HAL Id: hal-01307125
https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01307125
Submitted on 26 Apr 2016
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0
International License
Synergistic activity of antibiotics combined with
ivermectin to kill body lice
Abdoul Karim Sangare, Jean-Marc Rolain, Jean Gaudart, Pascal Weber,
Didier Raoult
To cite this version:
Abdoul Karim Sangare, Jean-Marc Rolain, Jean Gaudart, Pascal Weber, Didier Raoult. Synergistic
activity of antibiotics combined with ivermectin to kill body lice. International Journal of
Antimicro-bial Agents, Elsevier, 2016, �10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.01.001�. �hal-01307125�
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
International
Journal
of
Antimicrobial
Agents
jou rn a l h om ep a ge : h t t p : / / w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / i j a n t i m i c a g
Synergistic
activity
of
antibiotics
combined
with
ivermectin
to
kill
body
lice
Abdoul
Karim
Sangaré
a,
Jean
Marc
Rolain
a,
Jean
Gaudart
b,
Pascal
Weber
a,
Didier
Raoult
a,∗aAix-MarseilleUniversité,IHUMéditerranéeInfection,URMITE,UM63,CNRS7278,IRD198,INSERM1095,FacultédeMédecineetdePharmacie,
27Bd.JeanMoulin,13385Marseillecedex5,France
bAix-MarseilleUniversité,UMR912SESSTIM(AMU-Inserm-IRD),DepartmentofPublicHealthandMedicalInformation,
CentreHospitalierUniversitaireLaTimone,13005Marseille,France
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received26October2015 Keywords:
Pediculushumanushumanus Antibiotics
Ivermectin Synergistictreatment
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Ivermectinanddoxycyclinehavebeenfoundtobeindependentlyeffectiveinkillingbodylice.Inthis study,450bodylicewereartificiallyfedonaParafilmTMmembranewithhumanbloodassociatedwith
antibiotics(doxycycline,erythromycin,rifampicinandazithromycin)aloneandincombinationwith ivermectin.Fluorescenceinsituhybridisationandspectraldeconvolutionwereperformedtoevaluate bacterialtranscriptionalactivityfollowingantibioticintakebythelice.Inthefirstseries,alethaleffectof antibioticsonlicewasobservedcomparedwiththecontrolgroupat18days(log-ranktest,P≤10−3),with asignificantdifferencebetweengroupsintheproductionofnits(P=0.019,Kruskal–Wallistest).Ahigh lethaleffectofivermectinalone(50ng/mL)wasobservedcomparedwiththecontrolgroup(log-rank test,P≤10−3).Fluorescenceofbacteriocytesinlicetreatedwith20g/mLdoxycyclinewaslowerthan inuntreatedlice(P<0.0001,Kruskal–Wallistest).Inthesecondserieswithantibiotic–ivermectin com-binations,asynergisticlethaleffectontreatedlice(log-ranktest,P<10−6)wasobservedcomparedwith
thecontrolgroupat18days,associatedwithasignificantdecreaseintheproductionofnits(P≤0.001, Kruskal–Wallistest).Additionally,survivalofliceinthecombinationtreatmentgroupscomparedwith ivermectinalonewassignificant(log-ranktest,P=0.0008).Thesedatademonstratethatthesynergistic effectofcombinationsofantibioticsandivermectincouldbeusedtoachievecompleteeradicationoflice andtoavoidselectionofaresistantlousepopulation.
©2016ElsevierB.V.andtheInternationalSocietyofChemotherapy.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
ThebodylousePediculushumanushumanusisastrictlyhuman parasite,livingandmultiplyinginclothing;theirinfestationis asso-ciatedwithcoldweatherandalackofhygiene[1].Itsprevalence reflectsthesocioeconomiclevelof thesociety[2].In developed countries,infestationismorecommonamongthehomeless pop-ulationand variesfrom 7%to22% [3]. Bodyliceare extremely contagious and posea seriouspublic health problem. Theyare vectorsofthepathogensRickettsiaprowazekii,Bartonellaquintana andBorreliarecurrentis,whichareresponsibleforepidemictyphus, trenchfeverandrelapsingfever,respectively[1,4],andtheymay beconsideredaplague[5].
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33491324375;fax:+33491387772. E-mailaddress:didier.raoult@gmail.com(D.Raoult).
Fordecades,severalantibioticshaveprovedtobeeffectiveinthe treatmentoflouse-bornediseases.Asingledoseof200mg doxycy-clinecancurepatientssufferingfromR.prowazekii-inducedtyphus
[6],and500mgoftetracyclineorerythromycinisoptimal ther-apyforthetreatmentofB.recurrentisinfections[7].Azithromycin hasbeenrecommendedforthetreatmentofB.quintanainfections
[8].Inaddition,rifampicinwasshowntobeeffectiveagainstsome intracellular bacteria[9].These resultsindicatethepotentialof antibioticsforthemanagementoflouse-bornediseases.Recently, wedemonstratedtheinvitroefficacyofdoxycyclineatdifferent dosesonbodyliceandfoundthatdoxycyclinehasadirecteffecton endosymbiontsoflicethroughthemycetomeswitch[10].
