• Aucun résultat trouvé

84. Building climate smart pastoralism in the Sahel: ways forward

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "84. Building climate smart pastoralism in the Sahel: ways forward"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Poster Session 3 L3.3 Climate-smart livestock

177

84.

Building climate smart pastoralism in the Sahel: ways forward

Wane Abdrahmane1, Ickowicz Alexandre2, Touré Ibra3

1Drylands Economist, CIRAD-SELMET-PPZS-ILRI, based at ILRI Campus, Old Naivasha Road, PO BOX 30709, Nairobi, Kenya 2Zootechnician, CIRAD-SELMET–PPZS, Campus Montpellier SupAgro-INRA (Bat 22; Bur 59), 2, place P. Viala, 34060

Montpellier cedex 1 France

3Geographer-GIS, CIRAD-SELMET-PPZS-CILSS, based at CILSS, 03 BP: 7049, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

The critical triptych (food security-adaptability-mitigation) that ensures climate smart agriculture is not really reached in Sahelian pastoralism. The major shock remains spatiotemporal variability of rainfalls and temperatures. Deficits that followed 1970s lead to a severe drought that cruelly affected the mixed/lower mobility production systems (100,000 people and third of the cattle died) reverting to a higher mobility system. This appears to be the most effective strategy to sustain pastoralism as the second large-scale drought occurred in 1984 was less destructive. However, the direction of temperature and precipitation change remains unknown especially in Western Africa (Schellnhuber et al., 2013) thus reinforcing global uncertainties in which live pastoralists. Beyond climate variability, Sahelian herders are increasingly confronted to other shocks (commodity price variability and transmission, sanitary risks with re-emerging diseases, misused zoo-sanitary agreements and conventions on cattle marketing and transborder transhumance). Therefore political, socio-economic and ecological events all affected the increasing vulnerability of pastoralists. To build a climate smart pastoralism, it is crucial to integrate uncertainty in the outcomes of improved options (Jeuland and Pattanayak, 2012) and social, economic, political and institutional aspects into diagnosis and resolution of climate change impacts (Wane et al., 2014).

Empirically, we focus in Senegal Sahel with a survey that showed pastoral population strategies before and after the establishment of boreholes in 1956 in changing production systems and mobility schemes. A different history is told according to different sub-steps characterized by climate and economic crises, deregulation of agricultural sector, upgrading and rehabilitation of the livestock sector and food crises.

Références

Documents relatifs

In this review paper, we demonstrated that technologies and practices such as agroforestry, conservation agriculture, crop diversification, climate information services, etc.,

Proceeding of the Workshop  Multifunctionality of pastoralism:   linking global and local strategies through shared visions and methods 

Barreras vivas en granos básicos Selección de semilla en frijol Siembra de leguminosas en asocio con maíz Selección de semilla en maíz Árboles dispersos en granos básicos

Phase 7 can be implemented by the implementers of the innovation platform, but it requires the involvement of stakeholders, both public and private (producers' organizations,

Engineered landscapes that have been reclaimed from the flood plains and wetlands of the Mekong Delta are increasingly threatened by sea level rise, unexpected river flows

I will present documented examples from around the world to show how agroecology contributes to the three priorities of CSA, particularly in the context of

Fire Deforestation Water pollution Deterioration Forest exploitation (paths) Drought Bad practices in water use Water projects for rural development Land planning Legal

In such tropical environments and livestock systems, grassland improvement and changes of management practices are very probably the most effective Climate smart