• Aucun résultat trouvé

Appendix F: Partecipating Institutions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Appendix F: Partecipating Institutions"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

CLEF 2008 - Participating Institutions

Participant Country AdHoc Dom

Spec iCLEF QA Image CLEF

Web CLEF

Geo CLEF

Video CLEF

Morpho Chall. INFILE

Bulgarian Acad. Sci. Bulgaria

X

Cal. State - San Marcos USA

X

Carnegie Mellon U. USA

X

CEA-LIST France

X

Charles University Czech Rep.

X

CWI Netherlands

X

DFKI-Artificial Intelligence

Germany

X X

Dublin City U. Ireland

X X

Hungarian Acad. Sci. Hungary

X

IDIAP Research Inst- Switzerland

X

Imperial College UK

X X

INAOE-Ist. Nac.Astro- fisica, Optica, Electro.

Mexico

X X X X

Indian Statistical Inst. India

X

INESC-ID – Spoken Languages Lab.

Portugal

X

INESC-ID – Data

Management & IR

Portugal

X

Int. Inst. Information

Tech. (IIIT-Hyderabad) India

X

IPAL/IMAG-CNRS

(IR2)

France/Singap

ore

X X

IRIT/SIG Toulouse France

X

Johns Hopkins U. USA

X X

Know-Center Austria

X

Lab. LIG France

X X

LIMSI-CNRS France

X

Linguateca-SINTEF Norway

X

LINA-Nantes France

X

LSIS-CNRS France

X

Macedonian &

Slovenian U. Team

Macedonia/

Slovenia

X

Manchester Metropolitan U.

UK

X

Microsoft Asia China

X

MIRACLE – Daedalus

& Madrid Univs.

Spain

X X X

Nat. Inst.Informatics Japan

X

Nat. Inst. Health USA

X

Nat.Taiwan U. Taiwan

X

Open Text Corp Canada

X

Open University UK

X

Oregon Health & Sci.

U.

USA

X

Participant Country AdHoc Dom

Spec iCLEF QA Image CLEF

Web CLEF

Geo CLEF

Video CLEF

Morpho Chall INFILE

(2)

Participant Country AdHoc Dom

Spec iCLEF QA Image CLEF

Web CLEF

Geo CLEF

Video CLEF

Morpho Chall INFILE

Priberam Informatica Portugal

X

Research Inst. for AI Romania

X

RWTH Aachen-HLT. Germany

X

RWTH Aachen - Med.Inf.

Germany

X

Swedish Institute for

Computer Science

Sweden

X

SYNAPSE France

X

Tech. U. Chemnitz Germany

X X X X X

Tech. U. Darmstadt Germany

X

Tech. U. Helsinki Finland

X

Tel Aviv U. Israel

X

Telecom, Paris Tech France

X

TextMess Spain

X X

U. & U.Hospitals Geneva

Switzerland

X

U. Aberta Portugal X

U. Alicante - GPLSI Spain

X

U. Alicante – Software and Comp. Systems

Spain

X X X X

U. AI.I Cuza Iasi Romania

X

U. Amsterdam Netherlands

X X

U. Banjaluka Bosnia and

Herzegovina

X

U. Bari Italy

X

U. Basel Switzerland

X

U. Basque Country Spain

X X

UC Berkeley USA

X X X

U. Complutense de Madrid

Spain

X

U. Concordia –CLAC Canada

X

U. Cordoba Argentina

X

U. Evora Portugal

X

U. Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Brasil

X

U. Geneva Switzerland

X X X

U. Groningen Netherlands

X

U. Hagen Germany

X X

U. Hildesheim Germany

U. Jaen Spain

X X X X X

U. Jean Monnet France

X

U. Karlsruhe Germany

X

U. Koblenz-Landau Germany

X

U. Lisbon Portugal

X

U. Makere Uganda

X

U. Maryland & US Gov. USA

X

U. Meiji Japan

X

Participant Country AdHoc Dom

Spec iCLEF QA Image CLEF

Web CLEF

Geo CLEF

Video CLEF

Morpho Chall INFILE

(3)

Participant Country AdHoc Dom

Spec iCLEF QA Image CLEF

Web CLEF

Geo CLEF

Video CLEF

Morpho Chall INFILE

U.Nacional Colombia Colombia

X

UNED-LSI Spain

X X

U. Neuchatel Switzerland

X X

U. Ottawa Canada

X

U. Padova Italy

X

U. Peking China

X

U. Pittsburg USA

X

UPMC-LIP6 France

X

U. Politecnica Catalunya

Spain

X

U. Politecnica Valencia Spain

X X

U. Porto Portugal

X

U. Salamanca Spain

X

U. Sheffield UK

X X

U. Tehran1, NLP Iran

X

U. Tehran2, IRDB Iran

X

U. Tehran3, Electrical

Computing 1.

Iran

X

U. Tehran4, NLPDB Iran

X

U.Tehran6-NLPDB2 Iran

X

U. Twente Netherlands

X X

U. Tilberg Netherlands

X

U. Waseda Japan

X

U.Wolverhampton UK

X

U. York UK

X

Xerox SAS (CACAO) EU Project

X

Xerox XRCE France

X X

Participant Country AdHoc Dom

Spec iCLEF QA Image CLEF

Web CLEF

Geo CLEF

Video CLEF

Morpho Chall INFILE

Références

Documents relatifs

The least complicated solution is to translate questions from one language to the other (for example, using the Systran machine translation system) and to feed the translated

Like many state of the art QA systems base their performance on Named Entity Recognition (NER) [10, 3] as well as on precise linguistic information [2, 4], in order to build QA@L 2 F

passage retrieval, where the passages with the major probability to contain the answer are recovered from the document collections; question classification, where the type of

For the Answer Extraction component the distinction consists in different methods of computing the clusters of candidate answers (Group process): for factoid

The AR hands over the eventually reformulated question to the Question Analysis module, which is composed by a Question Analyzer that extracts some constraints to be used in the

Participant Country AdHoc DomSpec QA Image CL-SR Web GEO.. Brown (BLLIP)* USA

Because the version of PowerAnswer used this year is monolingual, the design we used for multilingual question answering involved translating documents dynamically for

(1) incorporation of syntactic knowledge in the IR-engine, (2) incorporation of lexical equivalences, (3) incorporation of coreference resolution for off-line answer extraction,