Severalstrategiesforeradicationoftheseparasiteshavebeen usedtoavoidthespreadand/oroutbreakofthesediseases. How-ever,someproductshavealreadyshowntheirlimits.Theresistance oflicetolindaneinEurope,AfricaandAsia[11]andtoDDTinKorea andJapan[12,13]hasbeenreported.Pyrethroidshavebeenwidely used,howeverresistancetothesecompoundshasemergedand
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.01.001
218 A.K.Sangaréetal./InternationalJournalofAntimicrobialAgents47(2016)217–223
spreadoverthelastdecade.Intheheadlouse,resistanceto per-methrinwasfirstreportedinFrancein1994andthroughoutthe worldthereafter[14].Ivermectinisasyntheticderivativeofthe antiparasiticclassofcompoundsknownasavermectins[15]. Resis-tancetoivermectinandrelateddrugsisanincreasingproblemfor parasitecontrol[16].PreviousstudieshaveassociatedATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters with drug resistancein nematodes
[17]andarthropods[18].However,resistancetoivermectinhas alsobeendocumentedininsectsandmitesofplants[19]andin nematodes[16].Resistancetoivermectinhasbeendocumentedin Rhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplusticksinMexico[20].The occur-renceofresistancetomacrocycliclactoneshasbeenreportedin otherarthropods[21].Usedinscabies,clinicalandinvitro resis-tancehavebeendocumentedintwopatientswhoreceived30and 58dosesofivermectin,respectively[22].
Today,post-therapeuticre-infestationofthevectorofdiseases (lice) is commonand still remains a realchallenge, thus there is a needto develop newtherapeutic strategies toavoid these re-infestations.ItwasobservedthatavermectinB1acouldact syn-ergisticallywiththeantibioticmeticillintokillmeticillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus(MRSA),renderingthebacteriaonceagain vulnerable tometicillin [23]. The hypothesis that the bacterial symbiontCandidatus Riesiapediculicola is a possible target for the development of louse control strategies [24] was recently confirmedinourpreviouswork[10].Inthisstudyweaimedto demonstratetheinvitrocombinationofivermectinwithseveral antibioticsasasynergisticassociationtoachievecomplete eradi-cationofliceandtoavoidtheselectionofaresistantpopulationof lice.
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Lousefeedingsysteminvitro
A long-established inbred line of the humanbody louse (P. h.corporis, Orlando strain), which had been bred onrabbits in alaboratorypetshopbyourURMITEteaminMarseille,France, wasused as a model in the experiments in this study[25]. A HemotekTMfeedingsystem(DiscoveryWorkshops,Accrington,UK) withaParafilmTMmembrane(Chicago,IL),aPS5A/220PowerUnit (HemotekTM5W1System;DiscoveryWorkshops)andsixheating unitswasused(Fig.1).Asquareofsyntheticfeedingmembrane measuringca.3cm×3cm wasstretchedaroundtheapertureof thebloodmealreservoirandwassecuredwithanO-ring(Fig.1a). Thefeedingareawassufficientfor100lice(Fig.1b).The blood mealreservoirwasremovableforeasycleaningandautoclaving ifnecessary.Thesystemdoesnotuseanimalhostsandenables modificationofthemealbyintroductionofchemicalsorinfectious agentsandaccurateadjustmentofthetemperaturethrough heat-ingunits(Fig.1c)connecteddirectlytothepowerunit(Fig.1d). Licewerefedeverydayat37◦Cfor1h(Fig.1e).
