL YARD 3. FOYER 4. PARKING AREA PASSENGER 5. OFFICE AREA 6. PARKING AREA TRUCK 7. CONTAINER YARD 8. GATE 9. OFFICE AREA 10. MULTI PURPOSE AREA 11. AREA ASDP 12. WASTE TREATMENT PLAN 13. SHEED 14. MULTIPURPOSE YARD 15. C F S 16. ENTITY INDUSTRY ZONA

BENGKEL Rumah Dinas Bea & Cukai Rumah Dinas Bea & Cukai Rumah Dinas Manager PBAU Rumah Dinas PELKAP

KANTOR MESJI D ADPEL (1.122 M2) Rumah Dinas Jabatan General Manager PT. PELINDO IV Cab Bitung

RM Sri Rumah Dinas Manager Teknik Rumah Dinas Manager PBAU

Lapangan Tennis

Backup Area Stage 1

Backup Area Stage 2

16

ZONA INDUSTRI ENTITY

275 M

225 M 150 M

SCALE 5 14 14 14

14 117 M

190 M 242 M 175 M

205 M 250 M 22 M

10 M140 M145 M

LOA = 200 M (KA PAL G EN CARGO / PETI KEM

AS)

60 M15

9 15 8 6 12 10

11 9 9

LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS) LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS) LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS) LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

LOA = 200 M (KAPA L G EN CARGO / PETI KEMAS) LOA = 125 M

(KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMA

S)

70 dm

60 dm

LOA = 125 M(KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS) LOA = 125 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

200 M

LOA = 200 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

LOA = 200 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

LOA = 200 M (KAPAL GEN CARGO / PETI KEMAS)

LOA = 144 M (KAPAL PENUMPANG) LOA = 144 M (KAPAL PENUMPANG)

ZONA LIQUID

ADDITIONAL WHARF MID TERM (2007 - 2015) 7

4

5 5 5

Ø 1 5Ø 1 5Ø 1 5

Ø 15Ø 15Ø 15

Ø 15 Ø 15 Ø 15

Ø 15 Ø 15 Ø 15 Ø 15

Ø 15Ø 15Ø 15Ø 15

Ø 15 Ø 15

RECEIVING STATION Ø 1 5

Ø 9Ø 9

Ø 9Ø 9Ø 9

Ø 15 Ø 15

Ø 15Ø 15

Ø 1 5

BANGUNAN SERBA GUNA KANTOR REFINERY WARE HOUSE CT Ø 9Ø 9 RECEIVING WAREHOUSE

PT JAYA TRADE POWER BOIRER HOUSE PROCESSING PLANT & GUDANG BUNGKIL

PT SEMEN TONASA 3 x 216 GS

3 x 252 GS

400 M 400 M

LAND WORKING BOUNDARY OF BITUNG PORT 300 dm

150 dm 100 dm 80 dm 150 dm

100 dm

80 dm 70 dm

60 dm 50 dm

30 dm

1 2

2 13

3

PO RT O F B ITUN G

mas t er pl an (Up t o 2 0 2 5 )

PARKING AREA

OFFICE AREA SHEEDS

PICTURE OF PASSENGER TERMINAL

PO RT O F B ITUN G mas t er pl an (Up t o 2 0 2 5 )

EXISTING WHARF YARD

DRAFTER

SUPERVISOR BY RHEO HARY WIDIANTO DEBBY DUAKAJU

KUSMAHADI SJ CHECKED BY/AGREED BY

ACKNOWLEDGED/AGREED

SUDARMADJI SUDARMADJI LOCATION

TECHNICAL DIRECTOR SM. PORT DEVELOPTMENT ASM. PLAN OF PORT FACILITY

WINARSO TRISALYONO WINARSO TRISALYONO

(7)

Table 6 Required Berth

Year 2008 2013 2018 2023 2028

Container Volume TEU 154.000 202.000 264.000 342.000 439.000

No. of required berth 2 2 2 2 3

Mobile crane 2 2 2 2 2

No. of crane

Gantry Crane 2 2 2 2 4

Berth Capacity TEU 362.000 362.000 362.000 362.000 588.000

Developtment of Bitung Port in short term operated up to 2015:

Infrastructures :

