• Aucun résultat trouvé

Manufacture and characterization of white cheese from camel milk / mineralisation and buffering capacity a comparaison with cow milk

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Manufacture and characterization of white cheese from camel milk / mineralisation and buffering capacity a comparaison with cow milk"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1 UMR 1253 Science and Technology of Milk and Egg, Inra-Agrocampus, 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France 2 Project Camel Center, FAO, AL-KHARJ, Kingdom of Saoudi Arabia

3 CIRAD-ES,TA C-Dir/B Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier cedex, France

B. Camier

1*,

E. Beaucher

1

, F. Gaucheron

1

, G. Konuspayeva

2

and B. Faye

2,3

* : Corresponding author :

Benedicte.camier@rennes.inra.fr

Usually, camel milk is consumed as raw milk, after pasteurization or like fermented beverages (Shubat in Kazakhstan or Chal in Turkmenistan for exemple). An other possible valorisation of camel milk is to transform it in cheese, but the cheese yield was low due to a bad coagulation with traditional bovine coagulant. Recently, it was showed that it was possible to make cheese with camel chymosin (ChyMaxM from Hansen, Denmark).

In this work, white cheeses were made with camel and cow milks with the same procedure. Milks and cheeses were characterized with special attentions paid on the compositions and rates of acidification of milks, and on the compositions and buffering capacities of cheeses. Recoveries of protein, fat, calcium and dry matter in cheeses were also calculated.

INTRODUCTION

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

MANUFACTURE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF WHITE CHEESE FROM

CAMEL MILK / MINERALISATION AND BUFFERING CAPACITY

A COMPARAISON WITH COW MILK

Camel and cow cheeses were manufactured in the project Camel Center (Al KHARJ-KSA) and in Dairy Platform

(INRA/Rennes-France) from raw milks, respectively. In this work, as camel milk had lower contents in total nitrogen (TN) and fat than cow milk, raw cow milk was standardized with UF permeate to obtain the same concentration in fat (~20g/kg) and TN (~25g/kg) than camel milk. Then, the same protocol was used to make white cheeses. After heating milk at 40°C, thermophilic starters (Coquard-France) were added. One hour after starters addition, milks were renneted by ChyMax M rennet (50µl/l). The curd was cutted 1h after renneting and moulded in a bag. After draining during 1h, the curd was moulded and pressed during 2h at 1 bar. At the end of the acidification of cow milk (renneting + 5h) and camel milk (renneting +18h), cheeses were stored at 4°C before analyses.

MILK pH Dry matter

(g/kg) Fat (g/kg) Total N (g/kg) Ash ( g/kg) Calcium (g/kg) Camel milk (n=3) 6.49 ( 0.05) ( 2.9) 96.15 ( 0.6) 20.3 ( 0.6) 26.57 ( 0.05) 8.62 ( 0.05) 1.16 Standardized cow milk (n=3) 6.61 ( 0.05) ( 1.65) 96.93 ( 1.5) 19.3 ( 0.2) 24.32 ( 0.15) 6.48 ( 0.05) 0.97

Camel milking Camel cheeses Camel cheeses Cow cheeses

-0,080 -0,060 -0,040 -0,020 0,000 2 7 12 pH d B / d p H 0 2 4 6 8 N aO H 0 , 5M ( ml )

Buffering capacity of camel cheese

-0,080 -0,060 -0,040 -0,020 0,000 2 7 12 pH dB/ dpH 0 2 4 6 8 N aO H 0 , 5M ( ml )

Buffering capacity of cow cheese

The acidification with thermophilic starters was faster for cow milk compared to camel milk. With a previous standardization of cow milk in fat and total nitrogen contents, the cheese yields were similar for both milks. However, the recoveries were different : total nitrogen recovery was better for camel milk, although that fat recovery was better for cow milk. Recovery in calcium was similar for both cheeses.

Maximal buffering capacities were determined at pH close to 6.0 for both cheeses (mainly due to organic and inorganic phospha tes). It was noted a second maximal peak at pH 4.0 for cow milk but not for camel milk.

CONCLUSION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This work was funded by FAO, the project Camel Center (Al Kharj-KSA)

2nd International symposium on Mineral and Dairy products, New Zealand, 26-27 February 2014

CHEESE (at the end of pH acidifcation) Cheese Yield (kg/100kg milk) Dry matter (g/kg) Calcium recovery % Total N recovery % Fat recovery % Dry matter recovery % Camel cheese (n=2) 5.62 18h 7.40 ( 0.15) ( 5.65) 486.80 ( 0.2) 37.0 ( 2.9) 84.3 ( 2.7) 57.4 ( 2.55) 37.1 Cow cheese ( n=2) 5.39 5h 7.30 ( 0.55) ( 29.05) 469.75 ( 0.6) 36.6 ( 0.35) 72.9 ( 3.4) 68.3 ( 1.0) 35

Références

Documents relatifs

On the other hand, the content of vitamin D in bovine milk had showed significant variations during the season, with lower values in winter and higher levels in summer (Kurmann and

Although camel milk has been consumed for millennia, processing of camel milk at industrial scale has only recently been initiated. The technological and functional properties

Figure 1 Changes in cholesterol content (mean and SD) in camel and cow milk at different milking times and types of diet (M1: morning with normal diet; A1: afternoon with normal

Түйін сөздер: Дромедар, сүт сапасы, желін, текстура жəне түсі, субклиникалық мастит ОЦЕНКА СОСТОЯНИЯ СОСКОВ И ЗДОРОВЬЯ ВЫМЕНИ МОЛОЧНЫХ ВЕРБЛЮДИЦ ПРИ

Identification of camel milk and shubat microflora provides a theoretical foundation for developing starter cultures by using local LAB strains for industrial production of

To compare the cholesterol content in camel and cow milk in similar farming conditions and to assess the impact of short underfeeding on cholesterol concentration in milk and

LACTOCORDER © КӨМЕГІМЕН ТҮЙЕНІҢ СҮТ АҒЫНЫН ӨЛШЕУ Сүттің өндірілуі жəне өнімділігі мониторингі аясында интенсивті түйе фермаларында бұл өндірістер жəне сүт

No revealed indicator PCBs in the milk of three regions (i.e. < 0,1 ng/g milk): Atyrau, Shymkent & Taraz. Only milk from Kyzylorda region showed some traces of PCBs 52