2.2. Preparationofbloodmealsupplementedwithantibioticsand ivermectin
HumanbloodgroupArhesuspositive(A+)[code74883from theFrenchBloodService(EFS)]wasused.Ethicalapprovalforthe useofhumanblood invitro wasobtainedfromtheLaboratory ResearchEthicsBoardofMolecularHematology,EFS.Bloodwas distributedinto5mLtubesandwaskeptat−20◦Cbeforeuse.The bloodwaswarmedinawaterbathat37◦Cfor30minbeforeuse. Drugsusedwereininjectableandoralformasfollows:doxycycline 20mg/mL (Vibraveineuse® batch A262408; Laboratoires SERB, Paris,France);erythromycin1g(Erythrocine®batch24370TB22; AmdipharmLtd.,Dublin, Ireland);rifampicin 600mg (Rifadine®
batchA3468;Sanofi-Aventis,Paris,France);azithromycin600mg (Azadose®batch490004;PfizerHolding,Paris,France);and iver-mectin10mg/mL(Ivomec®batchBM295/12;Merial,Lyon,France). For each group of lice,15L of uncombined antibioticdiluted atconcentrations(doxycycline20g/mL,erythromycin4g/mL, rifampicin10g/mLandazithromycin8g/mL)previously estab-lishedforthefirstseriesofexperimentswasaddedtoavolumeof 1.485mLofhaemolysedblood.Inthesecondseriesforeachgroup oflice,15Lofantibiotic(doxycycline20g/mL, erythromycin 4g/mL, rifampicin 10g/mL and azithromycin 8g/mL) plus 15Lofivermectindilutedataconcentration(50ng/mL) previ-ouslyestablishedwasaddedtoavolumeof1.470mLofhaemolysed blood.Thefinalvolumeof1.5mLobtainedforeachconcentration wasintroducedintodifferentreservoirs.Thereservoir wasthen attachedtothefeederbyscrewingitontoanylonstudontheheat transferplateatthebottomofthefeeder.
2.3. Monitoringofliceandnits
Intotal,450adultlice[excluding10licesacrificedaslive con-trolsinfluorescenceinsituhybridisation(FISH)]wereusedinthe experiments.Liceweredividedintogroupsof45,wereplacedon apieceofblackclothandwerekeptinjarsinanovenat29◦Cand 90%humidityasbreedinglice.Thefirstseriesofexperimentswas performedwithoutcombinationofdrugsandthesecondwasbased ontheantibiotic–ivermectincombinations.Agroupoflicetreated withivermectinalone wasmonitoredinparallelwiththe com-binationseries.Thecontrolgroupwasfedexclusivelywithblood withoutdrugsthroughouttheexperiments.Licewereplacedonthe membranedailyfor1hofbloodmealfeeding.Everyday,survival wasdeterminedbyassessingthenumberofnitsineachgroupand wasrecordedonadatacollectionsheetbeforethenextmeal (Sup-plementaryTablesS1andS2).Alloftheexperimentswererepeated threetimesforreproducibility.
Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 related to this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijantimicag.2016.01.001.
2.4. Fluorescenceinsituhybridisation(FISH)
FortheFISHtechnique,theaimwastohighlighttheeffectof theantibiotic(especiallydoxycycline)onthelouseendosymbiont aspreviouslydemonstrated[10].Thus,tenspecimensweretested ineachuntreated group(livingcontrolsanddeadcontrols)and inthedoxycycline20g/mLgroup(Table1).Followingfixation, samplesweredecolourisedin6%H2O2inethanolfor2handwere thenplacedinhybridisationbuffer[20mMTris–HCl(pH8.0),0.9M NaCl,0.01%sodiumdodecylsulphate and30%formamide] con-taining10pmoloffluorescentprobe/mLbasedontheCandidatus Riesiapediculicola 16SrRNA sequence:Cy3-Lice1255R (5 -Cy3-TTGGCTCGCTCTTACGAGT-3)[10].
2.5. Lightandconfocalmicroscopy
Thespectraldeconvolutiontechniquewasusedtodifferentiate autofluorescencecausedbychitinfromcleanfluorescence.First, thelousewasmarkedandmountedbetweenslideandcoverslip andimagingwasperformedasfollowsusingaLeicaSP5AOBS® con-focalresonantscanner(LeicaMicrosystems,Mannheim,Germany) inLambdamode.Thesamplewasscannedonatotalbandof160nm andaslitwidthof5nmtakingcaretoneversaturatethesignal. Fluorescencemeasurementwasdefinedastheextractionofcurves (oneforfluorescenceandoneforautofluorescence).Aftercreation ofthereferencecurves,allacquisitionsweremadewithexactlythe samesettingsforgain,offset,laserpowerandobjective.Foreach acquisition,32pictureswerecollected.Oncethereferenceswere
Fig.1.TheHemotekTM5W1membranefeedingsystemforlice:(a)thedevice’smealreservoir(a1,bloodmealreservoir;a2,plasticring;anda3,ParafilmTM);(b)assembling
thedevice;(c)theheatingunits;(d)thePS5powerunit;and(e)bloodmealfeedingofliceonartificialmembrane.
Table1
Measurementoffluorescenceintensityinthreepopulationsoflice.