1) Container wharf : 130 m’;

handling capacity : 300,000 teus/year 2) Container Yard : 31.000 m2 CY capacity (4

staking) : 200.000 teus/year 3) Truck parking area : 2.450 m2

4) Office : - CFS

- WRF (waste processing building)

Port Handling equipments :

1) Container Crane : 1 unit 2) Transtainer : 2 unit 3) Head Truck : 4 unit 4) Chassis : 8 units 5) Forklift 7 ton : 1 units 6) Reefer Plug : 16 plugs Criteria of Vessel will be handle of New Container

Terminal in Bitung Port : - GT = 20.000 - LOA = 201 m - Draft = 16 m

- Capacity of Container ship = 1.500 TEUs

4.The Opportunity of Bitung Port to be a Hub Port

Figures 6 Indonesian Navigation Channel

(8)

Table 7 Gross Regional Domestic Products (GRDP) of North Sulawesi Province at Constant Prices by Origin

Year (Million Rp.(1993 Prices)) No

Industrial

Origin 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 Agriculture 775,1 829,8 902,0 974,3 1006,1 1004,9 1046,2 1101,8 882,6

a) food Crop 303,0 320,4 337,8 356,7 347,4 325,6 342,9 346,7 272,6 b) Plantation 263,7 277,1 302,6 324,2 343,7 366,3 358,6 381,6 391,2

c) Livestock &

Products 58,7 60,5 72,6 80,9 84,3 75,0 75,0 84,5 65,4 d) Foresty 65,6 74,4 81,4 90,7 103,5 105,4 102,8 99,3 12,3 e) Fishery 84,0 97,5 107,6 121,7 127,2 132,7 166,9 189,7 141,1 2

Mining &

Quarrying 96,9 111,9 119,5 179,5 192,1 229,4 279,1 315,3 252,2 3

Manufacturing

& Processing Industries (non

gas/oil) 238,3 260,5 286,9 315,8 336,3 353,8 371,2 395,2 301,7 4

Elect, gas &

Watersupply 16,9 18,8 22,0 25,2 28,0 29,2 31,2 32,6 27,1 5

Trade, Restaurant &

Hotel 302,9 337,4 378,2 441,7 435,3 461,6 488,4 521,5 415,2 6

Transport &

Communication 391,3 414,4 456,2 493,2 526,9 540,0 561,9 587,5 539,5 7

Banking &

financial

services 151,4 164,5 176,5 190,7 200,5 87,5 121,2 141,2 99,3 a) Banking 57,1 64,4 68,9 75,6 78,2 -27,3 0,2 15,0 3,3 b) Non Banking 9,9 10,4 11,1 11,8 12,6 11,5 12,2 12,8 9,2 c) Rental &

Company

Services 84,4 89,7 96,6 103,3 109,7 103,2 108,8 113,4 86,8 8 Properties 7

Construstion 302,2 331,9 364,7 400,7 432,1 363,2 367,4 379,8 341,1 9 Public Admin

& Defense 531,8 548,9 565,8 583,6 497,7 497,1 505,3 515,5 403,1 10

Services (Private/Social

& Recreation) 94,8 97,7 101,4 105,0 112,1 111,2 117,7 126,8 95,7 TOTAL 2.901,8 3.115,9 3.373,4 3.709,7 3.767,0 3.677,9 3.889,7 4.117,1 3.357,5

(9)

Figure 7 Interaction - Connection of Bitung Port

4.1.Manufacturing

The manufacturing of hinterland bitung came from port of Ambon, Ternate Î Agriculture, industry & mining product

East Kalimantan (Samarinda, Balikpapan, Tarakan, Nunukan) also has significant contributions for cargo to port of Bitung such as world products, coal, oil & containerization plywood.

Strenght of Bitung Port

1. Located directly alongside the Pacific Ocean;

2. Natural port;

3. Suitable infrastructure and superstructure available;

4. Located in Indonesian Navigation Channel 4.2.The Fundamentals Factor to be a Hub Port

Based on the above explanation, question occurs is “Is Bitung Port possible to become a hub ports in Indonesia?

