• Aucun résultat trouvé

Spatial dependence of soil organic carbon, abundance, biomass and diversity of earthworms in 15 temperate agroforestry systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Spatial dependence of soil organic carbon, abundance, biomass and diversity of earthworms in 15 temperate agroforestry systems"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)
(2)

Soil Ecology

Spatial dependence of soil organic carbon,

abundance, biomass and diversity of

earthworms in 15 temperate agroforestry

systems

Kevin Hoeffner

1

, R´

emi Cardinael

2

, Claire Chenu

3

, Tiphaine Chevallier

4

, Camille B´

eral

, Morgane Ollivier

5

, Daniel Cluzeau

6

1 Ecosyst`emes, biodiversit´e, ´evolution (UMR ECOBIO 6553) – Universite de Rennes 1, UMR

6553 CNRS – Bˆatiment 14 - Universit´e de Rennes 1 - Campus de Beaulieu - CS 74205 - 35042 Rennes Cedex - France, France

2 CIRAD-UPR-102 – Centre de coop´eration internationale en recherche agronomique pour le

d´eveloppement [CIRAD] : UPR102 – Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex, France

3 UMR Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Ecotoxicologie des Agro´ecosyst`emes) (UMR Ecosys)

AgroParisTech, Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA) – AgroParisTech Bˆatiment EGER, Campus AgroParisTech Grignon 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France, France

4 Ecologie fonctionnelle et biog´eochimie des sols et des agro-´ecosyst`emes (EcoSols) – Centre de

Coop´eration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le D´eveloppement, Institut de Recherche pour le D´eveloppement, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique : UMR1222,

Centre international d´tudes sup´erieures en sciences agronomiques, Institut national d’´etudes sup´erieures agronomiques de Montpellier, Centre international d´tudes sup´erieures en sciences

agronomiques, Centre international d´tudes sup´erieures en sciences agronomiques, Centre international d´tudes sup´erieures en sciences agronomiques, Centre international d´tudes sup´erieures en sciences agronomiques, Centre international d’´etudes sup´erieures en sciences

agronomiques – place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France, France

5 Ecosyst`emes, biodiversit´e, ´evolution (UMR ECOBIO 6553) – Universite de Rennes 1, UMR

6553 CNRS – Bˆatiment 14 - Universit´e de Rennes 1 - Campus de Beaulieu - CS 74205 - 35042 Rennes Cedex - France, France

6 Ecosyst`emes, biodiversit´e, ´evolution (UMR ECOBIO 6553) – Universite de Rennes 1, UMR

6553 CNRS – Universit´e de Rennes 1 - Station Biologique de Paimpont, Paimpont, France, France

In temperate regions, silvoarable systems associating parallel tree rows and annual intercrops are the most widespread types of agroforestry systems. Earthworms are involved in numerous ecosystem services such as pedogenesis, soil structure, and nutrient cycling. In agricultural landscape, land occupation and management highly influence earthworm communities. The objectives of this study were to i) compare earthworm communities (abundance, biomass and diversity) between agroforestry tree rows, alley and agricultural control systems (treeless) and relate it to the spatial distribution of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) stocks. We used a network of 15 agroforestry French sites arranged on a North/South gradient compris- ing an adjacent agricultural control plot. Agroforestry alleys and control plot have been strictly managed (soil tillage, crop rotation, fertilization) in the same way since the tree planting. Mean earthworm abundance and biomass were significantly higher in the trees rows than in the agroforestry alleys and the agricultural control system across the sites. Earthworm species richness in the tree rows was not significantly different from the agricultural control system but was higher than in the agroforestry alleys across the sites. Interestingly, adult earthworm.

Références

Documents relatifs

Vege- tation surveys were carried out in May 2017 in South-Western France over 16 winter cereal fields (8 alley cropping systems and 8 pure crop controls), either under conventional

Based on a synthesis of the reported observations, we are pre- senting a set of Tier 1 coefficients for biomass C storage for each of the 8 main AFS identified, including

To deter- mine which components of the tree cover composition (species), structure (density, richness, Shannon, Pielou) and agroforest floor (litter more ground cover) best explain

0,0 0,5 1,0 SHDI trees Apple-ring acacias Palmyra palms All trees Neems Saopberry trees Baobabs 25. Effect of trees on

We compared in August 2017 soil fertility from two management levels (organic and conventional, Table 1), both management being declined in three shade trees association:

In Burkina, Mali and Niger, during the inventories made prior to the drafting of the master plans for the wood energy supply of large Sahelian cities, an attempt was made

Fuelwood produced by pollarding in a shea tree parkland, North Cameroon. 3rd European Agroforestry Conference 23-25

However, developing 3(or more)-strata AFS structured around fruit-trees and timber- or nut- trees directly addresses how ecosystem services are managed, especially