Group Day Totalarea Surfacemarked Intensityratio Doxycycline 20g/mL 1 16,217 1205 7.4 2 4808 325 6.7 3 29,970 1385 5.9 4 32,994 2179 6.6 5 19,730 1190 6 6 29,211 1537 5.2 7 51,047 2468 4.8 8 20,479 1216 4.6 9 37,185 1231 3.3 10 16,231 395 2.4 Dead con-trols 1 8977 1462 16.2 2 9523 1275 13.3 3 9488 1358 14.3 4 13,279 1755 13.2 5 12,391 1518 12.2 6 9873 1280 12.9 7 9173 1051 11.4 8 10,506 1163 11 9 9923 986 9.9 10 12,675 1269 10 Living con-trols 1 12,861 1943 15.1 2 12,496 1605 12.8 3 11,058 1467 13.2 4 7558 1249 16.5 5 10,913 1134 10.3 6 7945 1156 14.5 7 8962 1580 17.6 8 12,381 1397 11.2 9 9914 1290 13 10 13,091 1898 14.4
determinedandassigned,thesampleswerespectrallydeconvolved andthesignalswereseparatedbyassigningthemadistinctcolour. 2.6. Calculationofintensityratios
MetaMorphv.4.6(MolecularDevices,Sunnyvale,CA)anda gen-eratedExceltable(MicrosoftCorp.,Redmond,WA)wereusedto calculatetheintensityratios.
2.7. Statisticalanalysis
Data werestored in Excel.Analyses wereperformed withR softwarev.3.1.1(RFoundationforStatisticalComputing,Vienna, Austria).Kaplan–Meierestimationsandlog-ranktest wereused for survivalanalysis.AnalysisofKruskal–Wallisnon-parametric testwasusedformeancomparisons.Bonferronicorrectionwas appliedforsubgrouptests.Thestatisticaltestsrepresentbilateral situations,andP-valuesof≤0.05wereconsideredsignificant.
3. Results
Feedingliceonartificialmembranesenabledthemtobetreated withantibioticsandivermectin.Thebloodfeedingratewas>95% inalltreatmentarms(Fig.1e).
3.1. Effectofantibioticsonthesurvivalofliceandonnit production
To determine the effect of antibiotics, in the first series of experiments each group of lice treated with either doxycy-cline 20g/mL, erythromycin 4g/mL, rifampicin 10g/mL or azithromycin8g/mLaswellasthecontrolswerefolloweduntil theend.Survivalofliceinthecontrolgroupwassignificantly dif-ferentfromsurvivalinthetreatedgroups(log-ranktest,P≤10−3)
220 A.K.Sangaréetal./InternationalJournalofAntimicrobialAgents47(2016)217–223
Fig.2.Evolutiontrendsintheantibiotictreatmentgroups.(a)Kaplan–Meiercurvesillustratingsurvivaloflicetreatedwithantibioticsincomparisonwiththecontrolgroup. (b)Mean(±95%CI)numberofeggslaidperdayinthedoxycycline-,erythromycin-,rifampicin-andazithromycin-treatedgroupsandthecontrolgroup.CI,confidence interval;Doxy,doxycycline;Ery,erythromycin;Rifam,rifampicin;Azith/Azithro,azithromycin.
(Fig. 2a). Moreover, a decrease in the production of nits was observedinthetreatedgroupscomparedwiththecontrolgroup (Fig.2b),withmean[95%confidenceinterval(CI)]numberofeggs laidper dayof 7.5 (2.5–12.5), 9.8(4.3–15.3), 10 (4.6–15.6), 7.7 (2.2–13.2)and17.8(13.3–22.3)inthedoxycycline-, erythromycin-, rifampicin- and azithromycin-treated groups and the control group,respectively. Thedifferencein mean nitproduction was significantbetweenthegroups(P=0.019,Kruskal–Wallistest). 3.2. Directeffectofdoxycyclineonthelicemycetomeanalysed throughFISH
Toshowthatdoxycyclineaffectsthelouse’sendosymbionts,we focusedonanewanalysisbasedonspectraldeconvolutionto cal-culatetheratiosbetweenthetwosignals(Table1).Byusingthe functionextractioncurvecomputation ofreplyinemission and positioningthereferenceareasondistinctivesignals,twocurves were extracted:one for specific fluorescence of the bacterium andoneforautofluorescenceofthelouse.Thus,theresultsshow thatbacterialfluorescenceinthegrouptreatedwithdoxycycline 20g/mL(Fig.3a)waslowerthanintheuntreatedgroups(living anddeadcontrols)(Fig.3bandc)(P<0.0001,Kruskal–Wallistest). 3.3. Effectofivermectinaloneonthesurvivalofliceand
productionofnits
Todeterminetheantiparasiticactionofivermectinalone,lice treatedwith50ng/mLivermectinwerefolloweduntiltheendof theexperiment.Ahighmortalityratewasfoundcomparedwith thecontrolgroup(log-ranktest,P≤10−3)at18days(Fig.4a).A significantdifferencebetweengroupswasobservedinmeannit production (P=0.001,Kruskal–Wallis test),with mean(95% CI) numberofeggslaidperdayof5.2(0.6–9)and17.8(13.3–22.3), respectively(Fig.4b).