There are fundamental factors required to be considered : a.Geographical position and location

Positioned at 01°26’00’’ N and 125°11’00’’ E, in the island of Sulawesi, closed with the Philippines, and having the nearest distance to Europe and Asia Pacific. As one of ports in Indonesia located at Navigation Channels 2 (ALKI 2), Bitung Port is very strategic as Makassar Strait is in the center of Indonesia archipelago, connecting the western with the eastern region of Indonesia.

Taking the strategic position into consideration, in the future Bitung Port will be prepared to become an hub port handling local cargo transportation, and a transshipment port, supported also by the potential of hinterland and surrounding ports.

b.Hydro oceanography of Bitung Port Navigation Channel :

The length of the channels is 9 mile, width 600 meters and the depth 12 to 15 m LWS. And the condition of sea bed is Sand/Clay.

Basin :

(10)

Bitung port has a basin with the total area 4,5 hectares, and the draught - 7,00 to – 15,00 m LWS. The draught can be handle the container vessel, with capacity more than 3,000 teu (40,000 DWT).

c.Cargo potential surrounding Port of Bitung

The cargo flow within the period of 1993 to 2002 through other ports around Bitung such as Gorontalo, Pantoloan, Ambon, Ternate, Kendari, Tarakan and in Bitung itself indicated an average increase of 5% per year, meaning that interisland trading activities in the eastern part of Indonesia was quite promising.

d.Hinterland & hinter island potentials and growth of areas

The potentials hinterland & hinter island of Bitung Port support the development of the port, indicated by the crop products according to GRDP data of agriculture, fishery, forestry, mining, processing, water supply products, hotel and tourism as well as transportation and communication infrastructure, in which it indicated a significant growth between 4 – 6% per year.

It can be concluded that the economic activities in North Sulawesi, particularly in the city of Bitung, can be expected to support the development of Bitung Port to become an international hub port.

e.Supports from other ports in Indonesia and other countries

Developing Bitung Port also relies on the contributions given by the surrounding ports. So it is expected that the whole cargo, exported or imported to/from countries in the regions of Asia Pacific, Europe, and Southeast Asia can be collected at Bitung Port to be distributed according to the destinations.

5.Conclusion

The first stage Construction of Container Terminal of Bitung Port will be finished at the end of 2003. That new facilities will encourage the container movement particularly in the eastern part of Indonesia, and even accelerate the optimum use of Indonesian Navigation Channel (ALKI) II.

It is required to involve capable investors to make a new network in container movement pattern in the eastern part of Indonesia.

Advantages gained from making Bitung Port a hub port, idest.

As a trigger the development of eastern areas of Indonesia so they can accelerate the regional development like in the western part of Indonesia for the future.

6.Références

1 Biro Rinbang, (2003). Traffic Container and General Cargo In Indonesia Port Corporation IV in 2003. IPC IV.

2 Technical Direktorat, (2003). Master Plan of Indonesia Port Corporation IV. IPC IV.

3 Bitung Local Government, (2003). Bitung in Statistics. Statistics Center..

Références

Documents relatifs

The quantity of collected materials (more than 400 pages of transcript) led us to perform content analyses according to the following model: we cut each interview according

GHAR EL MELH Port côtier KALAAT ANDALOUS Port côtier LA GOULETTE Port hauturier SIDI DAOUD Port côtier KELIBIA Port hauturier BENI KHIAR Port côtier. HAMMAMET Port

The Catalyst 6500/6000 series switches come with an accessory kit that contains the cable and adapters you need to connect a console (an ASCII terminal or a PC that runs

Ces ouvrages appelés « Résonateurs » et mis au point au Laboratoire National d'Hydraulique de Chatou, utilisent le caractère ondulatoire de la houle pour la réfléchir sans

Puis complète le tableau avec leurs noms en utilisant les numéros.. La préservation du littoral

The preset is used to negate the AREQB signal and to hold it negated for the required AREQB negated pulse width as specified by the DP8422A.. AS is also used to preset this signal

Ce hub USB-C à 3 ports alimenté par bus se branche sur le port USB Type-C™ ou Thunderbolt™ 3 de votre périphérique, ajoutant ainsi un port Ethernet Gigabit, un port USB-C et

Developing tourism on the Port au Port Peninsula may assist in furthering the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Tourism, Culture and Recreation’s tourism goals for the