• Aucun résultat trouvé

Appendix E: Participating Institutions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Appendix E: Participating Institutions"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Participating Institutions

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO

Brown (BLLIP)* USA X

California State U.

San Marcos

USA X

Charles Univ. – Prague* Czech Rep. X X

Ching Yun Univ.* Taiwan X

DFKI-Artificial Intelligence

Germany

X

Dokuz Eylul U. Turkey X

Dublin City U. Ireland X X X

Fondazione Buno Kessler - TCC

Italy

X Helsinki Univ.

Technology*

Canada

X

Hungarian Acad. Sci. Hungary X X

IDIAP Research Inst-* Switzerland X

Imperial College London UK X X

INAOE- Ist. Nac.

Astrofisica, Optica, Electronica

Mexico

X X Indian Statistical Inst. India X

Indian Inst. Technology (IIT-Bombay)*

India

X Indian Inst. Technology

(IIT-Kharagpur)*

India

X Inst. Superior Técníco

(DEI-IST)*

Portugal

X Int. Inst. Information

Tech. (IIIT-Hyderabad) India

X

IPAL-CNRS (IR2) Singapore X

IRIT / SIG Toulouse France X

Jadavpur University* India X

Johns Hopkins U. USA X

Language Computer Corp

USA X

LIMSI-CNRS France X

Linguateca-SINTEF Norway X

Linguit Ltd* UK X

Microsoft Asia China X X

Microsoft India* India X

MIRACLE - Daedalus &

Madrid Univs

Spain

X X X Moscow State U.-

Computing

Russia

X X MRIM Group – LIG,

Grenoble*

France

X

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO

*indicates new groups

(2)

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO

Nanyang Tech. Univ.* Singapore X

Nat. Inst.Informatics Japan X

Nat.Taiwan U. Taiwan X

Open Text Corp* Canada X

Oregon Health & Sci. U. USA X

Priberam Informatica Portugal X

Research Inst. for AI of Romaian Academy*

Romania X

RWTH Aaachen-HLT. Germany X

RWTH Aachen - Med.Inf. Germany X

SUNY Buffalo USA X

SYNAPSE France X

Tech.U. Chemnitz Germany X X

Tokyo Inst.Technology Japan X

U. & U.Hospitals Geneva Switzerland X

U.Alicante – Comp. Sci Spain X X X

U.Alicante – NLP Spain X

U.AI.I Cuza Iasi Romania X

U.Amsterdam The

Netherlands X X X

U.Basel* Switzerland X

U.Chicago USA X

U.Concordia - CINDI Canada X X

U.Concordia –CLAC* Canada X

U.Coruna & U.Sunderland ES/UK X

U.Evora Portugal X

U.Freiburg – Pattern Recog.

Germany

X U.Groningen – Inf. Science The

Netherlands X X

U.Groningen – Math & CS The

Netherlands X

U.Hagen Germany X X

U.Hildesheim Germany X X

U.Indonesia Indonesia X X X X

U.Jaen Spain X X X X

U.Liege Belgium X

U.Lisbon Portugal X X

U. Macquarie* Australia X

U. Nacional Colombia* Colombia X

U.Neuchatel Switzerland X X

U. Nottingham* UK X

U.Ottawa Canada X

U.Politecnica Catalunya Spain X X

U.Politecnica Valencia Spain X X

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO

*indicates new groups

(3)

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO

U. Porto Portugal X

U.Salamanca – REINA Spain X X

U.Stockholm Sweden X

U.Tampere Finland X

U.West Bohemia CzechRep X X

U.Wolverhampton UK X

UC Berkeley USA X X X

UNED-LSI Spain X

Vienna Univ. Technology* Austria X

Xerox XRCE France X X

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO

*indicates new groups

Références

Documents relatifs

Brown’s entry to the Cross-Language Speech Retrieval (CL-SR) track at the 2007 Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) 1 was based on the language model (LM) paradigm for

In Prague02 they were constructed from lemmas (to match the lemmatized documents) and their synonyms and in Prague03 with the use of “stems“ and wildcard operators to cover all

Like many state of the art QA systems base their performance on Named Entity Recognition (NER) [10, 3] as well as on precise linguistic information [2, 4], in order to build QA@L 2 F

A combination of the text, description and nar- rative fields of the topic has been employed to perform the information retrieval process according to the submitted runs.. The rules

We submitted three officially scored runs for Czech: umd.all used all available fields (both automatically and manually generated, in both English and Czech), umd.asr used only

[r]

[r]

Each one of the terms of the topic in the logic form can modify its weight term according to the type of assert of the term in the logic form and the relationships between these