3.4. Synergisticeffectofantibioticsandivermectinonsurvivalof liceandproductionofnits
Todeterminetheantiparasiticsynergisticactionofivermectin combined with antibiotics, in a second series of experiments five groups of lice were tested for their survival kinetics. In
the combination groups (doxycycline 20g/mL+ivermectin 50ng/mL, erythromycin 4g/mL+ivermectin 50ng/mL, rifampicin 10g/mL+ivermectin 50ng/mL or azithromycin 8g/mL+ivermectin 50ng/mL), lice were more rapidly killed compared withthecontrol group,exhibiting potentsynergistic action (log-rank test,P<10−6) (Fig. 5a).Moreover, a significant decreaseintheproductionofnitswasobservedinthecombination groupscomparedwiththecontrolgroup(Fig.5b),withmean(95% CI)eggsperdayof2.4(−0.9to5.8),4.4(−0.1to9.0),4.0(−0.6 to8.6),3.6(−0.5to7.7)and17.8(13.3–22.3),respectively.Thus, thedifferencein mean production ofnits between groups was significant(P≤0.001,Kruskal–Wallistest).Moreover,overall sur-vivalofliceinthecombinationtreatmentgroupscomparedwith ivermectin alone wasalso significant(log-rank test, P=0.0008) (Fig.6a).Therefore,thedifferencewassignificantwhencomparing thecombinationgroupswiththeivermectinandcontrolgroups (Fig.6b).
4. Discussion
Fordecades,completeeradicationofhumanlicehasremained challenging.Inthefirstinvitroseriesofexperiments,thelethal effectoftheantibioticsdoxycycline,erythromycin,rifampicinand azithromycin on lice wasobserved compared withthe control groupat18 days, associatedwitha decreasein theproduction ofnits.Ofthefourantibioticstested,doxycyclineappearedtobe moreeffectivethan rifampicin,azithromycinand erythromycin, withavariablesurvivaltimeaccordingtotreatmentgroup(Fig.2a; SupplementaryTableS1).Recently,theinvitroefficacyof doxy-cyclineatdifferentdosesonbodylicewasdemonstrated[10].In lightoftheseresults,we cansuggest thattheuseofantibiotics (doxycycline,rifampicin,azithromycinanderythromycin)aloneor incombinationcouldbeanefficientwaytodevelopnewdrugsand toovercomedrugresistanceinlice.
Severaldecadesagoitwasdemonstratedthatbodylicedepend on obligate endosymbionts to supplement their nutritionally-deficientblood diet[26].However,theymaintainorganscalled mycetomes that house the primary endosymbiont [27]. Thus, throughFISHanalysiswewereabletodemonstratethatdamageto thesymbiontbacteriacausedthedeathoftheirhostasconfirmed
Fig.3. Imagesoflicebyconfocalmicroscopythroughthetechniqueofspectraldeconvolution:(a)lousetreatedwithdoxycycline20g/mLtakenatDay10showinglower bacterialfluorescence;(b)livingcontrolshowinghigherbacterialfluorescence;(c)deadcontroltakenatDay10showinglowerbacterialfluorescence;and(d)lousetested withnegativeprobeshowingnobacterialfluorescence.
Fig.4.Evolutiontrendsintheivermectinalonetreatmentgroup.(a)Kaplan–Meiercurvesillustratingsurvivaloflicetreatedwithivermectin(Iv)incomparisonwiththe controlgroup.(b)Mean(±95%CI)numberofeggslaidperdayintheivermectin(Iver)-treatedgroupandthecontrolgroup.CI,confidenceinterval.
byadecreaseinbacterialfluorescence(Fig.3a).Theseresults cor-roborateourpreviousworkshowingthatdoxycyclinemayaffect theendosymbiontsoflicethroughthemycetomeswitch,thus caus-ingdeathofthelouse[10].
Despitetheintroductionofsomeproductssuchas organophos-phates,pyrethrinsandpyrethroids,insecticideresistanceremains anincreasingprobleminmanyinsectvectorsofdisease[14], espe-ciallyamonglice.ExpressionlevelsofABCtransportershavealso beenassociated withdrugresistance in arthropods and nema-todes.OverexpressionoftheseABCtransportersisassociatedwith ivermectinresistance inHaemonchus contortus[16], Caenorhab-ditis elegans[17],P.h. humanus[28],Sarcoptes scabiei [29] and
R.microplus[18].Inacohort ofhomelesssubjectsinMarseilles (France),aprevalenceofbodyliceof85%wasobserved[30].This infestationwasreducedtemporarilyto19%withthreedosesoforal ivermectinadministeredat7-dayintervals.However,treatment failure or early recrudescence is commonfollowing ivermectin alone,andmultipledosesareusuallyrequiredtoachieveacure
[31].Moreover,intheirrandomisedtrialChosidowetal.suggest thativermectincouldbeanalternativetreatment[32],butits tran-sienteffectwasalsodemonstratedinsomestudies[3].Thefindings ofthecurrentstudyshowthetransienteffectofivermectinalone onlicewithamonitoringtimeof10days,associatedwithaslow decreaseintheproductionofnits(Fig.4;SupplementaryTableS2).
222 A.K.Sangaréetal./InternationalJournalofAntimicrobialAgents47(2016)217–223
Fig.5. Evolutiontrendsintheantibiotic–ivermectincombinationtreatmentgroups.(a)Kaplan–Meiercurvesillustratingsurvivaloflicetreatedwiththeantibiotic–ivermectin combinationsincomparisonwiththecontrolgroup.(b)Mean(±95%CI)numberofeggslaidperdayinthecombinationtreatmentgroupsandthecontrolgroup.CI,confidence interval;Iv/Iver,ivermectin;Doxy,doxycycline;Ery,erythromycin;Rifam,rifampicin;Azith/Azithro,azithromycin.
Fig.6.Evolutiontrendsintheantibiotic–ivermectincombinationtreatmentgroupsandtheivermectinalonetreatmentgroup.(a)Kaplan–Meiercurvesillustratingsurvival oflicetreatedwithantibiotic–ivermectincombinationsandwithivermectinalone.(b)Kaplan–Meiercurvesillustratingthecomparisonofoverallsurvivalofliceinthe antibiotic–ivermectincombinationgroups,theivermectinalonegroupandthecontrolgroup.Iv/Iverm,ivermectin;Doxy,doxycycline;Ery,erythromycin;Rifam,rifampicin; Azith,azithromycin.
Thus,inlightofthesevarioustherapeuticfailures,wemay con-cludethativermectincouldbeusefulwithotherdrugsofdifferent classesespeciallyantibiotics,inthecontrolofbodyliceinfestation. The efficacyof drugcombination withivermectin hasbeen demonstratedinnematodes[33]andectoparasites[34].For iver-mectin,itwassuggestedthatheadlicemaybemoresusceptible thanbodylice;thiscouldbejustifiedbythemodelofMumcuoglu etal.,whoobservedhighmortalityofnymphsandfemalebodylice fedonrabbitstreatedwith200g/kgivermectinfor3days, fol-lowedbyasharpdeclinereachingthelevelofthecontrolsonDay6
[35].Inlightofthevarioustherapeuticfailuresdescribedinlice,we decidedtestantibioticcombinationswithivermectin.Inthe sec-ondseriesofinvitroexperiments,wewereabletodemonstrate theantiparasitic synergisticactivityofa combinationofseveral drugs.Themonitoringtimerangedfrom5daysto7daysinthe
combinationgroup,whilstthatofivermectinalonewas10days (SupplementaryTableS2).Interestingly,thedifferenceinoverall survivalofliceinthecombinationtreatmentgroupscomparedwith ivermectinalonewasalsosignificant.Thus,theseresultshighlight theefficacyofdrugcombinationscomparedwithivermectinalone. Intheliterature,compoundsincludingantibioticshavebeenshown to increase intracellular concentrations of macrocyclic lactones
[36].Inaddition,itwasshownthatdrugcombinationsincluding ivermectinprovideantifilarialactivitywithancillarybenefitson intestinalhelminthsand ectoparasitessuchaschiggersandlice
[34].Whendoxycyclinewascombinedwithmacrocycliclactones inadultworms,ivermectinefficacywasca.80%compared with 9%whentreatmentwasperformedwithdoxycyclinealone[37]. Hoeraufetal.recommendconcurrentadministrationofivermectin withdoxycyclineinthetreatmentofOnchocercawormscarrying
Wolbachia endobacteria[38], and later Coulibalyet al. found a significantreduction of circulatingantigen levelsof Wuchereria bancroftiingroupstreatedwithacombinationofdoxycyclineplus ivermectinfor12months[39].Theeffectofthiscombinationhas also been confirmed in dogs naturally infected with Dirofilaria immitis[40].Thus,thecurrentresultsareinagreementwiththe literature,especially that of Guoet al., which identifies forthe firsttimethatavermectin(macrocycliclactonederivativeincluding ivermectin)could act synergisticallywith meticillin(an antibi-otic)tokillbacteria(MRSA)[23].Inaddition,thecurrentstudy demonstratesthefirstsynergisticassociationofthesedrugsinvitro againstbodylice.Webelievethatthesynergisticeffectof com-binationsofantibioticsplusivermectincouldbeusedtoachieve completeeradicationofliceandtoavoidtheselectionofaresistant populationoflice.
5. Conclusion
Thepresentstudydemonstratesasynergisticeffectof antibi-oticscombinedwithivermectintoevenmoreeffectivelycontrol lice.Thus,itwouldbeinterestingtodevelopthismodelinvivoin thecontrolofliceinfestationinhumans.
Acknowledgement
TheauthorsaregratefultoJean-MichelBerengerfortechnical support.
Funding:Thisworkwassupportedby‘IHUMéditerranéeInfection’ (Marseille,France).
Competinginterests:Nonedeclared.
Ethicalapproval:Ethicalapprovalfortheuseofhumanbloodinvitro wasobtainedfromtheLaboratoryResearchEthicsBoardof Molec-ularHematology,FrenchBloodService(EFS).
Patent:Title:‘Composedandcombinationofcompoundsforthe treatmentoflice’.Yearofsubmission:2014.
References
[1]RaoultD,RouxV.Thebodylouseasavectorofreemerginghumandiseases. ClinInfectDis1999;29:888–911.
[2]Meinking TL, Taplin D. Infestations: pediculosis. Curr Probl Dermatol 1996;24:157–63.
[3]BrouquiP,SteinA,DupontHT,GallianP,BadiagaS,RolainJM,etal. Ectopar-asitismandvector-bornediseasesin930homelesspeoplefromMarseilles. Medicine(Baltimore)2005;84:61–8.
[4]CutlerSJ,AbdissaA,TrapeJF.NewconceptsfortheoldchallengeofAfrican relapsingfeverborreliosis.ClinMicrobiolInfect2009;15:400–6.
[5]PiarrouxR,AbediAA,ShakoJC,KebelaB,KarhemereS,DiattaG,etal.Plague epidemics andlice, DemocraticRepublic oftheCongo. EmergInfect Dis 2013;19:505–6.
[6]RaoultD,NdihokubwayoJB,Tissot-DupontH,RouxV,FaugereB,Abegbinni R,etal.OutbreakofepidemictyphusassociatedwithtrenchfeverinBurundi. Lancet1998;352:353–8.
[7]ButlerT,JonesPK,WallaceCK.Borreliarecurrentisinfection:single-dose antibi-oticregimensandmanagementoftheJarisch–Herxheimerreaction.JInfectDis 1978;137:573–7.
[8]OhlME,SpachDH.Bartonellaquintanaandurbantrenchfever.ClinInfectDis 2000;31:131–5.
[9]RaoultD,DrancourtM.Antimicrobialtherapyofrickettsialdiseases. Antimi-crobAgentsChemother1991;35:2457–62.
[10]SangaréAK,BoutellisA,DraliR,AudolyG,WeberP,RolainJM,etal.Doxycycline killshumanlicethroughitsactivityontheirbacterialsymbiont.IntJAntimicrob Agents2015;45:675–6.
[11]GratzNG.Treatmentresistanceinlousecontrol.In:OrkinM,MaibachH,editors. Cutaneousinfestationsandinsectbites.NewYork,NY:MarcelDekker;1985. p.219–30.
[12]HurlbutHS,AltmanRM,NibleyJrC.DDTresistanceinKoreanbodylice.Science 1952;115:11–2.
[13]KitaokaM.DDT-resistantlouseinTokyo.JpnJMedSciBiol1952;5:75–88.
[14]HemingwayJ,RansonH.Insecticideresistanceininsectvectorsofhuman dis-ease.AnnuRevEntomol2000;45:371–91.
[15]DourmishevAL,DourmishevLA,SchwartzRA.Ivermectin:pharmacologyand applicationindermatology.IntJDermatol2005;44:981–8.
[16]XuM,MolentoM,BlackhallW,RibeiroP,BeechR,PrichardR.Ivermectin resis-tanceinnematodesmaybecausedbyalterationofP-glycoproteinhomolog. MolBiochemParasitol1998;91:327–35.
[17]JamesCE,DaveyMW.IncreasedexpressionofABCtransportproteinsis associ-atedwithivermectinresistanceinthemodelnematodeCaenorhabditiselegans. IntJParasitol2009;39:213–20.
[18]PohlPC,KlafkeGM,CarvalhoDD,MartinsJR,DaffreS,daSilvaVazJrI,etal. ABCtransportereffluxpumps:adefensemechanismagainstivermectinin Rhipicephalus(Boophilus)microplus.IntJParasitol2011;41:1323–33.
[19]LasotaJA,DybasRA.Avermectins,anovelclassofcompounds:implicationsfor useinarthropodpestcontrol.AnnuRevEntomol1991;36:91–117.
[20]Perez-CogolloLC,Rodriguez-VivasRI,Ramirez-CruzGT,MillerRJ.Firstreport ofthecattletickRhipicephalusmicroplusresistanttoivermectininMexico.Vet Parasitol2010;168:165–9.
[21]ScottJG.Cross-resistancetothebiologicalinsecticideabamectinin pyrethroid-resistanthouseflies.PesticBiochemPhysiol1989;34:27–31.
[22]Currie BJ, Harumal P, McKinnon M, Walton SF. First documentation of invivoandinvitroivermectinresistanceinSarcoptesscabiei.ClinInfectDis 2004;39:e8–12.
[23]GuoH,RenB,DaiH,DaiS,ZhangY,LiuY,etal.Reversalofmeticillinresistancein Staphylococcusaureusbytheanthelminticavermectin.IntJAntimicrobAgents 2014;44:274–6.
[24]KirknessEF,HaasBJ,SunW,BraigHR,PerottiMA,ClarkJM,etal.Genome sequencesofthehumanbodylouseanditsprimaryendosymbiontprovide insightsinto thepermanentparasiticlifestyle.Proc NatlAcad SciUS A 2010;107:12168–73.
[25]CulpepperGH.Rearingandmaintainingalaboratorycolonyofbodyliceon rabbits.AmJTropMedHyg1948;28:499–504.
[26]BuchnerP.Symbiosisinluminousanimals.In:BuchnerP,editor.Endosymbiosis ofanimalswithplantmicroorganisms.NewYork,NY:IntersciencePublishers; 1965.p.543–71.
[27]PerottiMA,AllenJM,ReedDL,BraigHR.Host–symbiontinteractionsofthe pri-maryendosymbiontofhumanheadandbodylice.FASEBJ2007;21:1058–66.
[28]YoonKS,StrycharzJP,BaekJH,SunW,KimJH,KangJS,etal.Briefexposuresof humanbodylicetosublethalamountsofivermectinover-transcribes detoxi-ficationgenesinvolvedintolerance.InsectMolBiol2011;20:687–99.
[29]MounseyKE,PasayCJ,ArlianLG,MorganMS,HoltDC,CurrieBJ,etal.Increased transcriptionofglutathioneS-transferasesinacaricideexposedscabiesmites. ParasitVectors2010;3:43.
[30]FoucaultC,RanqueS,BadiagaS,RoveryC,RaoultD,BrouquiP.Oralivermectin inthetreatmentofbodylice.JInfectDis2006;193:474–6.
[31]HuffamSE,CurrieBJ.IvermectinforSarcoptesscabieihyperinfestation.IntJ InfectDis1998;2:152–4.
[32]ChosidowO,GiraudeauB,CottrellJ,IzriA,HofmannR,MannSG,etal.Oral ivermectinversusmalathionlotionfordifficult-to-treatheadlice.NEnglJMed 2010;362:896–905.
[33]PasseriB,VismarraA,CricriG,BazzocchiC,KramerL,BacciC.Theadulticide effectofacombinationofdoxycyclineandivermectininDirofilaria immitis-experimentallyinfecteddogsisassociatedwithreductioninlocalTregulatory cellpopulations.VetParasitol2014;205:208–10.
[34]MunirathinamA,SunishIP,RajendranR,TyagiBK.Impactofivermectindrug combinationsonPediculushumanuscapitisinfestationinprimary schoolchil-drenofsouthIndianruralvillages.IntJDermatol2009;48:1201–5.
[35]MumcuogluKY,MillerJ,RosenLJ,GalunR.Systemicactivityofivermectinon thehumanbodylouse(Anoplura:Pediculidae).JMedEntomol1990;27:72–5.
[36]DupuyJ,LespineA,SutraJF,AlvinerieM.Fumagillin,anew P-glycoprotein-interferingagentabletomodulatemoxidectineffluxinrathepatocytes.JVet PharmacolTher2006;29:489–94.
[37]MenozziA,BertiniS,TurinL,ServentiP,KramerL,BazzocchiC. Doxycy-clinelevelsandanti-Wolbachiaantibodiesinserafromdogsexperimentally infectedwith Dirofilariaimmitisand treatedwith acombinationof iver-mectin/doxycycline.VetParasitol2015;209:281–4.
[38]HoeraufA,MandS,VolkmannL,BüttnerM,Marfo-DebrekyeiY,TaylorM, etal.Doxycyclineinthetreatmentofhumanonchocerciasis:kineticsof Wol-bachiaendobacteriareductionandofinhibitionofembryogenesisinfemale Onchocercaworms.MicrobesInfect2003;5:261–73.
[39]CoulibalyYI,DembeleB,DialloAA,LipnerEM,DoumbiaSS,CoulibalySY,etal. ArandomizedtrialofdoxycyclineforMansonellaperstansinfection.NEnglJ Med2009;361:1448–58.
[40]GrandiG, QuintavallaC,Mavropoulou A,GenchiM,GnudiG, BertoniG, etal.Acombinationofdoxycyclineandivermectinis adulticidalindogs withnaturallyacquiredheartwormdisease(Dirofilariaimmitis).VetParasitol 2010;169:347–51.